"When Opinions Are Free Truth Will Prevail" Seventieth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS STUDENT PUBLICATIONS BLDG. * ANN ARBOR, MICH. * Phone NO 2-3241 "They Don't Just Want The Answers-They Want Money, Too!" INTERPRETING THE NEWS: Kaiser Solution Uses NewA pproach By J. M. ROBERTS Associated Press News Analyst KAISER STEEL and the United Steelworkers' Union have adopted the idea that a-standard should be worked out by which to measure the share of stockholders, employes and the public in the economic progress of an industry. The idea is, of course, an old one. It has been entertained more by economic philosophers than by the men actually responsible for opera- Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1959 NIGHT EDITOR: JEAN HARTWIG University's Forbearance The Proper Approach IN THE MIDST of dozens of angry comments about the state's fiscal frustrations, the Uni- versity has been pleasantly and properly quiet. Latest in 'a series of excited charges about the state and the Legislature came Monday from Governor Williams, State Controller Mill- er, and Michigan State University President John Hannah. Williams and Miller outlined a "catastrophe" which would result if legislators do not come to a quick;solution of the state's revenue prob- lems. They pictured teachers and other state employees out of work, students out of school, and most sordid of all, afflicted children going without treatment at the state's institutions. Hannah, who has exploded in the past, blamed the Legislature for."balancing its books at the expense of the state's universities," and claimed MSU would probably have to close its doors if the state cannot meet its payroll obli- gations. The comments of Williams and Hannah, which preceded the legislative session by three days, were clearly scare threats, meant to prod the lawmakers into action. IN THE MEANTIME, the University said noth- ing about the Governor, nothing about the Legislature, nothing about its own awesome problems, but set itself quietly and firmly against any cuts' in its faculty or student body. The University's temperate reaction was one of the few sensible things done in the past hectic weeks. There is simply no use in a state university's invocation of threats or scare tactics to improve an already tense situation. Nor was there any sense in the Governor's frightening forecasts about Michigan's future.- The tactics of Williams and Hannah seem to have no other purpose but to cast the Legisla- ture as an enemy of teachers, students, af- flicted children, and the entire state of Michi- gan. Although the Legislature is guilty on a number of counts, it is by no means guilty of anything implied by the Governor and Hannah. T SHOULD BE pointed out that the Univer- sity's "silence policy is probably not en- tirely motivated by a desire to treat the Legis- lature as a nice group of men facing perplex- ing problems. Certainly, University officials don't want to tread on lawmaker's toes (which they did a few years ago, with unfortunate and still lingering effects) since the lawmaker al- ways holds the appropriations pursestrings. And certainly also, the University administra- tors don't want to unduly upset the faculty which is already jittery about the year-long tax issue. Whatever the motivator, it is best that the University leaves the Legislature alone. Cam- pus-state relations have too long been strained, with both sides sharing the guilt. However, the University must not be in- nocuous in its statements should the situation become any worse. If the Legislature fails to provide any revenue soon and shows no sign of coming to agreement on a tax solution, then the University will have to speak with more dynamism. In the meantime, the University can gain most through calm, serious explanation of its problems to the citizens of the state and to the Legislature. --THOMAS HAYDEN Herblock is awasy due to illness c5Prnt, S&L a 9 o Th PS-?W ftlulW"g " tions. Many employers, though, have tried to apply it. in one way or another, mostly flying by the seat of their pants. Setting up a committee with outside economic and social ex-, perts, to work with representatives of labor and management for con- crete results to be applied to an. existing contract, is an important extension of the idea. * * * IF KAISER and the Union can make it produce concrete results, in a mutual desire to call a halt to the periodic strikes and sometimes virtual lockouts by which labor and management have sought to weaken each other's bargaining position, they will have begun a change in the whole face of labor- management relations. Another committee has been formed to work on an issue which, in the age of automation and even' before it, has become one of in- dustry's great problems-the desire of management to effect labor- saving economies and the desire of unions to create and protect jobs. Like the railroads, the steel un- ions have gradually built up feath- erbedding practices and fought for the retention of jobs regardless of technological progress. The companies decided it must be stopped. 