Seventy-Sixth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS Michigan State: The Closed Society ere Opinions Are Free, 420 MAYNARD T., ANN ARBOR, MICH. Truth Will Prevail 42MANR$T.ANABRMIH NEws PHONE: 764-0552 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the inidividual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. ATURDAY, JUNE 11, 1966 NIGHT EDITOR: SUSAN SCHNEPP But Now We Ask, Is Man Dead?' Did I murmur of flowers and sunlight, Of the earth's simple things and the joys? Or did I moan of the slaughter and war, The unspeakable horrors we've seen? OUR CENTURY, we like to be told, is the century of the great scientific breakthrough. Atoms and genes are yield- ing their secrets, and the firmament has been staled out as the territory of man. The neo-evolutionists assert that the race now contains its destiny. Their theory is persuasive, but their optimism less so. They assume that as men of the scientific age, we will act in. accord with wisdom. Yet much of our research stems from inordinate fear, and sometimes science seems the ultimate in Russian roulette. What if we make the moon into the biggest of all missile pads? CAN THIS BE precluded in a century which, whatever its eventual scientif- ic achievements, already has been made into the bloodiest-and, so, the most cruel --in history? Some may believe that at least in its opening years were "golden." But Rupert Brooks in 1912 asked: Say, is there Beauty yet to find? And Certainly? and Quiet kind? Less than three years later Brooks was dead and buried on Scyros, having "pour- ed out the red, sweet wine of youth." The grim work of extermination was un- der way on the slaughter-fields of Brab- ant, Picardy and Champagne. For a few hundred feet of shard-churned soil, Eu- rope's great powers were bleeding them- selves white. WITH MILLIONS DEAD, the killing end- ed not in peace, but in exhaustion. The path was open for Hitler in Ger- many, for Mussolini in Italy and for "the grave-diggers" of the nation" in France. In Russia there was a new regime still regarded by many as a threat to the world. The rifles were not stacked for long. Japan invaded China. Mussolini sent his troops into Africa, and France brought his Moors out of Africa into Editorial Staff CLARENCE FANTO .... . .......... .. .. Co-Editor CHARILOTTE WOLTER..................Co-Editer BUD WILKINSON. .. .. .......... ,,. sports Editor BETSY COHN................Supplement Manager NIGHT EDITORS; Meredith Eiker, Michael Heffer, Shirley Rosick, Susan Schnepp, Martha Wolfgang. Business Staff SUSAN PERLSTADT .... . . B..CBusiness Manager LEONARD PRATT ......,....... Circulation manager. JEANNE ROSINSKI.............Advertising Manager RANDY RISSMAN ............ Supplement Manager The Associated Press is exclusively entitled to the use of all news dispatches credited to it or otherwise credited to the newspaper All rights of re-publication of all other matters here are also reserved. Second class postage paid at Ann Arbr Mich. Published daily Tuesday through Saturday morning. Spain. There was a rehearsal for a second world war bloodier than the first. When the war came, the killing was not confined to the trenches. This time the bombers* took off for London, then for the target cities of the continent, and eventually for those of Asia. The con- cept of "total" war took on a meaning as women and children died in the fire- storms. The survivors, as one of them told Dorothy Thompson, had "a boxseat in hell." IT IS NOT A QUESTION of what should have been done and what should not have been done. War has its own im- peratives. By now it should be clear that the scale of warfare is not proportionate td the issues which may divide govern- ments, but to the weaponry at their com- mand-even if, so far, the big bombs have maintained peace by terror. The twentieth century's bloodletting, however, goes on. We are just becoming aware of the extent of the current fever of extermination in Indonesia. Yet it may move us no more than the fighting in the Congo, the killing of Moslems and Hindus in India, France's "dirty war" in Algeria and that other French war in Viet Nam which we have taken over. JUSTIFICATIONS for carrying on come to mind more readily than do ap- proaches to peace. We have become a hardened, generation. We discuss .the political purposes of warfare and ignore its immediate objective, death. We seem not to realize that the deepest tragedy may be the sacrifice of many, many such as Rupert Brooks who might have helped us out of the bog of pointless death. A reminder of this is Louis Aragon'sn letter, telling friends of the death of Peter Rhodes who wrote the lines at the head of this column. As an American newspaperman, Rhodes was caught up in the Spanish civil war and much of what followed. Aragon could only hope that the unpublished fragments of his friend's writings will "testify to what Peter might have been, to what he might have done had this century