Sefwy-bdrd TeAW
EDITrED .ANDnM-AGEB-rSiuensof EU NIER~srrT or MiicGAN
 UNDER AUTHORRT cF BOARD Dx COwROL OP STUDENT PUBICATIONS
"Where Opinions A e STUDENT PUBucATIoNS BLDc., A" ARBOR, MrcH., PHONE o 2-3241
Truth Will Prevail"
Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers
or the editors This must e noted in all rehrints.

SIDELINE ON STUDENT GOVERNMENT:
The Making of The President, 1963

kTURDAY, MARCH 23, 1963

NIGHT EDITOR: BARBARA LAZARUS


Might Doesn't Make Right
But, It's A Good Substitute

THE OFFICE of Student Affairs often makes
platitudinous statements about the import-
ance of students taking part in responsibile
activities, but then -OSA officials take actions
'which leave all but the most naive students
shaking their heads at the hypocracy of it all.
The most recent case in point is a- statement
of policy on chaperones at student social af-
fairs. It was contained in a letter from Vice-
President for Student Affairs James A. Lewis
to Student Government Council responding to
a motion SGC passed some time ago asking the
elimination of mandatory chaperone forms.
After hearing the letter, one Council member
summed it up in one word, "farcical."
Lewis noted that by recognizing a student
organization "the University acknowledges that
group as a worthwhile segment of the Uni-
versity community. This acknowledgement im-
plies a concern for the maintenance and foster-
ing of a standard of excellence within the
organization."
HE WENT on to add that "Direct correlation
exists between the presence of older per-
sons and a good social finction," and that the
OSA "works toward excellence in social func-
tions of all student organizations. The sub-
mission of chaperone forms is an aid to this
end."
The letter also listed some examples of
comments chaperones turned in on events
they attended. One report said, "We were
treated courteously and observed nothing in-
consistent with good conduct." A second pro-
claimed, "A grand group-so energetic! I sup-
pose our power seemed so very great too. We
all should have this opportunity-many times.
Very well mannered." The third asserted that
"The decorations were very cute and quite
good. The decorum at the party was above
reproach. As a pointer to the social chairman,
though, I would suggest that they schedule
more than dancing and one or two contests
for an entire evening."
The above comments speak for themselves.
They are not contributions to the quality of
the social event; they are the reports of people
who are more watchers and policemen. And
despite what was said about student groups
as a worthwhile part of the community, it
indicates a basic disbelief in the ability of
college students to plan and run a social event
without adult supervision.

THE RATIONALE for the SGC motion gave
the reasons for getting rid of the chaperone
forms but emphasized the wrong ones. One of
these was that the policy was loosely enforced
and therefore "by eliminating the rule we
would just be recognizing the lack of substance
in a ghost." Yet this is bad, because laws
should not be advanced or withdrawn on the'
basis of whether they can or cannot be en-
forced. Force is not the determiner of social
standards.
The rationale also cites the difficulty in find-
ing chaperones as a reason for eliminating the
forms. The above reasoning applies here also,
laws aresnot passed because they can be con-
veniently enforced.
The real mention for the elimination of the
forms,'which the rationale mentions briefly, is
that it is an insult to college students to say
they need policemen at social functions to
make sure that they follow approved behavior.
The OSA probably likes the chaperone system
because it keeps administrators informed on
what goes on at parties and also because there
would probably be a ruckus from parents and
alumni if they were eliminated. The reason-
ing that sees them as contributing to the
quality of the social event is spurious; the stu-
dents are the ones who can judge best. Ques-
tioning of affiliated students revealed that most
of them did not know the 'chaperone was
around. It also stands to reason that if students
can't plan their social events by themselves it
is about time they learned.
The report also brings out the fact that the
forms discriminate against the affiliated sys-
tem because apartment parties are not chap-
eroned. One is forced to wonder whether the
University's concern for the quality of student
'social events is limited to those students living
in University and affiliated housing or whether
feasibility of enforcement has something to do
with it.
Lewis' letter makes the point that the OSA
was, not carefully considered prior to the form-
ulation of the motion by Council and this is
a valid complaint. But it is hardly justification
for the rejection of the motion and even less
for a letter that was almost insulting in the
manner in which it dismissed the students'
complaints. If might doesn't make right, the
news has not yet reached the OSA.
-RONALD WILTON

