1 Seventy-Sixth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITT OF MICHIGAN UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS SOUND and FURY by Clarence Fan t. New Horizons for the Journalism Dept. Where Opinione Are Free 420 MAYNARD ST., ANN ARBOR, Micl,. Truth Wil Prevail NEws PHONE: 764-0552 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily exPress the inidividual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. THURSDAY, MAY 19, 196F NIGHT EDITOR: MEREDITH EIKER .. -- - A Lottery System Will End Draft Discrimination THE DRAFT examinations currently be- ing administered to college students across the country prove again that the Selective Service is the most discrimina- tory agency in the United States Govern- ment. It is not enough that the Selective Service already discriminates against the poor, the Negro, the rural boy, the bache- lor, and the part-time student, who must work to earn his tuition. Now, the Selec- tive Service is making a calculated effort to discriminate against the average and mediocre student.. OSTENSIBLY, the Selective Service is to fulfill the nation's military man- power needs. But in the process it has set itself up as the arbiter of the young peo- ple's slives. It can even discriminate against prospective historians and artists in favor of mathematicians and physi- cists. But to belabor the inadequacies of the current Selective Service System, is mere- ly to confirm what is obvious to everyone from General Hershey to the college un- dergraduate: drastic change is needed in the Selective Service law. FHE DRAFT LAW comes up for. renewal in Congress in July of 1967. As a re- sult, there is a new issue that almost any student in SDS or YAF, the Newman Club or Hillel, Delta Tau Delta or Zeta Beta Tau can work on: pushing for changes in the Selective Service law. What is needed here is full mobiliza- tion of all the weapons in the student arsenal. This may mean a change in strategy. While protesting college policy of handing class rankings over to draft boards may have its merits, it would seem far more to the point to force the Editorial Staff CLARENCE FANTO.....................Co-Editor CHARLOTTE WOLTER ................... Co-Editor BUD WILKINSON ...................Sports Editor BETSY COHN................ Supplement Manager NIGHT EDITORS: Meredith Eiker, Michael Hefter, Shirley Rosick, Susan Schnepp, Martha Wolfgang. Business Staff SUSAN PERLSTADT ..............Business Manager LEONARD PRATT............. Circulation Manager JEANNE ROSINSKI,..............Advertising Manager RANDY RISSMAN.............Supplement Manager The Daily is a member of the Associated Press and Collegiate Press Service. The Associated Press is exclusively entitled to the use of all news dispatches credited to it or otherwise credited to the newspaper. All rights of re-publication of all other matters here are also reserved. Subscription rate: $4.50 semester by carrier ($5 by mail); $8 two semesters by carrier ($9 by mail). Second class postage paid at Ann Arbor, Mich. Published daily Tuesday through Saturday morning. House Armed Services Committee to open hearings when it discusses the draft law this summer. The point is to put pressure on Congress through student and faculty organiza- tions to abandon the current system. Then, a practical alternative is necessary. THE SUGGESTION that currently seems to have the broadest support among educators, politicians and student groups is a proposal for making non-military service, such as the Peace Corps or Vista, an alternative to military service. This idea combined with a lottery sys- tem may well be the most effective means of eliminating the discriminatory features of the Selective Service, while insuring that military manpower needs are met. Essentially, at the age of 19 men would participate in a lottery held to select men for military service. Men who have pro- posed an acceptable non-military alter- native prior to the lottery would not par- ticipate in it. Men whose names were not selected in the lottery would be exempted from giv- ing any form of service-their reward for participating in the lottery. All other men would be expected to give some form of service. INCENTIVES TO encourage men to join the lottery include higher military pay, a shorter term of service for military men than for non-military men and a broad- ening of the GI Bill. Another feature is that men with edu- cational deficiences would be allowed to take remedial or job-training as part of their service requirement. In other words, a man might take two years with the job corps learning a new trade as part of his service requirement. Yet, another feature of the plan is that students would be allowed to continue their education if they made a definite commitment to some form of service after graduation. A key advantage of this lottery system is that it eliminates uncertainty. At 19 a man knows where he stands with the draft. But most important, it eliminates many of the discriminatory features of the current system. The poor, the Negro, the mediocre and part-time student are no longer discriminated against. And, in this system there is more room for