been different." AS STATESMEN talk of containment and escalation and score their debat- ing points, one does not ask that they abandon legitimate objectives. But cer- tainly they should deeply consider wheth- er their means are suited to bringing the fruits of the Great Society to all the world. While some theologians are proclaim- ing that "God is dead," statesmen-and the rest of us, too-ought toask whether Erich Fromm is not more nearly right in saying that "man is dead," at least the kind of man able to build the Great So- cie-ty. -THlE ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH THE MICHIGAN State Univer- sity campus certainly has been enjoying a finals' week more in- teresting than most. The unusual flurry of activity has also pro- duced a strange contrast - the release of a faculty committee re- port on student freedom at Michi- gan State containing many lib- eral proposals with the riot-panty raids of the past few days. The report of the faculty com- mittee called for a definite change in the attitude of faculty and administration toward student rights. In the past, though it has been constantly denied by most iniversity officials, events at Mich- ikan State had shown that the administration felt it had the right to do what it pleased to students with little regard for due process or any other similar cour- tesies. The Paul Schiff case of last fall is an ample illustration of this. THE COMMITTEE'S recommen- dations included 1) the establish- ment of a student-faculty com- mittee on academic rights and re- sponsibilities. of students, 2)ra student-faculty judiciary which could, among other things, con- sider a student's application for readmission after it had been re- fused by an administration offi- cial, 3) a review of the structure and power of the student gov- ernment, 4) a change in the struc- ture of the Michigan State News to place editorial responsibility with the student editors, and 5) the creation of the office of Om- budsman, an official who would process and consider complaints from students. It was reported that the rec- ommendations of the committee had the enthusiastic approval of many student leaders. This is not surprising in the light of their past frustrating experiences with the administration. But, what about many of the other 40,000 students at Michigan State? WELL, for the last few days, seemingly oblivious to the events of the past week which promise to give them more freedom than they have ever enjoyed at State, they have been engaged in mas- sive rock-throwing riots that were conspicuously directedat that ma- ligned symbol of authority, the campus police. The riots, of course, were de- scribed by the administration as "a little letting off of steam" doubtlessly due to the tensions of finals week. They were confi- dent that the riots would subdue as the finals terms ended, as they probably will because school will then be over and the students will be gone. however, other sources attribute the riots to general dissatisfaction with MSU on the part of the stu- dents, partly resulting from the damning article in Ramparts The Associ by carney and w magazine on the univer. volvement with the CIAa ly from student concern poor quality of undergrad ucation. Indeed, the facu mittee reported that muc advice it received from was on the upgradingo academic quality. STILL, ONE wonders wi spark riots, not on oner on three, among students just received what amour release from the Middl that is, unless they were of it which is entirely poss sidering the low repute student paper at this time Many administrators w too ready to assume that son is that students re not capable of managing' affairs, let alone having in the administration of versity. But the causes riots, which certainly h occurred at most other s such a degree just becaus als, must go deeper than V THEREFORE, we are assume that something wrong at Michigan State sity. That something smells is evi- dent from the Ramparts article 7tes and other events, but, without a responsible campus newspaper voiter that is truly run by the students and that can voice their views, who can tell what lies beneath the calm surface depicted in ad- asd In ministration handouts. and part- In fact, no one knows exactly over the what the students at MSU think, duate ed- and numerous jokes assert that ilty com- they don't. But, what else can ch of the one say when the society of an students educational institution is as clos- ed as that in East Lansing? There is one voice for the institution hat would and that emanates from the of- night but fice of President John Hannah. wiht but If the problem is truly one of nho a communication, of anomie and e tgo-- a frustration in the forbidding [e Ages-- enormity of MSU, then the fac- unaware ulty committee's recommendations sible con- will help give the students a feel- . oing of involvement in their univer- e. sity. will be all the rea- BUT INVOLVEMENT of the Bally