By GLORIA BOWLES
STUDENT Government Council
went to the Hootenany in the
Union ballroom Wednesday night
and began its regular Wednesday
night session at 10:50 p.m.
Council members put in an ap-
pearance at the concert, but most
of them .were thinking of other
things: they were to elect Coun-
cil officers that very evening, and
thus bring to an anti-climax a
week of political maneuvering that
had begun with SGC elections on
March 3.
The presidential election, with
Thomas Brown and Kenneth Mil-
ler vying for the top spot, was up
in the air until about 6:30 Wed-
nesday evening when IQC presi-
dent Kent Bourland sat down to
dinner alone and made his vote
decision.
EVERY OTHER Council mem-
ber had declared either for Brown
or for Miller by then. Brown could
count on nine votes besides his
own, from Administrative Vice-
President Charles Barnell, Pan-
hellenic President Pat Elkins,
Treasurer Russel Epker, Inter-
fraternity Council President John
Meyerholz, Sherry Miller, Fred-
erick Rhines and Michigan Union
President Raymond Rusnak..
Eight votes were assured for Mil-
ler: Howard Abrams, Gary Gilbar,
Assembly President Mary Beth
Norton, Daily Editor Michael Olin-
ick, Michigan" League President
Margaret Skiles, and newly elected
members Thomas Smithson and
Edwin Sasaki.
Bourland, who came to the
Council as the new president of
Interquadrangle Council found
himself, in a position that he did
not relish: the last man to make a
decision, he could tie the vote for
president, and take the Council
into a second ballot. On the other
hand, his vote could assure
Brown's election.
WELL-VERSED in quadrangle
affairs, but admittedly "green"
when it comes to Council politics,
Bourland had been stewing over
his position for two weeks. In a
conscientious effort to make up
for some of his inexperience, he
conducted a series of informa-
tional interviews with candidates,
constituents and interested parties
for the last two weeks. He was in
his office until 6 p.ni. on the day
of elections, with seven appoint-
ments that afternoon. Representa-
tives of both Miller and Brown
were trying to convince Bourland
of the advisability of a vote for
their candidates.
Bourland, who says he is a
liberal, and voted with liberals on
basic policy issues including wo-
men's hours changes only a few
weeks before, finally concluded
that moderate Brown "would make
the better president." He is unable
to explain the reasoning behind
his vote, but contends that a
"total view" gleaned as a result
of his rounds of talks ed him to
the decision.
The enigmatic Bourland pro-
fesses a liberal philosophy, but
voted for a moderate for SGC
president. The IQC president "fed
on all the data" he could in a
two week consideration of the
presidency vote but finally came
up with a subjective evaluation.
BOURLAND seemed somewhat
confused by discussion at the
LETTERS
to the
EDITOR
To the Editor:
THE ATHLETIC plant at the
University is in . disgraceful
condition. Yost Field House, Uni-
versity Skating Rink, and the In-
tramural Building were all built
prior to 1928 when student enroll-

ment was less than 10,000.
The student activities fee at
the University is still $5 per se-
mester. $10 per year-by far the
lowest in the conference. It is $35
at Michigan State, $40 at Illinois,
$45 at Ohio State and $40 at In-
diana. In addition, most of the
conference schools charge students
for tickets to athletic events and
practically all of them receive sup-
port from university funds.
The Athletic Department at the
University has built intramural
facilities such as the women's
swiming pool and it pays out every
year $100,000 to maintain these
facilities. For 1961-62 the Athletic
Board received in student fees a
net of about $150,000; it paid back
to the University about $125,000
in tuition fees for grant-in-aid
students.
Other schools are financing new
intramural and athletic facilities
with student fees. We are so far
behind it will take long time to
catch up. A long overdue revision
of our inadequate token student
fees to the level of other confer-,
ence schools should be made at
once.
--Frederick J. Vogt, '25
Director at Large,
Michigan Alumni Association
Praise ...

