e £frit'iCn Duitu Eighty-four years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Tuesday, October 15, 1974 News Phone: 764-0552 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mi. 48104 Last chance for SGC IN RECENT YEARS, student govern- ment on this campus has backed itself into a lonely and unpleasant corner. Student Government Coun- cil's (SGC) past major officials have been accused of rigging elections and mishandling thousands of dollars in student money. The massive annual funding that comes from 75-cent stu- dent fee assessments has consistently managed to disappear into expensive, crooked elections, ineffective pro- grams, and - allegedly - SGC of- ficials' pockets. The negligible stu- dent support has been a sensible and accurate reflection of SGC's worth. But most recently, Council's grim condition has finally taken its toll: under a directive from the Regents, the Commission to Study Student Governance (CSSG) may soon recom- mend that SGC be overhauled or re- placed by a different and theoretic- ally more reliable body, a Michigan Student Assembly (MSA.) While the draft CSSG plan has drawn mixed reaction from SGC members and others, some commission members privately admit that some of the Re- gents may be looking for a way to liquidate student government and its problems altogether. Meanwhile, the current Council has had to concern itself with desperate- ly-needed house-cleaning in the form of lawsuits against former officers and reorganization of battered fi- nances. Hence Council begins its fall all- campus election today in the sha- dow of past incompetency real possibility that this is SGC vote. and the the last UGLI By STEVE ROSS MOST STUDENTS have only a one- sided perception of the Undergradu- ate Library's reserve desk. They write a call number on a slip, hand it to a person behind the desk, and wait for their names to be called. This process sometimes takes a long time, and some students get impatient watching a few people scurry around behind the desk looking for books. However, the recent slowdown in re- serve service is a problem brought on by rising business volume which has not been accompanied by increases in staffing, according to library personnel. Kirk Nims, the man in charge of UGLI reserve offers revealing insights into what goes on behind the desk. Nims, a young supervisor, quit a better paying job in the business world to return to the library staff. "I like students and I like working at the library," he explains. Often seen handling fines and assisting students with special problems, Nims de- scribes himself as "the crazy person running around with a beard." THE PROCESS of putting books on re- serve starts long before the term be- gins, Nims explains. Letters are sent out to faculty members asking what books they want on reserve for the next term. The sooner the faculty gets its list in, the quicker the books can be obtained. A quota accounting for class size re- rese rv, stricts the number of books reserved per course. The library system is check- ed first for books. If the library doesn't have a volume, private copies and photo- copies are sought out. "This year there are more lists in now than last year," Nims says. "The reserve system is caught up in its order- ing system." If a student checks out a book before the library staff can remove it from the stacks to put it on reserve, a call-in or- der is sent out to the person who has the book. Two years ago, this mix-up occur- red with some 400 books per term, and Nims predicts its frequency has probab- ly increased. The reserve office cannot crosslist books listed for more than one course. Such books will be listed only for the first course that puts in the reserve re- quest. ONE OF THE PROBLEMS which has caused an increased wait for reserve desk patrons is the increased volume of books on reserve. Last year, the School of Nursing moved its reserve collection from the Medical School library to the UGLI. Nursing books had previously been on open reserve and people were hiding books, Nims says. In addition, the UGLI picked up the education school's reserve load when the education library closed. As reserve books are checked in and THE DAILY urges students to quash that possibility by voting during the next three days. A ballot is not an endorsement of SGC's admittedly poor record; the vote now becomes an expression of belief in student gov- ernment as a necessary campus force. By voting, we tell the Regents that as bad as our government may get, it is still our right to misuse or improve it, and we insist upon that right. Moreover, the recent lawsuits and the reform-oriented rhetoric of the SGC campaign are clear indications that Council activists are aware of their problems. A vote in this week- end's election is a mandate for thatI awareness, a notice to the adminis- tration that students support their own house-cleaning efforts and op- pose Regental interference of any kind. The Daily chooses to specifically endorse no candidates or party in this election; the critical issue, as we see it, is whether students will en-I dorse to concept of student govern- ment by voting at all. SGC's fate may be the overhaul suggested in CSSG's draft report, or the Council may sufficiently repair itself to survive. In either instance, we insist that students be the deci- sion-makers, for better or