4. * * KAISER AND the Union have now agreed to work on this prob- lem with the idea of step-by-step incorporation of the results in the. contract. Regardless of how it works out in practice, it sounds sane.. The really exciting idea, how- ever, is that something can be done to establish a standard of labor's interest in successful busi- ness. This does not mean what is commonly called profit-sharing. It means equating investment of labor with investment of money. If that were accomplished, la- bor's interest in efficiency would begin to transcend all the old ideas about featherbedding. Labor and management interests would so closely coincide that the entire meaning of many conflicts would' be removed. It has taken a long time for management to realize that a prosperous and busy labor force is an industry's best customer and a vital factor in a dynamic eco-. nomy. It may take just as long for both sides to realize that the value of labor in a given industry. can be worked out by bookkeeping as well as bylblows. But an idea doesn't die until it is proved wrong. DAILY OFFICIAL BULLETIN The Daily Official Bulletin is an official publication of The Univer- sity of Michigan for which The Michigan Daily assumes no edi- torial responsibility. Notices should be sent in TYPEWRITTEN' form to Room 3519 Administration Build- ing, before 2 p.m. the day preceding publication. Notices for . Sunday Daily due at 2:00 p.m. Friday. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1959 VOL. LXX, NO. 32 General Notices Box office now open: The Mendels- sohn box office is open this week, 10-5, for season tickets to Playbill 1959/60, -and single tickets for all Playbill pro- ductions, including "Horse Eats Hat" ("An Italian Straw -Hat"), scheduled for this week, Wed.-Sat. To ensure ticket availability, patrons should pur- chase accommodations as soon as pos- sible. Regents' Meeting: Fri., Nov. 20. Com- munications for consideration at this meeting must be in the President's hands not later than Nov. 10. Please submit nineteen copies of all com- munications. Dept. of Mathematics: A joint meet- ing of the Actuarial and Statistic Sem- inars will meet Thurs., Oct. 29, at .4 p.m. in Rm. 3201 Angell Hall. Leopold K. Schmetterer, Director. Institute for Math. Stat., Univ. of Hamburg, Havers- tehuderweg, Germany, will talk on "Problems and Results in Collective Risk Theory". International Student and Family ex- change: Wed., Oct. 28 from 7:30 to 9:00 p.m. and Thurs., Oct. 29 from 10: 00- to 11:30 a.m. in Rms. 103 and 528, base- ment of the Student Exchange Bldg. The Dept. of Speech will present an admission-free performance of Moliere's "The High Brow Ladies" on Thurs.,, Oct. 29 at 4:00 p.m. in Trueblood Aud., Frieze Bldg. Flu Shot clinics for students, staff and employees will be held in Rm.58 (basement of the Health Service). Thurs., Oct. 29. Hours are 8:00-11:30 a.m. and 1:00-4:30 p.m. Proceed directly to basement, fill out forms, pay" feer $1.00 for students' and. $1.50 for staff and employees) and receive injection. It is recommended that each person receive two injections, 2-3 weeki apart. The clinics will be open for both first and second shots. International Center Tea: Thurs., Oct. 29 from 4:30 to 6:00- p.m. at the International Center. All students wel- come. Agenda, Student Government'Coun- cil, Oct. 28, 7:30 p.m., Council Room.. Observers at Council meetings may receive copies of available docurnents by signing up for them at 1532 'BA before the Council meeting.' Minutes of previous Reeting. Officer Reports: President - Letters, vice-President (Exec.); Vice-President (Admin.) - Appointments, Interim se- tion; Treasurer. Old Business. (Continued on Page 5) The Senior Column Jig Joun Kuutz Antarctica's Future ANTARCTICA -- Can a parley discussing scientific research in this icy wasteland help shape the future of East-West diplomatic re- lations? Can the continent, after encourag- ing beginnings, continue to be a proving ground for the practicality of peaceful co-existence, for the feasibility of ultimate world unity? The United States is optimistically looking to the 12-nation conference now meeting in Washington for affirmative replies, but the group's actions to date have circumvented solutions to the two most pressing stumbling blocks: establishment of an effective inspection team. to enforce an already-agreed-upon ban on military installations in Antarctica and resolution of conflicting territorial claims. The move to reserve the south polar con- tinent for strictly peaceful ventures smacks more of diplomatic maneuvering than anything else. Certainly not a strategic location, the area has yet to prove' its military usefulness. And all of the parley's members, including both the United States and Russia, consented to the proposal without apparent hesitation. America has repeatedly stressed her motives for supporting the move - she sees the ban as an opportunity to pin the Soviet Union down on the long-contested issue of inspection teams in general. The Communist nation, the United States feels, may at long last concede, in this case, to her traditional insistence on some means of effectings a military ban. BUT THE accompanying belief that an agree- ment of this sort in Antarctica would serve as a guidestone and model for broader East- West disarmament and nuclear test ban pacts is hard to justify. An inspection team to en- force an as yet unnecessary regulation can rep- resent little more than a token compromise - something the Russians certainly have not overlooked. With this in mind, the Soviet Union might easily take advantage of the situation to emphasize their professed desire for a world AS OTHERS SEE IT: peace while stalling /off more important dis- armament decisions. While the struggle over inspection teams is apparently unimportant to the future of Ant- arctica, existing conflicts among the 12 nations using the continent for scientific research are not - and on this the United States and Russia are apparently in complete accord. A uniquely unrestricted patch of our planet, Antarctica has been available to anyone who wanted to trek down to use any part of it, but seven na- tions are now threatening to criss-cross the ice with national boundaries. They stand to gain little from recognition of their territorial claims - military research is ruled out, by common consent, and the mineral rights are practically worthless so far (a little coal has been found, but not much else.) ON THE OTHER HAND, with the