THE MICHIGAN DAILY Wednesday S.GC Hare Method' To Be Used In Election Under the Hare electoral system that is being used in next Tuesday and Wednesday's election, students can rank the candidates from one to twelve on their ballot. At count night on Wednesday, all votes will be sorted into piles for each candidate. Candidates re- ceive all ballots on which they were first choice. Then using a preset system a quota is set for the election. Any candidate receiv- ing at least this quota is elected. The quota is obtained by first eliminating all invalid ballots. Then the remaining ballots are counted. The total is divided by the number of seats plus one. The quota is then obtained by adding one to this quotient. If all seats are filled on the first ballot the election is over. How- ever, if not all seats are filled the candidate with the' lowest total is dropped and his. ballots thrown out. His ballots are then sub- tracted from the total and a ;new quota is arrived at in the same manner as before. When any candidate goes over the quota all of his votes over the quota are distributed among the candidates marked second on the winning candidate's ballot. Newly Adopted SGC Election Regulation Used for First Time in Fall Campaign ACTION-After hours of debate last year, Student Government Council voted to withdraw Sigma Kappa's rpecognition. The action in the case dated back to 1956 when they were first found to be in violation of University rules. Three months later in February the Council gave the sorority until September of last year to conform to the rules concerning discrimination. SGC's action was later reversed by the Board in Review. COUNT NIGHT-The end of all the campaigning for election to Student Government Council is the final counting on Wednesday night. Here The Daily and WCBN have representatives taking notes as the; counting progresses until all'the seats have been filed. This is one of the few times of the year that the student body comes out in such numbers to watch SGC in action. Revised Plan of, SGC, Academics, K AIlaber. SGC; Political Issues Club, president; iInternational Stu- dents Association; Independent Student Forum, vice-president;' Student League for Industrial Democracy, vice-president; Na- tional Student Forum, vice- president. When I joined the Council a Year ago, I thought I knew 'what it was all about. I had student government down pat. That was a year ago. I'm now older, and I now realize that there is no for- mula to student government, by which it can ipake the University an e ducational utopia. High sounding words are only as valu- able as the potential to put them into p3ractice. Much as I might prefer it other- wise (and I am no longer sure I do) things happen slowly. in a university. Good ideas must be carefully nurtured. The better the idea, the more committees it must survive. The probability of an idea survival often seems inversely pro- A . HI. Shah ISA, president; Pakistan Stu- dents Association, secretary, 1958' Through Student Government Council I propose to: 1) To integrate foreign students into the culture of the campus and community, through participation, and to help them reach an under- standing, of the American way of life. ) 2) To help increase American students' understanding of inter- national affairs, stressing the im- portance of developing a broad world outlook among themselves. 3) To increase the awareness on the part of American students in sharing their educational resources with students from other lands. ) 4 To foster and extend an ef- fective communication among American students and students from all nations of the world. 5) To seek further SGC spon- sorship for the foreign students' programs and activities in order to encourage American student participation in these events. The social and economic needs of many countries, especially the portional to the number of com- mittees which consider it. I believe that I have initiated my share of sound ideas. Some of these have expired in the effort to overcome bureaucratic, ineria; others are still in the works; and a. number of them have reached fruition. The more important of these I outline in my platform. On the continuation of this record, I stand. As for the questions: 1) 'My vote has represented, and will continue to represent, my opinion of the best interest of the sincere student who wants the most out of his university experi- ence. I believe that I have been honest and forthright in dealing Nith.all "segments" of the campus. 2) The central point of my cam- paign is, of course, that I am de- erving of reelection. Student gov- ernment is as good as the people on it. It must be aggressive and outspoken in promoting what it feels to be right, but more im- portant, it must be constructive and realistic in translating its ideals into practice. Through this, however, student government must remain the spokesman of the stu- dent. For student government to take on real meaning and sig- nificance it must have the respect and confidence of the students. It must be a group to which you look for services and constructive programs, to which you express your ideas and interests, in whose decisions you have respect even if you disagree. 