---- x -, - -' ~r -r ~ - - - - - Broa adway Pla.ys: Alas, Poor Yorick! The New Hamlet Wore Knk The Industry's Antiquated Film Code Prevents Effective Movie Productions Of Some Important Stage Successes By MARC ALAN ZAGOREN By KATHLEEN MOORE ALTHOUGH adapting Broadway plays into motion pictures ac- counts for an extraordinary num- ber of the current releases, the films which emerge rarely have qualities satisfying to the more discerning appetites. Undoubtedly there are many reasons accounting for this un- fortunate phenomenon, but prob- ably the most important is the industry's stringent film code which specifically forbids cine- matic treatments of sexual per- versions and immoral relation- ships. And of course these are the very themes which appear most frequently in the contemporary theatre. The industry's blatant refusal to sensitively handle and intel- ligently discuss this more provoca- tive material accounts for the current overflow of diluted pro- ductions that have been adapted from some remarkably effective American drama. Instead of the studios concen- trating their efforts on producing a worthy screen translation, they appear to aim directly at maneu- vering the controversial material without offending the Code. Im- moralities that should be honestly and forthrightly discussed are at best only mildly suggested. As a result the Code acts to completely obliterate the original theme. PROBABLY the playwright who has suffered most extensively from the Hollywood treatment is Tennessee Williams. With the ex- ception of the dynamic production of "A Streetcar Named Desire" none of Mr. Williams plays re- ceived an adequate screen treat- ment. Although the adaptation of Williams' "Cat On A Hot Tin Roof" was the most successful financially, it was also the most disappointing from an artistic standpoint.1 "Cat" which is endowed with some of Williams' most exquisite prose, owes the bulk of its credulity to its homosexual implication. In the original Elia Kazan New York production, the 'alleged homo- sexual relationship between Brick and Skipper was not only explicitly stated but also sensitively treated. But in the subsequent screen translation this homosexual im- plication was insufficiently ex- plored and, even worse, entirely camouflaged. For filmgoers who were unfamiliar with the Williams' play, Brick's refusal to go to bed with his very sensual wife ap- peared inadequately motivated and totally implausable. This was further emphasized by the casting of the virile Paul New- man as Brick and the highly vola- tile Elizabeth Taylor as his wife; Maggie. UNFORTUNATELY, Williams' "Cat" has not been his only play to suffer from the -motion picture medium. So has Gore Vi- dal's adaptation of "Garden Dis- trict" which is currently making the rounds under the title of "Sud- dently Last Summer." The critically - applauded stage. play contained homosexual and cannibalistic elements which were discussed entirely through the use of Williams' artful dialogue. The motion picture medium however decided to carry things a bit fur- ther. Instead of restricting the play's more seamy elements to the effec- tive dialogue, director Joe Man- kiewicz attempted to supplement the work by graphically illustrat- ing the many perversions present. Not only was this effect far beyond the confines of good tasto, but the resultant images of the homo- sexualism and cannibalism were blurred to the point of being dis- tracting. The end result was a vulgar adaptation of Williams' extraordinarily beautiful play. PROBABLY the most defective quality in the industry's code is its tolerance of suggested im- moral behavior-as long as moral behavior eventually triumphs and proper punishment is given those- (Continued on Next Page)} Suddenly Last Summer r -I --- i - ,-Ae ANN ARBOR Genuine Imported Bleeding Madras A poor Yorick! I knew him1 ..The dapper young manE in knickers gazed pensively at the skull in his hand as he took an-s other puff from his cigarette. f Londoners flocked to see this Unique Hamlet back in 1926. E Later in the season, New Yorkersr were greeted with another por-1 trayal of the same "young mod- ern," stretched