- why then this restlessness? Auto strike III: Whaddya think, when will it end? by tuart gannes WILLOW RUN A HUGE TRACTOR-TRAILER truck rumbled down Tyler Road past the gates to the Chevy Assembly Plant, its teamster driver waving and honking to the squinting, shirt-sleeved men on the UAW picket line.' "Man that sun is bright," a sports-shirted worker noticed as he shuffled over to the line, "I ain't used to this kind of weather." If you aren't familiar with the weather in Michigan, and you were out on the picket line at the gate to the Chevy plant in Willow Run last Thursday, you might have been fooled into thinking it was still suimertime rather than the first day of October and the seventeenth day of what may well be one of the most gruelling auto- workers' strike in the history of the industry. The men on picket duty stood in groups of two or three in the sun near the gate to the factory, par- ticipating in their never-ending discussions of the merits of various cars. Cassady, his back propped by the com- pany's Cyclone fence, paged through a copy of the Detroit Free Press, pausing to gaze at the business section and then stopping to concentrate on the want-ads. A few men gathered around the pick-up truck of the picket-captain who had brought a case of cold pop which he was selling for 20 cents a can ... * * * ON THE OTHER SIDE of the driveway to the fac- tory, a UAW tent, rented for the strike, flopped in the fall wind. During rainy days, most of the picketers seek its shelter. But last Thursday was sunny. If you walked into the shade of the tent last Thurs- day, you were a black man or a journalist. And if/ you were a journalist, it wasn't hard to discover that you were out of place. At any rate, I walked into the tent. "How ar'ya man?" came a voice from the floor. Pretty. good, and you? "Not bad ... What'cha here for?" I work for the Michigan Daily in Ann Arbor, and I'm doing a story on the UAW strike. "Well you can tell those people in Ann Arbor that this strike is a lot of booey-shit. We want to get back to work and make some money." Isn't that what the union is striking for? "Well, they is striking for more money, benefits and what not I mean . . . Listen man, I gotta go." Turning to a younger man leaning back in a corner of the tent I inquire: What do you think about the strike? "I don't know, I don't say too much, I just be in the crowd. Come action though, I be there. See, this strike is a bad thing . .. When a person ain't working, he gets the opporunity to steal . . . When I was 17 or 18 that's all I did." How old are you now? ''Nineteen." Are you worried about getting drafted? "Man, I don't even know my number. I never go down there. A lot of my relatives is already been killed in Vietnam." A third man walks in and sits down. Turning to him I ask: What do you do in the factory? "I put on starters . . . It's a pretty good job; you do your work and that's just it . . . I'm already an old many I'm thirty-one and wasting my life away. Last summer I separated from my wife. Now I do a lotta booze . . . Listen man, you got a cigarette? No? Well, I gotta go." BACK OUT BY THE GATE, the men were talking about the strike. "Yuh know," mused one of the workers, "GM's already raised the prices of the cars and we ain't even got a contract." "Yeah, it works out so every year they make more money," says another. "GM is so big . . . you could fill the whole state with their factories." "They're vast," says a third, "but I think we're gonna beat them. We're gonna bust their ass." How long do you think the strike will last? "I don't know. Why don't you go over there and ask them?" Walking up the driveway to the Chevy office, you notice the neatly manicured lawns, and the trim shub- bery and flowers surrounding the windows on the first floor. Try the main door, but finding it locked, walk around to the side. This door opens, but since nobody talks to you, sit down. The room's atmosphere is much different from the weather outside. The sun and the wind are gone. No trucks rumble nearby to shake the ground. Instead you hear the steady hum of ventilating fans whooshing through grills in the walls. The room is filled with IBM punch clocks, and rows of racks holding time-cards. Every minute, the machines collectively whirr, as they rearrange the numbers on their faces, Finally, a white shirted man walks up and looks me over: Hello, I'm from the Michigan Daily .. . "Are you waiting for a check? No? Well I can't help you." 4.I M4yt4itan Pathj Eighty) years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Boycott your stomach and feed your head 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mich. News Phone: 764--552 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers cor the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 8, 1970 NIGHT EDITOR: STEVE KOPPMAN By STERLING SPEIRN Daily Guest Writer AS THE LEAVES turn and the temperature drops, p e o p 1e throughout the country, butpri- marily in New England, are being warned about the threat of fuel shortages following closely on the heels of last summer's power shortages. Americans are of course asking who is to blame. They are being told the problem is a little of everybody's fault. To name a few culprits: the Federal Power Com- mission; the Atomic Energy Com- mission; the public and private utilities; the coal industry and its railroads, along with its striking miners; and finally, yesterday's hero and today's newest scape- goat, the environmentalists. fn a larger sense, however, this alarming situation provides an- other cortemporary illustration of the impoverished condition of the American spirit. First, it shows that the United States, one of the most future-oriented societies ever to exist, lacks the simple ability to plan ahead. For all those who once relied blind optimism on the foresight of resources allocators occupying positions of power, their faith has been destroyed. Second- ly, those who accepted the reign of