for worse. The best way to insure our own deci- sion-making role is to vote this week. -THE DAILY STAFF j lacks staff out, they must be processed through one of three IBM machines behind the desk. As a result, Nims says, students cannot be allowed to take out more than one book at a time. "We've been on one book only since the beginning of the term be- cause of the volume," he explains. "I can't forsee alleviating it." The only way relative volume handled by the reserve desk can be determined is by comparison with figures from last year. For the week of September 15 to 21 this year, 8,887 volumes were checked out at the reserve desk, representing a 16.88 per cent increase since last year. Yet staff has increased by only 10.08 per cent over the same period. LACK OF STAFF has been the main reason for a processing slowdown this year. The desk is allowed to hire stu- dents to work for a total of 358 hours per week. Reserve also employs a half-time clerical to handle data processing, over- due books and binding. "I spend 20 hours per week helping students; this totals 378 hours per week of direct service," Nims emphasizes. "This is the maximum amount the li- brary budget allows us." When the desk is really swamped, reserve can some- times get a person from the general staff to assist them. The desk handles 47 books per hour, on an average of 1.2 books per minute. Machine time accounts for 30 seconds of the total. The handling volume for the first few weeks of the term this year has equaled midterms and finals levels in previous years. This increase is partly due to new use of the UGLI facility by nursing students. According to Nims, nursing students are using the materials more because they know they are available. NIMS EMPHASIZES the desk's need for more staff people. "At the busiest times, I'd like to have four people call- ing books, one person charging, one per- son shelving and one discharging," he says. "The way I'd like to see it is to figure out the busy times we can use more staff, but we're right up against the salary budget." The book bins fill every 15 minutes, he says. "It's so busy it's hard to keep the shelves in order." The reason for the delay at the UGLI reserve desk is a shortage of personnel. Volume has increased and staff has not been increased enough to meet'the de- mand. However, the slowdown is not as bad now as it was a few weeks ago because the expected midterm rush did not materialize. "In comparison to two years ago, there has been a broader distribution of Ilse." Nims says. Steve Ross writes for The Daily's Edi- torial Page. ofP Cyn icism By SARA RIMER in the world Econ survey: Nothing new TT WAS REPORTED yesterday that people are tighter with their wads than they were eight years ago. This bombshell revelation comes from a survey research project put together by two University econo- mists. The report not only does a bang-up job of indexing how long which peo- ple think "bad times" will last, but also concludes folks are less apt to splurge on a new set of wheels or take out a mortgage now than be- fore when there was more bite to the buck. No doubt this news sends Mr. and rSpor Staff MARC FELDMAN Sports Editor GEORGE HASTINGS Executive Sports Editor ROGER ROSSITER .... Managing Sports Editor JOHN KAHLER ........ Associate Sports Editor Photography Staff KAREN KASMAUSKI Chief Photographer KEN FINK Picture Editor STUART HOL~LANDER......Staff Photographer STEVE KAGAAN............Staff Photographer PAULINE LUBENS...........Staff Photographer Ms. average reader reeling back in their chairs as they scan the morn- ing paper. They read "Public Sees Long Recession," fight for control, but lose it all on 'the spot. The coffee goes first -- right through the win- dow, making that shiny new card- board pane a mere memory - then the American Family themselves tumble backward from their sawdust porridge and crash to the floor, cush- ioned only by a stack of unpaid bills. "My God, Elouise," murmurs Ed Breadwinner to his wife, "it says here we're headed for a depression." CO WHAT ELSE is new? We are tempted to tell the experts at the Survey Research Center that the money on this particular project could have been better spent on bread or gasoline. After all, you could eat and drive around for a week on that kind of money. -PAUL HASKINS and DAN BIDDLE TODAY'S STAFF: News: Don Biddle, Cindy Hill, Sara Rimer, Judy Ruskin, Tim Schick Editorial Page: Becky Warner, Sue Wilhelm Arts Page: Ken Fink, Doug Zernow Photo Technician: Stuart Hollander PUBLIC RELATIONS is a dirty word among jour- nalists. The term has been soiled by the likes of Richard Nixon and his smooth-talking press secretary Ron Ziegler. Most reporters prefer to spit out a quick I"PR" instead of dignifying the term with its full five syllables. So without the blessings of my friends, I hit New York as an intern at a large, money-making PR firm last summer in an effort to crack the public relations code. I quickly learned that no one was going to give me a slick definition of public relations (PR was a dirty abbreviation among the professionals). Who could swallow a line like the firm's, "Public relations is hav- ing a story to tell and telling it effectively"? The key lay in a list of the firm's clients, which read like "Who's Who in American Business." The firm de- veloped polished, well-conceived programs that