r Adidl r at DBaily Se eely-Third Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDNTS OF THE UNIV'ERSTY OF MICHIGAN UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS "Where OpInions Are Free STUDENT PUBLCATIONS BLDG., ANN ARBOR, MICH, PHONE No 2-3241 x ruth Will Prevail" Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in ar reprints. SUNDAY, MAY 3,1964 NIGHT EDITOR: JOHN KENNY The State Senate Should Pass thne Massachusetts Ballot STRANGELY, IT TAKES the Republi- ed to vote for 110 state representatives, cans a long time to wake up when 38 state senators and 19 congressmen. something is being put over on them, With this many openings the election but now and again their awakening comes commission will have to dig up a bedsheet in a burst of brilliance. for a ballot, and Democrats will undoubt- In Michigan, the Democrats are lead- edly be hard-pressed to find voters who ing the Republicans a merry chase over will wade through the many names on the problem of congressional and legisia the ballot hunting for the ones they've tive reapportionment, with the obvious been told to vote for. hope that they can confuse matters long Republicans outstate find a different enough so the whole state's Washington situation. In many cases, there is no and Lansing delegations will have to be Democrat opposition and in still more, elected at-large. Democrats favor this the Republican is quite well-known eventuality in the hope that, with hun- among the voters. Clearly, the Massachu- dreds of names on the ballot, the tradi- setts ballot would put the Democrats at tional straight party voting in Detroit a disadvantage. will carry the day and sweep tons of Democrats into office. SO IF THE MASSACHUSETTS Plan is simply a ruse to boost GOP chances, OR MONTHS, the GOP let their Demo- why then should it be supported? The crat counterparts get things further reasons are two: First, the Massachusetts and further entangled without retaliat- ballot upholds the American ideal of ing, but last week the state House of Rep- electing the best man to an office and resentatives struck back. In a straight makes the perpetuation of a machine, party line vote, the House passed a bill dominated by one faction, more difficult. changing Michigan's ballot from straight It also requires that the voter be a gen- party tickets to the so-called Massachu- erally aware, discerning and intelligent setts Plan. (On the Massachusetts ballot, person, and it will undoubtedly encour- candidates are not listed by party, and it age the electorate to become more in- is not possible to vote a straight party formed with regard to their elected offi- ticket.) The bill now awaits action in cials. the Senate. Butsecond, and more important, it will This action, if enacted, will be quite reprimand quite effectively, those who a blow to controlled voting. Up to now, it tried to take Michigan's government and hasn't taken a whole lot of intelligence turn it into chaos for their own political to vote. One simply was told to step into gain. the booth and pull the upper left hand lever, resulting in another straight vote TRUE, APPORTIONMENT in Michigan for the Democrats. Under the Massachu- is a problem-and a serious one. But setts Plan, however, it will be necessary nothing is solved by creating a situation for the voter to vote for each office and in which the voter and his interests are each candidate individually and by name. sacrificed to a three-ring circus. And an This certainly makes it much harder to at-large election couldn't possibly be any- get a straight-line party vote. thing more than a giant farce. Before he stepped down from the Unit- HE EFFECT on Michigan politics ed States Supreme Court, Justice Felix should be obvious. True, there are just Frankfurter opposed any judicial med- as many straight party votes outstate dling in the problems of apportionment, for the Republicans as there are in De- which he described as a "political thick- troit for the Democrats, but. only the least informed person would contend that It can only be that he had Michigan's the similarity goes any further. By and Democrats in mind, for they have turned large, the solid Republicans outstate representative government in Michigan would be able to identify their candidates into a game of musical chairs. on the ballot, whereas the solid Demo- crats in Detroit might well have trouble THE MASSACHUSETTS PLAN in Mich- picking the men they're supposed to vote igan will do something useful; it will for out of the hat. untangle some of the brambles in the And the Massachusetts Plan will be thicket. Let us only hope the Senate will especially effective should there be an have sense enough to pass it. at-large election, for a voter will be ask- -MICHAEL HARRAH TODAY AND TOMORROW: SLodge: Silent in Saigon by Walter Lippmann A LAST GLANCE: 'U' Changes and an 'Outdated' Senior By BARBARA LAZARUS Personnel Director, 1963-64 ONE OF the strange things about the University is that one can see rapid and