Eighty years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan The FBI: Federal Bureau of Instigation? 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mich. News Phone: 764-0552 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. SATURDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1970 NIGHT EDITOR: ROBERT KRAFTOWITZ q Standstill cease-fire: Standstill aggression PRESIDENT NIXON'S proposal for a standstill cease-fire in Vietnam as a precursor to meaningful negotiations in Vietnam marks only a continuance of the policies that have d r i v e n this country through five years of slaughter in Viet- nam. Confused and distorted as the war has made it, the key to the conflict continues to be the question of self-determination for the Vietnamese people. Nixon's pro- posal is unacceptable because the con- tinuing presence of U.S. military forces in Indochina, constitutes very real po- litical influeice-influence to which this country has no moral claim. A much more reasonable solution to the war was proposed by the Viet Cong three weeks ago, but it was quickly brush- ed aside as "nothing new" by the Nixon administration. Under the Viet Cong pro- posal, a cease-fire, swift U.S. troop with- drawals and the election of a coalition government would have been undertaken. But the continued assumption of an American right to influence in the gov- ernance of Vietnam is hardly surprising. For, in essence, the history of the war is simply the story of how political domina- tion by outside powers has turned to re- pression and genocide in the hands of the. bloody obstinancy of the U.S. military. THE CONFLICT in Indochina began during World War II, at first as a nationalist movement to throw out the Japanese occupation forces. It continued as a war against the French, who at- tempted to resume their colonial role at the end of the world war. Militarily defeated by the Viet Minh in 1954, the French left Vietnam and the country was "temporarily" divided be- tween North and South under the pro- visions of the G e n e v a Accords. This agreement, which was never ratified by the United States, called for reunifica- tion of the country under a government to be elected in 1956.' When the time for elections came, how- ever, the right-wing Bao Dai govern- ment in the South refused to hold them and was supported by the United States. Had the elections been held, the country would almost surely have been unified under Ho Chi Minh, the most well-known I e a d e r 'of the Vietnamese nationalist struggle. Substantial n u m b e r s of those who moved north of the demilitarized zone in 1954 had actually been residents of areas under the Saigon regime. In the late 50's, many of these Vietnamese returned to the south to resume the fight against the Saigon government. FROM THEN ON, the conflict escalated, with increases in U.S. military in- volvement matched by increased military support for the National Liberation Front from Hanoi. As a result, the countryside has been decimated, the death toll staggering and the devastated h u m a n dislocation im- mense. Total recovery, even if the war were to end today, would take decades. Almost all of these horrors are directly attributable to the actions of the U.S. military. In fact, the U.S. government has never been able to produce a document show- ing that the Saigon government, then very unstable and dependent on Ameri- can support, ever asked for or agreed to the massive influx of U.S. troops in 1965. In a very concrete sense, this dramatic increase in troop level was simply an in- vasion of South Vietnam. Beyond the mere presence of U.S. troops and bombers, the manner in which the U.S. military has chosen to press the struggle has demonstrated the unprin- cipled immorality of American intentions and tragically added to the destructive- ness of the war. THE STORY of how the Vietnam War has been fought remains largely un- told because representatives of the press have been kept away from crucial battle zones and have only occasionally looked beyond official government statements. Nonetheless, certain patterns are be- coming increasingly clear. For example the My Lai massacre was not an isolated incident. As the frustration of the U.S. military was heightened by continual in- cramped cities where they can be effec- tively controlled by the Saigon govern- ment. Especially in the Mekong Delta area, those who refused to leave the homelands of their ancestors were wiped out by intensive bombing raids. Forced urbanization is now being employed in Cambodia as well. Between 1965 and 1968, the countryside of North Vietnam, especially the area near the DMZ was subjected to concen- trated destruction by B-52 bombers. The fire power of the bombs dropped during this period was greater than that of all bombs dropped during World War II. Even now, after the "cessation" of bomb- ing, U.S. planes conduct frequent bomb- ing runs over the North under the Catch- 22 guise of "retaliation" for the anti-air- craft resistance other U.S. bombers have received! MEANWHILE, THE bombing and chem- ical defoliation of S o u t h Vietnam continue on an expanded scale. And with the opening of hostilities in Cambodia, the pattern is being repeated there. U.S. bombers are operating in tactical support of government troops, and in an attempt to destroy the supply trails from North Vietnam to nationalist Cambodian forces. That massacres, bombings and forced urbanization were carried out at all is shattering to all moral sensibilities. That they were carried out in support of gov- ernments like those in Saigon and Phnom Penh o n 1 y underscores t h e mythical character of the claim that the real con- cern of the U.S. government is democracy for the Indochinese people. THE PRESENT m i1i t a r y government came to power in a military coup cul- minating a series of such takeovers last- ing about 18 months. At a minimum, this coup had the passive support of both the U.S. military and the Central