Council table which centered
around the role of the President
of SGC, particularly implementa-
tion by the president of motions
passed by Council. The president
may follow several courses to carry
out the mandates of Council mo-
tions, the chief method being im-
plementation by writing letters.
Letters of implementation gen-
erally go to the Office of Student
Affairs, which has a veto over all
Council legislation, and .vhich
accepts recommendations from
Council on policy making directly
effecting students.
SOutgoing Council President Ste-
ven Stockmeyer was sometimes ac-
cused of sending out mild letters
of implementation for Council-
passed measures that he did not,
personally favor, and giving more
of a push to those proposals to
which he felt especially committed,
The Stockmeyer approach to the
Presidency never directly entered'
into discussion at Wednesday's
meeting, but both Miller and
Brown had Stockmeyer in mind as
they clearly delineated their views
as to the role of the president.
* * *
BROWN asserted he would im-
plement each measure passed by
Council with equal efficiency and
as quickly as possible. He said
"this does not mean that I do
not have a program as a member
of Council," but he does not see
the president playing a major ac-
tivist role in support of legislation.
Miller, however, pledged to im-
plementation of measures passed
by Council, said the president'
could implement these measures
"with more or less enthusiasm."
Miller would have put the power
and prestige of the president's of-
fice behind Council propositions
he considered particularly worth-
while.
His approach would differ from
Stockmeyer's: in fact, Miller has
been highly critical of the presi-
dency in the last semester, and
was also the first member to raise
his hand in officer's time to ask
the president: What has become
of this motion? What is being

done about that? Have the letters
been sent out yet? Has the presi-
dent made personal contacts with
the parties involved?
Miller, for example, would have'
taken advantage of his wide con-
tacts among members of the fac-
ulty to explain, and back the
student-faculty government mo-
tion. Miller would have made as
many person-to-person contacts as
possible in an effort to gain sup-
port for the plan. In general, Mil-
ler would not have been a quiet,
behind the scenes president who
saw himself a guide to the Coun-
cil, but rather an active and in-
volved president.
HOWEVER, Bourland had made
up his mind before this discussion
and before he entered the Council
room at 11 p.m. He was among
the last to be seated. The Council
room at the top floor of the Stu-
dent Affairs Building was crowded,
all constituent seats being occu-
pied. Everyone had come to see
who Council would choose as its
next President, to take a look at
the "new" Council and to get a
last one at the outgoing Council.
Steve Stockmeyer sported a pink
carnation in his lapel for the oc-
casion. He also announced that he
couldn't hand over' the gavel, be-
cause he didn't have. it. The presi-
dential gavel-along with a fifth
of scotch-had been taken from
his hotel room at the Young Re-
publican convention a, few days
before. YRs at Michigan State
have the gavel now; it is waiting
to be claimed.
Robert Ross, who used to sit at
the other end of the Council
table across from Stockmeyer,
hopped around the Council room,
pulling SGC members out into the
halls in a last-minute effort to
influence votes, and thus pull a
coup for Miller.
* * *
BARNELL, seen by Miller forces
as a possible vote only a few days
before, nominated Brown. He as-
serted that a "Council in transi-
tion" needed a Council president
who would subscribe to the role.


