*'< t I , t I - i y f a Page 6-Sunday, September 30, 1979-The Michigan Daily Books The Michigan Daily-Sundoy, Septembe Artm On Oemet: Daloue wth. Answers elude lin Dixon's By Eric Zorn QUITE CONTRARY: THE middle-aged lovers. Rather than star- MARY AND NEWT STORY ting at the beginning and following By Stephen Dixon through to the conclusion, Dixon's story Harper & Row, 200 pp. $9.95 exists outside of any time frame. It begins at the end and ends at the end, W HEN A writer starts writing and refers back to the end again and about a writer, you know he again. has run out of things to write The fact is, Mary and Newt have one about. of those stormy relationships that While the creative process fascinates alternates between crumbling and most writers, few works of fiction deal rebuilding, so the "end" is constantly successfully with that process. The being revised. Quite Contrary is a study writers' ideas seem of monumental im- in the revisions that people are always portance, and their lives revolve making' in their lives. The ways in around the continual, traumatic which we try to change our relation- method of creativity; but it is often ships and rationalize our failures are beyond the scope of writers to realize analogous to the revisions a writer that the life and tribulations of a writer makes in his or her text. are not especially interesting. Thus, throughout, when Mary and Not again do readers want to suffer Newt patch up their problems, author through alternative drafts of a story Dixon moves in to retell parts 'f their and the ironic ways in' which fact arfd affair and redefine their ncom- fiction intertwine. This sort of literary patabilities. While Mary and Newt dirty linen is not much more appealing don't fully understand the nature of than the way NBC counts down the their difficulties, neither does Dixon. commercials on Tom Snyder's Prime Here is what we are left with: Some Time television newsmagazine: It relationships are filled, as is life itself, elevates the process of creation to the with "a lot of sadness and a lot of level of art itself, which is a self-serving boredom and a lot of mistakes and a lot affectation through which the public of fun." These relationships are born, should not be expected to wade. they thrive, and then, sometimes, they It is peculiar, then, that a fine writer die. It happens to all of us. not solely to like Stephen Dixon, who was a writer- writers. in-residence at the University's Newt, the city boy who is a substitute Residential College during October junior high school teacher and (ap- 1978, falls into the trap of writing about parently) a part-time writer, tells his a writer in Quite Contrary: The Mary own story, for the most part, in a loose, and Newt Story. Dixon's main charac- rambling narrative voice. His is ter is not a writer, but the guiding humorously self-deprecating,; and authorly land' occasionally rears his keenly aware of his own vulnerability head to recast a scene and tell an ab- at Mary's hands. strusely "relevant" short story. It's all He is caught, as is she, in the same so preciously modern, old trap. There is'no particular reason Essentially; the'novel chronicles a they are together other than they need confoundingly labyrinthian affair bet- each other, and they teeter together ween a couple of confused, neo-liberated just on the safe side of the line where it is more painful to break up than it is to Eric Zorn is co-editor of the Daily stay together. Arts Page. Mary, the country girl divorcee and newman Stephen Dixon FIRST MET the little critter in this ancient cafe on 57th Street in Manhattan. It was sitting there alone, sipping strawberry Sego through a straw, eating celery and french fries. Its tall, pipe cleaner-like physique made me wonder why no one was stan- ding around gawking, but it may have had something to do with the fact that when the creature was seen from the side, it had slightly less visibility than the side of a razor blade. I vaguely remember that it had some problems getting the waiter's attention for just that reason. It spoke in this old, commanding New York Jewish accent, and it knew a lot of things. I had a hard time approaching it at first. I mean, it 'looked so damn familiar, but I couldn't figure out from where, and then, when we shook hands and it started taking over the conver- sation immediately, speaking in these free-flowing monologues (which were impossibly difficult for me) about stuff like "abstract thought-complexes," "the pure idea," and "freeing ourselves from the impediments of history," I was baffled. It was not so much that I couldn't follow these dense spot- orations; it was that I had no conception of why this thing was saying all of this to me. Where was all this coming from? And then, as the waiter was bringing the apple pie, he addressed my com- panion by name, and it all sank in. I was talking to that sublime creation of Bar- nett Newman, often calledian "abstract expressionistic" painter and a prime metaphysician for American visual art in the 20th century-I was downing espresso with a zip! As Rod Serling might once have said on The Twilight Zone, "Submitted for your approval-the case of the zip. On- ce a mass of silenced feelings buried beneath the silt-laden layers of sediment cushioning Barnett Newman's unconscious, the zip lay dormant, a fossilized prisoner within humanity's collective unconscious. And now (Serling saying all this in that clip- ped, toying prattle of his, with the stagiest damn pause this side of Ann Arbor Civic Theatre immediately following "and now ...")