Wan ted:. By SARA RIMER BY JUNIOR YEAR most students have endured several summers of back-breaking jobs that will never make impressive resume copy. Tired of numb- ing teir minds and muscles on assembly lines, behind restaurant counters, and atop lifeguard chairs, they begin hunting for the big-time game - the elusive career-related opportunities that students all over the country are hotly pursuing. They scramble for the newspaper, government, and law internships that offer connections for later employment and big resume play as bonuses. This year the Washington Intern pro- gram was glutted with 247 pre-law and journalism hopefuls fighting for about 54 non-paying positions in government, consumer affairs offices, and on news- papers. The New York Intern Program, which focuses on the big city business world, is reeling from econ- omic attacks on that front. When program coordinat- or Carol Leslie called one company and asked for It doesn't take an economic expert to predict a long, hot summer for many students. Even those dull,- gruelling, but paying jobs are no longer guaranteed. {rr ..Nr.:rr 'C;:?tr}Xit!?% ' n ' , r 'vpi$;;i'.v+ar; " i.tr.:re ';yi,'{:{}?>vi{: ra't." 'ractice Even those dull, grueling, but paying jobs are no longer guaranteed. AT THE Michigan Daily grim economic headlines are bouncing off the front pages and creating gloomy repercussions in the office. The heat was turned on full blast a couple months ago when the latest crop of aspiring Bob Woodwards and Carl Bernsteins hun- kered down at their typewriters to grind out resumes and job letters. Since everyone checked off news- papers from the identical big list of those reputed to have internship programs, locked drawers or any other attempts at secrecy were not worth the effort. However, the original big list is rapidly dwindling as newspapers slash their programs in budgeting efforts. When the Charlotte Observer answered one reporter's job query with a request for a "long, leisurely, per- sonal letter," several other staff members immediate- ly began agonizing over the words that would jolt the managing editor wide aware with interest. However, a subsequent short letter from the Observer can- celled the need for any long, leisurely replies. The paper regretfully announced the elimination of its eight promised intern slots - shoving the blame on the sagging shoulders of Wall Street. THE APPLICATION process resembles a lottery with no consolation prizes. Editors shake their heads over the growing pile of clips, often estimating that thousands are competing for two, four or six spots. The Talahassee Democrat counselled against any op- timism, claiming it had "mountains of applicants." This is one lottery where being the publisher's off- spring can weight the spining wheel. One paper said frankly that preference would be given to those with connections. In the stifening competition, some re- porters strive to throw punches in their applications that will distinguish them from the sweling crowd. One woman breezed through her health details with an ca" reer' exclamatory "great! 'for each area. Another an- swered an editor's reluctance to hire her without an interview, joking, "Yes, how do you know that I'm not a 400 pound gorilla?" However, the humorless rejection slips are slowly filtering in with only a few fortun- ates as yet employed. Some staff members, holding fast to their senses of humor in hard times, save the rejection slips, boasting, "Hey, I got a rejection from the Miami Herald today." THE WORDS "Bad News", etched in heavy black letters, have jumped off the Daily's bulletin board twice in the last two months. The first flash of gloom and doom came courtesy of the Journalism Depart- ment. Anxious to look after its own students during the job crunch, the department told the Daily's editor; he would have to limit the number of reporters inter- viewing with visiting recruiters from three news- papers. The next "bad news" note reported the death of the Lansing State Journal's spring internship pro- gram and the shaky status of its summer program. White male reporters on the Daily are feeling the economic bite with particular pain, since this summer is shaping up as the year for women and nonwhites. So far, three women and one male have landed jobs. During one round of interviews on campus, a couple of Daily reporters took an informal survey and learn- ed that, with one exception, the women all had con- siderably longer interviews than the men. They con- cluded grimly,that white males were not in hot demand on that paper. Several editors suport their findings, openly expressing their desire to hire almost exclus- ively women and blacks. DAILY STAFFERS are thinking nervously of those alternate waitress, lifeguard, or factory slots that no one realy wants as they grit their teeth for one more round of job letters. Sara Rimer is Executive Editor of the Daily. 