helped big companies gild themselves richly in profits. Seventy per cent of the firm's account executives and officers were drawn from the media. The mystery be- hind this statistic was illuminated in a single word- money. The office roll call included the former cream of the press corps, with former newspaper and maga- zine editors kissing their bylines good-by for lucrative salaries. They weren't content to let their former ca- reers fade into oblivion, however. One executive, for- merly editor of a leading New York newspaper and weekly news magazine, prefaced most comments with, "As former editor of , it is my opinion that . ." His advice to writers churning out press releases was an encouraging, "Write it like the New York Times." One executive, whose past credits included a stint as editor on a San Francisco paper and a professor's post at the Columbia School of Journalism, laughed when reminded of the scorn journalists level at PR people. "Fifty per cent of Columbia's graduates end up in public relations," he claimed, adding, "If you sug- gested that would be their futures, they would be hor- rified." HE HIMSELF was not proud of having instructed former Nixon speechwriters and strategist Patrick Bu- chanan in the tricks of the trade. One hotshot, who at 31 was already reaching for the upper rungs of the corporate ladder, slipped into the role of PR man for practical reasons. "Look," he ex- plained, "I was making $125 a week at UPI when my wife divorced me. I couldn't pay alimony on $125 a week, so I took a chance in public relations." It's a gamble he doesn't regret for a moment. He pro- claims: "I love this work. I get to dress well, eat at I love this work. I get to dress well, eat at good restaurants, and on most days I can get the- hell out of the office by five. If I keep my nose clean, I'll be on Executive Row in a, few years.' -a young reporter turned PR man good restaurants, and on most days I can get the hell out of the office by five." He added confidently, "If I keep my nose clean, I'll be up on Executive Row in a few years." His prediction was accurate, since only a few days later the higher-ups beckoned him to a better job on the West Coast - heading up an office there. HE HAS REMARRIED - to his secretary. Another man on the way up who had no previous media experience said frankly, "I applied to 150 news- papers when I graduated, and got exactly 150 rejec- tions, so here I am." Journalists as a class have long been known for high alcoholism rates, and they clearly don't leave their anxieties behind with their bylines when they switch careers. One executive munched a bagel and cream cheese during a coffee break, explaining, "I'm feeding my ulcer." He warned, "Go knock on some doors around here, and you'll find that everyone's either got ulcers or is recovering from a heart attack." He might have added that many were also picking up the pieces of their personal lives after messy di- vorces. It seemed that all the executives were scuttling up the corporate ladder without a backwards glance, carv- ing out a piece of the American Dream glossed over with fancy lunches, plenty of names to drop, and fat expense accounts. The men were packaged as slickly as the products they helped promote, and it was diffi- cult to get through the wrapping to the real person underneath. ONE 27 YEAR OLD account executive, who had not been able to swallow the public relations fishing line without an occasional jab to his conscience, gave me an honest appraisal of his .work. While attending a graduate school of journalism in Boston, he had worked on the Boston bureau of the New York Times. After holding a magazine job in New York City, he was at- tracted by the money in PR and decided to give it a whirl. "Eighty per cent of the time I like it," he com- mented, "but for the other 20 per cent I have serious questions." He then unfolded an ironic story about a colleague from his journalism school days who had recently won a Pulitzer Prize for some investigative reporting. With more than a trace of bitterness he said, "I went to school with this guy, and I know I write better than he does. Meanwhile, he's winning Pulitzer Prizes and I'm selling razor blades." Then he pulled the punchline: "So, I met this guy on the stree the other day and he wants to know if there's anything here for him. Jesus, he likes the money too." Sara Rimer is a staff reporter for The Daily, Letters to The rent control To The Daily: WHILE David Whiting's ac- count of the informal meeting between HRP activists was gen- erally correct, a few statements are quite incorrect. Council member Thomas did not "chide" the HRP proposal for being one that would almost "certainly be voided" by the courts. Quite the contrary, both he and the other Democrats pre- sent stated that the new HRP proposal was a big improvement over our last one. What he and everyone else did say (includ- ing me) was that any rent con- trol law would be challenged in the courts and that we had all better be prepared for it. In fact, it was not the Demo- crats who pointed out key legal problems with the HRP propcs- al but HRP and Democratic ac- tivists alike that pointed out big problems with the Democratic proposal. Most legal problems that were raised with HRP's proposal were adequately and incisively answered by Councilperson Thomas, and by the end of the meeting Councilperson K e n- worthy stated (as it was report- ed in Whiting's story) that all his objections had been met, a!