c 1 u t.gttn ti LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: Readers React to Qua ctio 4 Seventy First Year EDIrED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OP MICHIGAN nions Are F'ree UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL O STUDENT PUBLICATIONS W1il P~evai" STUDENT PUBLICATIONS BLDG. " ANN ARBOR, MICH. * Phone NO 2-3241 rids printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. ' Y, MARCH 22, 1961. i k NIGHT EDITOR: SUSAN FARRELL Members Must Consider Panhel's Changg ole iERE SHOULD BE hundreds of girls at the University wbe are informed and interest- enough to have an idea what Panhellenic ht to be. Recent procedural tangles-and r implications about the nature, structure future of Panhellenic-should provide these pie with food for thought. he Panhel Executive Council's nomination andidates for office deserves a searching. nd lobk, not only by girls involved so far by house representatives who will be voting ally next Tuesday. They will elect one of two ainees, chosen by the Executive Council from eld of three petitioners last Sunday. IE TWO FINAL CANDIDATES, presently office-holders, are now members of Execu-, Council; the unsuccessful petitioner is not. ?ne of the final candidates, as public rela- is chairman, was in charge of elections. lthough neither she nor the other Executive ncil members petitioning participated in the utssions or vote following petitioners' In- niews, the elections director chaired the rd of interviewers for the unsuccessful pe-, mer. anhellenic President Barbara Greenberg said thought all three girls were qualified peti- ers, with reservations about each. Since had not served on Executive Council and other two had, she said, experience was the n distinguishing factor between them, Bar- a said she saw no reason why a girl's role, Executive Council member-even Public Re- ns Chairman and Elections Chairman -- uld 'onflict with her role as petitioner for aination; in fact, this often occurs. She stioned the advisability of the elections Irman-petitioner interviewing one of her, is, but only if the interviewee was "uncom- able" about it. RBARA IS WORRIED about "bad faith." Since a situation like this might occur any r - and since there are no institutional ins to equalize this loaded chain of circum- ices -- she thinks criticism demonstrates iaging lack of 'confidence in the officers of hellenic. ut since the relatively few people involved the only ones formally aware of the cross- of roles involved, constructive criticism is bited. If criticism from the inside is to be with cries of "bad faith!" it is likely that e negative comment will be heard - and e positive change will result. ,is unfair to put an officer-petitioner in a tion where her interests conflict -because,; 'ever impartial she is, observers may infer opposite. However concrete the benefits of involvement in elections, the liabilities a to outweigh them. is unfair to put a petitioner in a position' re possible interest conflicts on the part an interviewer might harm her case, and a give her the option of concealing what- "discomfort" she might feel or being ac- d of "bad faith." OOD FAITH" is not an attitude that may be assumed in any situation. In this par- lar procedure, it is dangerously naive to look the possibility of question concerning motives and roles of those involved. Acting ,11 good faith-even idealistically-it would be possible to suggest changes in tlie pres- setup. When an organization loses -its ca- pacity to accommodate criticism,-difference of opinion, fresh thought, it becomes ingrown and sterile. The role of Panhellenic at the University is changing. Campus affairs and' student govern- ment will focus on the issue of membership selection for years to come, dealing in areas overlapping with Panhellenic's concerns. High time Panhel faced and considered the problems of an organization which is no longer a self- concerned social administrative unit but a poli- tical force 'on campus. A political force it will be, willy-nilly. The president will continue to sit on SOC, various houses will deal with the SaC Committee on Membership, various indi- viduals will represent. Panhel in campus poli- tics. Should Panhel regret the passing of the unexamined life, exert itself to retain the "club- by" atmosphere, abstain from overtly political' activities to avoid being smirched with the un- pleasant corollaries of practical politics? EVEN IDEALISTIC POLITICS--marked by free thought, open vigorous discussion, frank differences in values-sometimes creates tension. Sometimes good faith between indi- viduals suffers when all aspects of a question, all implications of a situation, are exposed and discussed. Good faith is certainly tested when the bases for group behavior and unity are. questioned. But what' is good faith if it ;can- not survive in a free, critical atmosphere? Nominations are over. Elections, however, are still to come. Constructive thought can and should be applied to the elections procedure by all members of Panhellenic-Executive Coun- cil, house representatives, and individual soror- ity girls. House representatives are chosen at random;" one girl from each class is suggested as the only criterion of selection. Why? These voting dele- gates will choose next year's Panhel officers on the basis of a platform and a speech-no more. Some flavor of politics might well enter into Panhellenic elections. 