R Po 4-,nda, September 16. 1979--The Michiaon Dailv THE WEEK IN REVIEW I" vividly demonstrated the Assembly's + weakness, the University Board of Regents took away their authority to z~t i e u g s n allocate funds to student organizations In order to regain that privilege - one of MSA's foremost responsibilities several of the organization's fo representatives spent most of the summer developing a plan acceptable The blimp came, ABC came, the She still wears her hair long, parted But she said she holds hope for the '_to them and Henry Johnson, vice- Catholics came and the scalper) right down the middle, and apparently future.. Steinem observed' that more 'president of Student Services, scalped as the University spent tlp has not aged a bit since the glory days women than men now are enrolled in And it is that plan which may finally week gearing up for The Game. of the late 1960s when Gloria Stein.m college, including older women retur- oput the Assembly back on the winning Itwo teams lost. surfaced as the.foremost spokesperon nng to the campus. track. There's still a long road ahead But it was exciting, at least up until for women's rights. "we will be radicalized. We will turn but adopting a new allocation system is the final seconds. Recently, however, Steinem and Ms. out highly educated, expectant, angry cektainly the first step. Early this week some scalpers werb magazine, have been criticized by more women and we will radicalize when we THE NEW SYSTEM, expected to be getting up to $50 a ticket and even more radical feminists as commercial still don't get the jobs," she said. ratified at Tuesday's meeting includes for pairs near the 50-yard line. sellouts. Steinam dismissed the charge AN OBVIOUSLY learned, and richanges in the membership of the And as game-time approached the saying, "it's the crabs-at-the-basket curious woman, Steinem's attack on Budget P .iortie Comiteeexcitement grew, a crowd gathere phenomenon, where one person of our religion as an example of a social in- body's Budget Priorities Committee outside Dooley's Friday night was stiution that is used to keep the disad(BPC), the introduction of an appeals subjected to a rendition of the Notce group goes up and the others try to pull sito hti sdt ep tedsd .subj., rcs frgop dsaifedwt aefigtoga ndtouhe o you down," in a press conference vantaged down, was spiced with process for groups dissatisfied with Dame fight song and, although m :before her Monday night speech before references to architecture and inter vestiation of violations or epe fans favored the Wolverines, thee a packed Hill Auditorium audience. national cultures. vestigation of viola tions or expen- were those few who insisted all wek :a acedHil Adiorumaudene, naionl ulurs.ditures of funded organizations. that the Irish would triumph. In fact, Steinem made quite a point of After her talk, Steinem read announ- It is also expected that Johnson willsr being radical during her visit here. She cements from representatives of local Gloria Steinem, noted feminist leader and founder of Ms. Magazine, called approve the changes, and give the In the game-time fervor, however; spoke of impending revolution and women's groups as a means of on the more than 3,500 persons in Hill Auditorium to use their advantages Assembly control over its budget once some chose to protest the disgusti i seemed to take pride in declaring her- organizing. of education and social awareness to challenge existing social power again practice of passing women up through self a "trouble maker" and "outside And, while she answered questions structures. Last year, MSA allocated nearly the stands-a "fun" pastime which pt agitator." from members of the audience, a $50,000 to more than 100 student a niversiy reshwoman unet BUT REALLY, what she had to say steady troop of women and men made tment just in time to be.thrust into theAorganizations. With that power retur- emergency treatment for seven hours was not so new. their way to the stage so Steinam could Itn stgth psc dned to them, the Assembly should be following the Northwestern game. In a free-form address Steine m announce the many upcoming meetingsn s potrt s w en tate able to regain some of its influence. At game-time, however, the scalpers touched on a plethora of subjects from and rallies-the real base for Ann Ar- et ga n MSA's maiconcerat its meetin who had not managed to unload their the "comfortable" caises on cam-bor's progressive and generally sup- over the LSA Building asdhriotingeonM con cer s e tickets were burned as tickets began "uses, to populaton planning and portive women's community. U ste members in the 10 top positions are sliding towards face value along State organized religion. But Krasny, unquestionably a charged with reviewing preliminary in- t. The Uni ersity also was left holding Many of the iformational quips dliner, remembers those days with a formation and making policy decisions tedag figure Steinem made Monday had previously nb certain fondness. in the group's Steering Committee in Fo te tigcw been published in Ms., such as her addition to coordinating all majorMSA rom the start it was clear this was additsonitoecsordintingnallnmajwrmMSAbig game. tn the student section th amous piece speculating on how man gThe high point was going through The past six months have