far- reaching future changes in it, even while still a part of it. By this I mean that as a senior I am already outdated by the brighter freshman classes, and I can see things like the residential college, a largor University and new teaching methods on the horizon. Nevertheless, there are a num- ber of problems that I believe may cause harm, or at least greatly alter the basis of the University. ONE SUCH PROBLEM is the steady crush of new students who are now pushing and will con- tinue to push into college for the next 20 years. Some older profes- sors feel that once the University reached and survived the massive size of 26,000 students it could survive anything quantitatively and qualitatively. But, in my own mind, the projected forecast for 'TALKIES' After the Silents At Cinema Guild !HE CINEMA GUILD is pres- ently showing three early talkies" - two from Hollywood and one from Paris. And the or- der in which they are presented tends to go from good to bad. The Buster Keaton comedy, "She's Oil Mine" is the best thing on the program because it utilizes so much of the silent screen com- edy technique a la Max Sennet. It is pure cornball slapstick per- petrated by a master of the com- edic trade. And yet there is always an hilarious comment on contem- porary mores. However, do not let ideas both- er you and interfere with the fun of watching fun. Laurel and Hardy were never too popular with the critics. That is understandable because they were more pathetic and sad by them- selves than as a symbol of the star-crossed "everyman" trying to live in a hostile world. They wereiphysically funny very often, as evidenced here in "Laughing Gravy," (and that is always a treat), but I feel as if they were two sisters who enjoyed sobbing on my shoulder. RENE CLAIR'S "Under the Roofs of Paris" Is, in 1964, a twitching bore. It seems to be the Paris version of some American musical I have seen many times and, at the same time, a piece of cinematic atmosphere and musical interlude designed to be refresh- ingly entertaining. Rene Clair wrote a solid script and the pro- duction is intelligent and enter- taining. Half the time, though, the actors mouth their lines un- der some delightful Parisian music and the other half they play with lines they are not sure how to deliver (the result of inexperience in the "talkie" form). Yet, the act- ing is generally good and the laps- es are brief. The subtitles are con- fusingly incomplete, while some twists and turns in the plot and unresolved gestures by the actors leave the audience with the desire to hope the movie will soon end. It is unfortunate that the talent in this film is weighed down by an incomplete knowledge of the new genre-the "talkie." -Michael Juliar triple 26,000 students ten years from now is apalling. While the new residential col- lege may be a feasible solution to meeting this growth while main- taining a small college atmos- phere, there is always the ques- tion whether its progress and funds will move fast enough. Somehow a mammoth Univer- sity with even less personal con- tact that it has presently would be a far less satisfying institution, and it might possibly just become an educational assembly line merely replacing and revamping society's needs. THE LARGE lecture situation is one manifestation of the grow- ing University, and in many ways it has injured the educational process. I am aware that in many basic courses there is no solution to having a maximally sized class, but it is disillusioning to find massive classes in the upper levels of one's major. In such classes one finds that students furiously take down notes and feel little ob- ligation to read the assigned ma- terial on which the lectures are based until the end of the semes- ter. More important than this is that when a professor asks a question of the class, he is met by bovine-like stares. Students are often afraid to respond because they are afraid of giving an in- correct answer. The student feels deep inside that he will make a fool of himself if he is wrong. Sometimes students do not re- spond because they do not wish to exert the effort, and I have sat in courses where students do not answer any questions at all. EQUALLY DISTURBING is that some professors are pedantic and voice controversial opinions or interpretations, and all these are taken down with the lecture note "facts" and never challenged. One tool to eliminate this situation, the recitation section, is poten- tially good and presently badly used. If recitation leaders, at least have some status within the department and could stimulate debate and questioning of the ma- terial, there might be some de- crease in a lecture group's apathy. Related to this could also go a better use of the professor's of- fice hours. One thing that has always amazed me about the Uni- versity -is that most professors are accessible through their office hours. But rarely, if ever, do studentsruse these hours, and the professors either sit in their of- fices in relative peace