are students and recognition of their their own right to a voice in making the a voice policies that govern them is only the uni- half of the task at hand. Anoth- of such er equally important considera- have not tion is the respect the students chools to accord to the leadership of the se of fin- school-lack of respect for cam- that. pus authority was shockingly obvi- ous in last week's rioting. forced to To accomplish this more will else is have to change than the amount Univer- of student participation in the de- cision - making processes of the university, which will necessarily involve a limited number. The important criterion here is the general mood of the campus -- its image, so to speak-and the students' attitude toward that im- age. If they have no loyalty or respect for their institution, or if they are not given any reason to feel loyalty even among them- selves, then Michigan State can expect more riots. The alternative, an open cam- pus community, seems too advan- tageous and rewarding to neglect, but the past history of State in- dicates that this is what may be done. If this proves to be the case, the new power given stu- dents through the joint commit- tees recommended in the faculty report enables them to launch the fight for a more open com- munity at MSU-for once through the "proper channels." THIS SORT of a fight, as stu- dents at this University have learned, can be tedious and frus- trating, but, against a determined administration unsure of its own students, this is the only way they can "show their worth." Unfortunate? Of course, but, then, the situation in Mississippi is unfortunate also-to use aft ad- mittedly extreme comparison-and it has taken over 100 years to change anything there. 4- In Mexico City, When in Doubt-Strike By KAYE NORTHCOTT Collegiate Press Service MEXICO CITY-Nothing but an occasional snow storm or flash flood stops the American univer- sity student from carrying out his appointed round of lectures, quiz- zes and finals on an orderly aca- demic timetable. And if a student doesn't like the way his Univer- sity is run, he can start a petition, write a letter to the student paper, or form a committee and try to get things changed. Such an orderly process seems a bit stodgy to Latn American stu- dents, for they have more dra- matic ways of expressing their views. They strike. IN THE PAST three weeks a strike by 7,000 students closed the National University of Mexico and most of the other educational in- stitutions in Mexico City. This student revolt has been treated by the Mexican press as everything from an ersatz panty raid to an international commu- nist conspiracy. It has been treat- ed hardly at all by journalists in this country. A history of the strike may shed some light on its nature. ALMOST TWO months ago, a law school dean at the National University announced that no more make-up tests would be giv- en to suspended students. A num- ber of those affected by the de- cision asked to use the school's auditorium to denounce the law school Dean Cesar Sepulveda. When they were turned down, they reacted by handing out leaf- lets protesting the denial. Sepulveda charged that the leaf- lets were undermining his author- ity, and he suspended students for distributing this "subversive propaganda." The press inter- preted "subversive" to mean "com- munist,' and so the red label im- mediately became attached to the disgruntled students. Approximately 2,000 of the uni- versity's 7,000 law students began a strike in reaction to the suspen- sions. They took over the law building, barring the doors with stacks of chairs, and barbed wire, and hijacked city buses. NUMEROUS members of the law school faculty supported the strike, and soon it was Joined by studentsnin the schools ofneco- nomics and political science. The latter two schools soon abandoned their strikes and the law school students continued alone until two weeks ago on the forty-first day of the strike. On that day, a group of law students approached Dr. Ignacio Chaves, the university rector, with a list of demands. During the interview in Chaves' office, two students were beaten by members of the campus secur- ity force. When the students, bruised and bleeding, withdrew from the ad- ministration building, a group of students waiting outside became enraged. They marched on the building, breaking windows and beating down doors. Chaves was held captive for six hours until he and some faculty members tendered their resignations. The law students were again joined by students from the schools of economics, political science, and by, others including philosophy and letters and medi- cine. They took control of the power plant and buildings of the university, forcing all university schools and many others through- out the city to close. Violence raged in the university area for three days, but relative calm was restored by the weekend, as the students settled down to guarding their