Page 4-Tuesday, October 3, 1978-The Michigan Daily be 3ibian maiIu Eighty-Nine Years of Editorial Freedom Vol. LIX, No. 23 News Phone: 764-0552 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan In order to vote you must A moral responsibility to cut ties with South Africa By Joel Samoff register - the time is now F STUDENTS ever needed a reason to register and vote, we've sure got it now. As we all learned in seventh grade social studies, voting is one of the moral, if not legal, obligations of citizenship. Voting means doing our part to keep democracy strong, we were told. That may or may not be the case. But this election, college students all over the state have much more per- sonal stakes in the fall election. First, and most obvious, is the ballot issue which would deny 18 to 21-year-olds to right to legally purchase alcoholic beverages. The new prohibition would reverse a . law in effect since 1972, which extended this right of adulthood to most college-age Michigan residen- ts. But the regressive dry law is only one of many initiatives on the Novem- ber ballot which would directly af- fect students. The Tisch tax-slashing proposal, for examplZ, could have a devastating ef- fect on higher education funding across the state. If passed, it could mean skyrocketing tuition and declining educational quality for all of us. These two proposals have the most direct effect on students but there are none other issues on the ballot this November. What this means is, if you don't vote, you're hurting yourself. There's one technicality, though. If you don't register, you can't vote. And, time is running out. Here are the fafts you need to know about voter registration: The deadline for registering to vote is Tuesday, Oc- tober 10-one week from today. If you've never voted before, or if this will be your first election in Ann Arbor, you've got seven days left to get your name on the voter lists. Local Democrats are maintaining registration tables on the diag and on the first floor of the Michigan Union tomorrow, Thursday, next Monday and Tuesday. Markley and Alice Lloyd residents can register in dinner lines tonight. West Quaddies can sign up at lunch today and tomorrow, and East Quad- dies, at lunch today. For Bursley residents, registration tables will be set up at dinner time tomorrow and Thursday nights. Inhabitants of South Quad may register at lunchtime Thur- sday and at dinner on Friday. Couzens residents may register at lunch Friday, and Oxford Housing residents at lunch on Sunday. In addition, regular registration sites at the Ann Arbor City Clerk's Of- fice and in the Public Library are available. City Hall, some seven blocks off campus at Huron and North Fourth. Avenue, ,will be open today through Saturday from 8 to 5, next Monday the same hours, and Tuesday until 8 p.m. The Public Library, at William and Fifth Avenue, is open for registration 9 to 9 until Friday, and 9 to 6 Saturday. Next week, the library is open from 10 to 9 on Monday and 9 to 9 Tuesday. All Secretary of State branch offices, including the one in the Church Street Arcade, are also available for registering to vote. There is much at stake. Let us not allow someone else to decide our future for us. Register and vote. Although the debate about whether or not the University should sell its stocks in companies with substantial operations in South' Africa has been going on for several years, there remains a good deal of confusion on what the key issues are. As a result, often those who favor selling the stocks and those who oppose the sale are talking about different things. Since neither is able to persuade the other, all that is left to do is shout (though, as the record shows, those who shout louder and more persistently do not always prevail). Since this debate is likely to continue for some time, it seems useful to try to set aside some of the major confusions, and thus focus the discussion. the sale . of stocks-divestment-has two major purposes: education (both of oursevels and of others) and pressure for change. The primary focus of divestment is us: what we as a university community, in Ann Arbor, Michigan, are going to do do identify and challenge racism. South Africa, of course, is a country where racism is institutionalized. It is not the only place where racial discrimination, exists, but it is one of the very few where segregation by race is legally defined and legally required. Since there are many good sources for more detail on racism in South Africa, there is no need to repeat that detail here. But it is important to note the importance of conflict organized by race at the globhl scale. As religious wars were formerly prominent in international relations, so racial wars are now. Unfortunately, there is every reason to expect them to expand.' South Africa, though distant from us here in Ann Arbor, does not live in isolation. There is. now ample documentation of the foreign role in South Africa's economy, polity, and society. Though the United States does not control South Africa, its substantial influence is clear. And though universitities, like the University, do not set U.S. policy, so too is their influence clear. Major Confusions Now for the major confusiqns. First, it is often pointed out that the withdrawal of U.S. investments will not destroy the South African economy. Quite so, but irrelevant. The goal of sanctions is notdestruction, but liberation. (Note, too, that the withdrawl of investments-disinvestment by companies, as distinguished from divestment by stockholders-is only one possible outcome