of the president known in pre-
vious years. He thought Council
needed "the continuity"' Brown
could give, and also noted that
Brown was "a more logical and
acceptable person" to deal with the
Harris report and its implementa-
tion.
Daily Editor Michael Olinick
spoke longer on Miller's behalf,
and said Council was not in tran-
sition but "in a rut." Olinick
thought that the days of the "pas-
sive, good-hearted" Council pres-
ident could be no more, and that
a more activist role was necessary
to give meaning to those motions
passed by Council. He noted that
Council has passed "some pretty
important and serious things, but
not done mucl to get them done."
Olinick was referring to pro-
posals for SGC participation in
Regental elections and the plan
for student-faculty government,
two of' the best motions to come
out of Council for many months,
but which have not gotten off the
ground after passage by Council.
He also noted that action on bias
procedure should have taken a few
;weeks instead of an entire year.
* * *
BROWN AND Miller both de-
livered acceptance speeches and
answered questions from Council
members. It was in this discussion
that each candidate delineated his
views on the role of the Council
president. As expected, Brown was
elected on the first ballot by a
10-8 vote. He received Bourland's
support.
During members time, the un-
predictable Bourland, in a flash
of emotion, looked across the
Council table at Miller, pointed his
finger at the twice-defeated presi-
dential candidate and said, "There
sits integrity."
Bourland may simply have
wanted to deliver a tribute to a
young man whom he "respects as
much as any one on this campus."
pr Bourland, who finds it dif-
ficult to define his political philos-
ophies and has shown ambivalence
and inconsistency in recent weeks,
may have felt a twinge of un-
certainty as to the vote he had
just cast. In either case, Bour-
land did not think about what he
was going to say to Miller; he
reacted to a situation and said
what he wanted to say.
* * *
VOTES SHOWED a consider-
,able shift after the presidential
election, with Edwin Sasaki elected
executive vice-president over Rus-
sell Epker by an unofficial vote
of 9-8. (Because voting is con-
ducted by secret ballot, none of
the exact tallies are "officVi," or
published in SGC minutes. How-
ever. Council members revealed
their choices, and ballot counters
released tallies, thus providing
sources of reliable and accurate
information.) . .
The "mandate of the people"
was ignored as Michael Knapp,
who ran first in Council elections
with a surprising 681 votes on the
first ballot, was turned down by
Council members on two occasions
for a Council office. Knapp was
defeated by Thomas Smithson for
the administrative vice-presidency,
and then again by Frederick
Rhines for the treasurer's job. In
the race for administrative vice-
president, Knapp wasndefeated by
a 12-5 bte with one abstention
and was then knocked out in a
try for the treasurer's post of a
12-3-3 split.
Conservatives thus switched over
to elect Sasaki, a liberal, for the
second Council post and four con-
servatives forsook Knapp to vote
for Smithson. The great shift came
in the last vote when Rhines,
elected by the campus on the final
ballot with 590 votes, defeated
Knapp for treasurer by a large
margin. .
ALL-CAMPUS elections which,
showing a majority of conserva-
tive votes, were followed by SGC
officer elections that put two

liberals-Sasaki and Smithson-
and two conservatives-Brown and
Rhines-on its executive board.
Brown is the only veteran, and he
will be fighting executive board
inexperience for weeks to come.
Besides that, Brown will guide.
Council through a spring whose
prospects for success look pretty

grim: he has moved over from
the executive vice-president's of-
fice next door to the president's
office.
It' is a move that Brown has
been wanting to make for a long
time. When he gets done wrestling
with student-faculty government,
the Harris report, Regental elec-
tions, women's hours, dress regu-
lations, rebel boards, the Office
of Student Affairs, an inexperienc-
ed Council, and an apathetic stu-
dent body, he may wish he was
back in the executive vice-presi-
dent's office typing agendas.
EEC OUTLOOK:
Cher?
By WALTER LIPPMANN
IT IS NECESSARY to take a
closer look at the bland and
cheery words of the President of
the European Economic Com-
munity, Dr. Walter Hallstein.
When he was in Washington re-
cently, he asked us to be pa-
tient'" and assured us that Britain
would be admitted ."eventually,"
perhaps even within two years.
Considering this, we are bound to
ask what can happen in two years
to transform the Anglo-Saxon
oceanic islands of Britain intoba
qualified European state capable
of playing an equal part with
France an Germany in European
affairs?
I think I know what Dr. Hall-
stein means, having' heard him
say when I was in Brussels at the
beginning of 'December that the
British'.application had come too
late-the British had refused to
join at the beginning in 1957-
and the application had now come
too early, for in the "Europe"
which the six founders are making,
"the bones are not yet hardened."
* * *
WHY, we must wonder, will the
bones have hardened in two or
three years? The answer to this
question is the key to much that
is happening.
This is the year 1963, and fol-
lowing Article 8 of the Treaty of
Rome, the six are in the second
year of this second of the three
"stages" prescribed in the treaty.
During this second stage, the veto,
,which might have delayed the
ending of stage one, can be used
only to prevent delay.
During stage two, the six, hav-
ing agreed on the broad principles
of agricultural policy, are putting
the power to work out the terms
of he agreement on Dr. Halstein's
commission. In effect, it becomes
a Federal European Ministry of
Agriculture. The critical fact is
that internal agricultural prices
will be set in this period. The
height of the Common Agricultural
Tariff is determined by the in-
ternal prices, since it is a variable
levy calculated to protect Euro-
pean products.
* * *
WE ARE now in a position to
see why we are advised to be
patient for two ,years. During
these two years, the agricultural
policy of the Common Market,
with France the main beneficiary
and West Germany a lesser bene-
ficiary, is to be formed without
the British being present. The
British absence are the argicul-
tural tariffs and levies. which will
penalize America, the Comnion-
wealth and the Latin-Ameican
farmeds in favor of French and
West German farmers.
The real question about the two-
year delay in admitting Britain,,
and the reason why it is not easy
to be cheery about it, is that the
two years may be used to make
the European Economic Commun-
ity restricted, exclusive, largely
self-contained and, with varying
accompanying military and politi-
cal agreements, a closed commun-
ity under French control with
German assistance.