'VUHY, FOR INSTANCE, should not each can- didate visit each sorority, present her plat- form and answer questions from the floor? Why should there not be some dissent be- tween the views of the candidates, rather than' simple disagreements as to means of implemen- tation? Why shouldn't this difference of opinion be open and honest? In an atmosphere of 'real understanding and coordination, of good faith that is not artificial but natural, the system can take it. If debate anddisagreement withinthe soror- ity system can't be aired without creating enmi- ty between houses and harming the cooperative spirit of the association, this spirit of good faith must have shaky foundations. I DON'T BELIEVE IT DOES. The results of: examination and criticism on the sorority system at Michigan have been fruitful for the University and for Panhellenic this year. If they are to continue to be so, Panhellenic will have to. adjust to interaction with the outside community, not just within itself. If under- standing of {a basic living philosophy, coopera- tion to make this living experience worthwhile, and good faith based on mutual respect and shared interests are realities, the adjustment will be smooth. -JEAN SPENCER To the Editor: IN THE MIDST of the Quid- rangle controversy, recently re- newed by the presentation of Mr. Scheub's report, it strikes one that this is the opportunity for some good constructive criticism and suggestions as to exactly what may be done to improve the residence halls. The issues involved in this situation are numerous and for individuals to assert their; opinion on a basis of misconstrued fac- tual support is to merely com- plicate the purpose of this attempt to remedy the quadrangle dilemna. The value of this report of Mr. Scheub's stems not only from its content (Since I feel this type of document would have a more realistic method of assessing stu- dent opinion than the views pre- 'sented to Dean Rea and Vice- President Louis' as they spend as little time as possible visiting each house.) but also from ' the con- structive criticism of the people who care to learn enough about the problem to make constructive comments. The embittered "quad- die" and the sneering Greek will, to be sure, have more than their share of comments to make but the impulsiveness of these re- marks wil make their value doubt- ful. * * *. IN HIS APPROACH to the prob- lem Mr. Sigman has given every opportunity to drown the name of residence halls at Michigan in the mud of negative thinking and sen- sationalism. I'm sure he realizes this and yet I also feel that this means to an end was justified by the seemingly -aloof attitude of administration. The constructive and lasting value of this outburst will be bas- ed on the constructive criticism that will be offered, and not by the weeping and gnashing of teeth of the anti-quad faction of our student body. Complaints are certainly very legitimate in many areas of the residence halls sys- tem. If a complaint is justified and premeritation has formulated a means of remedying the problem then by all means express your sentiments somewhere where they may have ,an effect on the prob- lem. If enough unified and con- structive thought and effort are put in the residence halls .at this time they are certainly going to be better residences in which to live in the future. -John Greene, '62 Senioriis.** To the Editor: S ENIORITIS: THE DISEASE, which according to the admin- istration is the affliction of any senior student who voices 'an in- telligent criticism, in a construc- tive manner, toward any archaic set of administrative views and practices. Having become violently infect-, ed with this disease I hope to wander the campus and haunts of students, regents, and alumni to spread everywhere its terrible sympton-insight. An observation is in order about this malady. It takes till the senior year for a person to realize, the full impact and utilityror useless- ness of some of the administration of the University. * * , THE DEVELOPING furor over the conditions of residence halls is getitng into high gear. I feel by this letter I can reach those sincerely interested in the prob- lem and supply them with a few leads. First I must say I can substantiate any statement put forth here. Second I am speaking as an individual and not as a. spokesman for any group or or- ganization that I am a member of. In the school year 58-59, 1 was a resident of Winchell House in West Quad. John Hale, now as- sistant Dean of Men in charge of residence halls, was then resident director there. We had two men in our house that were uncontrollable and con- tinually disrupting the other resi- dents. One was a "full ride" ath- lete. Both were convicted in Ann Arbor courts for theft and put in jail for a week-end, then given a years probation. They