Seventieth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER AUTHQRITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS STUDENT PUBLICATIONS BLDG.* ANN ARBOR, MICH. * Phone NO 2-3241 "Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, Who's the Fairest One of All?" Ten Opinions Are Free Truth Will Prevail" FOREIGN AID: American Assistance Effective in Laos (EDITOR'S NOTE: A little Asian country that lacked even shoes for its soldiers - that was Laos when the United States went in with bulging pockets not long ago. But although America will never get a cent back, as tar as the free world goes subsidizing Laos is a gilt-edged investment.) By DAVID LANCASHIRE Associated Press Analyst VIENTIANE, Laos - Laos is a drowsy Southeast Asian kingdom the size of Kansas, supported largely by the American taxpayer. The United States pays for the 30,000-man army - from shoes to salaries, rice to guns. It foots most of the bill for the police force. United States dollars back the kip, making the country's colorful ele. Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. AY, JANUARY 6, 1960 NIGHT EDITOR: KENNETH McELDOWNLEY Steel Settlement Calls for.Statesmanship x HETHER THE new steel settlement will work depends on how badly the industry and union want to make it work. The contract appears workable, and, if the parties will exert a real effort, it should work. Prof. William Haber of the economics de- partment yesterday emphasized that the cen- tral issue of the strike, work rules changes, will be a central issue of labor, management disputes in the coming decade. If the union shows a statesmanlike attitude in this area, the recent strike settlement will work. A great many economists have been em- phasizing the danger of inflation; a steel price boost would be new impetus to a new round, since nationally prices would go up, and then. all wage rates tied to a "cost-of-living" scale would follow. If industry shows a statesman- like attitude in this area, the settlement will work. T HE STAKES are high; the settlement could be a pattern for resolution of expected labor troubles in the near future. The country can- not afford many long strikes if the promised prosperity of the '60's is to be realized. USW President David MacDonald yesterday claimed victory for the union; and the union probably did do better than the industry. The rejection of arbitration in work rules clauses is probably the big victory, rather than the wage boost; management did offer more money. The procedure of the resolution of work rules questions now puts the burden of increased efficiency by rules changes squarely in the lap of the union, for mutual agreement must be reached on all changes., OVIOUSLY, management will always support changes increasing efficiency. If the union has its own interests, and the nation's, in mind, it will agree to alterations. This is not to say that all management's ideas are correct, or that changes should be made without regard for the workers; the plan will only work if management does take a sympathetic attitude in this area. The big responsibility though is on the union. The arguments for greater effi- ciency through better work rules are well- known. It must be pointed out, however, that union cooperation is necessary if management is to perform its task of statesmanship-hold- ing down steel prices. The ruminations of Roger M. Blough seem to hint industry has something up its collective sleeve, though of course nothing can be proved. Any price boost, though, that industry decrees will be a sorry disappointment. It is not fair to ask the workers to contribute to the national cause without a like contribution from in- dustry. If union and industry carry out their parts of the bargain, the specter of further federal strike legislation may be removed. Such7 gov- ernment interference is an unnatural element. in the labor picture, and should be eliminated as much as possible. However, national con- siderations outside labor-management disputes necessitate some federal authority. This inter- vention power should at all costs though be kept to a minimum. Again, the whole question resolves down to: how will the parties conduct themselves. If the steel settlement works, it can be a fruitful prototype. If it does not, chaos could con- ceivably break loose in American industry. --PHILIP SHERMAN When? THE GOLD PLATED DOOR: Immigration to America phant-decorated money one of the hardest currencies in Asia. EVERY SIGN of progress in the primitive state of two million people - schools, drinking wells, the capital's electric plant - in- volves the United States Opera- tions Mission (USOM). "Laos itself does not have a penny to invest," says Laotian fi- nance Minister Thao Leuam Ra- jasombat. The American taxpayer has no prospects of getting anything back in dollars and cents. BUT WITHOUT American