Intelligence Agency. Since then, the takeover has been "legi- timized" by the 1967 "democratic" elec- tions in South Vietnam. In that vote, however, the Thieu-Ky ticket garnered substantially less than 50 per cent of the vote. The r u n n e r u p in the elections, Troung Dinh Dzu, captured about 30 per cent of the vote running on a ticket sup- porting a coalition government for South Vietnam. He was soon after sentenced to five years in jail by the Thieu govern- ment under a law which made it a crime to advocate a coalition government. He is still in prison. So are several members of dissenting factions of the National Assembly. So are many South Vietnamese students who have objected to compulsory military training in the universities. So are many newspaper e d i t o r s and reporters who have broken the government's strict cen- sorship rules. Clearly, the Saigon regime has no re- gard for any of the basic principles of democracy. OBSESSED BY the ideology of the cold war, the United States was drawn deeper and deeper into the quagmire of Vietnam. Failing to adequately bolster the Sai- gon government by aid alone, massive numbers of troops were committed. Find- ing the Vietnamese people solidly antag- onistic, the military turned to the wide- spread terrorism of random slaughter. Faced with a government in Saigon that was acceptable to neither Vietnam nor America the military created one that was repressive enough to maintain con- trol and, at the same time, structurally democratic so as to lend some semblance of sanity to the claims of a desire for democracy. No extension of this policy can rectify the damage that has been done to the people of Vietnam. The issue is still self- determination for South Vietnam and Cambodia, and self-determination will never be accomplished as long as U.S. troops and bombers remain in these countries. IMMEDIACY IS the key to making even " total withdrawal an acceptable solu- tion to the war. For by using a prolonged disengagement, the U.S. is molding Viet- nam in a way that may become increas- in el ir-n rh1 r- a crvnn. 91- By LINDSAY CHANEY PRESIDENT NIXON'S recent call for an additional 1,000 FBI agents to deal with campus unrest and aerial hijacking bolsters the grand old tradition of the G-men - a tradition which, unfortunately, is outdated by about 30 years. The FBI tradition was born in the 1930's when ,the G-men spent their time chasing glamorous gangsters in exploits that garnered headlines across the country. Be- cause of the publicity thus generated, the Bureau culti- vated an image as a super-efficient police force whose actions were always in the national interest and whose motives were beyond reproach. Although the era of the shoot-'em-up gangster is ov- er, the FBI spends much of its time trying to maintain the image that was built up during the 1930's. One way of doing t h i s is concentrating on headline-grabbing crimes such as kidnapings and bank robberies. Another is to make sure the Bureau has impressive statistics on numbers of felons caught, arrests made, conspiracies broken, and the other activities by which police forces justify their existence. To bolster the yearly statistical report and hence make themselves appear even more efficient, the FBI regularly pursues trifling criminals, such as those who fail to record a change of address with their local draft board. Such people are fairly easy to trace, and become another number on the list of "federal fugitives appre- hended." FBI priorities in the area of law enforcement are thus determined by what will h e1p to maintain the "image" of the Bureau. Because of these priorities, per- haps the most serious crime problem - that of organ- ized crime - is practically ignored. Of course, there is some effort devoted to breaking up big time crime, but the slow work necessary to build a case against the mob- sters does not produce statistics which will preserve the "image" of the Bureau. DUE TO the large amount of publicity which any FBI effort at breaking up organized crime receives, some people are under the impression that the Bureau is ex- tremely active in this area. Unfortunately, this impres- sion is misleading. Given the damage and pain caused by organized crime compared to that caused by petty crime, the proportion of FBI resources spent on organ- ized crime is out of balance. This criticism of the FBI is not to imply that it is composed of bumbling idiots - it is probably the best trained police force in the world. Its agents receive con- tinuing in-service training and make use of the latest technical developments in criminology. However, the legitimacy of an organization whose priorities are deter- mined by what will maintain its "image" is questionable. The principal'cause of the misguided priorities and operation of the FBI is the simplistic notions of right and wrong and the excessive power of J. Edgar Hoover. Within the bureau, Hoover's word is law. Agents who disagree with him often find themselves transferred to remote regions of the country, or asked to resign. good for everyone else, he distributed weight charts put out by an insurance company and decreed that each agent be within the "desirable" limit for his height and frame. Although the insurance company intended the charts to be only approximate guides, the Bureau took them as the absolute authority. Agents were turned down for pro- motions for being one pound over the "desirable" mark, and at least one agent collapsed and died while attempt- ing to reach his "desirable" limit by means of a crash diet. One of Hoover's fanatic obsessions for over thirty years has been the "Great Menace of Communism." Through the 1940's, 50's and 60's. the FBI trailed known Communists and compiled extensive and elaborate files on their activities and the people they met. Recently, how- ever, according to columnists such as Russell Baker and Art Buchwald, Communism has resigned from its post as the Great Menace, and the position