Page 4-Tuesday, February 27, 1979-The Michigan Daily 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Eighty-Nine Years of Editorial Freedom Who will be next president? Vol. LXXXIX, No. 124 News Phone: 764-0552 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan _ Grievance committee needs help from faculty group Committee on University A T AST WEEK members of a faculty Comte onUirsyA Agrievance committee publicly (SACUA) and the Senate Ass criticized the lack of influence they asking for support of its decision have on University decisions. Several .he reommendations,which of the members said they were even within the present guidelir considering resigning from the group if SACUA and the Senate Assemb] they weren't given more input. for the groups to put more press SARC-the Senate Assembly Review department chairpersons and de Committee - examines cases of supporting SARC's decisions. .aculty members who claim they are We hope' these two faculty -victims of procedural injustices in will endorse SARC's decisions a thei r departments or schools. some clout to the committee'sr Ithe d ten teorssinchitwafoolmendations. If these alterations In the ten years since it was formed, made, SARC members may cho SARC has reviewed 12 cases, favoring disband due to the group the grievant in eight of them. Depar- significance. -tment. heads and college deans, Another problem facing SARC however, have turned a deaf ear to the tremendously slow process it :committee's recommendations - in deal with. Because cases mi _seven of the eight cases.,.da ih ecuecssm Tevesnot egases.foragrthrough all other channels first, There's no reason for a grievance decisions favoring the grievant committee to exist if no one is going to handed down months after the listen to its recommendations. At tiff's contract has expired. present, SARC's voice is nearly in- SARC's decisions must recei audible. port from these two faculty grou SARC -is currently in the process of is to be taken seriously by the U drawing up several recommendations sity. Otherwise the group i ;to be presented to the Senate Advisory wasting its time. kffairs sembly s. are all ies of ly, call sure on ans by groups nd add recom- aren't oose -to s in- C is the mdst ust go SARC may be plain- ve sup- ups if it Univer- s just Shh.. Chances are that sometime between now and the days in April when the kinigdom empties for the summer, the court will crown a new king. And when the eight Regents bestow upon their choice the authority to oversee the realm, we'll get out first chance to assess his or her lineage. We may find him wise and humble, or rash and rompous. He'll likely make a fine candidate for the office, with his share of virtues and liabilities. BUT WE won't know any of that until after he has mounted the throne. When the Regents come out of their huddle with a name, it may well be one which no student on campus (save those on the Student Advisory Commit- tee) has heard before. The arguments for secrecy are compelling. "When you're looking for prospects for a public job," said Regent Paul Brown (D- Petoskey), "you get two bad ef- fects. One, because someone is considered, it doesn't mean they're going to be asked, so if they're considered and not asked, they're put in an awkward position with their present em- ployer. And if he isn't asked, his employer might wonder what's wrong with him." BROWN'S SECOND point was that nominees need protection. "Most don't want to be can- didates - maybe it's the last thing they wanted. If that person wanted to let it be known he was being considered, I don't think the Regents would mind (cir- culating his name)." Brown's colleague, Regent Sarah Power (D-Ann Arbor) put it another way: "In nearly every case, if the names were known, the people would quietly say, 'Thank you, I'm not interested'." Power went on to say she thought right, undoubtedly knows the way many of her peers would react to publicity. AFTER CLASS briLan Blanchard . it's a secret h.. most people are happy with their present jobs and it's simply a question of whether or not the Regents can lure them to Ann ,Arbor. Jeff Supowit of the students' group - which was granted the right last week to interview the final eight candidates - reported that all of the members of that committee have agreed to be discreet about names. "YOU'RE TALKING about people for this job who're respec- table people," said Supowit. "What if we lost a candidate because someone says something?" Carolyn Rosenberg of the committee agreed with Supowit. "I would like to think that the secrecy thing will go all the way," she said, adding that the fewer names left in the running, the more important it will be to keep a lid on it. "I would hate to see the process all messed up" by spilled beans, said Doug Farr, another student who is in on the selection. PROF. HAROLD Johnson, the only member of the faculty committee who is allowed by the group to talk to outsiders, doesn't like to talk to outsiders. Johnson would only say that among the professors looking for a new head administrator to pick up where Robben Fleming left off, "there is a feeling that public discussion would impair the search." It is not completely true that the University community is being presented with a fait ac- compli by the Regents. The student, faculty, and alumni committees are all working diligently, sifting