Whether the United States has
the means to combat the move-
ments of Europe into restriction
and exclusiveness is not yet clear.
We have much at stake, and the
real issues should not be hidden
from us by bland and cheery
words.
(c) 1963, The washington Post Co.

Bias Is A Way of Life

IT WAS gratifying to see that all the can-
didates in the Student Government Council
election voiced their opinions on the problem of
discrimination in membership selection.
All the candidates declared they were against
discrimination, which is indeed an admirable
stand. Way back into the decades preceding
written history, candidates have included this
issue in their platforms. At the University, it
has become a prerequisite of running for office.
One sentence and possibiity two in a candi-
date's platform statement must be devoted to
the problem of discrimination and specifically
discrimination in membership selection. Judg-,
ing from what was written and said during
the campaign, not many Iof the candidates
have bothered with the actual implications of
the problem.
REGENTS BYLAW 2.14 states that the Uni-
versity shall not discriminate and that no
organization which is associated with it shall
discriminate. SGC has been extremely vigilant
of the membership clauses of various groups
which have come before it for 'recognition.
Much work has been done concerning dis-
crimination in fraternities and sororities.
Currently, five sororitiesi have not submitted
statements on their membership procedures to
SOC. Of course this makes a beautiful issue
for knocked kneed liberals. But the problem
goes much deeper.
The issue of membership selection on this
campus has had a very long life. From all in-
dications it will continue to live on for years
to come. Candidates for student offices will
continue to come out against discrimination
as candidates for public office come out for,
GOD, country and American motherhood.
A FEW of the candidates in the recent elec-
tion have realized that the problem of dis-
crimination cannot be legislated out of exist-
ence. In the past, this is the type of action
Editorial Staff
MICHAEL OLINICK, Editor
JUDITH OPPENHEIM MICHAEL HARRAI
Editorial Director City Editor
CAROLINE DOW..................Personnel Director
JUDITH BLEIER .............. Associate City Editor
FRED RUSSELL KRAMER .. Assoc. Editorial Director
CYNTHIA NEU.................Co-Magazine Editor
HARRY PERLSTADT ...........Co-Magazine Editor'
TOM WEBBER...... ............... Sports Editor

that SGC has taken aaginst discrimination in
fraternities and sororities. It has made these
organizations remove bias clauses from their
charters and file reports on their membership.
selection procedures.
The remainder of the candidates fell into
one of two categories. In the first, were those
students who although supposedly against dis-
crimination were also against the meddling of
SOC into the sacred selection procedures of
fraternities and sororities. Therefore, while they
opposed discrimination they also opposed the
implementation of actions designed to end it.
In the second group are those students who
favor further action but action of the same
type that SGC has taken in the past. Hence
they favor more legislative measures which, no
matter how numerous, will not effect any
real change in the existing situation.
The problem of bias clauses is or soon will
be a dead issue. Fraternity stipulations of this
sort are too flagrant to stand up against Uni-
versity regulations. However, there are latent
methods which are much more effective. These
methods cannot be combatted and defeated as
easily as bias clauses. On the top of the list
are the so called "gentlemen's agreements."
Fraternities and sororities ban together and
secretly agree not to pledger members of a
certain race or religion. No written agreements
are involved and therefore this method is
usually hard to detect. But on occasion, these
understandings come to light, and when this
occurs, other methods are resorted to.
A silent consensus among the members of
a fraternity and a sorority is probably the
most effective means of discrimination. It is
almost impossible to detect and prove. 'It is
this method that is now in use at the Univer-
sity. Because of this fact, one former member
of SGC jokingly said; "The only way to get
rid of discrimination in fraternities and sorori-
ties is to get rid of fraternities and sororities."
A WHITE Anglo-Saxon Protestant fraternity
may wish to keep its inner sanctum pure
of other races. No legislative enactment or
bylaw can alter this situation. Discrimination
is a frame of mind against which it is very
difficult to legislate. How do you legislate
bigotry out of the minds of people? It is
pretty near impossible.
A fraternity or a sorority is only the aggre-
gate of its members. Wipe out the discrimina-
tion in each affiliate and the problem will
be no more. Of course, this is much easier said
than done. However, trying to wipe out dis-
......,........r...,_,.