those who have moral objections to fighting in a war. THAT THIS OR a similar plan is an improvement upon the present Selec- tive Service System is difficult to deny. If college faculties and students can win adoption of such a plan, then young men in the future will not be subjected to the discriminatory whims of the draft, -ROGER RAPOPORT T HE UNIVERSITY'S journalism department, having recently marked its 75th anniversary and saluted its retiring chairman, Prof. Wesley Maurer, is about to embark on an exciting venture which should increase its already high standing among the nation's schools of journalism. Maurer has infused the depart- ment with a deep dedication to the principles of a free press (principles for the most part unique in this country) and has brought many of the leading fig- ures in mass communications to speak on campus. He has also initiated a unique training program which allows students to obtain two years of closely guided training on some of the nation's leading newspapers after they obtain master's degrees in the department here. The Bal-, timore Sun, the St. Louis Post- Dispatch and other top-ranking papers have served as the- train- ing grounds for many of the de- partment's graduates. Through the "intern" program, they have been able to obtain a far more useful initiation into the field than would have been possible otherwise. PROF. WILLIAM PORTER, who joined the department four years ago, will assume his role as chair- man on July 1st. His tenure prom- ises to be just as exciting as Maur- er's 19 years as department chair- man, and some new innovations are likely as well. Porter, one of the most respect- ed members of the department by students and colleagues alike, en- visions undergraduate journalism at the University as "the most liberal" of the liberal arts degrees. Students are likely to gain in- creased freedom to pursue studies in a variety of social sciences and humanities while also taking some- what fewer .journalism courses, mostly of the non-technical varie- ty. There are also indications that the department will be permitted to expand its facilities and staff as necessary in order to realize Por- ter's goal. ABSOLUTELY AWARE of the increasing trend toward academic over-specialization, both on the undergraduate and graduate levels, Porter realizes the need for the "generalist" in mass communica- tions - the individual with in- depth knowledge of several areas of social science and humanities as well as an acquaintance with many others. Undergraduate journalism edu- cation at the University has made a start toward offering the stu- dent this type of broad exposure to many significant fields. Partic- ularly in the new honors program, the department's requirements for hours of credit elected are less stringent than is usually the case in the literary college. In the journalism department, the student is presented historical material relating to the field and an intense exposure to the tradi- tions and laws governing freedom of the press as practiced in the United States. More specialized courses in writing, public rela- tions and the electronic media are also offered. BUT THE MOST important role of a good journalism department should be that of intellectual cat- alyst - a place where dissenting concepts and ideas about modern social trends and specific devel- opments in government, foreign affairs and the sciences can be exchanged. Too many other departments are afflicted with a narrowness of perspective resulting from academ- ic clannishness and the pursuit of status. (This is particularly true among those social sciences which are preoccupied with gaining re- spect and recognition as valid sci- ences-the type of recognition al- ready granted to the natural sci- ences.) In order to balance the aca- demic stuffiness which often re- sults from the mad pursuit of pro- fessional recognition in the social sciences, the journalism depart- ment should, above all, be a place of intellectual excitement, creativ- ity and vigor. It should sponsor debates and discussions on great public issues. It should prove the weaknesses of the various media, and it should stimulate research into the nature of the media them- selves and the nature of audience response (the impetus for which has been provided by the work of Marschall McLuhan). IN SHORT, the journalism de- partment should be far more than a place to train future journalists, although such training could not help but be furthered by an at- mosphere of intellectual excite- ment and discovery: Both on the undergraduate and graduate levels, the department has a unique opportunity to bridge the gap between the social sci- ences and focus on the important findings of sociologists, anthropol- ogists, political scientists and so- ciologists regarding the nature of political and social institutions, as well as the nature of man as an individual and as a social being. THE DEPARTMENT un d e r Maurer's leadership has already made a strong beginning in pro- viding this indispensable type of education. But more needs to be done. Technical courses should be pared to a minimum, since most journalists can receive technical training