of a successful divestment effort.) Divestment is intended, in part, to press companies to curtail and withdraw their operations in South Africa, but it is absurd to anticipate dramatic and large-scale disinvestment. Divestment applies increasing pressure on companies to change their behavior. Modest changes in the companies' behavior in turn apply increasing pressure on the South African government to change its behavior. That change is likely to occur long before massive disinvestment could be accomplished. There ae, in fact, already some examples of progressive changes within South Africa as a result of external pressure. Those changes are indeed modest, and for most South Africans thus far those foreign companies who are expanding their South African operations. Both Africans and white liberals in South Africa have been eloquent and persistent in their view that the isolation of South Africa has been a stimulus for change. THIRD, IT IS claimed that the University, whatever it does, cannot really have any impact. That is correct, if impact refers to destroyng the South African economy. But as noted above, that is not the point. There are many signs of the concern of U.S. corporations about possible divestment, particularly by institutional shareholders. Simply the threat of divestment, and the thus far small stockholders' challenges, have pushed major companies into defending their actions in South Africa and into adopting programs that they can claim are fulfilling their social responsibility to challenge racism. Many companies sign the Sullivan principles (a set of commitments to greater equality in the workplace) not only because they mean little change and are unenforceable, but also becatise the companies must have something with which to respond to stockholder demands for more aggressive action. Several major banks, threatened with the withdrawl of large deposits, have curtailed lending in South Africa. Precisely because of the University's prominence as a university, its behavior does not go unnoticed. There is also the possibility of substantial cooperation among institutional investors, thus increasing the collective leverage. And in any case, it is hard to justify supporting racism on the grounds that we, all by ourselves, cannot end it. FOURTH, THERE IS the claim that divest- ment, if it produced withdrawal of foreign investment, would hurt African workers. In part, to the extent that disinvestment occurs, that is correct. But it is also the case that disvestment by U.S. companies is likely to have a more rapid impact on the vitality of the South African economy than on the African labor force. And recall that that we are talking about increasing pressure, not cataclysmic withdrawal. It is reasonable to . , 1 .... _ _. .._ Humphrey-Hawkins bill " More than just a dream T HE HUMPHREY-HAWKINS full employment bill is one of the most important pieces of legislation yet to be decided by the Senate this year. It is a bill from which every American will derive benefit. President Carter said Saturday he was confident the Senate will approve the bill if it is allowed to come to a vote. But herein lies the problem; big business lobbying is stalling the Humphrey-Hawkins bill. What the controversial bill would do is set a national goal of reducing the overall unemployment rate to four per cent by 1983. The legislation, named for its co-sponsors the late Senator Hubert Humphrey (D-Minn.) and U.S. Rep. Augustus Hawkins (D-Calif.), is not as powerful as originally written. It now lacks specific funding levels and means of implementation. The bill is strongly supported by the Congressional Black Caucus. This group met with President Carter and, Vice President Mondale last week to express their concern for passage of the legislation. After somewhat stormy negotiations, the President put passage of the Humphrey-Hawkins bill we do not become neutral. Rather we encourage the very policies th we say we oppose: SIXTH, THERE IS the feat that if the University acts responsibly b challenge racism in South Africa, we migt be pressed to take similar action in other cirumstances. As I noted above, the institutioialization of racism makes South Africa stinctively different from other cases. But ;urely it is unacceptable for us to say that ie refuse to take action to challenge racisn on the grounds that some members of theuniversity community might jeekto address dher social problems. The hypocisy of tha response ought to make us squrm. One o the most exciting characteristic; of a majoruniversity is the multiplicity ,f its activities, its involvement in many hings simulaneously. That diversity is somehing to encourage, not fear. Seventh, some worn that the costs of disvestment, both for sock transactions and for the informatin-gathering and management requied, -would b unacceptably high. That eed not be the cas at all. The transactio costs of orderly divestment should b quite modest. Cooperation among instutional investor and the availability of epertise within th University could make the infqrmation gathering and managemet costs quite low. we ought to regard the ocal costs as an educational investment-te learning (about the U.S., about the intertional economy, about South Africa, abou global conflict, about racism, and aboutthe University) potential is enormous. Evenvithout the focus on divestment, the educatioal opportunity is too good to pass up. Finally, there is the noon that' if th University were to divest, it would los leverage with the companies volved. Not so. We would be committed to acuiring stocks