Page 4-Wednesday, November 7, 1979-The Michigan Daily 19 NOVEMBER. 79' Nuclear power debate growing into court battles SUNDAY AMOW( F1ESUAYWEI*EaW U){RSA/ FRIDAV SA1U11Y 4 , 5 oo 6 7 y 8 .,910t o 11 12 , 13 14 15 16 117 18 19 £122 3 £ P44#f ______4.0400 1000 A5 26 SW-oo stool, 28 A-too 30 O~.E o I5Aa1, EDITOR'S NOTE: The defense of necessity-rarely accepted by U.S. courts as a defense to justify civil disobedien- ce-has slowly begun to gain ground in the courts as anti-nuclear defendants have sought to use it as a means of publicizing what they regard as the hazards of nuclear power. With growing numbers of anti-nuclear protesters being arrested this autumn, the courts can be expected to serve as an in- creasingly important forum for the escalating national debate on nuclear power. Already, anti-nuclear activists who have engaged in civil disobedience have suc- ceeded, in a limited way, in putting nuclear power on trial in conjunction with their own case. IN A FEW recent cases, anti-nuclear defendants have managed to employ a cour- troom tactic that anti-war protesters had tried in vain to use a decade ago: the use of the defense of necessity. Under that plea, defendants must show the jury that they disobeyed the law (usually by trespassing or obstructing traffic) to protect the public from a grave danger, much as a passerby might break into a burning home to save a child. Where this argument has been made, expert testimony on issues of nuclear power safety has been introduced, heard by juries and reported on in the press. John Thorne, a San Jose, Ca., 'attorney, sought to defend "dozens and dozens" of draft resisters and anti-war activists by arguing that their participation in an undeclared war in Vietnam would make them war criminals. Thorne said to his knowledge no judge has allowed this necessity defense during the anti- war movement. But in anti-nuclear cases, three judges this year have accepted it-a major breakthrough that Thorne beleves might now be expanded into other civil disobedience areas. IN THE FIRST trial, 20 people who had been arrested at Commonwealth Edison's Zion plant in Illinois were acquitted. The second, involving 50 arrested in a sit-in at the Comanche Peak plant at Glen Rose, Texas, resulted in a hung jury. In the third trial, one of 11 defendants was found guilty, one not guilty. The jury could reach no decision on the other nine. The defendants had been arrested at the Rancho Seco Nuclear Plant near Sacramento for blocking an entrance at the By John Ogulnik time that plant's twin was running out of con- trol near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. To find any defendant not guilty under such a defense, the jury has to believe that: , " the defendants acted to preserve life or property; " a reasonable person under similar cir- cumstances would have reasonably believed that the dedendant's actions wer necessary to protect life or property;. " the defendants believed their actions were necessary; " the danger to life and property was sub- stantial and in the immediate future. The Elk Grove jury determined that only defendant Mike Gillogly had met all the con- ditions. Gillogly testified that he had organized rallies against nuclear power, had worked on California's unsuccessful Nuclear Safeguards Initiatice in 1976, had written to Congressional representatives, and finally had worked for anti-nuclear candidates for the board of the Sacramento Municipal Utilities District (SMUD). SMUD is the public utility licensed to operate Rancho Seco. Gillogly was one of only a few defendants residing in Sacramento. Unlike Gillogly, the other defendants had. not exhausted every avenue of protest before climbing the_ fence, according to the jury; therefore, their actions were found not reasonable. But in all nine cases at least one juror held out for acquittal. The one defen- dant found guilty did not appear to testify on his owp behalf; therefore, the jury felt they did not know just what his motives were. LEONARD POST, an attorney for the Ran- cho Seco defendants, says trials where the issue of nuclear power can be raised become. an "educational tool and political forum," especially in communities surrounding nuclear power plants where the population may never have been exposed to the anti- nuclear side. In all three trials, considerable testimony was given by the defendants themselves, who told how they came to oppose nuclear power and why they engaged in acts of civil disobedience. Experts testified about possible accidents at nuclear plants, about the effects of low level radiationand the nuclear fuel cycle. In the Rancho Seco trial, the prosecution brought in pro-nuclear experts to counter the testimony of defense witnesses. After the eight-week Elk Grove trial, one juror commented, "I'm afraid of nuclear power ... I really had a hand out to the kids . . . they really stuck to their guns ... I'm sorry I didn't bring in a verdict for them, I really am." BOYD BRADLEY, a prospective juror who can see the huge Rancho Seco cooling towers from his house said before the triam that he considered the defen- dants a "bunch of whippersnappers out there creating antics that weren't necessary in my opinion." He attended the trial every day pretending he was a juror and refusing to