aid Laos probably would collapse overnight and fall to the Commu- nists who are waging guerrilla warfare to overthrow the pro- Western government. Since 1955 the United States has poured 165 million dollars in- to the tiny Buddhist nation nestled in the heart of Southeast Asia, flanked by Red China and Communist North Viet Nam. About 60 per cent of this money has gone toward military support. In addition, a secret amount of military equipment has been shipped in for the amry, raising the over-all total of American aid to an estimated 225 million dol- lars. FORMER USOM Director Daly C. Lavergne says Laos is so stra- tegically located that "if this na- tion were lost to Communism the political integrity not only of Southeast Asiawould be placed in serious jeopardy but also South~ Asia... our program in Laos not only makes sense, it's imperative to the preservation of our way of life." Laos receives one of the largest per capita allotments of United shipped in for the army, raising world, but there are few trained personnel to administer, the pro- gram. * * *. "IT IS WELL beyond our ex- pectations," says USOM Director John Cool. "We were told it would never work out. The self-help plan has done more than any other project to show off American aid! and to represent the central gov- ernment to remote villages. "If it had been initiated a few years earlier it might have done much to head off the current pro- Communist rebellion. But Lao politicians did not see the need for it they. The (pro-Communist) Pathet Lao movement went into the villages rarely visited by gov- ernment officials and convinced the villagers the administration in Vientiane had no interest in them, and said Amercan aid went only to help the politicians." I A freshman asked an upperclassman to read over a draft of a paper he had writ- ten for English 23. While doing so, the upperclassman pointed out a few gram- matical mistakes. "Oh, that doesn't matter," the upper- classman was assured, "my instructor doesn't care about grammar." When was freshman English going to be dropped? I' -P.P. TODAY AND TOMORROW The Political Doldrums. THE POLITICAL campaign is about to have its official opening, and there arein the running one Republican and several Demo- cratic candidates. Of none of them can it be said that he has identified himself clearly with any largt national concern or taken a posi- tion which distinguishes him clearly from his rivals. None has aroused more than what may. be called the enthusiasm of a faction.. As of now the only issue within either party or be- tween the two parties is who can be nominated In the conventions and who can win the elec- tions. Considering the size and the import of the, questions which the next President will have to deal with, it is strange and it is disconcert- ing to find that there is as yet no promise and no prospect that the campaign of 1960 will be- gin to prepare the minds of our people for the future which is at hand. Yet in this campaign there will come to pbwer the new political generation. With the retirement of Eisenhower, the old Generals and Chiefs of the World War and of the post-war period will give way to their successors. These successors will have their own battles to fight, not the same old battles which Roosevelt and Truman and Eisenhower fought. But as of now, the Republicans are stuck with the ideas of the Eisenhower interlude and the Democrats are stuck with the ideas of the Truman ad- ministration. YET WE KNOW that at least some of the candidates, indeed all the serious candi- dates, are aware that at home and abroad we are entering a new period. At home we are entering° it because of the need to meet the mounting and unfilled needs of our growing and urbanized population. Abroad, we are en- tering a new period because the brief years of our material, economic, technological, and mili- tary supremacy are over.. Why then is the campaign so listless, so vacant, so uninteresting, and so unimportant? Some would say because the people are lulled by their material comforts and are drugged by the official assurances that all is well and that nothing will happen to them. But this leaves unanswered, indeed it begs, the question which is why in these momentous times our people have been lulled and drugged into apathy and complacency? I VENTURE to think that the answer to the question is that the party system is not working as it is meant to work. It is throttling debate and it is stifling ideas. This is because the opposition party, that is the Democrats, are not functioning as an opposition. They criticize Eisenhower. But they do not challenge ALTER LIPPMANN ers on the one hand and by the Truman office holders on the other. Speaking broadly, the Congressional leaders are concerned with do- mestic affairs and the Truman office holders are in charge of the party's position in