had been selling the merchandise in the house. * * * THEY WERE EVEN more un- controllable after this. All appeals to Hale resulted in no action. That is none except benevolent coun- seling and admonitions to the rest of us to help "reform" the boys and be nice to them, mean- while we were supposed to keep' our doors locked and hope like hell for the best. Seeing they were getting away with everything due to the soft attitude taken, they continued their pattern of be- havior. Representatives' of the house council repeatedly asked for re- moval of these men as did the staff of the house. After a couple months of grow- ing disruptions and increasing Hale got a promotion for his ability and now handles all men's residence halls. The situation is so poor in the Quad, seniors and even juniors are given staff positions because not enough graduate stu- dents stick with it; or get all they can take early in the game. Many more stay because of finan- cial reasons than for the great benefits of Quadrangle living. -Lionel J. Gatien New Approach.-- To the Editor: WITH REGARD TO the recent controversy over the Scheub report, it strikes: me that so far an intelligent and perceptie ap- proach Ito the situation has been completely lacking. Therefore I should now like to enlighten some foggy minds.; It is appalling, to note that the Seniors Editors, in a front-page editorial, should, commend such an' obviously, unethical action as that taken by Herbert Sigman.' To work for an organization and at the same time voice loud dis- content with. it, as Sigman has done, is to diminish other people's rfpect for you-however valid your criticisms may be; and in the Residence Halls the respect in which the Resident Advisor Is held is the basis for his effectiveness in working with and for the residents. If.J were the Resident Director cft East Quadrangle, Herbert Sigman would now be looking for a job--. not because I agreed or disagreed with his opinions, but because' of the means he chose to bring them to light. The Senior Editors, in commending Sigman's course of action, show only their own poorly set standards of ethical conduct. Now let us look at -the report itself-or more generally,Istudent complaint with the Residence Hall system. In the first place, no in- tensive report, no IQC-Student- Faculty-Administration conference is necessary to make Residence Halls Staff and Administration aware of student complaint. Any- one acquainted with the Resi- dence Hall system and has a minimal amount of gray matter between his ears (this requirement excludes many of the residents) can sit down and draw up a list of the failings of the system. It is ridiculous to suppose that the Dean of Men's office, or the busi- ness office, has been shocked to see the list of student complaint revealed in the Scheub report. In the second place, it is necessary not only to look at student com- plaint, but to look at the students making the complaints. And here we ,note an interesting facet of a' broad trend: * * * THERE IS A small, self-styled group of liberals furiously at work in our student government on cam- pus, our Resident Halls, and on our student publications, who are so busy t waving the banner of Student Oppression that they are utterly carried away from the realm of common sense. The aver- age bystander, listening to this vociferous minority, would be led to the conclusion that our Uni- versity Administration was oc-. cupied with the weighty problem' of how to make students miser- able. Specifically, with regard to the Residence Halls, we note, ac- cording to the Letter to the Edi- tor of one Amos Perry the other day, that Assistant Dean of Men in charge of Residence Halls John Hale is a total incompetent whose primary function is to brush aside 181-page reports. Mr. Perry's pro- found freshman wisdom leads him even farther: "What does (Hale) know about how a-report of this type should be compiled? Has he' lived in these , .. Residence Halls for six years as Herb (Sigman) has?" It is difficult to overestimate theh ignorance shown by Mr. Perry's words John Hale has lived in and worked for Residence Halls before Mr. Perry was out of grade, school. He has more sound know- ledge about students and Resi- dence Halls than all of us put together. He has always shown himself to be a friend to the stu- dent and a conscientious adminis- trator. But unfortunately facts such as these mean less than nothing to Mr. Perry, who is too concerned about his own wants. THIS, THEN, IS our typical Op- pressed Student: a freshman, "forced .to live in the quads," who has "dozens of complaints." Does this individual for a moment sup- pose that people have no com- plaints about him? I would like to ask all our Oppressed Students to mentally place themselves at the desk of Assistant Dean of Men Hale, or-of Business Manager for Residence Halls Leonard A. Schaadt. Now imagine yourself (dear student) confronaed by these hundreds of students who want this, want that, want the other thing. They want the rules re- moved, yet are of insufficient maturity to conduct themselves like responsible individuals even