and quiet or just stop ooming. There is no absolute rule that says that one must have a specif- ic gripe or question to ask before he gains access. In fact, profes- sors are perfectly willing to dis- cuss other issues with students, and both parties benefit from this more personal exchange. Since office hours are being unused by undergraduate students, eventual- ly they might disappear entirely. Without use of such opportunities education will shift and possibly already has shifted to a passive process which lulls one's mind into absolute laziness. THE HONORS PROGRAM in another area that sorely needs to be investigated. Unlike some, I do not criticize its method of selec- tion as much as what it does with students after choosing them. In some departments no careful planning or creative thinking has gone into the program, and those participating do not find it a worthwhile experience. The pro- gram needs a good survey of par- ticipating students as well as those who have dropped out to find out just what it lacks, what its orientation should be and how it can be improved. The honors program should also do its best not to foster elitism and pedantic thinking among its ness and isolation from the main- stream of the University Oo not always indicate flexible and think- ing minds. I ALSO BELIEVE that student activities and the honors program Some departments refuse to have are some what mutually exclusive. a student activities person in their program, but much of this is due to the likelihood he can- not do both sufficiently well. But the active and, what I consider to be, more well-rounded person deserves the chance to try both and, if necessary, to choose be- tween them. There is nothing spurious about activities, and they are not anti-intellectual, as I was once told. The honors program has become in some departments a highly concentrated academic experience in that particular field, but for students who do not plan to enter the discipline, it is perhaps too concentrated. In devoting one's self so deeply to the academic world, a student can miss another dimension of his education. * * ANOTHER interesting phenom- enon about the University is the amazing conservatism of its fac- ulty members. Many students come to the University thinking of professors in terms of activa- tors and stimulators of change, if not in society, at least within the University. But instead faculty members are usually overly deliberate in their decisions and lock up pro- posals for change in one of a myriad of faculty committees. Often, surprisingly enough, fac- ulty men are more anti-student and against greater student free- doms than the administration. It becomes difficult to find any real leaders and innovators within the University, since students are too transcient, faculty often shirk in- volvement and administrators are out of touch with the real situa- tion. IN THE REALM of student ac- tivities a shift is also occurring and, as academics and the tri- mester take over, student activi- ties people are beginning to van- ish. Consequently there is evolv- ing what I would call the "self- ish" personality. A student no longer extends himself outside his safe, little world and under- goes the element of strain involv- ed in participating in extra- curricular activities. Confront a student wrapped up in the library world, and he defends himself by saying that he uses his spare time for outside reading, concerts and a social life. While the latter may be overly fulfilled, somehow the individual cultural program never gets off the ground, and the spare time just wastes away. I have come to believe that this "selfish" personality is the pre- dominant form in undergraduate life. Apathy, student disinterest and a growing avoidance of ac- tivities indicate that the average collegian wants to be left alone and to remain society's adoles- cent, taking from the University, but failing to give anything back. The value of community service is one that I believe in, and one which sadly has begun to disap- pear. IN THE REALM of affiliate life I now see that while the tri- mester and freer apartment per- missions might injure the system, it will manage to survive. Un- fortunately the sorority-fraternity mentality is very much a part of twentieth century American life. We all want to be accepted and participants. Intellectual snobish- have some feeling of identity, and sororities, fraternities, country clubs and exclusive neighborhoods are all manifestations of this need. Each year University women flee the anonymity of dorm life and run like leemings into rush, and each year the secure, accept- ed sister make value judgments about other people's personalities. It's a very cruel system, which does not seem to justify the hell everyone goes through to get in, but it offers such a basic need and feeling of acceptance that it will last. The University also has done a fairly good job in liberalizing rules for women. Although the Office of Student Affairs is often slow and