1 , heic t ~tanBail!; Eighty years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mich. News Phone: 764-0552 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. x r"" ( i t 1 ! ,r 4 s ยข 1 STMM THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 1970 NIGHT EDITOR: STEVE KOPPMAN Violence against Nixon: Don't go the way of San Jose W'eutralize': A time-hono red game By LYNN WEINER A NEW GAME, rumor has it, will soon be filling the shelves of better stores. Joining such classics as "monopoly," "risk," and "clue" will be "neutralize," a game of skill and chance. When we played, the silent majority won the first round, and for several turns the war was ignored by the others. "Chance" cards deci- mated villages and populations, as the war gained strength. And then the action began. The dove pulled a strong "candidate" card. but the administration allied with the silent majority .to barely win the coveted election point. The dove's points had been forfeited when he had pulled a "con- vention" card, and was beaten to a bloody pulp. BUT THEN the dove fought back. He lucked out, pulling several "moratorium" cards in a row. especially the valuable Oct. 15 and Nov. 15. And he began to gain a broad base of support, by siphoning off many of the silent majority's constituents to his side. It seemed to him that he was winning, and he thought the war might really end. The revolutionist, not allowed to play according to the rules, kib- butzed and when he tried to overturn the board, he was given a "go to hell" card. The hawk began to retaliate. He got an extra turn and pulled both a "billy graham" and a "victory march." The administration followed by swallowing bpth the hawk and the silent majority, in a triple al- liance. It was three against one. The dove began to lose points. He had to mortgage his movement, compromise, and withdraw. The administration-led alliance had won, the dove had been neu- tralized, and the status quo was saved again. Marketers have great hopes for the game. It's quite flexible, as many wars can be chosen, for instance, and many factions pitted against one another. BUT WHEN the board is set up, with the current factors, the dove can only lose. And the marketers believe that, at the present time, this is the best way to sell the game. 4' 4 ITH THE FURY of the election over, it is time to examine the San Jose incident in which "a barrage of rocks, bricks, bottles, eggs, red flags, and other missiles" was reportedly thrown at Presi- dent Nixon, This incident, which followed a poli- tical rally in support of California Gov- ernor Ronald Reagan and Senator George Murphy, was the most serious act of vio- lence aimed at a President since the assassination of John Kennedy in 1963. As such, it raises many questions. Where were the Secret Service agents whose duty it is to provide protection for the President? Anybody within throw- ing distance of the President's car could just have easily shot Nixon a few min- utes earlier when Nixon exposed himself to the crowd. Why was this particular route taken when thousands of hostile demonstrators were obviously in the Pres- ident's path? IT HAS BEEN suggested that Nixon may have actually desired violence to a certain This is absurd1 FOR A LONG TIME we have watched sadly as University officials and re- searchers justified project after project of dubious value in the name of research. Sometimes, these activities call for a public accounting. Most recently, the University has gone to great expense and trouble to import a mutant albino frog to Ann Arbor. For re- search they say. But in reality, behind the facade, we discover that they want to mate the albino frog to produce millions of frogs, and hopefully lots of mutants to research on. When you come right down to it, we are spending hundreds of dollars to facil- itate frog fornication. Where is Sen. Huber when we really need him? -J.N. Editorial Staff MARTIN A. HIRSCHMAN, Editor STUART GANNES JUDY SARASOHN Editorial Director Managing Editor NADINE COHODAS Feature Editor JIM NEUBACHER Editorial Page Editor ROB BIER.A.Associate Managing Editor LAURIE HARRIS Arts Editor JUDY KAHN Personnel Director DANIEL ZWERDLING ....... Magazine Editor ROBERT CONROW.. Books Editor JIM JUDKIS..... ...... Photography Editor NIGHT EDITORS: Dave Chuwin, Erika Hoff, Steve Koppman, Robert Kraftowitz, Lynn Weiner EDITORIAL NIGHT EDITORS: Jim Beattie, Lindsay Chaney, Steve Koppman, Pat Mahoney, Rick Perloff OOPY EDITORS: Tammy Jacobs, Larry Lempert, Jim McFerson, Hester Pulling, Carla Rapoport, Debbie Tha. Harvard Valance ASSISTANT NIGHT EDITORS: Rose Berstein, Mike Cleply, Mark Dilen, Sara Fitzgerald, Art Lerner, Jonathan Miller, Hannah Morrison, M i c h a e I Schneck, Bob