in tn n- r% ofCh-1Ao .. it will come raining down from Heaven. Would you (dear Op- pressed Student) as a responsible administrator, feel secure in giv- ing in to their demands? Would you? The entire attitude of this self-: styled minority group of Op- pressed Students is absurd. They complain loudly about the ab- rogations of their rights and pri- vileges, and yet they are totally incapable of assuming any de- gree of responsibility. I would submit to these individuals that they are privileged to come to this University and are privileged to live in the Residence Halls. They are not required to do so. They can go to schooldelsewhere, if they wish (and relieve us of their pres-, ence). But I pity them when they are earning their living out in society. Their "all take, no give" attitude will trip them up any- where they may want to go, and they will say to themselves "What did I do?" when people shun their company. s s s IN CONCLUSION, 1 would be, the last to say that the -Residence Hall system is without problems, serious problems. I have lived in' them for four years, and have worked in their student govern-' ment-not out of obligation, but by choice. I have seen many prob- lems dissolve when worked out between mature, conscientious stu- dents and administrators. Many' problems still remain, and the Scheub report is nothing more than an inane reiteration of them. What the Scheub reports fails to mention is the biggest problem of all: How to do away with 'the' immature and misguided Oppress- ed Student who makes up too large a fraction, however small, of our Residence Hall population. -David L. Cation Lady Macbeth* To the Editor:: AM PLEASED TO see that after- many years of protest, taking variously the forms of meetings, letters, active and Passive rebel- lion, and riot, that a substantial rigorous criticism of the Univer- sity Residence Halls has warranted some attention. Mr. Sigman and Mr. Scheub are to be congratulat- ed for forming so effectively many of the complaints which have been 'voiced continually over the years by residents of this inmature and backward living system. There is no reason at this time to recapitulate the numerous fail- ings of the Residence Halls in the face of the extensive coverage of the Scheub-Sigman report. In- stead, I should like to emphasize the problems which this report- faces in its attempt to be effective toward some administrative action. THE FIRST AND loudest Lady Macbeth of the residence halls, according to Thursday's report in this press, was John Hale, weaned fromrthe very residence halls which prompted this report. Hale cannot be expected to give reason- able or uninvolved consideration to an attack, as empirical asthis one may be, on the home of his former loyalties. As an ex-staff member who knew Hale well when he saw action in the residence halls directly, I can speak from personal experience. Hale is a' small man with narrow objectives who followed the example of others before him, in using the residence halls as but a stepping .stone to higher administrative. achieve- ment. Never has he had the goals of the student in mind, never did he dare detour from the rigid paternalistic policies set down by higher adherents to a set of ir- relevant rules. I. donot wish to set up.Hale as scapegoat in this issue. Hale is no stronger although perhaps somewhat weaker than those who have preceded him. I merely wish to point up that the residence hall system as Scheub and Sigman have suggested, in no way meets any ' objectives of the original, Michigan House plan except those forced, by the students upon the administration, business office, and food service, in order to, quickly quiet those recurrent pro- tests whichhthreaten the tran- quillity of the water's surface. * * *. I AM ENCOURAGED that per- haps with the relentless pressure of a sympathetic press, an end may come of the abuse of students' in the residence halls for other aims, that some appointments in the administration of the resi- dence halls will come to be con- sidered by the appointees as more than a slow and dirty, but, sure way to reach a secure administra- tive job. ,I know that there are and have been devoted adminis- trators in the residence halls who see their job as important and whose high ideals have gone equal- ly unconsidered as those of the sincere authors of the report and the students represented in. it. These few will recognize the truth of my accusations. They have, in general, kept silent' in fear of their jobs or left the residence halls, as I did, in angry protest. Perhaps some of these staff members will' be, as I have been, encouraged by the direct honesty of the current report; and will finally speak out against 'the cold' lack of consideration, the injus- tices, and the selfish motivation which are apparent in the admin-r istration of the residence,,halls. Mr. Scheub's final statement classically bears repetition in view of its penetrating accuracy; "... if the residence halls are indeed stifling individual initiative by chocking student opposition, stu- dent criticism, student protest, student suggestion, then the