Page 4-Tuesday, April 3, 1979-The Michigar Daily U.S. must not return Marroquin to Mexico Today, Hector Marroquin, the Mexican student leader and political dissident, is scheduled to appear before' a deportation hearing in yet another ef- fort to convince the federal government that he should be allowed to remain in this country. A very strong case has already been presented on his behalf by his lawyers, torney General of Mexico was recently, forced to admit to certain "excesses" on the part of governmental agenices. It is only the U.S. government that in- sists on laundering the Mexican gover- nment's much tarnished image. After the 1968 Tlatelolco massacre of hundreds of peaceful demonstrators, the task has not been an easy one, but By Memo Torres "With t government hese actions, the U.S. to ignore a has chosen I . mass of evidence, and has refused to admit that Marroquin's life would be in danger if he is forced to return to Mexico. " DAY (S NOVOrTQT COMPANY/ m~o0IL.OIL' IeR Pop in the world. He maintains that not only is there close cooperation with the Mexican repressive apparatus, but that high officials up to and including presidents have received "payments" from the C.I.A. IF IT'S evident that the F.B.I. recognizes no borders with regard to its operations, then it should be pointed out that neither do the U.S. economic in- terests. Notwithstanding the indepen- dent posturing of that well known enemy of the Mexican people, President Lopez Portillo, both the economy and political system of Mexico are still very much dominated by the U.S. A very profitable partner- ship has long been established with the Mexican ruling elites, and it is of great importance to both parties that the status quo be preserved. The task of maintaining it has fallen mainly on the Mexican government with help from the U.S. Workers in Mexico - and in the U.S. too, for that matter - are victims of economic interests which do not recognize borders. When they migrate north as "undocumented" workers in search of survival, the U.S. government confronts them with a border it very conveniently ignores when it serves the interests of business. Mobility within this well-integrated economic zone (Mexican-U.S.) is reserved for the corporations. Workers are best kept divided, unorganized and docile. The so-called run-away shops (factories that move to cheap labor areas) have proven how profitable this can be by moving to Mexican border towns. The government provides tax incentives and guarantees a lack of labor unrest. Mexico's labor movement has been subjected to a long history of violent repression and exploitation through the government's use of corrupt labor "leaders." In spite of this, militancy for democratic unions exist, but at a very high price for the workers. Hector Marroquin's problems stem from his having voiced dissent against an un- democratic government and against the economic exploitation of his people. He, like other undocumented workers, has come to this country in search of survival and a chance to live a useful life. He, like other undocumented workers, deserves to have his human rights respected and given a proper hearing. His struggle is not the struggle of one person, but that of a whole people. Today's hearing will most likely result in another refusal for asylum, and it would be naive to expect anything else from a government whose interests demand a refusal. To grant official asylum would mean ad- mission of too many unpleasant realities. If Marroquin is to remain, it will have to be through pressure generated by popular support for his cause. Those persons wishing to show support are urged to attend a demon- stration on his behalf at the I.N.S. office in Detroit (Jefferson and Mt. Elliott) Friday, April 6, at 12 noon. Memo Torres is a member of the Ann Arbor Committee for Human Rights in Latin A merica. Mexican witnesses, and human rights groups in the U.S., Mexico and abroad (including Amnesty International). But, the State Department has nonetheless recommended that Marroquin, be deported, and on December 21, 1978, the Immigration and Naturalization Service denied him political asylum. With these actions, the U.S. government has chosen to ignore a mass of evidence, and has refused to admit that Marroquin's life would be in danger if he is forced to return to Mexico. EVIDENCE THAT violent political repression is a real and common oc- currence is so strong that even the At- Washington is sparing no effort in trying to erase history. Ignorance through lack of information is certainly an unlikely reason for such an unswer- ving loyalty to an undemocratic and repressive regime, since- the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. should be able to supply more than adequate information given their close ties with their Mexican colleagues. Much has been said and written on the extra-legal activities of these two agencies, both in this country and abrod. Marroquin's case is another example of the role they play in support of governments "friendly" to the U.S.' Papers acquired by Marroquin through the Freedom of Information Act, show that the F.B.I. gathered data on him: since he was a 15 year-old high school student. Philip Agee, the former C.I.A. agent, has stated in his book "Inside the Company", that the