Schreiner, W. E. Schrock, Edward Zimmerman SPORTS NIGHT EDITORS: William Alterman, Jared E. Clark, Richard Cornfeld, Teri Fouchey, James Kevra Elliott Legow, Morton Noveck, Alan Shack- elford. Business Staff IAN G. WRIGHT, Business Manager PHYLLIS HURWITZ CRAIG WOLSON Administrative Adv. Mgr. Sales Manager VIDA GOLDSTEIN .. Staff Coordinator MARK WALFISH .....: Personnel AMY COHEN .. Finance Manager DAVID BELL .. ............Circulation Manger extent, and may thus have provoked the demonstration himself. Nixon emerged from the rally, climbed atop the hood of his car, and flashed the peace sign at his adversaries. Reagan said later that he and the President flashed peace signs at the demonstrators, "because nothing infuriates them like that does." N i x o n was also quoted in a similar vein by some press reports. Democrats in California charged that Republicans deliberately allowed the at- tack on the President. Many political analysts viewed the attack as helping Senator Murphy, a law and order candi- date, who was in a tight race for re- election. Reports circulated throughout the campaign that Republicans were al- lowing a small number of demonstrators to attend Nixon's rallies to enable the President to attack hecklers. Obviously the campaign raised mn a n y tensions. The vicious, vituperative attacks that Vice-President Agnew made on Re- publicans, and Democrats alike did n o t help establish a peaceful climate. In addition, Nixon's hard campaign rhetoric engendered many strong passions. YET EVEN taking into account all of the provocation, a violent attack on the President cannot be justified or condoned. During the last years of the Johnson ad- ministration, the President rarely left the White House except to travel from o n e military base to another. Hatred for Johnson had become so widespread that he could not safely travel through t h e country. Many high Johnson adminis- tration officials were also prevented from speaking at various places throughout the country. During those long months in which Johnson escalated the Vietnam War, he and his staff were essentially cut off from the people they governed. Johnson never really knew the depth of feeling his war policies had engendered until it was too late. IT IS IMPORTANT to all those who op- pose Nixon's policies that they refrain from violent attacks and not make him a prisoner of the White House and of military bases as was Johnson. If elec- toral politics in this country are to work, it is important that Nixon be seen by the people. For over eighteen months Lyndon John- son did not go out among his people. In that time the war was escalated to i t s greatest intensity. It is frightening to imagine what would happen if Nixon be- came as isolated as Johnson was. When Nixon campaigned two years ago he campaigned on the theme of lowering our voices. As many of us feared w o u 1 d happen, he has unfortunately not carried out this pledge. Now that the election is over and hopefully the '72 election cam- paign will not start for at least a year, maybe the goal of lowering our voices can be fulfilled. What is needed now is work toward solving our social ills at home and an end of America's insane adventure in Vietnam. Rock throwing or any kind of violence directed against the President or any public official will not bring us closer to these important goals. -MICHAEL SCHNECK "T Le "Let's go!. ... This is worse than San Jose".! 4 A TRUE ADVENTURE Wouldn 't it be interesting to audit ROTC? By MARGARET LEHMAN and CAROL FAUDMAN Daily Guest Writers WOULDN'T IT be interesting to VV audit a ROTC class? That's what we thought on Tuesday (Oct. 29) when we walked into Military Science 201. Motivat- ed by curiosity rather than our political ideology (after all, who would try to trash North Hall at 1 p.m. in the afternoon?) we en- tered the building and waited for the cla ssroom to be unlocked by the major. Talking briefly with an ROTC student, we discovered that all doors in North Hall are lock- ed unless they are being used at that moment. Thiswas our first glimpse of ROTC paranoia. The major came to unlock the door and the student we had been speaking to said. "There two airls are here to audit the class, sir." Glancing briefly at us, he said, "Oh they are, are they?" Although he seemed vaguely intimidated. we sat auietly in the back of the room while he gallantly ignored us. Af- ter listening to a half hour of intersection and resection of man- reading, we rose quietly and left. BUT as we itnroached the lobby we discovered it was easier to get into North Hall than it was to get out. Thp uniformed Ann Arbor policeman on duty (+) stonned us. askin'- "Are you women emnlov-d here?" We arnswered