M4 FRIDAY, AUQVST 28, 1961 r.om.: IT MICHIGAN DAILY 7 Draft on Student-Faculty Freedom] - 'KYY YY CYV S - fwwwVwwwu 7 tion. The administration should not discriminate against astudent because of membership in any such organization. A student organization should be free to choose its own faculty ad- viser. No organization should be, forbidden when, after reasonable effort, it has failed to obtain a faculty adviser. An adviser should consult with and advise the or- ganization but should have no au- thority or responsibility to regu- late or control its activities. FREEDOM OF STUDENT PUB- L LICATION. An academic comu- nit" requires freedom to exchange infrmtion and ideas. The.fa- ulty should promote and sustain institutional policies which will provide students the freedom to establish their on publications nd to cbnduct them free of en- 'soshp"or of faculty or -admin- istrativeddetermination of con- oE itors and mangersof stu- dent publications should be select- ed democratically, on the basis of competence, and in accordance with established procedures. '2) Editors and -managers should have independence of action dur- ing their .term of office. They should be protected against sus- pension and removal because of " facuty, administrative, or public p dstpprvalofediorial plcy o cfeioil oiontent. Similarly, neither stu- dent control of the publication nor "" the powers of the student govern- ing body should be used to limit editorial freedom. On the other hand, a student publication should open its pages to representation of diverse points of view. 3) Freedom to distribute pub- lications on or off campus should be permitted. 4) Students should also be free to establish, publish, and distribute unsubsidized publications without institutional niterference. 5) Student directors of campus television and radio stations,.not perated primarily .for instruc- tinal purpose, should have a freedom of programming, subject to F.C.C. regulations, comparable to that, of the editorial staff of campus publications. - III Responsibility of Faculty for Safeguarding Off- Campus Freedom of Students The faculty has an obligation to insure that institutional au- thority and discplinaryy powers are not employed to circumvent or limit the rights of students as ,members of the larger community. CITIZEN FREEDOMS. Students should enjoy the same freedom of religion, speech, press and assem- bly, and the right to petition the authorities, that citizens general- ly possess. Exercise of these rights Subject them to institutional pen- on or 'Off the campus. should not , altoes. POLITICAL RIGHTS. Off-cam- pus activities of students may upon occasion result in vioation of law. Students who viola or- dinances or laws they consider to be morally wrong risk legal penalties prescribed by civil au- thorities. However, not every con- viction under the law represents an offense with which an educa- tional institution must concern it- self. The student who violates institutional regulations, such as those relating to class attend- ance, in the course of his pro- test should be subjected to no greater penalty than would nor- mally be imposed if the violation, had not arisen in the course of a public controversy. When stu- dents ran into police difficulties off the campus in connection with what they regard as their politi- cal rights-as, for example, tak- ing part in sit-ins, picket lines, demonstrations, riding on freedom buses -- the college authorities should .take every practical step to assure themselves that such students are protected in their full legal rights and against abuse. IV Responsibility of Faculty for Procedural Due Process in Cases of Alleged Misconduct The faculty has an obligation to see that students are not dis- ciplined for allegedn iscondut without 'adequate procedural safe- guards. The folowing procedures are recommended to assure rea sonable protectfon of the student, a fair determination of the facts, and the application of appropri- ate sanctions. NOTICE OF CONDUCT SUB- JECT TO DISCIPLINE. Discipli- nary proceedings should be in- stituted only for alleged viola- tions of adequately defined stand- ards of conduct made known to the students in advance, e.g., through publication in the cata- logue or student handbook. Of- fenses and penalties should be made as clear as possible, avoid- ing such vague phrases as "un- desirable conduct" or 'conduct in- ju ious to the r'est interests of the institution." CONDUCT OF INVESTIGA- TION PRELIMINARY TO FOR- MAL CHARGES. Except under emergency circumstances, premis- es occupied by students and thej personal possessions of students should not be searchea unless ap- propriate authorization has been obtained. For premises such as dormitories controlled by the in- stitution, an apropriate academic authority should be designated to whom application must be made. before a search can be conducted. The application should specify the reasons for the search and the' objects or information sought. The studentt should be present, if pos- sible, during the search. For prem- ises not controlled by the insti- tution, the ordinary requirements for lawful search should be fol- lowed. Students detected or arrested in the course of serious violations of institutional regulation, cr infrac- tions of ordinary law, should be informed of their applicable rights under institutional regulations and general law. No form of har- assment, including isolation from counsel, should be used by insti- tutional representatives to coerce admissions of guilt or information about conduct of other suspected persons. NOTICE OF CHARGES. The student should be informed, in writing, of the reasons for the proposed disciplinary action with sufficient particularity, and in suf- ficient time, to ensure opportunity for a proper defense. TREATMENTn OF STUDENT PENDING FINAL ACTION. Pend- ing action on the charges, the stat- us of a student should not be altered or his right to be "present 