U.S. intelligence presence in Mexico is one of the largest 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Eigh ty-Nine Years of Editorial Freedom Vol. LXXXIX, No. 146 News Phone: 764-0552 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan dHash Bash must be ended O RIGINALLY created to give Uni- versity students an opportunity to smoke marijuana to urge passage of a more lenient penalty, the annual April fool's Hash Bash has become a farce. No longer the scene of hundreds of college students taking a day off to smoke on the Diag, the annual pot sit- in has served as a refugee for hundreds of high school students to invade the University. It was a disgusting scene on the Diag Sunday afternoon-a scene that should not be repeated again. And the only proper way to prevent a similar recurrence is to put the Hash Bash out of business. When the annual event was first initiated, many college students gladly participated, lighting up a joint and relaxing comfortably to listen to speakers calling for passage of a more lenient punishment. On one such oc- casion a few years ago, newly-elected State Rep. Perry Bullard joined the large contingent of students and even lit up a joint himself. The annual gathering continued to feature mostly University students un- til the Ann Arbor City Council passed the $5 pot fine in 1973. That approval paved the way for the lenient system which.allows University students am- ple opportunities to smoke pot in public without fear of being disturbed. But gradually since that liberal legislation was passed, the Hash Bash has undergone a radical transfor- mation from a protest by college students to an assembly of high school pot smokers taking control of the University for a day. And Sunday was no exception. Besides spreading litter across half the campus, the high school kids were very belligerent and hostile, causing a few scuffles with the police. And when the police asked several rowdy studen- ts to stop their unruly behavior, many refused. Also, the disruptions prevented many University students from studying in the Undergraduate and Graduate libraries. The University had to install security guards at various points across the campus to insure against penetration from out-of-town high school students. Unfortunately, for a few students who forgot to carry their identification cards to the libraries, this precaution proved to be very up- setting. The University was forced to resort to this measure because of the mess caused by the Hash Bash. The Hash Bash is no longer for University students; only a handful stay for more than a few minutes. It is a day for high school students from all over the state to pervert the Univer- sity. The University must take steps in the next year to make sure that the an- nual Hash Bash, which has lost its original purpose, is mercifully ended. THE MILWAUKEE JOUMAL . Dist. Field Newspaper Syndicate, 199 . About halfway through an American Studies discussion session a few Thursdays ago, the round-faced, full-bearded teaching assistant found himself trying to describe what he called a "false consciousness" that per- vades modern American thought. He'd asked the dozen students who gathered in his Mary Street apartment that evening - as they have for at least two hours every Thursday all semester - to prepare for the meeting by touring the Rouge River Ford plant and watching the movie "Blue Collar". David Papke, the TA, had in- troduced the topic as the last of the undergraduates settled into the sofas and corners of his small living room: "Is Fordism Americanism?" The discussion about a glittering showroom and roaring assembly line which led up to Dave's explanation of "false consciousness" wandered some, despite his admonition to be "analytic, not im- pressionistic." To an outside ob- server, they sounded like dorm floor neighbors talking over beers late at night, relaxed and inspired. Dave played the role of the wise senior; everyone com- peted to please him with astute or witty comments. THEY TALKED of the dulling effect of monotonous labor, the pressures that force us into chasing the dollar, the meaning of work on the line: Then Dave pointed out that the Rackham was Henry I's patent attorney, reminding the group they were talking "as if we're out of the shadow of Ford." They digressed to discuss the academy. "Lear- ning to function in a hierarchy," Dave suggested to nodding students, . is part of the educational message. Dave had gone for his education to Harvard from his native Milwaukee for an un- dergraduate degree. Then he went on to Yale for another in law, graduating in 1973 at 26. But he's decided he wouldn't take the bar exams.He didn't wanttto support, as a lawyer must, what he saw as the worst of Americanism - the "Fordism", if you will. So after a brief stint as a freelance journalist and lower- rng administrator at Yale, he turned scholar. He came to Ann Arbor last year - leaving his wife in New Haven - to earn a doctorate and begin the climb for tenure. So on this Thursday night, as the receptive students washed down chocolate-chip cookies with Stroh's, Dave could take knowing aim at our misdirected values. HE RECALLED a summer job he'd had on Wall Street during his law school days. The firm he was working for had just acquired leather wastebaskets