captured buildings. FROM THE FIRST demands for reexaminations grew long lists of university reforms. And from a small rebellion, the strike grew into an academic revolution. A majority of striking schools and the faculties of law and philosophy and letters have asked for the complete revision of the rules of the university. Their demands in- clude: -Abolition of the campus se-, curity force; -Cessation of administrative intervention in student organiza- tions; -Student participation in re- organization of curriculum and in the selection of rector and other top administrators; -University residences for stu- dents (There are none on cam- pus); and -Free medical services for stu- dents and workers. Besides university-wide reforms, students are writing and rewriting particular demands for each school. THE "FUNTA del Gobierno," governing body of the university, has yet to appoint a successor to Chaves. Few are anxious to accept the job. Striking students have composed about 12 per cent of the massive student body at the National Uni- versity. Naturally, a great number of nonstriking students are anxious to return to school while another portion of the easy-going student population shrugs off the delay in its education with a casual, "No importa." Some Mexico City newspapers are predicting that the strike will die because of dissension among student leaders and reluctance to lose more class time. (Law stu- dents may surrender a full semes- ter of credit.) Yet, strike leaders insist that they will maintain pos- session of the schools' buildings until a new rector is named and they are assured reforms will be instituted. THE CAPITULATION of Dr. Chaves is in many ways unfor- tunate. Striking students described him as aloof, exceedingly strict, and inaccessible. Many Mexican journalists, however, see him as a perfectionist, uninterested in pop- ularity but very efficient. Chaves had survived numerous; student revolts since his appoint- ment by the "Junta" in 1961. Soon after he took the tumultuous job of presiding over the largest uni- versity in Latin America, students seized the administration building, stoned his home, and declared a general strike in opposition to his policies. A' similar strike occured in 1964. His unpopularity can be attri- buted to his severe personality and his strong policies as rector. When he became rector, the National University, built to handle 30,000 students, had an enrollment of 60,000. Today, it holds more than 80,000. Chaves tried to eliminate the student loafers by easing out those who never attended classes and by instituting entrance re- quirements for the first time. He also tried to upgrade the faculty by setting higher teaching stan- dards and reducing the salaries of the inferior, and at times ama- teur, members of the 15,000-man faculty. CHAVES, it has been charged, did not try to stop the strike. He "could have resolved the conflict in the beginning with a little cleverness and conciliatory spirit, but he, far from having known or wanting to find a solution, threw more fuel on the fire every day," a columnist for El Sol wrote last weekaChavesheartily supported the law school dean, Sepulveda, and both were forced to resign. In the past 35 years, students have forced two other rectors to quit. Until 20 years ago, students themselves elected the rector, and they still think they should have a vote in the selection of admin- istrators. IT HAS BEEN charged by some Mexican newspapers and by the attorney general of Mexico that communists strongly influenced the strikers. Many of the student leaders are Marxists or Trotskyists, but the strikers emphasize that their complaints are academic rather than political. Strikers are of both the right and the left. Mexico's President Diaz Ordaz has been quoted as saying that he does not believe the strike is com- munist inspired or led. A reporter for the Associated Press explained that the attorney general linked the students to a communist conspiracy for political reasons. If the situation should become more tense and Diaz Ordaz decided to send in troops, com- munist infiltration could be used as an excuse for violating the sanctuary of the university, the reporter said. The National University sup- posedly is autonomous. Members of the "Junta" are chosen for life by other members of the self- perpetuating body. Since 1929 police have been banned from the campus. Chaves, according to a report in The News, an English language newspaper in Mexico City, talked of bringing in the police, but he realized that to do so, to flaunt the "autonomia" of the university, would trigger a national student uprising. Striking students insist that the university is not truly autonomous, and they believe that their reforms would make it so. THE "HUELGA" has disrupted the schooling of thousands of Mexican students and has rocked an already volatile city. By stan- dards in this country, both the students and the administration