- though he still wanted to see the final draft. WHILE I understand the space limitations of a newspaoer, it is unfortunate that Whiting could not go into the key economic problems discussed. The Demo- cratic proposal, one about which 41 -. l '-'--- - .--.t 41- - --in l .: they wil be "reduced" to only mildly ridiculous levels; -lets Board members serve for four years without a n v ac- countability to the electorate -allows landlords to repre- sent evidence in hearings for re- ductions but not tenants. -and a host of other loop- holes. To the Democrats' credit, though, they did not seem wed- ded to this proposal and seem quite wililng to listen to our new proposal which is far simpler and easier to administer than the one voted on last spring. On the basis of the Wednesday night meeting I would have to conclude the Democrats are in far greater agreement with our rent control proposals tha Ithey were last year. Everyone at trat meeting is to be commended for discussing things freely and with an open mind. -Frank Shoichet come the first candidate for Congress to lambast Ford's conditional amnesty program for draft dodgers. Well, as a supporter of John Reuther for Congress, I hope my candidate sticks to his guns (no pun m- tended) and continues to support what has become the F o r d plan. I say "continues to support" because he has refused to sup- port unconditional amnesty dur- ing the primary and I hope that he does not change his mind to get student votes. The only way a Democrat can Meat Marvin Esch this year is by being mod- erate to conservative on some key issues - busing, amnesty, abortion, drug law reform. This John Reuther has d ine intelli- gently and shrewdly in order that he may be elected. Let the HRP have the luxury of advocating "principled" posi- tions. This year the job of Dem- ocrats is to get elected. -a Reuther supporter legal rights To The Daily: THE CORE - of the relation- ship between students and the University should be seen in this perspective. The Univer- sity of Michigan is a non-profit educational corporation, deriv- ing its powers from the federal Constitution through the Mtate constitution. The Regents have the highest authority to exer- cise whatever powers the Uni- versity has been granted from the state constitution, which powers derive from the federal Constitution. The Regents may 'Daily expressed by Unive.s:y-paid lawyers who spout the . that the Regents can do what- ever they want to. The easy re- ply to this stupid idiocy is that the Regents obviously cannot lawfully order the dleath of a student. Moreover, the Regents cannot do many other things in the nature of a lesser infringe- ment of personal rights as well. And this comes to the heart of the matter facing student organ- izations. The Regents through any of their agencies - vice presidents, SGC, student-4ar.ulty committees, etc. - cannot law- fully restrict the right of citi- zens to use public property in a manner which violates basic civil rights under the fed eral and state constiuions. Any proposed regularians of student organizations should be evaluated from this perspective. FINANCIAL freedom is an in- herent attribute of the right of association under the federal and state constitutions. Govern- ment cannot lawfully exercise day by day supervision of an association's financial activities unless it first shows gross il- legality necessitating control in a particular case. There is a presumption of legality to the activities of any citizen ,r asso- ciation, unless a high degree of proof is submitted showing il- legality. It goes wirhoit say- ing, a fortiori, that the Uiv-r- sity has no business se -uring the business transactions of or- ganizations using University fa- cilities to any other entity ,han itself. To the ends of protect- ing our rights of association come from an all white subirb and an all white high school to this predominantly white college containing animosity towards minority groups. He implies that the burden of ending race discrimination rests on the white person's shoulders, and this is where he is wrong. One look at society today and anyone can see a remaining flame of racism; however, when looked at closely it can be seen that the majority of this racism is in reverse of the conventional form. Now, it seems, it;s pop- ular to believe that minority groups should be looked at as something special, more t n a n just equal. Take the case of the black growing up in a big city. Throughout the last few years society has been teaching that person that the white race is in great debt to him and must repay his race for harms suf- fered in the past. He is taught to separate socitey into minor- ity groups. This is, in the truest sense, racism, for he will nev- er be able to look at a white person as a person; rather that person will always be a white. Just look at the University of Michigan where minority groups have formed their own social circles separated entirey from the rest of the society. How can they ever expect to treat others or have others treat them as equals when they separate themselves into a minority group. THIS LETTER may carry a scent of prejucide in itself, and intentially so, because I am very prejudiced against anyone / AW1 I 'r/iAU .0