inter- national affairs. Beyond the three-mile limit Sen. Johnson defers to Mr. Truman and Mr. Acheson. Inside the three-mile limit they defer to him. This cooperative arrangement - if that is the right name for it - has neutralized the Democrats as the opposition party. On the domestic front Sen. Johnson has accepted without question, and indeed with some fervor, the basic dogma of the Eisenhower administra- tion. This dogma is not, as is often said, that the budget should be balanced in time of prosperity and that inflation should be avoided and that the currency should be kept stable and sound. The basic dogma is that defense and public improvement must be tailored in order to balance the budget at the 1954 level of taxation. The ark of the covenant is the rates set by Secretary Humphrey when he re- duced taxes in 1954. HAVING ACCEPTED the dogma that these 1954 rates are untouchable, unless they are red'uced, the Democrats have disqualified themselves from criticizing the Eisenhower program. They are unable to look forward. For when anyone looks forward nothing is more probable than that in the times to come it will be necessary to divert to public spending some larger part of what now goes to private spending. It is conceivable, but it is not likely, that' some money can- be saved by a reduction of armaments. It is more likely, however, that more money will. have to be spent on arma- ments because the weapons are becoming more and more costly. In any event the civilian needs of our people, beginning with our schools and medical services and going on to the re- planning and the rebuilding of our cities, will demand a ,rising share of our expanding eco- nomy. It is the business of the Democratic opposi- tion to prepare the way. It is their business to do it even if they cannot be elected on thesej issues in the year 1960. But this is what they are not doing. What they are doing thus far is to make it as likely as possible that they can elect, not a President, but a Congress. ON THE INTERNATIONAL front, Mr. Tru- man and Mr. Acheson have caused the Democrats to miss the bus. For what they have done is to oppose the President's effort to find an accommodation. Thereby they have handed him a monopoly on "peace." Moreover, they ,have confirmed the old and very unfair but (EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the first in a series of three articles on the current United States Immigra- tion policy.) By NORMA SUE WOLFE Daily Staff Writer LATVIA'S immigration quota is mortgaged to the year 2274. China, which has the largest population of any single country in the world, is allotted a yearly quota of 100 immigrants. Three countries (Britain, Ire- land, and Germany) may send immigrants who make up 72 per cent of the total United States nationality system quota, but they have never filled this quota. A LOOK at the trends leading to immigration legislation with the above provisions makes the idealistic lines engraved on the Statue of Liberty seem a little less pure, less encouraging, more iron- ical. After approximately 130 years of unrestricted immigration, the first federal regulations were ef- fected in 1882. A temporary mea- sure ending Chinese immigration was enacted, and "undesirables" such as criminals, paupers and the insane were forbidden to land on American shores. Although exclusion was extend- ed in 1891 to those suffering from contagious and loathsome dis- eases, these early restrictions have been described as "aimed at keep- ing out certain kinds of immi- grants rather than at reducing the tide of immigration." THE EARLY years of the 20th century saw few changes in poli- cy. In 1897, Congress enacted a bill requiring all new arrivals to prove their ability to read and write. However, the bill was vetoed by President Grover Cleveland, and similar proposals were subse- quently vetoed by Presidents Wil- liam Howard Taft and Woodrow Wilson. Congress was not to be deterred, though, and in 1917, over Wilson's veto, a law was effected refusing admittance to immigrants unable to read or write. Vagrants, chronic alcoholics, and persons believing in violent overthrow of the gov- ernment were also restricted. S 4 4 UP TO 1921, however, almost any person in good physical and mental health, not illiterate, of good moral character and not racially ineligible for naturaliza- tion could eAter the country. But during World War I, a reaction against immigration set in which led torwidespread demand for some form of restriction. Accoringly in May, 1921, Con- gress enacted a law limiting the number of immigrants who might enter. Because a definite quota was assigned to each country (ex- cept those in the Western Hemis- phere), the act has become known as the Quota Act. It limited the number of im- migrants to three per cent of the number of that nationality resid- ing in the United