politely, "No. we hve .iust been auditing a class." "I wnt to spe your I.D.'s. plese." "Why do you want to see our I.D.'s?" "I have to know who comes in and out of this building, it's my job. Are you working on a pro- ject or something?" "No, we're students here, we were just auditing a class. This is a University building, isn't it?" We continued by pointing out that no one had stopped us coming into the building. His face showed the first signs of annoyance as he ex- plained that he must have been out to lunch. "I want to see your I.D.'s" he *1 -Daily-Tom Stanton sponded by slamming his walky- talky on the table and saying, "You can call the department if you want to. Dial 9 and I'll give you the number." The walky-talky be- gan to babble impressively. Half- way through the number, we real- ized that the police department was the last place we wanted to call and hung up the receiver. At this point the officer became /very annoyed with us and said, "You can call a lawyer if you want to, because I'm going to arrest you if you don't give me your I.D.'s!" He picked up the telephone and began dialing. At this point, we were so intimidated that we forgot all our Bust Book instructions. We couldn't think of anyone to call or what our rights were. All we could think of was that if we did go to the police station, they would not only have our names, but also our photographs and any- thing else they wanted for iden- tification before we were released. At this point in our logic, we slapped down our I.D. cards. "What will you do with our names?" we asked, somewhat bel- ligerently as he hurriedly copied them down. "We'll keep them and when nothing happens, we will de- stroy them." He smiled sweetly. "Thank you for your cooperation." We left. WE FELT confused as to why the Ann Arbor police were on campus, angry at ourselves for not being aware of our rights, and frustrated in general for having been harassed, so we decided to pursue the matter. The results are as follows: we discovered that VP Knauss, who was consulted first, knew nothing of the presence of the policeman, Officer Willard, and the Ann Arbor Police at North Hall. Colonel Davids, head of security, however admitted knowledge of the officer's presence but said he had given the police department specific directions to only "show a presence" and not to speak to the students or ask questions. We have been promised a verbal apol- ogy from Davids and have been assured that our names will be cancelled from the files. Officer Willard, Davids and Knauss we as- sume, have been instructed to erase from their minds any know- ledge of the incident. SO, FOR those of you who have ever considered dropping in on ROTC for an afternoon, think twice about it. On second thought, why don't you drop in on Officer Willard - if he doesn't take your name, he might let you play with his walky-talky. It's really far out. demanded. We turned1 other and remarked that probably call someone. to each we should He re- I P YOJ VOW' ?7 VI? V HE IT 7l U O? WH I you e3OW UP A YAI ROM NOW . I WY HOWGW(UL" L7'() Ffft iAr TI - 7Dro UFFGCT(V6. 6 ?b VO~F6? s X 66TM , rME Stillw gon To the Daily: THE ARTICLE by Steve Kopp- mnan (Oct. 29) about Democratic Congressional Candidate Michael Stillwagon was good, but has one inaccuracy which needs to be cor- rected. The article states that Still- wagon "defeated the candidate supported by the local Democra- tic organization - . . . in the August primary." This is incorrect both in the technical and in the actual sense. The local Democratic organiza- tion adhered strictly to its 1 a w and there is nothing to suggest that in actuality the preponder- ance of such individual support went to either candidate. The local Democratic party val- ues highly its principle of "neu- trality in primaries," as a basic protection of the right of any Democrat to seek nomination as a Democratic candidate. We have no "preferred candidates" in pri- mary elections, as the other poli- tical party does. -Carol Rees Chairman Oct. 29 In itiative We need to avail ourselves and more of the initiative petition fea- ture mentioned in our State Con- stitution. We need to make better laws ourselves, by sidetracking or even avoiding the legislature, and we can do that by the initiative. petition method. One thing I want is to amend our State Constitu- tion so it allows us to order our entire Congressional Delegation to submit a proposal to Congress to get our troops out of Vietnam. That would be truly fantastic. We'd surely need to get out the vote to do it, and that surely in- cludes the younger vote. And we'd need to publicize this very well, sn- nur neighhorino states wouild Letters to The Daily 10. MI ER- ~F7 6 kOFF(Cr1V I I I