languidly on a gold divan, immediately behind the footlights. The scene was Hamlet's "To be, or not to be" soliloquy and, one critic described it as "a pleas-j ing picture of a 1926 gold-coasti undergraduate at Wittenberg in the throes of contemplation." A public used to seeing Shake- speare's infrequent repl-esentations in the theatre staged in Elizabeth-, an splendor opened their eyes, pricked up their ears, and avidlya watched the tale of a modernized; Danish Prince unfold. A few years earlier, England and; America had been treated to a, modern-dress version of Hamlet presented by the German producer Max Reinhardt, but the accents of' the actors had been so thick that the illusion of present-day reality suffered considerably. O THE YEAR 1926 was really the first time big city audiences had been exposed to up-dated Shakespearean presentations. All, in all, an evening with either of the "Hamlets" was highly enter- taining, if nothing else. But dress- ing the tragic character in the latest fashions, critics felt, had a definite and not always desirable effect on the play as well as the audience. "The play has been turned into a sprightly modern piece, a trifle melodramatic, but never for an instant boring, and never for one moment profound," a Londoner observed at its opening there. From the United States came groans that "novelty is allowed to run rampant," but when our own production opened in New York later in the year, reaction was de- cidedly mixed. BROOKS ATKINSON, for one, stood up in favor of the in- creased opportunity for pertinent characterizations that such a pres- entation permits. He especially en- joyed what was done with Polonius -"playing in formal and informal dress of today, with monocle and closely-trimmed beard, Mr. Law- ford achieves a splendid character portrait, fatuous, supercilious, plausible to the extreme, yielding nothing to the usual conception of a doddering old fool, fit only for the stage." But another American hit on the perennial problem that faces all modern producers of Shake- speare-one that was (and still is) intensified by modernizing the cos- tumes. "No one nowadays goes about speaking blank verse, so the most conscious effort of the players is to keep the speech with- in the same century as the clothes." As Prof. William Halstead of the speech department pointed out, actors in modern dress are "almost forced to use a naturalistic acting style" for today's audiences to ac- cept them as moderns. Needless to say, this approach does not fit the poetry of Shakespeare's lines, but Prof. Halstead is quick to add that "most Americans play him na- turalistically anyway," so modern dress in itself is not particularly injurious to the plays, THAT IT can be very effectively employed wasn't illustrated un- til 10 years after the first Hamlet productions appeared. By 1936 the international situation was rapidly decaying. The threat of war hung heavily over the world, and a stark and compelling version of Julius Caesar was not intended to-ease any tension viewers might already feel. Played on a completely bare stage with a brick wall for a back- drop Caesar,. according to Prof. Halstead, became a powerful "in- dictment of fascism." Costumes for the Orson Welles production were very real military uniforms and the final touch was added when an actor with an uncanny resemblance to Mussolini was cast in the title role. "Parts of the play came to life as I've never seen them," Prof. Halstead recalled. Much of the play's compelling drama may have stemmed from its absolute conti- nuity. There was no break in the action or the words for scene changes, no intermission. Shake- speare the poet was respected by Welles; Shakespeare the play- wright didn't fare so well. The modern treatment of ty- ranny "warped the play," Prof. Halstead noted, and the last half (after Caesar has been killed by Brutus and his other "chiefs of staff") was "cut to ribbons." But the total effect remained an "ex- citing theatrical experience." New' York critics were unanimous in their praise of Welles' creation- "an almost-unheard-of state of affairs," one magazine insisted. BUT