i companies with progressive olicies towar South Africa. That could be n incentive to some companies whose stockwe do not now hold. And companieswhose tocks we sold would know that we wod again be interested, once their policies hd changed. In any case; what is the evidenc that prior to the campaign for divestment v did use our stockholdings as leverage for cange in South Africa? Divestment and the U iversity That brings us back to the %rting point. Divestment at the first level is aned at us, as a university commuinity. Th process of divestment involves us in an educational effort whose benefits can be subtantial. Fo us, and the other communities e reach, to become better informed about Suth Africa, about racism with international onnections, about the links among the ecomy, the polity, and the society, about ;he global political economy, and about the ructure of power in the United States, is no sirple task. At the next level, divestment isaimed at joining with others in applying icreasing pressure to challenge institutionalid racism in South Africa. Over time, SouthAfricans will themselves determine their on'future. Our choice is between assisting prgressive change or getting in its way. All th talk of crippling economies and geerating widespread unemployment serves o divert us from doing what we can do, anddoing it now. By way of postscript, I want to no that to regad the University's links with South Africa racial segregation as largely a matter of buying and selling stocks is also diversion. The University's portfolio and the leverage it permits are not unimnportat. But an educational institution is in trouble when it permits its role as a stoctholder to become paramount. Why have we ot yet proceeded to explore systematically oter links between the University and South Africa? And why have we not yet begun o pursue other avenues for understanding aid clarifying the South African situation, anc for influencing the course of events? Ve should be embarrassed by our inactivity during the current legislative session on his "must" list. Critics, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, argue that the bill is useless - it only sets a goal, it doesn't provide the means of attaining it. They also say whatever funds needed for implementation of the bill would have to be raised through a tax increase. With Republicans trying to milk the alleged tax revolt, their opposition to Humphrey-Hawkins is expected, especially since blacks and other minorities would benefit most from the bill. If the bill is as weak as its critics suggest, it wouldn't be under such intensive lobbying efforts by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others. Second, Humphrey-Hawkins was designed to help all Americans. If it is of particular aid to blacks and other minorities, all the better. Full employment will benefit everyone in this country whether black, white, rich or poor. The initiative has not come from the private sector. We can wait no longer. The Humphrey-Hawkins bill could begin working now. The University's portfolio and the leverage it permits are not unimportant. But an educational institution is in trouble when it permits its role as a stockholder to become paramount. - inconsequential. But they do demonstrate that external pressure can force changes, and that as the pressure escalates, so the changes occur. We should all be clear that external pressure, by itself, cannot reorganize power 'within South Africa. South Africans must do that themselves. But just as the international links of the minority government enable it to stay in power yet a bit longer, so the disruption of those links can reduce the white regime's staying power. Foreign investors cannot make change, but they can surely assist or block it. IN ANY CASE, it makes little sense to talk of destroying economies. Large scale human institutions rarely crumble overnight. Even revolutionary change is more likely to be spasmodic than cataclysmic. Hence, all the talk of the inability to destroy the South African economy is a distraction: It has little to do with what divestment is all about. Second, it is claimed that withdrawal of investment by some U.S. companies cannot expect that many changes would occur long before there was a significant displacement of the African work force. It is also important to note that most African leaders in South Africa have encouraged the economic isolation of South Africa. It is true that there are some Africans in South Africa, most of them holding positions of authority within the current arrangement. who have opposed disinvestment. Yet, what is most striking is the constancy and breadth of the support for disinvestment over quite a long time-from Nobel-Prize winner Chief Luthuli to the militant Soweto students to the officers of the Christian Institute. Fifth, it is asserted that foreign policy is not the business of a university. That is incorrect, both in theory and in practice. Universities must be concerned with policy-making, and often we claim to be educating the future policy-makers. Many University units are currently involved in the policy process, not only studying it but influencing it. That involvement .ranges from work for AID EDITORIAL STAFF Editors-in-chief DAVID GOODMAN GREGG KRUPA Managing Editors EILEEN DALEY KEN PARSIGIAN gtttt + tti1 Arts Editors OWEN GLEIBERMAN MIKE TAYLOR NIGHT'I'EiI'f'( Is: Jeff F'ranik,(Gary Kicinski. Geoff Larcorn. Brian Martin. Brian Miler'. Hilly Nefl. lDan ll('mrinl. lDave I{('ntal'ger. B111 Y satin. Ii''oIshiluniri. .JainieT' luroc'i. Bob Wa r'mn.