come to any con- clusions until all the evidence was in. By the end, Bradley's opinion of both the defendants and nuclear power had changed. "I won't go so far as to say I'm anti-nuclear, but I'm no longer pro-nuclear by any stretch of the imagination," he said. JURORS IN THE Zion trial made similar comments. The strongest came from a juror who said that two days into the week-long trial "I was ready to picket with them." Despite this relative success of the defense of necessity, however, many anti-nuclear ac- tivists find it a dubious tactic. "It's so depen- dent on the whim of the judge," said one at- torney close to the New England Clamshell Alliance. Also, the costs of this court tactic are enormous and cases can drag on for many months, tying up people who might be working in other ways in the movement. The New Hampshire Supreme Court has ruled against the use of necessity defense by nuclear protesters. In Massachusetts and California, higher courts are expected, to determine its validity. Clamshell member Roy Morrison said that in future arrests, unconditional release will- be sought. "It's saying to the courts, either you jail a large number of people for a long time, or you release them." Morrison adds that they will not promise to return for trial if released. About a third of the 1,000 protesters arrested in last month's Wall Street demon- stration refused to give their names and were booked and given court appearance dates as John and Jane Does. If they fail to show up for court, their arrests are unlikely. John Ogulnik is a freelance writer. based in the San Francisco area. 14OW lb COPE VflO NWFLW rOPADFUEL cOM 16 MMrEI Ninety Years of Editorial Freedom Vol. LXXXX No. 54 News Phone: 764-055 Edited avad managed by students at the-University of Michigan. ,-y Another 14*test of wll Khomeini's ruthessness T ERRORISM, the outgoing ter than to get their hands on th decade's contribution to modern year-old Shah. diplomacy, again presents negotiators Therefore, since the death pena with a no-win situation. The latest a cruel and inhumane punishmei f.lain, the clergy-dominated matter who is involved, it would b (evolutionary government of Ayatollah risky for the US. to send him to Ira Khomeini, has, by refusing to do This incident also highlights the Anything about the students' takeover ruthlessness in Iran-the Khor df the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, given regime. Since the Ayatollah s the terrorism weapon another difficult power last year, his leadership tst. become more and more like ; This time, the State Department has Shah's. After banning forms of i tb decide whether to deport the cancer- and censoring the press, the Ayat stricken Shah to Iran, or risk the death has quashed the rights of the Kurd o6 about 60 Americans there. So far, has even permitted his Mo neither side has budged, though followers to attack the rebellious Iranian Prime Minister Mehdi ds as another guarantee against lBazargan has finally stepped down. expressions contrary to strict Mo : Either decision would be painful, but doctrine. the American negotiators should Now he has plunged into even: remain firm and refuse to extradite the dangerous territory. In resisting Shah back to his native land. For put- efforts to improve ties With his ting the Shah in the hands of government, Khomeini has st Khomeini's reign of terror would be deep bitterness toward the Shah'. handing down the death sentence for mer allies. That may well be u the exiled dictator. standable, but endangering the liv No doubt the Shah was ruthless. He the Americans in the embassy permitted few, if any, liberties and ex- beyond mere disagreement. It s ploited the common people of that a basic disrespect, and even host country. A defense of his regime would toward traditional diplon be impossible; his actions of murder relations. When a country's le cannot be condoned. becomes determined to terminat Yet it seems quite clear that the with another nation, the no Shah's life would be in serious danger procedure is to withdraw envoys if he returned to Iran. The recent end official discussions. statements by the Ayatollah-in which But kidnapping and hol he said he hoped reports that the Shah Americans for ransom, Khomein is dying of cancer are true-show the displayed characteristics of a des former leader would not receive a fair leader. The revolution has eve trial in Iran. The cutthroat completely into a new kin revolutionaries would love nothing bet- repressiveness. 2 he 60- Ity is nt no be too n. enew meini eized has the music tollah s. He slem Kur- t any slem more U.S. new hown s for- nder- ves of goes hows tility, natic eader e ties rmal and ding A has potic olved d of Letters to The Dail To the Daily: The racist scum of the Ku Klux Klan murdered five anti-Klan demonstrators and wounded nine others (two critically) in Green- sboro, North Carolina, on Satur- day, November 3. As an in- tegrated group of Textile Union organizers, community activists and anti-racist militants organiz- ed by Workers Viewpoint Organiza- tion demonstrated peacefully, the KKK drove up; leapt out of their cars and unleashed a barrage of semi-automatic weapon fire on the crowd. Within minutes the streets were covered with the blood of the anti-Klan protesters. Klan night-riding, cross bur- nings, bombing and murder are part of the heritage of racist, capitalist America. But an ar- med, murderous assault by these fascist vermin in broad daylight on a public demonstration is un- precedented. 