not been activities. typical fols demanded the sit ri would behave if. they menstruated. But ' 4thtubln' f hMh SttAEetdwr'DvdFser ypclflsem dd they strih for the uninitiated who came to hear the the turbulent '60s," he said in an inter- easy for the Michigan Student Assem- Elected were: David Fischer, there in their exact seat. Then came the speech and view the legend, Steinam view this week, "you were tested not bly (MSA). Student General Counsel; Robert typical reply, "Let's see your student once a day, but 20 times a day 'with In April, the Assembly was racked DiScipio, Vice President, personnel several standing ovations. she red Anot er vestige of the 1960s, although situations somewhat foreign to police with an elections process that had a Roy More, Vice President, Student "Oh, I took it back to the car after She said the campus has opened up to perhaps on the other "side" of Steinam, agencies. We just weren't geared for number of improprieties. Candidates Organizations Board; Connie Bridge, showed it at the gate," one jerk had t announced this week he will step aside. something like that." were operating polling sites, certain Vice President, Minbrity Affairs; gall to say. Nobody believed him. " dergraduate in the 1950s, but she also But Walter Krasny, Ann Arbor's polling areas were closed before David Trott, Administrative Coor- But we all squeezed in, drank, a4 ,implie woer haven't ,ome allsthat police chief,-retiring after 40 years with In recent years, however, the scheduled hours, and numerous other dinator; Alan Abrahams, Budget.Watched in horror as :implied women haven't come all that the department, will go down in city challenges of Krasny's job have rules were violated. Priorities Coordinator; Mervat Hatem wc i r a long a way. history as the person entrusted with pr- become the less glamorous, but equally THE STUDENT government's image and Jeannie Barr, Co-Communications The Week-In-Revie was "WE HAVE YET to find a campus teting the people who really live here challenging battles with City Council had suffered severely. Coordinators; Jack Hall, Legislative written by Editor-InChief where men sit around and talk about from those crazy hippie students. over funding for more mundane, but Though the Regents eventually cer- Relations Coordinator, and Marc Susan Warner and Editorial 'having careers and being husbands and In 1966, Krasny assumed the top post nonetheless important police services tified the elections, MSA's troubles Breakstone, Academic Affairs Coor- fathers at the same time," she said, of what was a small town police depar- such as patrol car availability didn't stop there. In a move that so dinator. Director Michael Arkush. i Ninety Years of Editorial Freedom- Carter jeopardizes peace treat by talks with Arab extremists !. 4 Vol. NXXXX, No. 10 News Phone: 764-0552 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan A dangeroi W HAT BEGAN as a simple case of government abuse has evolved into a potentially dangerous episode in the history of American journalism, and beyond that, a serious in- fringement on individual liberties., Six months ago, the federal gover- nment obtained a preliminary injun- ction from a U.S. District Court Judge in Milwaukee to prohibit the editors of Progessive magazine from publishing an article about the mechanics behind building a hydrogen bomb. Without even reading one line of the article, the judge ruled that prior restraint to protect national security must be in- voked. That decision sparked a nationwide :debate as to tie merits of issuing prior restraint. The argument can be broken up into three camps - one group who believes in the theory of prior restraint :but not in this case, another who op- :poses prior restraint in any case, and a third who think the judge made a righteous decision. As the Supreme Court ruled in 1971 ;during the Pentagon Papers case, the government of the United States should own the right to invoke prior restraint in emergency- situations when they truly believe publication of an article or document would threaten the nation's security and when there is adequate grounds for that fear. Consenting to that authority does not ;mean each time the government tries to exercise that right, that they are doing it to protect national security. One can still agree with that basic premise but question its adoption in a specific case, as should be done in this incident. ,n, mi1A v nnecihiv, ha th affaMt nn as precedent ft "test case" for prior restraint. The simple fact is that they are sup- pressing an article from the American people just because "they" believe it would endanger national security. And therein is where the danger lies. For any society which permits that right is taking numerous risks when the government haphazardly tries to exer- cise that privilege. It is a sacred right, one which must be used so very cautiously or the danger to society is even greater than the effects of publishing the article un- der question. Erwin Knoll, editor of Progressive, came by campus the other day to remind everyone of that very danger. Appearing before a communications class, the magazine's editor said that suppression of the article constitutes *an infringement on the rights of every individual, and he is right. Almost as disturbing is the un- necessarily long