3) The extent of the Council's impact on University policy and planning depends on the soundness. of its ideas and its ability to trans- late these ideas into workable practice. Students do. not run the University but can influence those who do. And, they may have as much influence as their ideas have worth. You may judge the worth of my ideas from my platform. ARM BIll Warnock Lambda Chi Alpha frater- nity, social chairman, pledge trainer; Wolverine Club, chair- man of pep rally committee. 1) In regard to voting on speci- fic issues, I maintain that the po- sition one takes is generally a combined synthesis of the feel- ings of his group, of his personal attitudes, and of the aims and ob- jectives of the University. How- ever, in matters in which there is a conflict between these interests, I believe that his primary respon- sibility is to the student body, which is the essence of the Uni- versity. Thus, as a student repre- sentative he must vote on issues in such a manner so, as to satisfy; the best interests and welfare of ;he greatest of those involved. 2) It seems that the chronic weakness of SGC is simply its lack of prestige and popular support from the student body. The rea- sons for this deficiency are sever- al. First of all, the bounds and; limits of SGC with regard to pow-1 er and authority have never been clearly defined. Thus situations have arisen in which the SGC has advocated and declared courses of action which were later overruled as inconsistent with University policy. Problems such as these tend to show a lack of power and importance for the Council which is certainly a detriment to' pres- tige. The outlook for this year, however, appears to be significant- ly better ;because the new Council Plan which has been submitted to the Regents for approval specifi- cally defines the role and limits of SGC jurisdiction. Thus with pru- dence and care, a skillful Council should be able to avoid such pit- falls as Sigma Kappa. The second contributing factor to insufficient Council prestige is' that its purposes 'and functions are not clearly visible to the stu- dents. The difficulty arises from two factors. First, there is not enough emphasis on student rela- tions, and second, the projects that the Council sponsors (i.e., SBX, Willopolitan, and the Stu- dent Bicycle Exchange) aren't given sufficient stress. As a member of SGC, I would be quite interested in investigating the possibilities of increasing the scope and efficiency of Student Government Council projects. I feel that this year with the new Council plan and the substantial- ly new membership, significant steps can be made to improve the Council's standing and prestige. 3) I feel the role of the Student Government Council in matters of University policy and planning should be subordinate and in a consulting capacity when sucht matters have direct or . indirect bearing on student interests. Thus' the administration should care- fully consider and weigh the views1 expressed by SGC because this group is a representative cross- section of the many and varying attitudes and interests 'of student groups. In order for any policy to work effectively, it is necessary that all interests involved be able to express their attitudes and take2 some part in its formation. When such procedures are followed, the result is a uniform, well under-i stood, and respected policy. c Ron Bassey Tau Delta Phi treasurer; Beta Alpha Psi accounting hon- orary; Phi Eta Sigma; SGC, member, public relations com- mittee, driving regulations re- vision committee, driving regu- lations administrative board, education and student welfare committee, publicity director, elections committee; National Federation of Temple Youth, treasurer." .m opinion, but conscientiousness and to do its best, but more responsi- proper representation dictate that bility will be seen if we carry our he must be willing to go out of his complaints about SGC to the polls way to be sure he is aware of and to vote for those we think will best recognizing properly all minority handle the responsibility of work- points of view. That an SGC ing in a representative student member may come from one seg- government. In other words, .if ment on campus means that he we want a responsible student must go further out of his way to government, the only way to do it recognize other points of view for is vote! the sake of fairness rather than 3) SGC is not a central plan- that he should stand up for his ning agency for the University, own personal view and be blind to nor is it even crucial in many all others. matters, but when it has acted re- The reason for SGC elections sponsibly, it has been effective in being general rather than by areas getting more -student participation of campus or housing groups lies in University policy making and in the hope that members will not planning. SGC can get and has feel bound to vote a certain way gotten a student voice in Univer- without giving thought and con- sity planning boards such as the sideration to all points of view. Lecture Committee, Admissions The whole area necessitates good Committee, Housing Committee, communication between SGC and Development Council, and' many the student body, and in essence, others. In matters directly eon- more effective public relations, cerning students, (driving regu- such as through the Speakers' Bu- lations, library hours, etc.) SGC reau, which brings SGC members has been and can continue to be into direct contact with student very effective in fulfilling student groups,. . . and is presently rela- desires. At the very least, SGC tively weak. should and often does effectively 2) My most important point is express student opinion, particu- primarily the above commentary. larly where there is no more di- Student Government Council tries rectly related student group. 