4i e £f iaan na t Eighty-one years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Black Expo '71: A show of solidarity 4 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mich. News Phone: 764-0552 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. SATURDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1971 NIGHT EDITOR: SARA FITZGERALDI i Alternatives to SGC TIE RESIGNATION of four Student Government Council members at this week's meeting once again raises the question of SGC's legitimacy, its function and its future. Individual resignations from SGC are not unusual; each term one or two Coun- cil members become disillusioned with SGC, find that it conflicts with their personal activities or leave the Univer- sity. Thursday's resignations had some poli- tical basis in that the three members of the conservative Student Caucus who left SGC felt it served a purpose con- trary to their goals as student represen- tatives. But the politics behind the resig- nations must not be allowed to cloud the fundamental problems that beset SGC and threaten it on a plane that trans- cends polltial consideration. SGC has lbng borne challenges that it is not representative, that it is ineffec- tive, that it is unnecessary. And now, with four vacant seats to fill and one newly-appointed member, Council will be the brunt of even more intensified challenge. For, until the next regular SGC election in November, Council will comprise more appointed than elected members. It is no secret that SGC is weak and ineffectual. Nor is it a myth, on the other hand, that there are certain very valu- able functions which Council can and sometimes does perform. Thus, it is tragic indeed that SGC is strangling it- self with bureaucracy, destroying its promise by internal strife, and through- out this crisis, wallowing in apathy. Rather than abandon the sinking ship that SGC has grown to resemble, how- ever, it is prudent to consider alternative forms of student government while still maintaining the present system as a stop-gap measure. AMONG THE possibilities f or a differ- ent form of student government are three that bear serious consideration- a community-wide senate, a federation of task forces and a series of ad-hoc com- mittees set up in response to specific is- sues. Perhaps none of these would prove more effective and satisfying than SGC, but each merits careful review. The first proposal, a community-wide senate, entails the dissolution of Senate Assembly, the redistribution of power throughout the University including a complete revision of the executive offic- er concept and the demise of the Regents as pseudo landed gentry. Because this system would be truly aemocratic despite its mimicry of con- x