I rie Mirligan Baity Eighty-one years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan supersciription Good Humor: Laughs sold at others' expense by lynn weInerI p. 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mich. News Phone: 764-0552 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must bJ noted in all reprints. SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1971 NIGHT EDITOR: LINDSAY CHANEY i I I .". ,. - .. ; ", .. ,. ,' . ,. m ti , a - I ~a. -MD "People can't laugh at themselves anymore." Daily sports staffer, 197il NOPE, PEOPLE can't laugh at them- selves any more. Pity. Aren't the cartoons with this column clever? Why should Communists, immigrants, or Jews be offended by the art work of the White Nationalist Party, and why should women be insulted by the advertisement in this month's Gargoyle? The creators of the two cartoons are white males, and humor is poked at those who are non-"white" or non-male. The creators are not offended, for the butt of the joke is a member of a minority. class of society which is threatening in some way to the elite and therefore must be undercut with laughter. And so 'we suffer under a deluge of Polish, chicano, "womens lib", or sexual jokes which aim to minimize the move- ments they concern and to bolster the self- image of the white male elite who deter- mine that what is funny is what they are not. The phenomena of this political humor are used as a tactic to stave off rising cul- tural and social groups by demeaning them. But these minorities are no longer passively accepting the use of their stereo- types to define the non-humorous - the "to be taken seriously" white male cul- ture. AMERICAN INDIANS, for example, an- gered by a 90-minute comedy skit on the Glenn Campbell television show, confronU- ed television officials last week with de- mands to delete the serialized skit and to give them air time to answer it. And chicanos have protested the "Frito Ban- dito" stereotype nationally, and locally have fought such stereotypes as a Daily ad of a lazy Mexican inviting the campus to a meeting, in standard dialect. The original "stereotype" was a metal printing plate cast from a mold made from set type. Now, the word connotes a mental image cast from a one-dimensional mold of thinking, a mold which -is in the refer- ence of the elite group as it catalogues the world to its standards. In this sense,dhumoraimed at groups of people with the goal of denigrating them AY,_ THfY;RE RE~ALLY I~CE WHEE DID O~YU GErT T f SE I > KR 4 S F J, 1 *- =_-_ I - _ - 7 . r " ,eA- _, _ --''-- i is as political, ina covert way, as the Nazi hate literature or Southern anti- black material is, in an overt, blatant man- ner. THE DAILY sports pages often illustrate the covert politics of humor. Last week Associate Sports Editor Rick Cornfeld wrote a column using the meta- phor of a woman as a football, in what one sports editor termed a "light, clever style." "They treated the ball as if they were gingerly trying to make advances on a scared, whimpering girl." "The few times the gawkeyes had the ball they acted as if the pigskin might slap them if they squeezed it in the wrong places." "Even if you ignore the visiting cheer- leader who a few weeks ago got passed up the stands while horny sports fans tried to cop feels, Michigan games do provide their moments of interest." Examples of a light, clever style? Or of a political attitude which detremines that women are objects - and so which is clev- er only to those who accept this vision of women and who wish to reinforce it with all its social implications? And Gridde Pickings - the Daily sports feature in which readers guess the out- come of football games - continually prints "funny" copy about women or gay people, the most obvious threat to the standards of macho football culture. Other student publications also mirror the elite humor. The Gargoyle, the inter- mittently-published ,magazine which will be sold this week, overflows with copy which is "funny" to a select audience - the white, male University student. A full page on "Kinner's Easy Cares Abor- tion Kit," a cartoon of a black being arrested with the cutline "Police search for M&M chocolate mess," a photograph of a Buddhist monk in front of a tank4 with a caption "need pressing done?" and the advertisement of the woman prited in this column - all are humorous to the humor elite in the same political way as hate propaganda is to other self-styled elites. NO, PEOPLE can't laugh at themselves any more. But it's tremendously easy for some to laugh at others - ind to be be- wildered when their hollow chortles are not joined by the objects of their scorn and fear. . - _. 