FANTASY DIGRESSION-Sigmund Freud (Montgomery Clift),
cigar in hand, pauses to consider the inner implications of his
impending actions. His earlier trials and tribulations are currently
depicted on the screen of the Michigan Theatre.

Freud Uneven;
Clift Questionable

N FILMING "Freud," John Hus-
ton has re-shuffled the chon-
ology of Freud's discoveries, and
reconstructed a rudimentary fac-
simile of the early theory (to
1897) which can make some sense
when presented serially. To make
it palatable, and a "dramatic pro-
duction," the psychoanalytic struc-
ture is fitted out with episodes in
Freud's life, both real (though
anachronistic) and fictional.
Granting this power of recon-
stitution as a dramatic premise, I
must review the picture from two
aspects, since it claims to be both
a movie and a textbook, and be-
cause these two never quite merge
successfully.
As an introduction to psycho-
analysis the film is at once good
and bad. Good because most of
.the crucial concepts are presented,
if only with brief lip-service, and
the progression from one to an-
other flows logically; the only
really difficult gaps to bridge being
why free association was better
than hypnosis and just why, at
the point when it is presented, the
theory must be based on infantile
sexuality.
Bad because of the misleading
hypnotic techniques, and, ironic-
ally enough, because' of an over-
zealousnessrto squeeze in every
last bit of relevant material, which
results in, what I suspect is, a
presentation that is confusing to
the layman and offensively insub-
stantial to the psychiatrist.
* * *
FAR MORE interesting is a,
onnsideratinn of the mnvie as a

fectly appropriate to the movie's
theme, and immediately access-
able (the clitoral mother in the
womb-cave, for instance). This is
the kind of symbolism some
authors dream of but don't dare
to introduce as superfluage. The
gradual unfolding of flashback
technique, since "Marienbad"
seems to be here for good.
The fidelity to history is uneven.
Montgomery Clift looks quite a
bit like Freud, Susan Kohner looks
just like his wife. Charcot and his
clinic are straight out of that
popular etching, and Freud's bed
is covered with that terrifying
afghan.
Larry Parks, on the other hand,
neither looks like Breuer nor acts
like anyone you ever saw. As Al
Jolson he was admittedly hitting
his stride hard, as Breuer he is
still a sort of bearded Al Jolson.
Miss Kohner is a fine actress,
easily outdistancing Susannah
York, who plays Cecily, a com-
posite of Freud's, and others', pa-
tients.
CLIFT DOES his role adequately,
but it is the wrong role. He is
coarse and bug-eyed as Freud, who
was so immensly and subtly cul-
tivated that any comparison be-
tween Clift's Freud and the real
thing is best left unmade.rItris
sufficient to note that in the con-
text of Clift's Freud, the rail-
road station dream, with all its
intellectual and cultural trappings,
looks strangely out of place; es-
cargot on a plate of corned-beef
hash.

FROM ANOTHER CAMPUS:
Students- and Power

(EDITOR'S NOTE: The following
is an excerpt from the editorial page
of the Cornell Daily Sun.)
STUDENTS can be justly proud
of the Academic Integrity Code
which will soon come up for final
approval. It is a radical proposal
for complete unification proce-
dures dealing with cases of aca-
demic fraud. Perhapscmore im-
'portant, the proposal comes from
the students and gives them some
part in determining university pol-
icy. But the proposal is plagued
by a final inability to give the,
students real responsibility.
The code, which has been wal-
lowing in faculty bureaucracy for
nearly a year, provides for one
judiciary body to consider all cases'
of cheating. This plan will end'

he plans to take action in his own
sphere of jurisdiction.
THE FACULTY should recon-
sider one point in the code. The
code as it presently stands pro-
vides for five students and five
professors to sit on the committee
which will judge guilt and mete out
punishment. But the students will-
not be able to vote on punish-
ments. The justification for this
is that if a suit were brought
against the committee and the
university in a specific case, the
student could be hurt.
First, no suit has ever been
brought against the university in
a case of academic misconduct.
Second, why shouldn't students
share the responsibility for their