'Some of them are quite easily trained!' Eighty-four years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Thursday, March 13, 1975 News Phone: 764-0552 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mi. 48104 Time to forgive and forget the personnel department, which usually hand tern requests, the voice on the other end inf her, "We don't have a personnel departmen more." Another advertising agency knocked outt economic crunch snapped that it took "a lot ofj to seek paid internships. New York City busin pulling in their budget belts are clearly not ea take on paidinterns. It doesn't take an econor pert to predict a long, hot summer for many stt Progre s By GREG REST lines as contr WITHIN THE last few years critical. Fc growing numbers of whites Housing Offi have begun to feel that discrim- staff selection ination has been unfairly re- the goal of 1 versed -against non-minorities. to select ther One area where the "reverse didate for it discrimination" debate has been regardless of rather heated is within the aca- religion, ge demic community. According to tional origin. "U.S. News" and "Time," col- sentence says lege and university officials ever, the in have been complaining for the and minoritie last six years that the Federal pool and non- Government has been forcing affirmative a them into "reverse discrimina- Office has est tion" in favor of women a n d goals for in-r minorities - and weakening the And a few li quality of their faculties in the phabetical lis process. plicants wil b Dr. Richard Lester of Prince- Building Dir ton, found that "employment building. .."' goals under affirmative action ernment prov programs are often inflated in ple of contr relation to the supply of women EXECUTIV and minority people fully pre- "prohibits dis pared for college teaching." Al- basis of rac though Lester supports the anti- sex, or nati discrimination goals, he 'found according to the numerical hiring and pro- "affirmative motion goals to be ill-conceiv- employer ton ed," and described federal ef- forts to recr forts to deal with the situation promote qua as clumsy and misguided. groups forn THE DAILY APPLAUDS the GEO for their success in the pursuit of a just contract. However, now that the bitterly divisive strike has reached its long-awaited conclusion, the Daily finds it important that the opposng factions in the dispute come together in the spirit of reconciliation to bind the wounds and return to the business of education. A long strike such as this can leave a sour legacy of half-hidden rancor and hurt feelings that can only dam- age the cooperative spirit which is essential to the life and function of a university community. A measure of understanding from both sides is ne- cessary to assuage the powerfully par- tisan feelings which remain. A com- promise has been reached; it is time for the threats, counterthreats and accusations to be forgotten. The administration's image has been severely scarred by the walkout. It is clear the negotiators dragged their feet in bargaining until a strike was imminent, and only the show of force moved them to take the union seriously. IT IS NOW UP to the University to implement the new contracts fair- ly, particularly in the areas of affir- mative action and nondiscrimination. In fairness, however, GEO backers must recognize the difficulties which the administration e n c o u n t e r e d throughout the dispute. Faced with a belligerent student body on one side and a power conscious faculty on the other, every move the administration made was greeted with suspicion or anger. Since the beginning of the negotia- tions, the GEO leadership has had the difficult task of reconciling the con- cessions required of the tedious, prac- tical process of collective bargaining with the idealistic promises they made to their members. The bulk of the GEO constituency was totally un- familiar with the machinations of negotiation and unable to see any justification for the compromises leadership was forced to make. They must accept the fact that in a situa- tion such as this, where bitterly op- posing interests collide, compromise is the only solution which can end dispute with a chance of continued cooperation. FURTHER, DUE RESPECT must be given to all those who chose not to strike. Just as GEO members had to solve the strike dilemma individ- ually, so did those who remained on the job. The label "scab" can now be dropped from the University vocabu- lary. The faculty's role in the following weeks is crucial. If strikers are wel- comed back with respect for their individual decisions, the educational process will resume smoothly. If not, the ensuing dissention is bound to hurt the only party to the drama which is totally innocent: the under- graduates. Of late there have been cries from all corners of the campus for the University to remain above politics. We have the chance to achieve that aim now that the struggle is over. thrc radictory and hypo- or example, t h e ce states iH i t s a guidelines: "It is the Housing Office most qualified can- s in-resident staff f race, sex, color, ographical o: na- " The very next s: "To insure, how- clusion of women es in the applicant -discrimination and ction, the housing ablished numerical resident staff . . ." nes later: "An al- st of minority ap- be compiled by the rectors of e a c h The Federal Gov- ides another exam- radictory wording. 