'R-~.,r - "We're not going bock 100 years! . . . Just to 1954!", Letters: Candidates respond to The Daily REFLECTIONS Zhivago at the U' and an indictment To The Daily: IF THE STAFF of The Daily had not been so fascinated with their own cigar smoke and the perpetual ad- justment, of a shelf that kept falling down during my interview, they might have gleaned more of my politics than "traditional Left rhetoric." However, since striking the pose of 'macho re- porters' seemed to be more crucial than the content of the interview, it is I who must bear the onus of their frivolous attitudes towards reporting. While' recognizing that other candi- dates besides myself have little or no experience with SGC, The Daily feels this is particularly significant in my case, while mysteriously unimportant in others. The fact that I have at- tended only one SGC meeting came out of my observation that people are isolated from all levels of politics, in- cluding SGC, largely because 'politics' are mystified: people don't under- stand the workings of it, or what it can do for them. I want to promote the idea that politics is accessible, to all, while The Daily scorns that any- one who hasn't sat through endless hours of "Point of order!" bullshit can know their ass from their elbow. The mystification of politics is no more rhetoric and no less a fact than the Vietnam war or police occupation of the ghetto communities. Finally, The Daily claims that I have based my campaign on the fact that I am a woman. This is such a distortion of what I told them on the topic that it's hard to believe it wasn't willful on their part. I pointed out that women were under-represented among the candidates and that I was responsive to the needs and interests of the community of women. The Daily rightly values such group identifica- tion on the part of the Asian students who are running (since they are "good liberals", racism is 'out') but sexism still goes: women's oppression is more a source of amusement than something to be taken seriously. By the Daily's dubious standards, I am 'not recommended" as a candi- date for SGC. I return the compli- ment and do not recommend The Daily for anything more than uncon- scientious, biased reporting, -Allison Stieber SGC Candiate Radical People's Coalition Nov. 12 To The Daily: IT IS NOW 4:30 as I sit writing phis letter in East Quad, and I have half an hour left to respond to The Daily's screw job SGC election en- dorsements. So please excuse me if I am not clever and witty or polished out merely brief. ;estion for SGC projects as one would surmise from the Daily's article. Both Allison and I opposed appear- ing before The Daily, and we must take 2he blame for allowing ourselves to be pressured into participating in this togie and Southern Com-fort game. But for future candidates, a word to the wise - make use of Student Ac- Jon. -Jean Teshima SGC Candidate Radical People's Coalition Nov. 12 LSA Student Govt. To The Daily- I AM WRITING in regard to Chris Parks' article "Heated Meeting: LSA Student Gov't picks VP" (Daily, Nov. 11) and Rick Perloff's quixotic quest -- "Responses to a Speech" (Daily. Nov. 11). Wednesday's LSA Student Government meeting was my last meeting as a member-at-large of the Executive Council. During my year of student government work I have seen an ineffectually operating coun- cil become prevented from ever being effective by the ego of one of itt's newer members. Under David Brand and Brian Ford., the first president and vice president, the government was ineffective. This was due primarily to the structure of the government - council did not have its total membership until a year after its instigation. There was also apathy on the part of the student body to contend with as well as disinterest by The Daily, who refused to even cover the meetings. To pick up The Daily this morning and read a one-sided account of last night's meeting written by a Daily re- porter who was not even there, has infuriated me. Yes, council members, Russ Bikoff and Bob Black did walk out of the meeting (undoubtedly straight over to the Daily building). But only because Black didn't get his own way. The vice-presidential selec- tion was not ramrodded t h r o u g h council. It is Black's fault if he didn't get a chance to voice his objections to the election -- he was too busy telling his cohorts how to vote when objections were asked for. Further,when asked w hy elections should not be held last night, Black gave no good reason. Eve ryoneknew, however, that he wish- ed to wait until his puppets, running for council, were seated. Black forgot the most important qualification of the VP - to be able to work effectively with the President. Black clearly wish- ,s to further ineffectualize council. It seems contradictory that the or Black's in the article, Who's try- ing to shove who? -Francine Hymen Member-at-large LSA Student Governmept Executive Council Nov. 12 Editor's note: The picture appearing nexthto Rick Perloff's article was plac- ed there by mistake, Harris on tax To The Daily: I HOPE