continent chopped up into colonies, the policy of free access to the whole continent would prob- ably begin slow deterioration. And with it would go, slowly but surely, the traditional co- operation among the world's scientists sta- tioned there. The current conference has al- ready publicly advocated continuation of inter- national research projects, but the statement on paper makes no guarantee that the policy will actually work. It does now, but minor in- cidents over territorial restrictions have cropped up already - and no doubt will in- tensify unless the nations involved decide to preserve the internationality of Antarctica. So far, the Antarctica parley has accom- plished very little in the way.of defining just what Antarctica's future will be. At present, it makes an excellent scientific laboratory, but the chances for converting it into a laboratory for diplomatic relations research and experi- ment are still rather slim. Maybe, in a few years, if we're still here .. . -KATHLEEN MOORE RUSHING RULES are necessary and valid characteristics of the affiliates' system of acquiring new members. Unfortunately, pen- alties imposed for violations of them are, in practice, useless. In essence, the rules insure the individual houses from "dirty rushing" by their competitors, and they guarantee the rushees a fair and equal opportunity (within the inherent limits of the system) to be considered at each fraternity or sorority. Penalties imposed thus far for violations, however, have not been meaningful. As indicated last week by IFC's action regarding several fraternities that violated these rules, the punishment came after the goal desired by the violation was accomplished. THE FRATERNITIES which had women at open houses may have innocently done so, but it still gave the houses added rush- ing attractions. Innocently or not, the action was definitely in viola- tion of a rush rule and the houses should have been aware of it. Likewise, the house -which il- legally had rushees for lunch prob- ably had a specific goal in mind when they did so. In both cases, the houses in question probably achieved an ad- vantage over the other fraternities. Its attraction to rushees was in- creased by the additional func- tions, and therefore probably caused several rushees to drop an- other house in favor of the violat- ing house. *S *s SOME RUSHEES that did so were also put at a disadvantage. When they dropped one house in favor of the violating house and then, perhaps, were not considered further by that house, they had eliminated the possibility of being selected at the house they dropped. IFC imposed monetary fines on the violating houses. In theory, the stiffness of these fines could serve as adequate punishment for the houses. But, in practice, these fines are broken down as small assess- ments on each member's house bill -so small as to be not very effective. Perhaps a better method of punishing violators would be for the IFC and Panhellenic executive committees to meet immediately after the violation is reported and impose a punishment that would affect the house during the exist- ing rush period. The executives could eliminate a scheduled rush session of the violating house in lieu of the illegal session that was held. A plan like this might be some- what inconvenient for the execu- tive committees of both affiliate groups; but it would begin to make punishments for violations more meaningful. a LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: Honorary Degrees, IHC Letter Draw Protests To The Editor: L AST WEEKEND the Univer- sity's law school celebrated its 100th anniversary. Part of the festivities, according to last Fri- day's Daily, consisted of the grant- ing of 12 honorary degrees. One weekend earlier, President Hatcher conferred two honorary degrees in connection with the Medical Honors Convocation. At the University's June 1958 and 1959 commencements, a total of 11 honorary degrees, exclusive of six given at special occasions during 1958, were presented. All told 31 honorary degrees have been given by the University during the last 16 months. In short, the University appears to have joined the multitude of other United States colleges and universities which have become generous fountains of unearned diplomas. Although the University is os- tensibly serious minded in its use of these sheepskins (the same can- not be said, for example, of the University of Idaho, which, last June, conferred an honorary LL.D. on a Broadway restaurateur for "promoting better health in the world with the genuine Idaho baked potato"), it nonetheless is contributing significantly to the general debasement of higher de- grees in this country. AS ALREADY noted, the Uni- versity is not alone. -It was esti- mated that, during last June alone, approximately 5,000 honorary de- grees (i.e., doctorates, except for a few master's and bachelor's) were conferred in the United States; this quantum assumes greater meaning when compared with the some 9,000 earned doc- torates (excluding medical and dental degrees) which have been granted in the United States dur- ing all of 1959: well over 50 per cent as many honorary doctorates as earned academic doctorates go to market each 12 months. California Directive Criticized (EDITOR'S NOTE: President Clark Kerr, of the seven-campus University of California, recently is- sued a directive inserting the word "Chancellor" into the preamble to the constitution of the Uni- vresity's All-Student University Congress. Accord- ing to The Daily Californian, "With this change in the wording of the preamble, the chancellor is given full authority over the actions of the execu- tive committee (of the ASUC)." Following is a front-page editorial by three University of Cali- fornia student newspapers, The Daily