will soon be filled by the American college student. Hoover, being in tune with such changes, has given indications he will pursue the college student "menace" with the same or even greater vigor than that with which he pursued Communism. One such indication was an op- en letter to college students, entered into the Sept. 23 Congressional Record, in which Hoover "exposed" the methods by which radicals "entrap" unwary, uncom- mitted, students. OF COURSE, FBI involvement with and infiltration of radical groups has been going on for some time. It is the FBI's record in this area which causes uneasiness at the prospect of an additional 1,000 agents joining the game. The purpose of FBI undercover agents in radieal groups is supposedly to spot advocates of violence and act in time to prevent massive property damage and loss of life. However, there is increasing evidence to indicate the FBI encourages students to acts of violence, and makes ar- rests after the event. Such tactics are fine for the pur- pose of increasing arrest statistics, but the people who are arrested would probably never have committed their crime in the absence of the FBI provocateurs. An example of FBI action with regard to radical groups comes from three American Civil Liberties Union lawyers who have charged that a paid FBI informer was - acting on FBI instructions - the principle advocate of violence during disturbances at the University of Ala- bama Tuscaloosa campus last May. The lawyers claim the agent was often the only advocate of violence at numerous radical groups' meetings. The FBI's questionable priorities, its dominance by one man, and its autonomy are sufficient reasons to de- mand that the myth behind which the Bureau operates be erased and the inner mechanisms of the Hoover ma- chine be exposed to public scrutiny. The proper instru- ment to acconplish this objective would be a Congres- sional investigation. However, the chances of such an in- vestigation being initiated are slim, due to Hoover's po- litical pull in Washington. * 1 -Daily-Richard Lee AN ANN ARBOR agent of the FBI stands guard in the Student Activities Bldg. this summer. The FBI attempted to gain access to one of the student offices where, they claimed, allegedly stolen federal property from North Hall was being held. Hoover's influence over bureaucratic structures ex- tends beyond the FBI. His access to personal files makes him a valuable friend for various politicians, and these politicians in turn see that no one from the outside in- terferes with the management of the Bureau. As a result, although the FBI is supposedly under the jurisdiction of the Justice Department a n d Attorney General, it has developed into an autonomous entity and is held accountable to no one. With no effective checks from outside or within, the FBI is thus guided by the mental aberrations of an aging man who lives a third-of-a-century in the past. His ob- sessions, fantasies and daydreams, ludicrous though they may be, are transformed into FBI policies. A PRIME example was the weight program instituted by Hoover in 1958 when doctors advised him to lose a few pounds. Deciding that what was good for him was 0- U' housing funds: A question of pri~orities. (EDITOR'S NOTE: The fol- lowing article is an official position paper of the Ann Arbor Tenants Union.) As everyone knows, there is a housing shortage in Ann Arbor. The private housing market is in- operative. This is not really the fault of the private housing in- vestors; they cannot build be- cause of the state of the national economy. Loans for construction are only attainable at interest rates approaching 10 per cent; there has been no significant apartment construction in A n n Arbor since 1966 when the interest rate was under 6 per cent. In addition, restrictive zoning laws effectively forbid the construction of housing that is of high enough density to have low rent in the central campus area. An ineffi- cient bus system means that stu- dents cannot commute from the cheaper areas (if there were any). Together these factors mean there is no adequate low-price housing for students or the low- income employes of the Univer- sity in Ann Arbor. Not that the existing high priced housing is of high quality, it is mostly low quality. High rents are only pos- sible because the private housing supply has broken down. A n d those investors lucky enough to have invested in apartments in the early sixties - your landlords - are taking advantage of the situa- tion with the help of the Univer- sity's inaction. The University is the low-in- come renter's only possible hope. No one is predicting a sufficient increase in the private supply be- fore the mid-seventies. But any public university can finance hous- ing development at 3 per cent below the market interest rate. Since the University is the only group capable of doing so, it must break the housing market short- age that its expansion has creat- ed. Instead of doing this, however, the University has for ten years been following a policy of with- drawing from its responsibility for the housing supply in Ann Arbor. Increasingly, money for student housing has been a low priority in the annual University budgeting process. From 1957 until 1966 the University budgeted about $800,- 000 per year for support of stu- dent housing. However, beginning in 1967 that support declined, and it now stands at only $220,000. It is now policy not to supply hous- ing or to compete with local busi- nessmen. It is not that anyone in the Ad- ministration Building has been very much surprised by this de- veloping crisis - for 5 years there have been numerous inde- pendent reports and a special ad- visory committee urging the Uni- versity to invest in apartment style housing. But all advocates have been silenced with the same story, "that there is just no money available." They are 1 told each year that this particular year the budget is unusually tight. How is the University budget