on the job. It has been said by those in the field that journalism students often have to un-learn many of the technical practices they were taught when they go to work, in order to con- form to a specific medium's re- quirements and individual pecul- iarities. Students should be required to pursue studies in the English de- partment. Without a basic knowl- edge of literature, both modern and historical, no individual can be well-educated in our society. "Minors" in a student's specified field of interest-whether it be economics, political science, his- tory, or another area-should al- so be encouraged. When possible, journalism students should elect at least 15-20 hours of courses in one field as a cognate require- ment. In this way, they receive a broad knowledge of a specific field but retain their freedom to ex- plore a number of other areas at the same time, all the while re- ceiving a basic grounding in the history and principles of Ameri- can journalism. The graduate program already has a plan similar to this. Stu- dents with previous experience in journalism take a minimum of journalism courses and range widely through the course offer- ings of the University's top-rank- ing social science and humanities departments. THERE ARE high hopes that Porter, as department chairman, will be able to gradually modify journalism education here in order to better equip students to become leaders in communications fields. He conducted an honors course in the mass media during the past academic year which was well- received by students and is an ex- ample of the type of course which should be added formally to the journalism program. He has also demonstrated an ability to probe deeply into the content of the media and lead informed discussions revolving around defects and weaknesses as well as strengths in specific news- papers, TV and radio networks, and magazines. AS A PROFESSION, journalism is notorious for its reluctance to criticize itself. There are only two main organs of such discussion- "Nieman Reports" published at Harvard University and the Co- lumbia University Journalism Re- view-both of which have limited circulation. The field's trade pub- lication, Editor and Publisher, ab- dicates its responsibility to probe the media's problems and instead concentrates on smug reassurances that newspapers are better than ever, and of course far better than the arch-villain, television. E & P also fills its pages with silly debates about how many peo- ple read papers rather than watch the tube, all of which serves little purpose and can best be left to the rating services and audience- measurement outfits. WHAT IS NEEDED in journal- ism is a close examination of why the newspapers, radio and televi- sion failed to inform the Ameri- can people about the background and dangers of the Viet Nam war until we were too deeply involved to extricate ourselves. (A few pub- lications did devote space to an- alyses of Viet Nam before the war became an American preoccupa- tion early in 1965-but the pro- vincial press which reaches 80 per cent or more of American news- paper readers did not.) Examination is also needed of the problems in reporting trials and crime news generally; of why too many papers continue to fill their pages with syndicated en- tertainment features rather than hard news; and of why news in- terpretation and analysis is still largely absent from the, wire serv- ices and, hence, most newspapers. OTHER TRENDS such as the growth of services featuring col- umns and news stories syndicated by major papers such as the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times also deserve attention. A possible solu- tion for the small or medium- sized paper which wants to pre- sent news interpretation is the use of one of these services along with the basic news report provided by the Associated Press and United Press International. The increase in the domination of the monopoly press - single ownerships of all the newspapers in cities as large as Los Angeles -should be probed for its im- pact on independent journalism. Does a newspaper without com- petition become less concerned with active newsgathering and in- vestigative reporting? How much does a community suffer if it is represented by only one editorial voice, often a vague, middle-of- the-road one? UNIVERSITY journalism de- partments offer the ideal setting for intensive discussions'of issues such as these. There seems good reason to hope that the depart- ment here, under Porter's leader- ship will continue along the path it has charted of offering the stu- dent the broadest possible liberal education, and will make new strides in the presentation of in- formed analysis and research on the major problems facing mass communications in a rapidly changing social environment. The Crumbling of the Ivory Tower 4 tl O s " ; ' _ : ob r ,, ;,,, %' . F; By DAVID KNOKE Special To The Daily "THE HUMANITIES are dead! Long live the Humanities!" Might we not one day hear this cry and see the ivory towers of academe, that last stronghold of that solitary bird, the humanist scholar, come crumbling down? SEVEN YEARS AGO, C. P. Snow, venerable old don