resi- dence halls have indeed become oppressive, paternalistic, domi- neering." Mr. Scheub, these are indeed, at least peculiar adjectives to arise from a student body, as, pleased with its living conditions as the administration is. -Name Withheld Candidates Rebut. . To the Editor: XE THANK the Senior Editors for their interest and concern in the present SGC elections; we regret, however, that your editor- ial sometimes blends fact with vagueness, innunendo, and false statements. On vagueness: What do you mean when you say Ken McEl- downey has tried to be "all things to all people?" Do you mean that, he has contradicted himself dur- ing the campaign or something less obvious? If the former, yoir claim is false; if the latter, why didn't you use more precise and less suggestive language? On innuendo: You say that Bill Gleason's stand on discrimination is not clear and point this out, in part, by' quoting a sorority leaflet published in his behalf. You Im..- ply that he was responsible for the publication of this leaflet. Can you prove it? On false statements: You claim that although Roger Seasonwein has "been involved with many motions and programs, he has originated none of these." If he did not originate, for example, the Freshman Reading and Dis- cussion PrograM, who did? Are you implying that he gets his ideas from others and then par- rots them in his motions? Know- ing Mr. Seasonwein and his de- bate as you' must, do you honest- ly believe that-he has merely been parroting other people's ideas- while on the Council? We point out. these errors as examples-and there are more-- in an editorial which was' not written as carefully as it should have been. We hope that future Senior 'Editors will evaluate "S0 candidates but that- they will take greater. care to avoid vagueness, innunendo, and false statements. John "Tex" Curry, William Gleason,, Brian Glick, Mark Hall, John Martin, Ken Me- Eldowney, Nancy Nasset, Arthur Rosenbaum, Roger Seasonwein, and Jim Yost. y 1 :. A SIDELINE ON SGC: Member s' PreparatonU neven Letter of Intent' Quarrel 1H S0-CALLED letter of intent in regard o college enrollment of a prospective ath- has caused considerable controversy in its eer. signed letter of intent simply means that igh school graduate has indicated his in- ion to attend the school whose letter he endorsed. he Big Ten calls its letter a "tender" (it's contract" in the South) and Conference Dols vie to have a. boy sign their tender. s prohibits the 'other nine Conference Dols from even approaching him. The win- g school knows that the boy chose it' on its other than financial aid, because the Ten has a standard system based on need, set-up by the Conference office. [F IMPARTIAL OFFICE sends a financial form, to be filled out by the boy's family, indicate to what school or schools the a should be sent. The Big Ten office in- ns the school as to how much it can offer boy to cover the rest of his basic costs d on the Conference "grant-in-aid" plan., se costs are for room, board, books, tuition fees. A student in the upper quarter of graduating class can receive a full ride, not d on need. nce a boy has signed a Big Ten "tender," s still approachable by any other school in country. These schools, many under the !A financial plan, are able to give two more ncial benefits than the Big Ten; 1) they 't base their aid on need. and 2) they can' these will not be the prospective entrant's criteria. However, in many cases it apparently is. A national letter of intent would help to alleviate the raiding that exists, not only in the Big lien, but in other conferences as well. The NCAA proposed to let each school list a hypothetical 'number of "untouchables, with the particular prospects named and signed. being unapproachable by any other school. The proposal was defeated at a recent NCAA convention, with the strength of the small college vote' a key factor. As the smalled in- stitutions can't compete with the bigger ones in terms of quantity, they didn't want a bigger school to have a list that could not be touched. A CASE IN point involves a boy presently on the Michigan campus, who, had originally signed a Michigan- tender, but then was "bought" by a small college, only to return to Michigan after a 'year. The results were simply that the boy lost a year of varsity eligibility, and that a large school education and a chance, to make a name for himself athletically out- weighed the flimsy financial aspects. Keeping his original monetary choice in mind, it is obvious, that the smaller schools don't want a national letter of intent so they may continue to raid the big schools and wrest one or two prospects a year from them. Since the small institutions outnumber the bigger ones almost 10-1 in the NCAA, with each having one vote, it appears that such legislation will never pass. By PAT GOLDEN Daily Staff Writer THE CLEANEST DIVISION be- tween Student Government Council candidates this year is: not an ideological one. There is little disagreement among the contenders on any spe- cific issue. They agree that non- academic evaluations are unde- sirable; they agree that