The Daily will give as much space to this support of a city income tax as it did to HR-RIP's attack on such a tax. In fiscal 1972-3 the City of Ann Arbor must either increase its taxes or drastically cut existing city serv- ices. We are $3,000,000 short of being able to maintain the identical serv- ices provided in 1970-1. We are about $4,000,000 short of the City Adminis- trator's "desirable standards" budget: a moderate improvement in human re- sources programs accompanied by im- proving the staffing of the fire, po- lice and parks departments-all of which are well below accepted stand- ards of ratio of city employes to popu- lation. We are far more than $4,000,000 short if you desire-as I do- to do more about environment problems, traffic problems, in-service training of police, etc. Unless the city raises taxes con- siderably, we will be laying off large numbers of city employes in 1972-3 and reducing all city services sharply, instead of increasing services as we should be doing. And each succeeding year that we continue without an in- crease in taxes, the 'layoffs and the service cuts will get worse-to the tune of about one million dollars per year. Michigan law provides cities with only three ways to raise taxes: (1) adopt the Michigan Uniform City In- come Tax-1 per cent with a $600 per person exemption; (2) increase pro- perty taxes: and (3) increase user charges, such as parking rates and parking fines. Of the three alterna- tives, the Uniform City Income Tax is mildly progressive (because of the $600 per person feature) and the other two are strongly regressive. Hence the Democratic Party's sup- port of the Michigan Uniform City Income Tax as the best of the avail- able alternatives. Democrats in the Michigan House are presently fight- ing to put on the state ballot a pro- posed constitutional amendment which would permit progressive rate city and state income taxes City Democrats are suoporting this effort. However, to date Senate Republi- cans have blocked the effort and nei- ther House Democrats nor Governor issue when it says we should not be passing the 1 per cent city income tax now, but should instead be lobby- ing for a steeply graduated city in- come tax. Such lobbying is going on, but it is a long road and the city needs money right now. HR-RIP objects that some of the new money that would be raised by an income tax would go to expand the police department-or at least to pre- vent its further contraction. But HR- RIP fails to explain how a city is to retain and attract good police officers while overworking them and giving them poorer wages than other com- munities. Nor does it explain how we would institute in-service training if we lack funds either to increase the size of the force or pay overtime for training. Nor does HR-RIP explain how it would meet the 26 per cent increase in police calls in the last year while we are contracting the size of the force. Not even HR-RIP will deny that an adequate police force may be import- ant while burglary, rape, and heroin sale are apparently on the increase. Nor will HR-RIP deny, I assume, that the overworked police officer is more likely than the rested officer to make a dangerous mistake. I have never suggested that all new revenue would go to police. Nor have I denied that some of it would go in that direction, just as some of it would go to human resources programs. If we have no income tax next year and we have to make drastic cuts in all departments, the police and the fire department will not be the only departments slashed. Inevitably, the cuts will come in bus transportation, human rights, emergency housing, day care center funds, drug treatment, Oz- one House, housing inspectors, plan- ning, parks, recreation, and the traf- fic and road programs, too. Respectfully, I suggest that HR-RIP is irresponsible in refusing to face the bitter fact that the city is currently facing a four-way choice: (1) adopt the Uniform Michigan City Income Tax; (2) increase the property tax; (3) increase parking rates and fines: or (4) slash all city services dras- tically. There is no fifth alternative and it is intellectually dishonest to pretend such ar alternative exists. -Robert J. Harris, Mayor Oct. 27 Editor's note: City Council rejected a bid Monday to enact the Michigan Uniform City Income Tax for Ann Arbor and instead voted to place the issue on a city-wide advisory referendum in Feb- ruary.r .! aigont To The Daily: WHILE THE corner of State and Washington Streets has never been my By ROBERT BERNARD Daily Guest Writer DR. ZHIVAGO, at the tender age of 114, has consented to give and has just completed a series of lectures at the University of Mich- igan. He is sitting by himself on one of the concrete benches on the Diag taking his pulse. Up approaches a rather dazed young man. "Have you seen any of our literature?" "No." l f " "Christ is with