... things are different (sinister, SINISTER!). "Newman unleashed some of those feelings on the world, seeking out that sojourner's trek which engulfed Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko, and so many others in eternal darkness. Newman invested those feelings, but not in any sort of typical bank; he made his deposit a metaphysical one, putting his stock in his painted zips. With the zip as the Brinks Security Guard of Newman's inner life (Jesus Christ, a nickel, please, for every tinny, overfed Rod Serling metaphor!) Newman was safe .. .if only for a while. His was a life never free, only one always striving to be free, by excavating again and again from that stonehouse of submerged feelings. And safety guard or not, each trip was a peregrination into evil, haun- ted dimensions. For no matter how nearby Newman's zip was, each time he picked up a paint brush, he was stepping into.., the Twilight Zone." Born in New York, Newman was one of the biggest guns of all in the lifespan of the "New York school" of the thirties R. J.. Smith is co-editor of the Daily Arts Page. By RJ, Smith By R.J. Smith through fifties. The New York school was the fountainhead of the movement associated with abstract expressionism in which such folks as Pollock, Adolph Gottlieb, William de Kooning, Rothko, Robert Motherwell, Lee Krasner, and lots more matriculated. In a few words, what was coming out of this New,, York scene was largely work by so- VER AND OVER (and over and over) one finds in Newman's painting, drawing, and sculp- ting the image of "the zip"-a skinny, elongated strip. In the vast sum of his paintings, the zip cuts across (always, ALWAYS! vertically) the generally massive canvas, dividing areas of color that occupy the canvas from top to evident in his v Dynamism and fe and all factors of size and shape, re the areas of color positioning and ni painting-showed into the areas of was interested in. Soon, Newman seen all over town but also to soc Newman general various art-comn dition, they bowk shared an interest Meeting up witi Street community me, and it was als se correspondence in 1970, the zip has fallen into the sha coin collectio Newman's bac general, seeking a We have had num versations. Most ri itself in Detroit Newman's drawin into town for a m month, and over a ("it reminds me j the Cedar Tavern point) we held th which the followir tracted. Well, to get s to read you a q reaction to it. Certainly, certa It's by James and it comes j Praise Famot else: in God's n as Art. Every fu, absorbed in ti religion, or as at or another. The enemy of the strike is to do Blake, Beethov Kafka, name mE thus been castra tance is the one i .ptom that salvat and is the one s misunderstandin Judas. " Well, for the mi agree with that. I anything, it was th salvation, if there stand what happen us-to understand share-it is thrc people who would on our lives. It s way to do that i passionate interes ideas-which en door-closing. The "official a Agee spoke of, the ceptance which a negating of the something Barney ned with for as together. Because whole art establi; just like the entii mother of two, thinks her answer lies in an unrestrained lifestyle and does her best to be a ;swinger and to _couple freely. Her battles with Newt never cease, and they focus on the mutual guilt they feel and the desire both have to squeeze more from the world than one exclusive sexual partner. 0 THAT'S the problem. Newt tries adjusting the relationship to fit his needs. He fakes it. He i. He invents. Mary does the same. She experimen- ts. She threatens. She ends the relation- ship, then begins it again. Matters don't get better. The author-seemingly trying to excorise ghosts of his own-interferes and tries to revise things romantically and ap- propriately, but, as he reveals in a vivid scene in which the writer himself is seduced while typing thetwords we are reading, he is open to the same problems that the characters face. He doesn't have the answers either. Well, dammit, we are sick of hearing about the problem. We know the problem. All of us go through doubts in our relationships and we all struggle with the conflict between commitment to another person and