delay there has been since the court ruling in March. There has been legal maneuvering on both sides. This five-month delay can only be harmful to the American people, and it again shows the danger of prior restraint. All the government has to do is make their case and bring it to court. The judge doesn't even have to read it, just believe 'the government. After all, when does the government ever lie? One more grave danger from this case is that a victory for the gover- nment could spell troubles for the future of the nation's media. When the New York Times and the Washington Post were permitted to publish the Pentagon Papers, it was widely viewed c ci:r.i:in .,: ,n,, mne the nvor_ Immediately upon assuming office over 2% years ago, President Carter. set a Middle East peace settlement as a top priority of his Administration. But his approach to the Middle East conflict was far different from the step-by-step approach exercised by previous Ad- ministrations. Carter preferred a comprehensive solution to the Middle East conflict as a way of resolving all issues at once. As part of his Grand Plan for Middle East peace, Carter called throughout 1977 for an all-parties' Geneva Peace Conference. Sadat's surprise visit to Jerusalem in November 1977 changed the entire context of the Middle East conflict. The United States began to slowly but only temporarily abandon the com- prehensive approach. Rather, President Carter began to push for a separate peace agreement between Israel and Egypt. THE CAMP DAVID accords - with due credit to Jimmy Carter - amounted to a separate set- tlement signifying that the con- flict could and should be resolved by a piecemeal, step-by-step ap- proach. The historical and political significance of Camp David was that it set in motion a Y rocess offering peace by stages or those who joined the process. The Palestinians could be in- cluded in this process moving toward peace with Israel and self-determination. Camp David meant to demonstrate that peace had its rewards and the U.S. had the prime responsibility of con- vincing other Arab countries and the Palestinians to join the peacemaking effort. As Frank Church, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said: "The Camp David strategy was a concrete manifestation of American ingenuity in seeking constructive solutions to seemingly intractable problems." Now, exactly one year later since that monumental summit. seems unwilling' to let the newlyweds furnish their own house." Events of this past summer clearly illustrate how Carter's poorly defined policies are moving against the CampsDavid peace process. At the same time, the volatile autonomy negotiations began in Israel-with Begin and Sadat hoping for Palestinian and Jor- danian participation- the United States was making overtures to the Palestine Liberation Organization, both publicly and privately. Not only are such moves contrary to the spirit of Camp David, but they are in violation of previous American commitments not to negotiate with the PLO so long as it is devoted to destroying Israel. Camp David established a framework to include moderate Palestinians in autonomy negotiations. 3 Menachem Begin and Anwar Sa TO INTRODUCE THE radical PLO into the very peace process it rejects is illogical and contrary to the mnderatae natire of the By Jeffrey Colman Arabia agreed to sell extra oil to the U.S. in return for "noticeable progress" on the Palestinian question, which apparently means accommodation to the PLO.rAmerica's latest moves toward the PLO and the un- timely proposal to sell sophisticated American tanks to Jordan signal to the anti-Sadat Arab world that they need not join the peace process and that Saudi oil blackmail can exert pressure on American policy. In- stead of inducing the hostile Arab world to join Sadat in making peace with Israel, Carter seems bent on appeasing, even rewar- ding, opponents of Camp David and the Israel-Egypt peace treaty. Last week's harmonious meeting between President An- war Sadat and Primce' Minister Menachem Begin in Haifa illustrated that the so-called mer of progress toward peace and even closer relations bet- ween Egypt and Israel. BUT AS ISRAEL and Egypt were making peace this summer, the Carter Administration was moving away from this relation- ship it helped to create. "The Israelis and Egyptians seem to do quite well when left to them- selves," says the New Republic. "It is the United States that in- troduces most of the discordap notes into the negotiations." - Rather than demonstrating t the hostile Arab world, especially to the Palestinians, the promise and benefits of peace (as Begin and Sadat have), President Cay- ter continues to become closer with those who oppose peace By opening a road to Arab extremists such as the PLO who reject compromise solutions to the Middle East coi- flict, Carter runs the risk pf killing the momentum of the peacemaking effort now under'-, way which he helped to initiate. By proposing to sell tanks to Jer- e,' k .;. dat hug each other after last year's conclusion of the Camp David summit. "spirit" of Camp David is alive and well, at least in Egypt and Israel. The two leaders ex- chanrid f urther conessionsa nd dan, Carter is rewarding King Hussein for his continual refusal to join the peace process. Bv submitting to Saudi 'bil