to replace the aluminum ones. But there weren't enough for allthe junior partners. The lawyers lost sleep for weeks, said Dave, his sad eyes widening, because they weren't sure just who would get the coveted baskets. "They put real meaning in leather wastebaskets," he said with a broad grin. "Can you believe that?" They believed it and it prom- pted a renewed hunt for further examples of a warped America. Everyone reached to strike a responsive chord in their instruc- tor. Why wasn't a glimpse of the white collar workers part of the tour, someone asked. What is Ford hiding? THAT'S NOT the point, someone else cut in. You want to see shiny cars and bored workers. "It's the American utilitarian bias." At this point a woman volun- teered without apology or pride that her father works as a paper- pusher for the company. When asked about it, she said her dad doen't have much to say about his work, "it's boring stuff." Switching the subject, one man began: "This is an American Studies-type observation ... " THAT'S OKAY," came an in- terruption amid chuckles, "you're among friends .-. . "Well," the first continued, "they didn't try to beautify the place. I mean, there was no at- tempt at cosmetics. One school held that no one wants to see a pretty auto plant; another maintained there were in fact evident efforts to spruce up the plant. AS HE did several times dur- ing the session, Dave asked the group to "push" on the idea. Af- ter no one much pushed, he tried to raise the conversation to a more general level. "Do you feel like you experienced that auto plant, or do you feel like you had a tour of an auto plant?" Mixed response, everyone spoke at once. The meetings - Dave doesn't like to call it a "course" or "class" due to the I-talk-you- listen connotations - grew out of two discussion groups of an in- troductory American Studies class last semester. It's overseen by Prof. John King of the History Department (there are no American Studies professors sin- ce it's an interdisciplinary department). DAVERUNS the sessions with what he calls an "organic syllabus". Each week he chooses a new topic to work with, or he'll throw out a fewpossibilities for class vote. Last week the group had to decide between discussing Huck Finn or the movie "The Deerhunter" this week. Huck Finn won. Dave's idea is to break down what he calls the "frames" that constrict formal education. He's moved away from the classroom and blackboard, away from for- mal written exams and assigned AFTER CLASS Brian Blanchard papers, away from the professional image. But not quite. For there's no doubt to an outsider he's the broker of ideas. Dave seems to be a good teacher, and as such he encourages independent thought and intelligent questioning. But he's always guiding the discussions and thought doesn't get too independent. During the session on the auto tour, he was the only one present to quote from a source (a book of prison notes written by an Italian Com- munist from a generation ago), the only one to bring any established system of thought (usually the Marxist one) to bear on the problems, and the only one to try and define the shared ex- perience (in a summary exercise he contrasted the "form" and "content" of the tour). TO SAY DAVE had an ap- preciative audience isn't to say thinking wasn't evident. Dave mentioned that one woman had told him there- weren't enough "female voices" being heard at the meetings, so the next week would be devoted to poetry by women. The emphasis during the discussion admittedly wasn't-or facts, relying instead on im' pressions and feelings. But everyone in the room had something to say, and the two hours flew by. Dave, to use his own terms, has broken down the "form" of a Mason Hall hour-long class. No one has to raise a hand to speak beer and wine flow freely, and a fellow named°Al, the classclown, has a good deal of freedom to cut in with jokes about phallic sym- bols and drugged-out workers. But the "content" is maybe not so removed from the rest of the teaching in town. All eyes turn to Dave during disputes of fact or opinion, and his theses tend to carry the conversation. In using Marxist interpretation, he plays the same indoctrination game Capitalistic professors and TAs play. Dave's not like any teacher our parents ever had, but they'd recognize the "class" in the meetings. Daily Editor chard's column other Tuesday. Brian B/an- appears every Letters 'U'should give Samo ff tenure To The Daily: I have studied on four continen- ts in as many universities, and now here. For Dean Frye and Vice-President Shapiro to in- sinuate that we students do not have enough experience to decide are. How come our finance-smit- ten, shrinking enrollment- perturbed Political Science Dept. and LS&A leaders do not take note that Samoff's Southern Africa class has doubled in size in / two years? Something must be wrong about the war in Vietnam, the students were right, and look who was vindicated! Many of them were wrong or at least acquiescent about Nixon, whereas most students never titntpd theicr snd lnn m he ows gotten some of his campaign fun- ds now.) Black students on this campus are unfairly dealt with as the BAM strike showed, and may need to show again. And they are, oh so wrong, about Joel Samoff. All in all, that's a pretty bad