have gone ridiculously far in a disagreement that might have been settled by reasoning and con- ciliation. But most of the student demands are just, and neither the students, the faculty, the admin- istration, nor the citizens of Mexi- co City seem greatly disturbed by the extremist tactics in this aca- demic revolution. (Miss Northcott is editor of the Daily Texan. She and'other members of her staff have been covering the Mexican strike for CPS). is '41 Viet Nam: Light, Not Heat, Needed Now By DAVID KNOKE Vietnam: Between Two Truces, by Jean Lacouture, Random house, 1966 IF THE WAR in Viet Nam has done anything constructive at all, it has been to focus world at- tention upon that formerly ob- scure Asian nation to such a de- gree that the publishing world is being inundated with scores of books, articles and essays on the history, sociology and diplomacy of the divided nation. Much of this material has been inadequate. The torrent that flows through daily newspapers and newsmagazines and the terse edi- torials advocating one stand or another concern themselves with fragmentary, piecemeal slices of a complex question. This condition seems to be aleviated somewhat, however, by recent publications of scholarly research into the his- tory, origins and trends of the current conflict. The steady search of Sen. J. W. Fulbright to bring the light of reason to foreign policy can have vantage point. Lacouture is one of France's outstanding journalists and knows the leading figures in the wars, which he has been re- porting since 1945. The book covers the period from the Diem regime to the April 7, 1965, offer of Presi- dent Johnson for unconditional negotiations and a billion dollar aid program for Southwest Asia. While his chronicle is still too brief to deal with and fully docu- Cold War The blue sky greyed and shut away the sun. A snowflake, then another, one 'by one. The cold crept in and chilled the battleground, And whirling, blinding, snowy wind cut down. We both began to build a wall of snow Between us two, and then an- other low And snowy fence encircling each alone With snowballs piled up high-- ment the nuances of Vietnamese revolution and counter revolution, his staying force is in piecing to- gether a feel for the conflict in terms of individuals involved as well as groups. He reprints inter- views with National Liberation Front leaders, exerpts from a cap- tured Viet Cong's diary, the fas- cinating lethalness of the Ngo family before Diem and Nhu were assassinated. LACOUTURE RECALLS an in- terview with a triumphant Nguyen Cap Ky after that air general's planes helped topple the rule of General Khanh. Ky was just as impetuous then as now and his words of two years ago carry a haunting insincerity: Q: Are you sincerely in favor of returning power to the politi- cians? A: Of course. Its their job, not ours. We are here to run the war. Q: You have been quoted as favoring military action against the North. Is that true? A: Absolutely, and some action has 2red taken nace. one who rid the country of for- eigners. Lacouture goes right back to the abrogation of the Geneva Agree- ment of 1954 by Diem ("an Asiatic Phillip II"), especially the refusal of national elections and solicita- tion of forbidden military alliences with the Americans. Diem's rigid Catholicism and anti-Communism were to mount in an oppressive "witch hunt" forcing genuine nationalists into the NLF and culminating in the Buddhist self immolations that turned away world opinion and lead to a palace uprising that has placed Saigon's government under military rule ever since. Lacouture stresses throughout the factual narrative the idigenous nature of the NLF and Viet Cong movement. Definition of the North as an "outside" aggressor through support and supply of the NLF has been a bone of contention and a major stumbling block to nego- tiations. LACOUTURE ARGUES from a Frenchman's viewpoint - with France's former control of Indo- china ann Gaulle's interest in but to break up Viet Nam's eco- nomic unity was to attempt the irrational. He goes on to argue that Ameri- can military buildup 'seemed to block off possibilities for eventual reunification of the two sections, and as a consequence, Ho Chi Minh was willing to support Southern rebels after five fruitless years of abiding by the Geneva Argeements Diem would not keep. IN VIEW of the historical as- sociation of all of Indochina- which may be superficial Gaullist thinking in terms of Cambodia's intense xenophobia for her neigh- bors-Lacouture proposes a self determination of internal South Vietnamese politics including the NLF; establishment of economic ties between Hanoi and Saigon with eventual reunification; and a neutralization of all of former Indochina, insured by the Great Powers in the area. Lacouture's "Viet Nam: Between Two Truces" has its shortcomings of scholarship and personal bias, but is one of the first attempts to 4j. W - M 7,40-10- 10111-- 1