Californian, The Santa Barbara El Gaucho and The Riverside Highlander.) PRESIDENT CLARK KERR slapped student government in the face yesterday. The student newspapers of three of the cam- puses of the statewide University vigorously protest his action. The University has a long tradition of strong, free, independent student government. The president's directive recognizes this - "Con- tinuance of this tradition is a major aspect of University policy." How does the president's directive implement such continuance? ment constitutions to prior approval by cam- pus 9fficials. We do not contest the legal right of the president to assert his executive authority over student government. But this does not mean we should not pro- test his action.It is unjustified, ill-considered, totally unnecessary. Pre-censorship of amendments to student government constitutions by campus officials is an infringement on your freedom of expression. It is as destructive a policy as pre-censorship of the press. PREVENT student governments from ex- pressing student opinion on off-campus is- sues is absurd. In these times, what issue is really off-campus. The president's directive represents "maxi- mum" control of student government. If we are "good," we may get some of the provisions toned down. But what kind of independent ac- tion is that? There is empty solace in know- ing that the Ph.D. degree (and more important, the "professional" M.D. and D.D.S. degrees) is no longer awarded "honoris causa." To the general public, one aca- demic degree is like another. Furthermore, the commercial air of the honorary-degree business became fully manifest when, in May of last year, a leading na- tional business magazine filled a page and a half with protocol in- structions to those of its readers who were being tapped that June. Businessmen, diplomats, and (es- pecially) university presidents are the leading candidates for these degrees. We do not pretend to be able to inquire into the worthiness of each recipient of an honorary degree from this university. Morteover, we would assume that these people are deserving of some honor. But, is the doctoral degree-the high- est symbol of achievement which a university can bestow-the ap- propriate and suitable honor in all of these cases? We think not. HONORARIA and the other- wise distinct honor of being asked to address a university gathering should be sufficient in themselves. That these honors may not today appear to be very distinguished and singular citations is due to the way in which colleges and uni- versities have almost promiscu- ously doled them out. Contrary to what our college and university officials apparently believe, it seems to us superfluous to grant an honorary degree as an apparent quid pro quo for the recipient's talking before, or merely attend- ford, Cambridge and the University of Dublin in June, 1957, said, "I would much rather receive a de- gree from a university than an, education." This view, somewhat cynical though it is, carries more truth than fiction. A club is no longer exclusive if everyone can join. Likewise, an earned degree loses much of its status and lure to the prospective degree candidate when its brothers, albeit unearned and of a tech- nically different garden variety, are distributed in what seem to be unlimited quantities-or, as one writer has put it, "like lollipops." We believe that the university should . review its policies with respect to honorary degrees in order to remove itself from the long list of honorary-degree fac- tories. -Stephen A. Zeff, Grad. A. Richard Krachenberg, Grad. Response . To The Editor: PRESIDENT of each hous- ing unit recently received a letter from Mr. Charles Sheffer, the administrative vice-president of IHC. The letter had to do with International Week and the pro- grams which are available to the houses. It seems to me that before Mr. Sheffer writes a letter, of this sort, he should take a refresher course in this art. The lead-in to the letter-"If you agree with the prevailing apathy and do-nothingness of the residence halls, read no further." At this point I was tempted to drop the letter, not because I ". . agree with the prevailing apathy . . really set a pace--more like a stand still." I think that this "stand still" was due to the fact that the IHC was too busy buying pins for its members to worry about Inter- national Week, and therefore there, was no International Week, pro- gram in the quads last year. After this verbal barrage, Mr. Sheffer goes on to outline the pro- gram. In one place he speaks about having foreign students visit the quads for dinner-". . . But do not fall into the usual misconception of viewing the program as,"charity' for guests. Much more can be learned from them during the din- ner in an educational scope (sic.) than you can possibly hope to give in return." I am sure that there are very few of us who look upon the quad kitchens as field offices of the Salvation Army. Also I am acquainted with many people in the quads, who could certainly re- turn their share of information ".. .in an educational scope.." MR. SHEFFER'S closing para- graph-"With all to gain, and only the' ignorance of the men in your house to lose; I implore you to take the fullest advantage of these op- portunities." Mr. Sheffer reasons that the guest speakers will help us lose our ignorance. It is quite clear that in order to lose our ignorance we must be ignorant to begin with. We may be uninformed but we are not ignorant, and I, for one, take this as a personal insult. After his signature, Mr. Sheffer adds this masterpiece-"The Uni- versity of Michigan is blessed with the largest foreign student popu- lation of any American college. Let's use them." I am sure that with a little bit of thought, Mr. Now -Even Lower Overhead 4 m