1 on the campus and to attend classes suspended except for rea- sons relating to his physical or emotional safety and well-being, or for reasons relating to the safety of, students, faculty, and university property. HEARING. The formality of the procedure to which a student is entitled should be proportioned to the sanctions which may be impos- ed. Informal tribunals, such as traffic bureaus 'or dormitory or residential councils, may assess minor penalties and some cases may be closed 'with a reprimand. But if, after investigation, it ap- pears that the alleged offense may; expose the student to serious sanc- tions, for instance expulsion, sus- pension, substantial fine, or nota- tion on a permanent record, he should have the right to appeal the initial judgment of his culp- ability to a Hearing Board. The Board should be composed of fac- ulty members selected by the fac- ulty or, subject to request by the accused student, of faculty mem- bers and students, the latter to be selected by the student council or another appropriate agency of student government. 1) The Hearing Board proceed- ing shouic be de novo, that is, without reference to 'ny matter previously developed in informal proceedings. No member Of the Hearing Board who is otherwise interested in the particular case should sit in judgment during that proceeding. 2)h The student appearing before the Hearing, Board. should Dave. the right to be accompanied and represented by an adviser of his choice, and by legal counsel if he so requests. 3) The burden of proof should rest upon the officials Instigat- ing or responsible for establish- ing the (charge. 4) The student should be given an opportunity to testify and to present evidence and witnesses relevant to the charge or the pen- alties involved. Wheneverpossi- ble,, he should be given an op- portunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses. In no case should the Board consider statements against him unless he has beenhadvised of their content and of the names of those who made them, and un- less he has been given an oppor- tunity to rebut unfavorable in- ferences which might otherwise be drawn. 5) The decision should be bas- ed solely upon matters placed in evidence during the hearing. The failure of the accused student to testify (if such is the case) should not be a factor in the decision and improperly acquired evidence should not be admitted. 6) A transcript of the hearing should be made and, subject to the student's waiver, the proceed- Ang before the Hearing Board should be open. FURTHER RECOURSE. Subject only to the student's right to ap- peal t4 the highest institutional authority or a designee, or to a court as provided by law, the de- cision of the Hearing Board should be final. Submitted by Phillip Mony. penny (Political Science, Univer- sity of Illinois), chairman of Com- mittee S. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 'i' , International Presentations for 1964-1965 CHORAL UNION SERIES Chicago Symphony Orchestra . . . . . . . . Friday, September 25 Antonio and the Ballets de Madrid Thursday, ,October 8 Warsaw Philharmonic . . . . . . . . . . . Wednesday, October 14 LeonidKogan,violinist. . . . . . . . Wednesday, November 4 Raduga Dancers . . . . . . . . . . . . Saturday, November 14 "Faust" (Gounod) New York City Opera . . Sunday, November 22 Minneapolis Symphony Orchestra . . . . . . Monday, February 8 Rosalyn Tureck Pianist . . . . . . . Monday, March I Robert Merrill, Baritone . . . . . . . . . . . . . Friday, March 12 National Ballet of Canada .. .......Saturday, April 3 Season Tickets: $25.00--$20.00.-$17.00--$14.00--$12.00 EXTRA SERIES London Symphony Orchestra . . . . . . . . . Friday, October Iria Arkhipova, Mezzo-soprano . . . . . . Monday, November "Merry Widow (Lehar) New York City Opera (2:30) Sunday, Nov. 2 Berlin Philharmonic. . .. . . Saturday, January 3 Polish M ime Theatre......... .. Tuesday, February 2 *Season Tickets: $12.50-=$10.00--$8.50--$7.00--$6.00 #fifffi * * a CHAMBER 'ARTiS SERIES Soc ieta Corelli . 5. . . 0 New York Chamber Soloists . . . .Wednesday, October 28 Tuesday, November 17 . . . . . Wednesday, January 20 Andres Segovia, Guitarist Paris Chamber Orchestra . Netherlands Chamber Choir . Chicago Little Symphony . . Solisti iZagreb. Sunday, February 1. ; is f' s 4 s Saturday,, February 27 .. . . Sunday, March 7 Tuesday, Mac . . r s . . . . .4 *Season Tickets: $15.00--$12.00-$10.00 4- / S, C R' I5 Bf E T H E '1 C G At N D A *NOW ON SALE. (Counter sale for single performances tegin Sept. 10) ******** * *#**** *** *** * f r* tnkfff f ##f + f kirir+# f f f off+#sir'irirk7kiir ,kk yirir+f' . f P%)% w )%7KWWW 7 xwwwwwww:Kwwwwwwxwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwx wwwwwxwwwxwwww7 AWW"W-WRWs SPECIAL ATTRACTIONS Ballets de Paris, featuring Zizi Jeanmaire . . . . . . . . Tupsday, September "Die Fledermaus" (New York City Opera Co.) . . . . . . . Friday, November i Tickets: $4:50-$4.00-$3.50-$3.00-$2.25-$1.50 "Messiah" (Handel) 2 performances . . . . . . . Saturday, (Tickets on sle beginning October 1 2:30, Sunday, December December 5 6 } wl AAm^A^AAA^WWWAw^WX slpswJR arl. I I FESTIVALS 3/f et1&L6i Chamber Dance Festival Paul Taylor Dance Company{ Jean Leon Destine Dancers First Chamber Dance Quartet Series Tickets: $6.00-$5.00-$4.00 Single Performances: $3.50-$2.50-$2.00 . . . Friday, ,October . . . . . 23 24 . . . . . . . Saturday, October iIuaitonal men j Wear . (2:30) Sunday, October 25 The acknowledged leader of Michigan Men for forty years Qii2I12R) J9. Chamber Music Festival (five Beethoven concerts) Budapest String Quartet Tickets on sale November 5. February 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 . . . . . . Ann Arbor May Festival, 1965 (six concerts) The Philadelphia Orchestra . . . . . .f . . . . . May 6, 7, 8, 9 Eugene Ormandy, Music Director, guest conductor and soloists Orders for series tickets accepted and filed beginning Decemrber 1.