technocrats over interlocking networks, aided by "whiz-kids" and trained systems of analyzers, can now observe the widespread effects of a few weak links giving way to the demands of the Amer- ican public. And thirdly, those who believed that having each person pursuing his own food would insure the well-being of the community should look now as domestic fuel suppliers sell at a high price to exporters while schools, libraries and other public buildings face threats of brown or blackouts. Clearly what must be done with this crisis is to critically examine the larger social context in which these so called 'technical' tread 'hard') problems are arising. THERE IS A strong probability that substantial numbers of peo- ple may experience fuel cutbacks, shortages, or rationing sometime this winter. Barring extreme shortages that might lead to senseless suffering or death, power reductions and limitations may create the most propitious circum- e stances that could result at this ye time. I fWhat this country needs is, in Is the most literal sense, less wwer O to the people, any argument from y Consumers Power or Consolidated S Edisonto the contrary notwith- standing. The reasons are these. Production and use of power po- lutes, hence less power consump- tion equals less pollution. Second- ly, the quantity of the earth's e fossil fuel is finite and, atpresent, y Americans consume a shamefully d disproportionate amount, while _ over half of the people alive today don't know the pleasure of run- ning water, let alone hot running tlwater. In this light, can one in o good conscience purchase and use O such a thing as an electric can r opener? Finally the overcon- sumption of power in America has r helped create a synthetic environ- m ent that has incapacitated the yT American people. 9 While the reduction of power o consumption is a small step, it could mark a significant begin- try. If a cutback on the use of power was viewed as a return to equilibrium rather than as a sacri- fice or temnporary inconvenience, it might aid the country in retaining consciousness of the impact of its life-styles on the environment, other peoples and itself. THE LIST of possible ways to reduce power consumption is end- less. The aluminum industry con- sumes almost 10 per cent of the industrial power used in this coun- try, and much of that goes for making aluminum cans. Recycling, no matter how extensive, cannot reduce the power required to make and re-make a aluminum can. They should not be made at all. And not all of those inefficient household items are necessary. Also instead of keeping their homes excessively warm during the winter people -ould wear sweaters. In Western Europe, the per capita consumption is one-half that of the U.S. Yet life there is not considered unusually uncom- fortable by Americans. Certainly when relative deprivation means going without air conditioning, a garbage disposal, and atpersonal car, Americans as individuals and as a culture are in serious trouble. A decrease in the consumption of power might also serve as a model for lower levels of consump- tion in other areas. Hopefully an initial attack might be made on that disgusting phenomenon which is only the elitist's privilege and flourishes in America-overeating. Dr. Paul Erhlich of Stanford Uni- versity has remarked that an average American baby born to- day has a pollution and consump- tion capacity 50 times that of a child born in India today. If any- one would be a revolutionary to- day, and sincerely witness the tragic physical conditions and suf- fering millions experience daily, he can begin by denying himself food he does not need or power he can do without. Our "consumers' society" should and must radically de-emphasize consumption out of a desire and responsibility to provide more for those who have less, out of fear for the world's eco-system and of the dangers man is creating for himself. Prof. Rene Dubos of Rockfeller University has pointed out that the real threat to the quality of human existence is man's very adaptability. The in- creased use of powers and the resultant loss of human physical and mental exertion affects people physiologically and psychological- ly. How long shall this continue before we realize we 'have traded health for mere survival? And yet the obstacles to such a turnabout appear almost insur- montable. The new environmental coalitions have performed a much needed service by analyzing, docu- menting and publicizing the pre- carious state of this nation's and many of the world's eco-systems. But they have fallen short in the task of illuminating the implica- tions that true ecological thinking holds for the "American way of life." IT SHOULD BE clear that any- one opposing excessive consump- tion should also oppose the ethic of American advertising, whose overpaid advocates work not to inform the public, but to "crative- ly" introduce a material good or service between every human itch and scratch. He who opposes over- consumption opposes the American predilection for growth, the idola- trous worship of and the chronic dependence upon an expanding economy, and constantly increas- ing GNP (which many have re- marked is just that, gross). But growth must not be blindly sup- ported. Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of a cancer cell. Instead people must learn to talk in minimums. What is the mini- mum number of people, the mini- mum amount of power, the mini- mum amount of food, etc., re- quired to create a humanly en- joyable and culturally stimulating civilization? Still further the equality of the American character cannot be ig- nored. Historian David Potter of 'Stanford described it: "In his personal economy, so- ciety expects him to consume his quota of goods - of auto- mobiles, of whiskey, of tele- vision sets - by maintaining a, certain standard of living, and it regards him as a 'good guy' for absorbing his share, while it snickers at the prudent, self- denying, abstemious thrift that an earlier generation would have respected." And finally those who reject over-consumption are against the power companies who in o n e breath advertise appliances or en- courage industry to come and set- tle where they can provide all the "cheap" power, and in the next, scream that more land' is needed to build atomic power plants or huge reservoirs to keep pace with the demands of the people, de- mands the power barons them- selves helped create. IN VIEW OF the imminent fuel and power shortages, it is likely that much of the resistance by the environmentally minded to the raping of Alaska will dissolve amidst cries of "More power, more crude, now." Or licenses will be more easily forthcoming from the AEC for atomic plants like that of Consumers Power near South Haven, (The safety qualifications of that installation are receiving a scathing scrutiny at the current hearings in Kalamazoo thanks to the lawyers hired by the Sierra Club.) Necessity shall be the mother of inventions, and these inventions shall cause one ecol- ogical catastrophe after another. Unfortunately the laws of na- ture cannot be determined by majority vote. In the interim, there may be more power, b u t in the end there will be less life. The real crisis today is not a lack of power or fuel, nor is it a lack of "control" of our environ- ment. The problem has its deepest roots in disfunctional cultural val- ues and social relationships that are no longer viable. Exploitation of man and the exploitation of nature \ are ulti- mately related. One difficult ques- tion is: Can men be realistically expected to begin to treat the land around them with respect when they have not yet begun to treat their fellow men with the same respect? And another is, how shall people bring themselves to realize that no thing and no man exists in isolation and that all are re- lated? Until these questions and many more are answered, the United States will continue to organize it- self into two large parts: o ri e working night and day to piovide power and goods to satisfy a n d stimulate the country's consump- tinve aberrations, and the o t h e r working equally as hard in the defense industries to protect this consumptive process. Let the revolution begin today. Boycott your stomach, and feed your head. (Sterling Speirn is a first year law student who graduated from, Stanford last spring with a de- gree in political science.) Aw 4 " Using the bludgeon on Goodel] rME-HONORED political tradition dic- tates that Democratic politicians sup- port Democrats and that Republican pol- iticians support Republicans for elective office. If theppols just can't bring themselves to support another candidate of t h e i r party, they customarily at least keep their mouths shut about/him, out of good manners. Few politicians, especially those in high office, h a v e ever publicly de- nounced another member of their own party. Even fewer have done it and sur- vived. And then came Spiro Agnew. No ordi- nary politician, Agnew has never con- sidered himself bound by the rules of pol- itics or good manners. In fact, he behaves as if he is above those rules. And now he's proven this once again, by attacking a "radical-liberal" within the Republican's own ranks - New Y o r k Sen. Charles Goodell. Agnew's conception of the Republican party is rather different from Senator (nofiP11's. W h 11 e Ag'new thinks, of then And so it would be no great loss to thi GOP, Agnew maintains, if Goodell wer defeated in his bid for re-election in No vember. Just to makensure everyone get this message, Agnew has come close ti endorsing, Goodell's Conservative Part; opponent, James L. Buckley, brother o: right-wing columnist and editor William Buckley. HOW WILL Agnew's attack on Goodel effect the outcome of the election? Nc one knows for sure. Goodell is running three-way race, opposing Buckley a nc Democratic Rep. Richard L. Ottinger, an other "radical-liberal" type. If Agnew's attack is successful, it wil send conservatives of all parties i n tc Buckley's c a mp and anger Democratic liberals who had intended to v o t e fo: front-runner Ottinger into voting fo: Goodell. .By doing this, Agnew may b able to split the liberal vote more evenly between Ottinger and Goodell, denying either a plurality, and send Buckley tc the Senate with solid conservative back- A TRUE ADVENTURE The great Coca-Cola ripof story (Dear Editor Jim: How about an editor's note above the Coke story, just saying that it is ALL 100 per cent true and that I'll swear to it in court. Other- wise, they'll never believe it.-Jonathan) > }tt".:hu By JONATHAN MILLER: r ,s:wa:s:{, The scenario: r xs} ' . . Myself, thirsty and in need of the phychological reassurance that Ds th sta d dsseller of CoamCola y A Coke machine.tm Aenickel(howbot that,e hve ay nick el Coke machine). The same tired tradition. Find the money, put it in the slot, wait fort to fall out of the return coin hole onto.the floor:and.repeat with a low body hit to the Coke machine with a left o the side- CTHUNKsssh. My bottle lay there, nestling in the bottle chute. Tenderly I picked itup and then, horror of horror, I saw it was onl mylcblnompn onyoethird ful Disgusted I sat down at mydeskafan plled noutatsh, "o D stationery and wrote them a letter telling them that if you could not <. rely on a Coke bottle to be full anymore then America was really in trouble, This'll impress them I said to myself as I sealed the letter in a bond paper Daily envelope. I sat back to wait.":sd,""aa? The reply came. It was a scream. I still have it, if you want to come in t 2 Maynard42 sometime when you're feeling depressed =:'' ;:; .":,<.*.' ;- please do).>f I was apologised to with a note of sarcasm and advised to complain tmlclbtlnco an.I picked up the telephone and called information, "Phone of Ann Arbor Coca Cola company please?" "How do you spell that please?"}: .--' >:{i :: : ' "Are you kidding," I said, "Coca Cola?" "Oh," she said. and gave f it e. '. }~* ~