the Uni versity has a serious problem with driving and parking regulations; they agree that changes are need- ed in Regents' Bylaw 8.11, dealing with restrictions on lecturers in University buildings. At least, those who are talking agree. e S * FOR THE BIGGEST difference between candidates is the dis- tinction between those who know' what issues and problems there are, and those who simply do not have any background. Two of the candidates have never been to an SGC meeting, and evidently have no prior knowledge of the issues confronting the Council either now or in the past year. One candidate's main platform plank is that if he is elected he will obstruct action. He claims that SGC has overstepped its bounds in delivering opinions on issues of national character. Function G. of the SGC Plan, revised as of 1959, says the Coun- cil is "To serve as the official representative of the University student community in expressing opinion and interest .. . to the outside student and world com- munity"- A THIRD CANDIDATE makes but one issue statement in his platform, a personal condemnation of non-academic evaluations such as the ones used by the chemistry department. He urges that they be abolished. SGC asked the chemistry de- .partment to discontinue use of the evaiation cardi in a resolution more knowledgeable candidates is striking. Their acute awareness of. problem areas and their willing- ness to improve conditions is evi- dent from 'the platforms. They are the kind: of Council members the University needs, no matter where .they fall on a, conservative-liberal continuum,. IN HIGH SCHOOL student government. councils a-, broad knowledge of the school and the. world's;problems is not necessary. The Daily Official Bulletin is an' official publication of The Univer- sity of Michigan for which The Michigan Daily assumes no editorial responsibility. Notices should be sent in TYPEWRITTEN form to. Room 3519 Administration Building, before 2 p.m. two days preceding publication. WEDNESDAY, MARCH 22 General Notices Regents' Meeting: Friday, April 21. Communications for consideration at this meeting must be in. the President's hands not later- than April 11., The annual Selective Service College Qualification Test will be given on April 27, 1961. Applications for the test are available at Local Board No. 85, 103 East Liberty, Ann Arbor, 'and must be submitted before April 6, 1961. Selective Service registrants who are' full time. college students are urgedrto take.the test. The test may be taken only once. Residence Hali Scholarship: Women students wishing to applyfor a Resi- dence Hall Scholarship for the academ- ic year 1961-62 for Helen Newberry Residence may do so through the Of- fice of the Dean of 'Women. Applica- tions must be. returned COMPLETE by March 31. Students already living in this residence, hall and those wishing. to live there next fall may apply. Qual- ifications will be considered. on the basis of academic standing (minimum 2.5 cumulative average), need, and con- tribution to group, living. Seniors: Get your announcements nowi Announcements, at 12 cents each, will be sold from 1 to 5 p.m., March 22 to 31, in the booth on the first floor,. This is probably true at a great many colleges also. But that isn't the case at this University. The Council is a well- informed, responsible, active body. It can only remain that way if the, seats are filled each election with well-informed, responsible, active individuals. Students 'who do not know .what is happening in SGc, and who do not take the trouble to consider problems. and solutions should not bother running for the Council. fIAL, BULLE1TIN on Thurs., March 23 at 4:15 p.m. in the Backham 'Amphitheater. High Energy Physics Lecture. Series: Dr. Thomas Devlin, Physics Depairt- mient, University of California at Berke- ley, will speak on "Pion-Proton .Total Cros Sections and the Newly Discov- ered, Pion Proton Resonances"' on Thurs., Marcb 23 at 4 pm in 2038 Randall Lab. Lecture: Prof: Francis O. Schmitt, Department of Biology MIT, will speak on "Molecular. Specificity and -Biologi- calMemory" on Thurs.. March 23' at.3 p.m. In Aud. C. University Lecture: "Problems in 'the Reonstruction of African Culture Ws- tory" will be discussed by Piof. George P. Murdock, University of Pittsburgh, on Thurs., March 23,'at 4:10, in Aud. B. American Chemical Society Lecture: Thurs., March 23, 8:00 p.m., 1300.Chem- istry Bldg. Dr. Peter Yates, University of Toronto,. will speak on "Recent Work on the Chemistry of Natural Products." Lecture: '"rhe Influence of Marxian Biology on Forestry in the USSR"rill be discussed by Prof..Scott S. Pauley, University of Minnesota, on Thurs., March 23 at 4 p.m. in 2082 Natural Science Bldg. CancertResearch Seminar: "Host Fac- tors influencing the Prognosis of 'Car- cinoma of the vulva" will be discussed. by, Murray R. Abell, Department of Pathology on Thurs., March 23 at, 7;30 p.m. In 1564 East Medical Bldg. Every- one welcome. Applied Mathematics Seminar: Prof. C. L. Dolph will speak on "Non-linear Oscillations of a Cold Plasma, Thurs., March 23. at 4:00 p.m. in 2% West 'I '