'E ORDER 11246 scrimina'ion on he e, color, raliglon, Donal origin," but HEW guidelines, action requires the make additional ef- uit, employ, a n d lified members of merly excluded", en and minorities. rent contradic-ions some whites to nature of sicial it is important to factors underlying action policies. Af- ion was largely de- viate the stagger- roduced by many ugh a others. This could natnally les- sen tendencies to discrimi late and bring an ideal situation clos- er to reality. Affirmative acti n works at achieving this aim. THE ALLEGED adverse ef- fects that many charge affirm- ative action with are not nearly as extreme as implied. Dr. Mary Lepper of HEW's Office for Civil Rights countered Les- ter's complaints of ruptured fa- culty traditions and stsndards as in fact, surveys have shown that from 1968 to 1972, numbers of blacks on campus facilities increased only from 2.2 per cent to 2.9 per cent, and the number of women from 19.1 per cent to 20 per cent. The University of Michigan Affirmative Action Office re- vealed that from 1973 to 1974, the total number of instruction positions held by minorities and women increased from 11 8 per cent to 20 per cent, and tenure ladder positions (includng As- sistant Professor, Associate Pro- fessor, and Full Profesor class- ifications) increased from 14.67 per cent to 16.05 per cent. It does not seem that such n rate of change would cause a very rapid deterioration of standards. Another area for consideration is admissions to the University. Pat Wilson later added that the complains from rejec e1 whites cannot be attributed solely to minority goals. THE ADMISSIONS Of'ce has all kinds of other goois to ful- fill as well; for example, limit- ed numbers of studen's are ad- mitted into the scnools of en- gineering, nursing, or literature, and there is a set goal as to how many in-state students are to be admitted. All in all, it does not seem that society "or the white race" or the non-mi- nority male is nearly as oppres- sed by the effects of affirmative action as minoritoes and wo- men have been in the past. In conclusion, there are two ways to view the issue: either as affirmative action or as "re- verse discrimination'. One at- titude is more concerned with positive steps take,, and the looking glass SIDNEY HOOK, of the Com- mittee of Academic Non-dis- crimination and Integrity, pi e- sented several arguments against "reverse discrimina- tion" at a recent House sub- committee hearing. Hook first protested that discrimination is deplorable, whether used for that it, wom< These appar have caused question the justice. However, examine the affirmative a firmative acti signed to ale ing effects p "In fact, many biased whites simply hide their prejudice behind a veil of radical think- ing. A Black Panther once said he would prefer a southern white racist to a northern white racist because at least the southerner would openly admit his racism." ?:"}t - .: 'v.{ q' .,fl,.VWr.".r: .sS :: "{ r a nwi"m:?:r}}a U'.v other with negative reacimon. Andrews made an i itrresting ol- servation: "One main reason for negative reaction is because people don't unders+and . . . or because people understand but don't buy." THERE SEEM ;o be people who agree with the idea', prin- ciples of affirmati"e action but are turned off by thio methorls used - they see the white male being discriminated against, which is true from a short eight- ed view. Maybe these people would support aff,rnatix'c ac- tion if the HEW were Io period- ically reevaluate its programs and to emphasize 'ne temporary state of the goals set 'that is, that they are intended to last until the effects of past discrim- ination are erased). Maybe thcn the divisions brought about by "reverse discrimina;ion' will be less intense and affi:mativ ac- tion wil be closer to achieving its goals of social justice and unity. Greg Rest is an LSA fresh- -wan with an hiterest in the social sciences. Endless verbiage to cease THE 1974 CONGRESSIONAL elec- tions brought to Washington a host of freshman legislators deter- mined to streamline the creakingly antiquated structure of the United States Congress. The House has de- posed numerous of its antediluvian committee chairmen, clearing the way for more legislative responsiveness from that body. The Senate fight to change the filibuster rules is nearing success. Under the new rules, a 60 per cent majority will be needed to cut off debate, as opposed to the current two-thirds majority. Senate conser- vatives are already howling about how this rule change will expose the legislative process to "the tyranny of the majority." In theory, the conservatives would seem to have a point. But, as Al Smith said, let's look at the record. Historically, the filibuster has been used by a willful minority to frustrate the wishes of the majority. To cite legislation could muster the 67 votes necessary to cut off what had by then become the traditional Southern fili- buster. IT IS DIFFICULT enough to get 33 Senators to agree on one thing. It would be next to impossible to get 40 senators in unanimous agreement, and