of many a British government. spoke at the Rede lectureship at Cam- bridge: I believe the intellectual life of the whole western society is increasingly being split into two polar groups . . . at one pole we have the literary in- tellectuals . . . at the other the scientists. Snow went on to pontificate that the scientists "have the fu- ture in their bones" and his lit- erary friends' inability to quote the Second Law of Thermody- namics (much less understand it!) was tantamount to the admission by a scientist that he had never read a work of Shakespeare's., Snow's "Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution" was re- printed and given wide circula- tion and study in British schools. Subsequently, the phrase "two cultures" has come to be a syn- onym expressing the lack of com- munciation and comprehension between persons of the scientific and humanistic persuasions. THREE YEARS later in the same annual lecture at which Snow promulgated his thesis, Prof. F. R. Leavis retailiated with a scathing attack of Snow's "in- tellectual nullity" for stressing the superior merits of thescientists above the values offered by the humanists. Despite Leavis' elucidation that Snow could not appreciate the different orientations of scientific and humanistic purpose, the "two cultures" dichotomization persists. This phenomenon is nowhere more obvious in the United States with the most advanced scientific technology in the history of man. The federal government has even become concerned that the creative and scholarly arts will play bridesmaid to the sciences, and has established a National Humnities Foundation, some dec-, ade and a half after the National Science Foundation. PROF. ROBERT H. Knapp of Wesleyan, in "The Origins of American Humanistic Scholars," published the results of a recent study of the status of humanistic scholarship in this country today. Knapp confined his study to ties also ranking high are Wis- consin, Berkeley, Chicago, Penn- sylvania and Michigan. A COMPARISON of the fields of undergraduate concentration in 95 degree - awarding institutions showed that the majority of bac- calaureate degrees in these five fields are awarded to women, very few of whom go on to the doc- torate. The overall impression in undergraduate education is that the humanities are, numerically and thus presumably influentially as a society-shaping force, run- ning a poor third behind the phy- sical and biological sciences and the technical and vocational fields. At the doctorate level, the ratio of science doctorates to humani- ties ranged in the Ivy League from about 3 to 2 to the majority of state-supported institutions where scientists predominated, 5 to 1 or better. Of the five humanistic dis- ciplines, over 13,000 doctorates were awarded in a 20 year period ending in 1956. There were 4000 each in the more utilitarian his- tory and English fields, but only 800 in music and fine arts. KNAPP ASSESSED the future of humanities as being in clear need of effective recruitment and prosecution, especially a m o n g state universities. "The main task, it seems to me, is to accelerate the infusion of humanistic thought and aware- ness through the broad fabric of American higher education. Its realization would provide a sort of intellectual leaven that could lift our civilization to a new and truly creative epoch." THIS IS PRECISELY the thing not being done, charged William Arrowsmith, chairman of the classics department at the Univer- sity of Texas, in "The Shame of the Graduate Schools" (Harpers, March 1966). Arrowsmith's biggest criticism of the system of graduate human- ities education leads indirectly back to Snow's "two culture" thesis. The infusion of the scientific method, strongly bolstered by the splurge of federal spending on science education since the first Sputnik, has pervaded the human- ities scholarly research. "The humanities have been distorted and their crucial en- abling principle-the principle of personal influence and per- sonal example-has been neg- lected and betrayed in a long, servile imitation of the sciences. .." In every humanistic field today is a simple but overwhelming fact: we have trained as schol- ars men who are not fit to be scholars or who are fit to have other fates. It is these reluctant scholars whose efforts, born of constraint and willfully persis- tent hope, lack vigor." WHAT CAN BE seen as the pos- sible future development of the humanities, if they are to shake off their present lethargy and aim- lessness? The distinction between the sci- ences and the humanities' pur- poses will go a long way to show how they fulfill unique, proper functions in a social context. "Pure" science aims to augment man's factual knowledge, indirect- tly aiding men to "dominate mat- ter by calculation." The humanistic disciplines, on the other hand, concern themsel- ves primarily with values. They deal in experiences and interac- tions, the subjective perceptions of the world that teach a man how to live well and die well, in a way that science cannot begin to approach. CURRENTLY, the hope of a "new breed" of humanist scholar lies in taking full advantage of the teaching function