all of us." "That may very well be." "The world is drowning in its own sinfulness. We. must all rediscover Christ." "How?" "By knowing that he is us and we are him. That in his spirit I love you and you love me." "But you don't even know me." "Let me read to you from the Scriptures." The young lad reads and reads while Zhivago does deep breathing exercises. A half hour later the young lad goes chasing after a couple walking across the Diag. Zhivago rises and staggers toward his room in the League when a rather unkempt young lady shoves a leaflet in his mouth and an- nounces a demonstration protesting the failure of the University to hire mores female profes- sors. '.But I am not a member of this University," Zhivago gasps. "We are all involved in the struggle." "But doesn't someone have to go on living?" "Male chauvinist pig! I should give you a karate chop in the chest for that." She spits in his direction and walks off. Twenty paces from the League, Zhivago is asked for some spare change. "Would a doll'ar do?" Zhivago is given a mean sneer and the offended youth stalks off - love beads, lea- ther pants and all. Just as Zhivago -reaches for the door to the League, he feels a hand in his pocket. Before he can even turn his head, his wallet is lost to him forever. ZHIVAGO COLLAPSES to the mud, takes out his pad and scribbles something which the wind blows away. Thousands upon thousands of his closest friends attend his funeral and compete to see who can cry and shriek the loudest. Months later a University trashman spears a sheet of paper and out of curiosity reads it. "But whatever may be the circumstances of my death, please let me rot where I lie." He shrugs his shoulder, puts it in the bag, and goes back to snaring the usual multi-col- ored leaflets. THE LITERARY CRITIC Irving Howe once wrote that he refused to allow students in his freshman composition class to use the word 'alienation.' Howe's impatience w i t h r-etoric is understandable, yet this does not What is the graduate student confronted with? He must ingest all the same professorial garbage at a greatly accelerated pace and in addition must demonstrate his own capacity to produce similar rubbish in thirteen weeks or less. Rat colonies self-perpetuate. What is the junior member of a depart- ment confronted with? Not only must he per- form all the gut-work of his department, teach the intro courses, and kiss ass, but he must prove himself on the fiels, of battle within five years, i.e., produce yet another worthlep i book. It is the fourth criteria that will made or break him. A number of us believe there are two pri- mary reasons why Ameltican universities are of such low quality. First the academics do not do the reading and secondly they do not know how to write. Both criteria have rather involved explanationV. BY NOT DOING the reading, I mean two things. Within a man's specialty, the research- er does not adequately, carefully, and repeated- ly study his sources. It is not enough just to have glanced at Thomas Jefferson's Papers. They must be read again and again. The papers of all his major contemporaries must be read. The newspapers, periodicals, and pamphlets of the period must be perused. My second point implicitly flows from my first. Thomas Jeffer- son had a solid grasp of philosophy, literature, science, mathematics, poitical theory, theology, etc. To have read Jefferson adequately, one. must have read Plato, Tacitus, Aristotle, Locke Newton, et al. adequately. I do not believe this is being done - not at Michigan, nor at Harvard, nor anywhere else. It is almost hackneyed to use the term 'boring professor's book,' yet they are boring! I believe that style (or to raise the. discussion to a higher level-art) is a reflection of * man's totality. It reflects the depth of his 'knowledge, the depth of his thought, and very importantly the depth of his experience with life. It is difficult to pigeonhole academics, yet it has been my experience that they seem to enter school at age six, get their Ph.D at age twenty-six, retire at age sixty-six, and at n# time take a sabbatical to observe and immerse themselves in the day-to-day world six miles from their home. This is and is not laughable. In their journey through Academic Wonderland they have denied themselves and thus their victims the benefit of a healthy understanding of the actual world they claim to seek > understand and explain. The fact that so many students are so eager to escape the University after graduation and go anywhere else and do anything else but continue their studies is testimony to my argument. I BELIEVE there is a political explanation and an intellectual and political solution to th above stated problem. This is the most de generate epoch in the history of the most de- generate nation the world has ever experi- encedA. Naiturialy the TUniversity would reflect