1) No good SGC member can as'- sume he knows enough and is wise enough to arbitrarily try to run other's lives by his own thinking. The SGC member has, in my opinion, two main responsibilities; 1) to recognize and express stu- dent opinion, and 2) to use stu-, dent opinion to its fullest advan- tage in furthering the goals of the University. When both do not ap- pear to be the same, a compromise is necessary. To accomplish this compromise, the SGC member must make himself fully aware of all issues, no matter how small, and of all sides of an issue, no matter how small a segment of campus represents them. From the student body as a whole the SGC member must seek out and recognize the majority utes to the cross-fertilization of knowledge and ideas across na- tional boundaries and to American understanding of foreign ways of life. When he returns home, his American experience has a lasting influence on his career, his out- look on life, on the long-range social and economic progress of his nation. Equally important, the foreign student comes to know Americans from first-hand experi- ence, and can interpret what he has seen to his fellow countrymen. Finally, his presence on the cam- pus as part of a two-day exchange helps to insure mutual under- standing. The SGC on the campus should provide an atmosphere conducive to expression of and exchange of ideas on all subjects, political, social, educational and otherwise. It should also provide the total educational experience which is more than academic. The council member should be a whole person with ideas and principles. It is the member who makes SGC an active and continual expression of ideals of higher education, and respon- sible, voice for an ideal such as good government for the good of' the students. I stand for a virtually "Good. -F^" nramm n -^"G+hood_ .f I Elliott Tepper Adams House, floor represen- tative, assistant social chair- man, chairman of " honorary selection committee, honorary drafting committee, social rep- resentative, 'Spring Weekend chairman, Michigan Union in- ternational relations committee, WCBN, Hillel. More than a new plan, more than clarification committees, new rules and endless debates, more than any other factor, Student Government Council needs new life. As helpful as all of these results of intense introspection may be, they will not supply what is most lacking on SGC today- fresh impetus. For authority isn't lacking. The SGC Plan ("Constitution") granted wide areas of jurisdiction to the Council. The new plan gives essen- tially the same powers. And certainly problems aren't lacking. With wide areas open to it, SGC has more than adequate room in which it can work effec- tively. A few that I'm particularly interested in are: 1) Off-campus housing - SGC has made a fine start in this area. I would like to see this work con- tinued and expanded, in both dis- crimination and sanitation areas. 2) Parking - one area where SGC could perform a valuable service to the campus. Funds have been accumulating for the expan- sion of parking lots. Let's expand them. This goes for bike facilities also. 3) Academic-student represen- tation on administrative boards should be increased. Also, the com- mittee on academic freedom sug- gested by SGC in the past should be set up. 4) Discrimination-I'd like to a~ th faG 49 ri n4rginn ripuwiTt JohnGarla nd LloydeHouse, vice-president, president; Michigan House, counselor; Political Issues Club, acting vice-president Student Government Council can be of interest and importance to' students by providing a focal point for their ideas and opinions. Student Government Council can stimulate, encourage, and evaluate student opinion. The Council can and should provide a line of com- munication with the Administra- tion. To date, this line of com- munication has been blurred by the dual concerns of the Council, trying to legislate and state stu- dent opinion. To make the line of communication more effective, there needs to be a clear respon- sible statement by the Council of what they believe the student opinion to be. Once this line of communication is effectively es- 160 students from 80-odd nations of the world. As a result the University of Michigan has be- come, educationally, a "most fa- vored campus," surpassing other American universities in sheer size of foreign student population. As a "most favored campus," the objectives of the University of Michigan provide the student with an opportunity through SGC for furthering people-to-people con- tacts, and development of mutual that power as it probably should. Once this is realized and the Stu- dent Government Council does not try to legislate, the members will be freed from "fighting" with the