as a persua- sive factor in winning adherents to the humanistic viewpoint. The "publish or perish" dictum so bruited about lately may not be as serious as imagined, for schol- arly research and verification should always remain a bulwark of the humanist's art. But the "English bards versus Scotch reviewers" attitude has split many of the humanistic dis- ciplines (especially philosophy and English). Such a trend is deadly for it relegates the scholar to the role of librarian and archivist of the living and dead languages. It denies him the position to play a decisive role in the creation of current standards of art, litera- ture and morality. PROF. KNAPP observed that the clustering of humanities-or- iehted institutions on the East Coast indicated that they were "deeply committed to European intellectual traditions," notably still moving "in the spirit of a pre-industrial age." Arrowsmith's charge that a ques- tion mark lies over the whole field, gives one hope that the uni- versities - the prime centers of modern humanistic endeavors - will answer that question with a vigorous recruiting p r o g r a m among teachers and prospective students, with a revamping of de- partmental structures to "moder- nize" the humanities. The humanities are in an ex- treme financial bind compared to the sciences. This may be the re- sult of the Sputnik-caused over- emphasis on the scientific educa- tion, but part of the trouble no doubt lies in the above-mentioned situations within the humanities themselves. Until they can present substantial evidence by example that they are of intrinsic value to society, they will continue to be relegated to secondary status in those public institutions "dedicat- ed to service in utilitarianism." THERE MAY BE some who wIl argue that the humanistic arts should not have to justify them- selves in terms of any other value than their own contemplation. A better case can be made that ac- tion is the end of thought; the hu- manities can bridge the widening gulf of technology and the living of the good life. In forging such an almagam, the humanists would be in for a large part of the leadership, as they were in the first Rennaisance 500 years ago. 'I 4 41 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: Kautsky Misrepresents Marx j AIL To the Editor: THE DAILY of Sunday, April 13, 1966 carried a review of Earl Kautsky's "The Dictatorship of the Proletariat." The review was written by Prof. Carl Cohen. The succession of publications which the University Press has published or reprinted about Marxism, Socialism, and related subjects once again brings to mind the complaint of Karl Marx that people can not read (meaning an inability to understand that which they read). APPARENTLY with an attach- ment to the "gospel" of the dis- credited Social Democrats or, per- haps, with intent to confuse and mislead, Prof. Cohen repeats the claim made for Kautsky in the in- troduction to Kautsky's "Dictator- ship of the Proletariat." Prof. Coh- en stated: "Kautsky knew Marx and Engels personally," implying, thereby, that Kautsky was quali- fied to be and was the "chief lit- erary executor" of Marx and En- gels. Prof. Cohen -continues: ". . . MARX DESCRIBED Kautsky to his daughter by letter in 1881: "He is a mediocrity with a small- minded outlook, superwise, very conceited, industrious in a certain sort of way, he busies himself a lot with statistics but does not read anything very clever out of them . . ." And this is the man whom Prof. Cohen concurs to have been the "chief literary executor" of Marx and Engels! For 34 years, Kautsky carried on in the Neue Zeit the same op- portunism which Engels, stated in a letter to Kautsky (1884) was "overrun with philanthropy, hu- manitarianism, sentimentality and whatever all the antirevolution- ary vices" of the opportunists of the clay were called. Referring to the opportunists of the Neue Zeit, Engels continued: "People who do not want to learn anything fundamentally and only make literature about literature and incidentally out of literature, naturally achieve more printed pages per annum than those who grind at something. . ." The cur- rent crop of regurgitators and re- At other times he uses the word democracy where only the expres- sion Socialist Industrial Democra- cy would have been correct. At other times. the context in which Kautsky uses the term democracy is so vague that it would be dif- ficult to precisely define what Kautsky meant. And this "small- minded" opportunist is being pass- ed off in University circles as the "chief literary executor" of the uncompromisingly scientific Marx and Engels! IF UNIVERSITY pedants want to sincerely bring Marx and Engels analyses of capitalism to light and the general tactics which they, Marx and Engels, concluded would have to be followed by workers in accordance with the conditions prevalent at a given time and place, they will go directly to the. works of Marx and Engels rather than to the distorters and detrac- tors of Marx and Engels. If the pedants really want to apply the findings of Marx and Engels to the American scene, they will discover and publicize the findings and voluminous works of I I