States in 1910. THE QUOTA ACT was replaced in 1924 by the Lodge-Johnson Act, under which two per cent of the iumber of a given nationality liv- ing in the U. S. in 1890 could be admitted. In the same year, the Japanese were barred from enter- ing. After 1921, when the National Origins Law became effective, the total number of immigrants was limited to 150,000 per year and each country was given a quota depending on the percentage of people of that origin in the Amer- ican population in 1920. These acts, the Depression of the '30's and World War II com- bined to reduce immigration to the lowest point in 100 years. But following the war, partially be- cause of emergency legislation de- signed to admit 341,000 displaced persons (it was under this legis- lation that Latvia became mort- gaged to the 23rd century), im- migration again increased. WHAT WAS to become the groundwork for the McCarran Act of 1952 was laid with the 1947 authorization of the Senate to in- vestigate immigration and natur- alization systems in the United States. Enacted over President Harry. Truman's veto, the act repealed 48 laws and parts of laws and amended 10 laid down by previous legislation. Under the act, which went into effect the following year, the number of immigrants for any quota country has been limited tohone-sixth of one per cent of the number of that na- tionality residing in the United States in 1920. National origin was ascertained by determining "as nearly as pos- sible" the number of inhabitants whose origin by birth or ances- try was attributable to the various countries to which separate quotas were allocated. * * * OF AN ANNUAL immigration total of 154,657 and 84 quotas in all, 56 have been set at 100 immi- grants each -- the minimum al- lotted per quota country. Since quotas remained almost identical with those of the '20's, it was ex- plained that the purpose of en- actment had not been to change the quotas, but rather to simplify mathematical calculations. Japan was allotted a quota of 185 immigrants; acts excluding the Chinese had been repealed in 1943; and the people began con- gratulating themselves on a well planned, non-discriminatory im- migration policy. First had come a period of wel- coming aliens, such as the Chi- nese, as a source of cheap and available labor. Then, when jobs were completed (for example, completion of the transcontinen- tal railroad in 1869), the native labor began to worry about con- tinued employment and good pay. It rose in groups and was able, to effect discriminatory legisla- tion in order to avoid a drop in the average native workingman's standard of living. And slowly but surely; Asiatics and groups known as the "new immigration" (from eastern and southern Europe) were restricted. DAILY OFFICIAL BULLETIN (Continued from Page 2) tion and Records, Rm. 1513 Admn. Bldg., by 8:30 a.m., Mon., Feb. 1. Disciplinary action in eases of uW- dent misconduct: At the meetings of Dec. 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10 and 15, cases in- volving 52 students were heard by the Joint Judiciary Council. In all cas~ the action was approved by the Sub- Comnmittee on Discipline. 1. Conduct unbecoming a student in that the Student Automobile Regula- tions were violated. (a) Failure to Register: One student fined $30.00, all of which was suspend- ed; Five students fined $20.00; three students fined $20.00 with $15.00 sus- pended; one student fined $20.00 with $10.00 suspended; eight students fined $20.00, all of which was suspended and five students issued a written warning. (b) Failure to register and attempt to falsify: One student fined $40.00 with $20.00 suspended; one student fined $35.00, all of which was suspended and three students fined $35.00 with $20.00 suspended. (c) Driving without authorization: Three students fined $35.00; one stu- dent lined $35.00, all of which was sus- pended; two students ined $35.00 with $10.00 suspended and two students lined $35.00 with $15.00 suspended; one student'ined $20.00 and one student is- suied a written warning. (d) Driving without authorization and attempt to falsify: One student lined $50.00 with $40.00 suspended and one student ined $50.00 with $25.00 suspended. (e) Attempt to falsify: one student lined $15.00. all of which was suspend- ed. (f) Misuse of special business permit: One student ined $25.00 with $15.00 suspended and one student ined $25.00 with $10.00 suspended. (g) Misuse of special commuting per- mit: One student issued a written let- ter of warning. (h) Unauthorized presence of auto- mobile: One student fined$20.00; one student fined $20.00 with $10.00 sus- pended and one student issued a written letter of warning. (1) Unauthorized presence of auto- mobile and attempt to falsify: One stu- dent fined $35.00 with $20.00 suspended. (j) Misrepresentation of facts in ob- taining a driving permit: One student lined $40.00. (I) Use of an unregistered automo- bile: One student fined $10.00, all of which was suspended. 