with sufficient motivation to keep a filibuster going. A determined block of southerners and other conservatives has been fighting this rule change every step of the way. But observers seem to feel that their efforts are nearing defeat. This defeat should be wel- comed by all who are interested in an efficient and responsive Congress. True, some colorful traditions will die. No longer will the District of Columbia phone book be read into the congressional record. And the record for the longest continuous speech will probably sit in the Guiness Book of Records unchallenged for or against women and minori- ties. He further asserted that the present practices violate two fundamental principals of human morality - justice and .human welfare - since the sys- tem of award by merit benefits the entire community, and vio- lation of this system downgrades human welfare. In addition, Hook said that preferential treatment by race or sex sets a dangerous pre- cedent for society: "It not only sets groups against each other and promotes discord, but it also devalues what it means to be a citizen of the United States, since what once was a precious right, equal justice under law, becomes a privilege to be doled out at the pleasure of an admin- istrator." Hook concluded that discriminatory, preferential practices are establishing rew racial and cultural barriers ra- ther than eliminating old ones. SOME WHITES charge that discrimination against non-mi- norities is practiced here at the University. Although. Housing Director Archie Andrews said there have been no complaints concerning staff selection prac- tices from individuals, he said there have been people in gens- eral who felt that hiring meth- ods were unfair. Pat Wilson, years of discrimination. Even if discrimination were to in- stantly cease, the damage it has incurred would remain. The psy- chological disadvantage t h a t minorities are saddled with are among the most difficult effects of discrimination to erase. Wo- men and minorities are fighting to break away from the stereo- types asigned to them in a white-male dominated society. KATHY SHORTRIDGE, of the Affirmative Action Office, cit- ed the "bright young man" mo- del which women compete with in job-seeking. She said many women, concerned wi*h holding onto their feminine stage, do not want to respond with ag- gressive behavior. Otjers react passively to the mode!, leaving themselves open to accusations of incompetence or lower qual- ifications. There are a multitude of factors, characteristic to cer- tain minorities, which often n- fluence employers. Therefore, it is naive to as- sume that discrimination ends just because someine says so. In fact, many biased. whites simplythide their prejudice un- der a veil of liberal thinking. A Black Panther once said that he would prefer a Southern white racist to northern white racist, arguing that the South- erner would at least openly ad- Letters to The Daily law school To The Daily: THE UNIVERSITY of Michi- gan has long prided itself on be- ing not only one of the top centers of higher education in this country but also an being one of the most progressive. This image is somewhat reserv- ed since, for the majority of its students, the courses are rele- vant; the professors are help- ful and the education, therefore, is innovative. But Michigan has failed miserably where minority students are concerned. After finally being convinced in 1970 that minority students should be admitted in numbers roughly related to the percent- age of minority residents of the state, the University has been dragging its feet on all other forms of affirmative action. presentation on its work force, it would be called racist. Of the large number of workers within the Law School (custodial, cler- ical, etc.), only six or seven are black - well below 10 per cent representation. In any other situation this would be called racism. Of the many posidons within the administration only the financial aid officer is black. WHAT OF the curriculum? Blacks are being trained to be- come corporate lawyers for large firms. There is precious little training to help tne needs of the poor, black community. There is no course on rac sn and how it can be attacked. There are no courses explaining how to set up a small, one or two man practice in the bI a c k neighborhoods. The legal aid program suffers from 1lnck of sufficient facilities for all w h o - - "__ _ .._ _.... _ _ tain areas, sometimes very far removed from the black com- munity's needs. This has got to stop! The Black Law Students Alliance has seen the need to rearrange the structure of this Law School to make it more relevant to the needs of black students. When proposals to af- fect such a change were submit- ted theyadministration decided that they should be shuffbiJ off to a "committee". The frustration we, black law students, feel now compels us to ask for the public's aid. Only the people can make this public institution explain why it has shown reticence in moving ahead with affirmative action. We call on you to shake the conscience of this University and make it a school for all neonie