made and why is there no money for hous- ing? Is there a group of evil people in the administration build- ing who want to see the students suffer in inadequate housing and who are conspiring against us? Probably not. Perhaps our bril- liant financial planners have just evaluated each budget item mathe- what will be best for the stu- dents, but about what will make' their boss and fellow function- aries happy and secure. Not rock- ing the bureaucratic boat is what makes their boss happy. So every year each department in the Uni- versity gets the same fraction of the total budget that it got last year. Unfortunately the budgeting game is one that the Housing Of- fice is losing; this year $400,000 which has been previously alloted for housing construction has been "Since the University is the only force capable of doing so, it must break the housing market shortage that its expansion has created." :.::::': .::J:':;":i}..1}:}".:::: "Vs~m~it }" Jtsstsms#^ " "'"#s: sisi ss :V5# $ 1" :":}" t . "..5:":.'?'.:t: .": : ": having more "bureaucratic pull" than the Housing Office. This misallocation of resources is what the BAM strike was all about last spring: BAM said the University is not serving all the people of Michigan, that the Uni- versity is an upper class, white school and therefore racist. Flem- ing said he liked blacks but had no money for them because the University was already spending it on so many other more import- ant things. But think of all the things that the University does that are less important than end- ing the racist-elitist condition of the University of Michigan. One reason that this is a school of rich white students is that poor students cannot afford the high rents of Ann Arbor. Until t h e students, the poor, and the blacks in Ann Arbor force the University to reconsider its stance toward their welfare, the budget-makers will do nothing. The University was not going to chpange its old bureaucratic way of allocating money until BAM struck , last spring. Likewise, the University will never finance adequate low rent housing until the students and the poor take whatever action is necessary to make themselves heard. If we do not take action there will always be greedy ad- ministrators to suck up the bud- get for such irrelevant expenses as walkie-talkies for the garden- ers and the Univeristy Golf Course. matically and have discovered that everything the University does including raking leaves is more important at its present lev- el than more dollars for housing. This is certainly not a valid con- clusion. The truth is that budgeting is a bureaucratic game. The function- aries who decide on the budget gave Student Housing this year about what they gave it last year; no one decided whether money for housing is better than money for the Plant Department. T h e s e administrators do not think about diverted to remodel the old Food Services Building and make it into neuroscience labs. The Tenants Union would like to know whether the budget-makers have decided that $400,000 for a neuroscience lab is better for the students, the citizens of Ann Arbor and, the general welfare of mankind than $400,000 to underwrite a loan to house 1000 students in low rent apartments (apologies to all neuroscience-freaks). We do not think any budget-maker ever thought about it; the Medical School merely won the battle by 4F, LETTERS TO THE DAILY Driving the Arabs into the desert?' To the Daily: I HAVE DULY taken note of the two letters appearing in to- day's Daily (Oct. 7) taking me to task for not being politically "cor- rect" with regard to the Middle East. The headline reads: "Driv- ing the Israelites into the Sea." I would suggest, however, that a more historically accurate title would be: "Driving the Arabs into the Desert." The two writers quote Arab sources to justify their attitudes. The first quote is over twenty-two years old! that is just too outdated to reflect accurately events of the area which change so drastically from week to week. None of the statements is more recent than 1967. One cannot use antiquated references to comprehend f r e s h Arab question must surely con- sist of a secular state of Pales- tine where the Palestinian Arabs can live with rights equal to those of the Palestine Jews. While it is often argued by Zionists that Palestine is the national home- land of the Jewish people (Bal- four Declaration), let us not for- get that it is also the national homeland of the Palestinian Arabs. Even the most casual observer must surely realize that the 1.5 million Arab refugees living on 10 cents a day in UN ghettos form the underlying question. Offer these peace with justice and the whole problem will evaporate. T h e s e hapless refugees have come to believe in a new type of A r a b Zionism which dreams of a re- turn to their national homeland, a homeland that lies within sight of their squalid camos. After all. Mr. Egner's first point is that "time-honored political tradition dictates" that a politician support a member of his own party who is running for elective office. What Mr. Egner fails to realize is that this tradition, though it may have been somewhat applicable in the past, no longer holds water. In the past, the two parties were fairly different from one another in their view of the nature and role of government. This difference be- tween the two parties has stead- ily diminished, and it is now in- cumbent upon every concerned Republican to disavow a member of his party who, for all practical purposes, better represents t h e prevalent views of the Democratic Party. Presumably, one enters politics to attempt to achieve certain mendable, and not wrong, for Mr. Agnew to have denounced Senator Goodell. Finally, does "time-honored pol- itical tradition dictate" t h a t Democrats support, or at least "keep their mouths shut about," the southern white racists among their own ranks? -Alan Harris, Chairman U.M. New Republican Coalition Oct. 8 f 1f 9 / " O / i 44 i