2. Conduct 'unbecoming students in that University property was defaced and misappropriated: Two students fined $20.00 each, all of which was sus- pended. Student Accounts: Your attention is called to the following rules passed by the Regents at their meeting on Feb. 28, 1936: "Students shall pay all ac- counts due the University not later than the last, day of classes of each semester or summer session. Student loans which are not paid or renewed are subject to this regulation; how- ever, student loans not yet due are exempt. Any unpaid accounts at the close of business on the last day. of classes will be reported to the Cashier of the University and "(a) All academic credits will be withheld, the grades for the semester or summer session just completed will not be released, and no transcript of credits will be issued. "(b) Al Istudents owing such ac- counts will not be allowed to register in any subsequent semester or 'su- mer session until payment has been made." Sir Donald Wolfit and Rosalind Iden, noted British Shakespearean actors, wil be presented Sat., 8:30 p.m., in Hill- Aud. They will enact, in costume, scenes from their favorite Shakespear- ean roles, including scenes from am. let, Henry V, Othello, Macbeth and others. Tickets for "Scenes from Shakespeare" are now on sale at the And. box office, 10-5 daily. Students are given a 30 per cent reduction on all tickets. Agenda, Student Government Coun- Minutes of previous meeting. Officer reports: President: Letters, Dramatic Arts Center Report; Vice- President (Exec. )-Sigma Kappa'Study Comm. Appointments: John Feldkamp, Charm. Mary Wellman, Roger Season- wein, Phil Zook, Tom Turner; NSA - Nancy Adams, Pat Backman, Tex Chertkov; Vice-President (Admin.) - Ad wing Bulletin: Treasurer. Old Business: Joint Judiciary Report (Levine); Questionnaire; Forestry Club Petition. standing Committees: Student Acti- vities Committee; Calendaring Com- mittee - Odonto Ball, ISA events (4). Ad Hoc Committees: Restrictive Prac- tices Committee; Homecoming Dance - financial report (Jenks). New Business. Members and constituents time. Announcements. Adjournment. The Michigan Marketing Club, a col. legiate chapter of the American Mar- keting Assoc., cordially invites you to attend a talk on,"Advertising's Role in Marketing" by Hugh MacMillan, Marketing and Research Director of Campbell-Ewald Advertising Agency, tonight at 7:30 p.m. in Rm. 131 of the Bus. Admin. School. Lectures University Lecture: George C. Ho- mans, Dept. of Social Relations, Har- vard University, "Status Congruence," Wed., Jan. 6, 4:15 p.m., Aud. A, Angell Hall. The 1960 Ziwet Lectures in Mathe- matics will be held Mon., Wed., and Fri., Jan. 6, 8 and 11, 13, 15 at 4 p.m. in 1025 Angell Hall. J. H. C. Whiteead Waynfleet, Prof. of Pure Mathematics. r . {;I INTERPRETING THE NEWS: Jittery Political Outlook By J. M. ROBERTS Associated Press News Analyst THE FREE WORLD is entering a period of danger about which its leaders have been jittery ever since the cold war started. This is a period in which the easing of fears of physical danger could lead to lack of alertness and a critical increase in political dan- ger. Indeed, it is a period in which a relaxation of the western defense posture could produce a quick re- turn by Soviet Russia to the policy of physical threat which proved so profitable for her in the first years after World War II when the West lay undefended. * 4 ' THE WORLD welcomed the new year and the new decade with a strong display of hope that 1960 would see the real turning point in relations with Moscow. For the first time in many years hope for peace, for disarmament, and for a start toward real world cooperation outweighed dragging fear. Yet in the background remained the hard, factual situation that trying to make peace between de- mocracy and totalitarian, expan- sionist communist is like going over Niagara Falls in a barrel padded with little more than hope. One of the few voices which attempted to keep this in the fore- front during the new year's wave of optimism was that of Secretary Herter, who has not always been too clear about what he himself believes is in the figures book. THE VERY acceptance by West- ern leaders of the idea of a series of Summit conferences represents also a fundamental acceptance that an early and definitive break- through toward world settlements is unlikely. In the current contest specific turning points, such as the battles of Midway, and Stalingrad in a war, seldom develop. If there is room for hope, it is for an evolu- tionary period in which the think- ing and practices of the opposition campus are brought closer to- gether by natural forces rather than by grudging agreements. .{ Y. b The Platitudes that- Comfort