4 It is crystal clear that no union, black or leftist organization can defend itself against a repeat of this wanton reactionary terror without the right to armed self- defense! Robert F. Williams set this example in Monroe, North Caroline during the civil rights movement. In contrast, the young black athlete shot in Boston and now paralyzed from the waist down is a victim of the stringent Massachusetts gun- control laws which leave racist murderers unhindered while citizens are deprived of the democratic right to bear ar- ms-leaving the victims helpless against the cop and racist terror. No to gun control! The Greensboro cops were ob- viously complicit in the Klan's at- tack. The racists in blue followed the KKK car right to the demon- stration site-but were con- spicuously absent when they opened fire. They appeared moments after the bloody assault and proceeded to arrest the vic- tims of the attack! The cops have proventhat they will side with the Klan and the nazis: their job is to defend the racist, capitalist state-from gunning down the Panthers to the Jackson State killngs. Groups like the Young Workers Liberation League who call on the government to "ban the Klan" simply embolden the KKK murderers. The Klan could care less about their legal status; their program is to kill blacks, leftists and labor militants. The state has no intention of sup- pressing the fascists; the capitalists need them to unleash their bloody terror. On the very day of the Greensboro massacre, no less than 300 cops protected a band of 50 of the fascist Klan filth marching in Dallas for the first time in 50 years. Civil libertarians of the ACLU and their fellow travelers in the left, the Socialists Workers Par- ty, defend the democratic "right" - of the" fascists to organize. The Greensboro killings demonstrate that fascists like the Klan use such "rights" to only one end: reactio'nary mobilizations that defeated bussing in Boston and Louisville, the fascists have stepped up their campaign of terror. It is the organized labor movement that has the power to smash the nazis and the Klan. Detroit auto workers at the giant River 'Rouge plant pointed the way forward when the mobilized to drive two KKK-hooded foremen out of the assembly plant just three weeks ago. A number of those killed at Green- sboro were active union organizers as well as militant an- ti-racists: the KKK is virulently anti-labor as they are anti-black. The murderous Klan must be smashed!' We are for mass ac- tions of the labor movement and black organizations to get rid of these racist labor-hating scum once and for all. The SYL is calling on all those who denounce the murderous KKK to demon- strate Wednesday, November 7, at noon, on the Diag. --Spartacus Youth League Elton's songwriting ability because it isn't reflected on this album. , Mr. Harvey also seems to dislike Elton's new style of't showmanship. To tell you the truth, I don't think it's changed~. very much. The show was dif- ferent because Nigel Olson, Dee Murray and Davey Johnston aren't there to add a powerfulT backgrourd sound. However, Elton himself still puts on a powerful show which leaves everyone drained after the show. I found Elton's keyboard abilities. to be quite excellent and his en- thusiasm was everpresent. He } was on stage for three hours which is unheard of nowadays. I would just like to add that everyone I've talked to so far, about the concert agrees that it was the best, or one of the best concerts they've ever seen. I believe that Mr. Harvey should. crawl back into his hole and reevaluate his ability as a music critic because it is certainly lacking. My personal music tastes have expanded quite a lot since the days when Elton was popular but I still feel that Elton is a powerful force in contem- porary music. Elton John lives on ' and he proved it Monday night, October 31, at Hill Auditorium. --Brian Wiatrak - y A~WQIe~ $TATVOI). 9 4 IRAT1W d 7VX5~ AIM' TVl RIP ors . WS AHE21CA To the Dlaily: To the Daily: In your issue of 10/31/79, Den- nis Harvey reviewed the Elton John concert at Hill Auditorium and obviously without much thought he stated, "Tuesday's concert revealed that he's (Elton) in a relatively unin- teresting state of transition, with his peak days of both songwriting and showmanship behind him and no new ideas in sight." This statement couldn't be more eroneous. Elton's songwriting ability has remained quite intact as can be seen in his "A Single Man" album which was released in 1978. The music on this album is beautiful and if you don't like Friday you stated that Carter's' bailout plan "recognizes economic reality," and shows' "commitment to large cor- porations". If reality is that welfare for the rich will ensure that corporations can be wasteful as long as they can buy off politicians, and that. free enterprise is impossible, then Carter is recognizing" reality. However, the economic reality is that Chrysler can't. make cars very well. What Car- ter is recognizing is political realitv L o r TE15 foM Eu6R6. 4W fi7 ''-1C r I r nu