WELLES' experiment has not been repeated on so grand a scale since. Every season there' are a sprinkling of Shakespearean productions billed as "modern dress" versions, with costumes from some definitely recallable or only nebulously recent period in history. Tyrone Guthrie's 1955 produc- tion of Troilus and Cressida fea- tured the hobbled skirts of 1913; the 1957 version of Much Ado About Nothing had Katherine Hepburn and Alfred Drake looking very much at home on a late- nineteenth - century Texas cattle ranch. Both approaches to costuming were used by Shakespeare himself, who dressed characters either in the clothes of the day or in an ethereal type of never-never land fashion that was still fairly recog- - nizable to the audience. Identifiable but not quite con- temporary settings and costumes help the audience establish a play- er's character at first glance, just as an actor's motions and tone of voice add to the total impression he 'is creating. And this in turn can add much to the viewer's un-_ derstanding of the social situation on the stage while keeping the action more in the realm of make- believe than actuality. N Much Ado About Nothing, Shakepeare exploits the comic potential of two civil servants, Dogberry and his assistant Verges,a whose main job involves locking up towers at night and arresting drunks on London streets. The Hepburn - Drake version transplanted the two lower class bumblers onto the Texas range by equipping them with sheriff and deputy badges. The humor was instantly more obvious to modern American audi- ences in this context-but Prof. (Concluded on Next Page) a PRESENTED BY THE UNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY Pro grams Philadelphia Orchestra Throughout THURSDAY, MAY 5, 8:30 P.M: Rudolf Serkin, Pianist. All Beethoven program: "Leonore" Overture No. 3; Symphony No. 7 in a major; and Piano Con- certo No. 5 (Emperor). Eugene Ormandy, Conductor. FRIDAY, MAY 6, 8:30 P.M. Andres Segovia, Guitarist-Concerto in D major (Castelnuovo- Tedesco); and Fantasia for Guitar and Orchestra, (Rodrigo); University Choral Union in "Alleluia" (Thompson); Sympho- nie de Psaumes (Stravinsky); Choros No. 10 (Villa-Lobos); and Corrido de "El Sol" (Chavez). Thor Johnson,-Conductor. SATURDAY, MAY 7, 2:30 P.M. William Kincaid, Flutist, and Marilyn Costello, Harpist. Over- ture, "Le Corsaire" (Berlioz); Concerto for Flute and Harp, K.299 (Mozart); Divertissement (Ibert); Variociones Con- certantes (Ginastero); and "Till Eulenspiegel" (Strauss). - William Smith, Conductor. SATURDAY, MAY 7, 8:30 P.M. Anshel Brusilow, Violinist, and Lorne Munroe, Cellist. Sympho- ni No. 7 in C major, Op. 105 (Sibelius); Concerto for Cello, Op. 107 (Shostakovich); Concerto for Violin, Op. 77 (Brahms). Eugene Ormandy, Conductor. SUNDAY, MAY 8, 2:30 P.M. Leontyne Price, Soprano; Frances Bible, Mezzo-soprano; Al- bert Do Costa, Tenor; Kim Borg, Bass; University Choral Un- ion; in Verdi "Requiem." Thor Johnson, Conductor. SUNDAY, MAY 8, -8:30 P.M. Lisa Della Casa, Metropolitan Opera Soprano, in operatic arias. Toccata and Fugue in © minor (Bach--Ormandy); Sym- phony No. 2 (Ross Lee Finney); and Suite from "Der Rosen- kavalier" (Strauss). Eugene Ormandy, Conductor, Season Tickets: $15.00-$12.00-$9.00-$8,00 Single Concert Tickets: $3.50, $3.00, $2.50, $2.00, $1.50 (On sale beginning March 15) at University Musical Society Burton Memorial Tower, Ann Arbor Julius Caesar in m Michigan's finest VU.FW. Club! Dancing every Friday and Saturday from 0lob 1:30 HALL RENTALS WFW BANQUETS and CKLI 7ARTIES 314 E. Liberty NO 2-3972 Members and Guests (a' \"%h a flair for lrovel; a mor shaped to a smart two-piece s The slim bodice buttoned with to the softly belled skirt. All c< novelty weave in toupe 5.15 2995 BEST-SELLERS for your reading enjoyment H 4ii i t 11 Now for the first time in Ann Arbor - Imported Indian Madras -- at the sensible price of 75 Conservative patterns and a large selection..8 LiM- Q PAPERBACK & BOUND EDITIONS at SLATEReS Your College Bookstore- C OLL state and ii 347 Maynard Street Since 1951 Kathleen Moore, a junior in the literary college, is a night editor on The Daily. I1 1.11 I