fully slaking the thirsts of the self. Who has not oc- casionally wished for the strength to abandon a malignant love affair? The artist has an obligation to show his audience something they have not already seen, and here Dixon falls short. His prose is delightful and his ear for dialogue nearly perfect, but he does not give much of a new wrinkle to the same old story. We don't learn any more about ourselves than we learn about Mary and Newt, and he suggests no way we can avoid ending up just like them. Quite Contrary is the story of how conflicting desires exist only to bog us down, and it becomes, in that sense, a passive sort of work. It fails to challenge us, shock us, enlighten us, or comfort us. By implication, it depresses us by joining the fatalistic choir that sings that we are living in a selfish, self- serving era and there is-to cop the title of Dixon'searlier, tremendous collec- tion of short stories-No Relief. And it's not so much that Dixon never finds any answer; he just never seems to look very hard. Even the way the book ends and begins at approximately the same point in time clues us that progress has been minimal, nothing has been significantly altered, and the characters have not really gone, through any important changes. Indeed, the author himself, over- whelmingly present in this work, hasn't gone through any changes either. He's shown us that a writer is confronted with the same troubles as everyone else, but doesn't seem to have any bet- ter answers. Because a writer must deal with the maddening intensity of the artistic spirit does not automatically make his or her view from the creative mountaintop worthy of our consumption. Readers want to be lead to where they have been before, but to see there what they have never seen. Reading Quite Contrary is like scanning the play-by-play of a football game the day after you've watched it in the stadium. - One of Barnett Newman's series "Stations of the Cross," featuring his thin, white helper, the zip. Says the zip, "I was the best damn thing in the world for what Barney was doing!" (Continued fromPage 3) historians, was one which embraced the depiction of "real things"-stuff found in nature-and "real ideas"-concepts prompted by the nature stuff. But to Barney, when one looked at oranges painted by Cezanne, or a fish painted by Klee, one reacted on the deepest level to something entirely diverted from fruit and fishes. They, had an experience that looking at fish in a pond or oranges in the market could not possibly give them-Barney was all about what that stuff was that the viewer got from the painting and not from nature. It was about nothing else. And that was a notion that was forged inside of Barney, because it sure didn't come from the line of art history. Of all modern movements, it's hard to imagine one more dour and humorless than the abstract ex- pressionists. Many even say that your seriousness was one of the reasons pop art, - a movement in some ways more "down to earth" and humorous, got off the ground so quickly. Why the perpetual high seriousness? Now wait just a minute. We had lots of fun! I remember the time we put Saran- See NEWMAN, Page 8 called action painters and "color field" artists. All in the good fun of oversim- plification, one can say that the action painters (Franz Kline, de Kooning, and that Milky Way's supernova, Pollock) turned out work heavily dominated by crude brushstrokes and flung paint, paintings concerned not at all with the way subject matter had been depicted in art, but with the processes of pain- ting, and with the expression of emotions found only inside the in- dividual-emotions invested nowhere in nature. The color fielders also were deeply interested in the unlocking of that which is not found in "things," but their approach was extremely dif- ferent. They used large areas of color, centralized into simple shapes, so as to play out a drama of this unlocking process. On the New York color field team, Barnett Newman was batting clean-up. bottom. His sculpture is typically sim- ple, three-dimensional zips rising into the air. His drawings, which throughout this month have been exhibited at the Detroit Institute of Arts, exhibit the zip in a variety of presences. There are tapering zips, smudgy ones, Mother- wellian ones, relatives of the zip residing in what appear to be Kandin- sky-like abstractions-abstractions in- vested with such psychological weight, however, that they have none of Kan- dinsky's free-blowing feel, and none of his balance. As his career developed, Newman and the zip got realtight.The zip, which began as a sort of created vessel for the expressions of the internal world for which Newman was shooting, expanded within Newman's psyche. It became invested with all sorts of personal, organic qualities to Newman, a fact See NEWMi P clean-up. See NEWM organic qualities to Newman, a fact