through hun- dreds of names and trying to ap- ply the needs statements they have already drawn up. Those groups, as well as the Regents, undoubtedly have what they con- sider t? be the best interests of their constituents at heart. NO ONE wants to see the sear- ch impaired, or as Farr put it, all messed up. And Sarah Power, a notable political figure in her own But the University is not looking to fill a ceremonious post. As Bridget Scholl, another mem- ber of the student presidential search committee, wrote on this page recently, "Policy matters affect us greatly; it is our educational - environment, and perhaps ultimately our future that is being decided." There is a trade-off, granted. Some fraction of those being con- sidered may scratch the Univer- sity off their list of possible em- ployers because of the attention their nomination would draw where they work now. But it wouldn't be anything like the catastrophe Regent Power suggests. Would Fleming, con- tacted on Bascom Hill in Madison eleven years ago, have quietly dropped himself from the list of nominees because his name was published along with twenty others? Would someone like Harold Shapiro, one of the most likely candidates inside the University, be sorely offended if he was identified as a contender for the post? MORE IMPORTANTLY, the Regents are refusing to recognize that the presidlent of the Univer- sity is like a politician in that she/heis directly accountable to the public.. If some conservative candidate from Minneapolis and a radical one in Cambridge are forced to define positions to the public before being considered by the Regents, all the better. It would not be a disaster, that is if the aura of royal legitimacy were lessened, and the bright light of public scrutiny intensified. 4 Brian Blanchard is the Daily's University Editor. His column appears every other Tuesday. Students will profit from cheating rules amendments AT A UNIVERSITY where students must all too often pry changes from the administration, it was pleasant to note last week's decision to delete clauses criticized by students in a proposed Literary College code that, when finalized, will govern cases of academic dishonesty in LSA. When a draft of the propsed Manual of Procedures of the LSA Academic Judiciary was reviewed by the tollege's Administrative Board in mid- January it contained two clauses which caused great concern among students on the Board and student government members. One clause allowed "individual faculty members (to) handle minor cases of plagiarism, fabrication, aiding or abetting dishonesty with minor consequences, and impulsive cheating." Another sanctioned "disciplinary grading" as a punishment professors could invoke. Students worried the two rules left them,open to abuse by faculty mem- bers. Several explained the first clause made the professor a prosecutor, judge and jury in the, case of "minor" cheating - and the definition of ''minor' was not really made clear. The "disciplinary grading" phrase angered many students because they felt it formalized a process which too often occurs now. While Eugene Nissen, assistant dean for academic affairs, said the first clause was meant to encourage professors to use the judiciary only for major cases of cheating, he added he had no objection to removing the passages if they offended students. Apparently students were offended, because Administration Board mem- bers Kathy Friedman and Dan Solomon openly protested the rules and met 'with Nissen and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs Judy Bardwick to change the code. Last week the student demands were met. Nissen apparently passed on student concerns to the LSA Executive Committee, which sent the document back to the Academic Judiciary for revisions. That body eliminated the clauses students crticized. The manual now goes back to the Executive Committee where little discussion is expected. After that, only the LSA (governing faculty must ap- prove the code. We support the rational and fair- minded decision to delete the poten- tially disruptive clauses in the manual. The student concerns were valid and important, and they effectively ex- pressed them. More importantly, Deans Nissen and Bardwick listened to, and eventually agreed with, studen- ts. Hopefully, the LSA faculty will be equally receptive to student wishes and pass the code intact. The publication last week of yet another Surgeon General's report, repeating the fact that smoking is hazardous to health, raises the question: whatever happened to Joseph Califano's much-heralded war on the cigaret- te habit? Over a year ago, on Jan. 11, 1978, the. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare announced what sounded like the most am- bitious effort yet to get 54 million Americans to quit what he called "slow motion suicide." Now it seems the battle was doomed from the start. CALIFANO OUTLINED a four-pronged $30 million attack, to be directed from a new Of- fice on Smoking and Health. He proposed a joint HEW-Treasury Department task force to consider a cigarette tax increase and a new tax based on tar and nicotine content. He called for a $6 million education cam- paign, directed at youth and those especially vulnerable to smoking hazards. He said he was asking the Federal Trade Commission to bolster warnings against smoking, the Civil Aeronautics Board to consider banning all airplane smoking, and insurance companies to consider non-smoker discounts. By last fall, however, a Treasury Depar- tment spokesman for the tax review group told an interviewer that "the task force at the moment is sleeping - not dead, but sleeping." THE FTC WENT along with Califano's request for stronger warnings on cigarette packs, but Congress declined to approve them. The CAB agreed to snuff out pipes and cigars on commerical airliners, but few ex- pect the agency to ban smoking on airlines en- tirely. The Food and Drug Administration rejec- ted a request that it regulate nicotine as a drug, while tobacco lobbyists managed to exempt their products from the 1978 Toxic Substances Act. BUT THE UNDERLYING problem has been money. The anti-smoking campaign's skeptics contended that $30 million (trimmed HEW's war on. smoking may" be, burning out By Richard Mahler later to $26 million) is laughable in the face of the tobacco industry's own $500 million an- nual advertising budget. "Califano wanted only $30 million for what he termed 'the nation's primary preventable cause of death,' " a Washington pundit lamented, "when $250 million was made available for a non-existent disease like swine flu." Many critics think that Califano, a three- pack-a-day man for 28 years until he quit in 1975, must have known his attack could not get far in the face of enormous power wielded by the tobacco industry. In 1977, the industry, claims to have paid $6 billion in taxes while conducting an estimated $7 billion worth of business. Its lobby, according to Sen. Edward Kennedy,chairman of the subcommittee on Health, is "probably the most effective on Capitol Hill." MORE THAN a month before Califano an- nounced his war on smoking, Kentucky's Democratic Senator Walter Huddleston received Carter's personal promise that the Department of Agriculture's $600 million-a- year tobacco price stabilization subsidies would continue. The President, native son of a tobacco producing state, has long-standing ties to the cigarette industry. He sometimes vacations, for example, at the estate of Smith Bagley, heir to the R. J. Reynolds fortune. And inside the office of Frank Saunders, director of cor- porate relations for Phillip Morris and the only big-businessman to work full time on the 'Carter campaign, is a photograph of the President's swearing-ii inscribed: "Your help on my campaign made this day possible, (signed) JimmykCarter." Recently asked to descr ibe White House reactiontto his anti-smoking atta1c; Califano replied: "The President sad, 'you're on the right track.' " AT THE OFFICE OF Smoking and Health - which has a budget of $2.million, not the $6 million Califano wanted - director John Pinney reports a "steady stream" of non- threatening, non-accusatory educational materials are flowing to schools and others. Privately, though, tobacco lobbyists con- fess they're less worried about such small government efforts than they -are about changes in regulatons or price supports. In California, for example, the industry ,recently poured more than $4 million into a successful campaign to defeat proposition 4, an initiative aimed at tightening public smoking regulations. The Tobacco Institute estimates some 200 measures designed to limit smoking were intorduced in state legislatures alone during 1977. Besides fun ding campaigns against such proposals, the Institute has sent more than 3,000 letters to police chiefs arguing that local smoking or- dinances would divert police from apptehen- ding "real criminals." The industry is also unnerved by ai estimate by the Dartnell Institute of Business Research that more than three per cent of all U.S. firms are now actually paying their workers to stop smoking. In San Francisco, attorney Marvin Belli is representing several children of a woman who died of lung cancer. In what could become a precedent-setting case, the lawsuit charges major eigarette manufacturers with liability for selling a product to the woman that they knew, or should have known, causgs cancer. Belli argues that ad- vertising "makes" people smoke, and that tobacco's addictive components prevent them from quitting. Richard Mahler is a free lance writer in California. He wrote this piece for the Pacific News Service. 4,. a. 4_, A /n' 1 :4. y' N .4 A'I ;, LETTERS: Women Editor's note: the fol/owing 's track team getting runaround g __ _ ^- j I ; ,, 1 jN S T , 91 , i r is an update on a letter which appeared last Saturday con- cerning the women's track team and its troubles using the track at times alloted to it. To the Daily: Our state of progress has been zero. After talking to Lund, and season. He also promised us the sole use of the track between 2:00 and 3:00 Tuesday and Thursday and between 5:00 and 6:00 each day. Finally Mr. Harris promised us that next year's practice schedule would be,made equal for all the athletic teams using the Track and Tennis building. We presented Harris with a written track, and a cross-country team and a better practice schedule for next year are unforseeable gains. We were frustrated with this obvious set-back. A final frustration came when we sought the help of a higher authority. We called the athletic department and asked to speak with Don Letters to the Daily typed and should be triple-spaced and must be signed. The Daily reser-