balky on changes, we are far better off than many other institutions. Apartment per- missions will probably be shoved down the line to junior and per- haps even sophomore women, but it will only be done by the con- tinuous, organized and active push of women students in efforts similar to the Women's Confer- ence Committee and the active Woman's Judic of two years ago. THE PROCESS of viewing Uni- versity problems in any editorial is very much a part of one's value system, and those I have selected are the ones that bother me a great deal. The Daily gave me the chance to speak about these prob- lems and to learn about and, in some sense, give to the University. It also helped to give me a feel- ing of identity, which I would not have had in a purely academic experience. About two years ago an honors professor told me that I would be missing the academic experience of a lifetime if I stayed on The Daily, which he described as an institution of 'all tinsel and no substance." He was very wrong. .t .,,,sM1 I' ' 'AMERICA, AMERICA': A Melting Pot of Emotion At the Michigan Theatre "AMERICA, AMERICA" is a' most perplexing motion pic- ture. It is compelling and yet un- even, containing moments of real cinematic brilliance along with some that are dramatically mono- tonous. Theplot is basically concerned with the life of a young Greek (Stathis Giallelis) who becomes. possessed with a dream of Ameri- ca. The boy leaves home to go to Constahtinople. He is tricked and robbed by a'sly Turk and arrives at the shop of his uncle pen- niless. He then attempts to earn the ship fare for transportation to America only to have seven months wages stolen from him by a prostitute.'Next he courts the homely daughter of the town's wealthiest merchant in an at- tempt to secure her dowry, but before the wedding he is seduced by the wife of a rich American who thus pays for his passage. x . * THERE ARE plots and subplots woven in and about the general story line and except for a very trite and messy introductory 15 minutes, Kazan handles the threads with both skill and beauty. Character is adeptly fash- ioned through position and speech (e.g. the traveling beggar) Kazan's main concern, however is with the development of Stathis. His character is never sacrificed in order to present a clever, or eccentric part. The character of Stathis there- fore is vital to the success of the movie and it is here that the con- fusion first sets in. The boy is often rather poorly portrayed with glowering eyebrows and a turned head often substituting for his- tronic ability. However when Sta- this is courting the merchant's daughter (Linda Marsh), Giallelis manages to be not only convincing but also compelling. The interlude of the family dinner is a brilliant cinematic moment. Yet Kazan loses this and resorts to the in- effectual and poorly developed se- duction sequence. AND SO GOES the whole film. Kazan creates within the two and one half hours sequences of re- markable clarity and depth (such as the family awaiting word from Stathis, the burning of the /Ar- menian church and the aformen- tioned dinner.) Yet he seems in- capable of sustaining this clarity and maintaining a high esthetic level. Often Kazan seems to lose his hold on the dignity of his purpose and presents standard viginettes or low comedy. Much of the success of the film belongs to Haskell Wexler, the head of photography. "America, America" has some of the finest black and white photography of any recent American picture. Wex- ler approaches the lyrical beauty and meaning of India's Ray in his handling and fusing of scenery with plot development: the soft muted greys of the countryside, the finely etched lines of the city, the dark brooding atmosphere on board the ship, the strict starkness of the merchant's home. Wexler makes his camera do more than record; it also interprets. * ,, * KAZAN DESERVES PLAUDITS for his open and searching pre- sentation of the everyday torment and terror that consumed the peoples that swarmed to America in search of that nebulous identity "freedom." Kazan never winces in presenting the issues of morality and choice, that become sublimat- ed to the overwhelming goal of reaching America. Stathis repeats the prophetic words of his father "My honor is safe ... inside me" to explain that the shame and de- gradation was both expected and accepted. But the real issue for Kazan is that concerning the import of the magical word "America" to the homeless, hungry and subjugated peoples of Europe. Just as Stathis looks to America for a cleansing of his soul, so the people saw hope for all men in the young nation. And the corrupt and unfeeling Americans that Stathis does en- counter cannot destroy the dream' for dreams aren't measurable as people are. * * "AMERICA, AMERICA" is an honest though erratic film. It is much to long but still very moving. As a unity it fails, but what an intriguing, magnificent failure. -Hugh Holland . 4' WHATEVER THE REASONS for Am- bassador Henry Cabot Lodge's in- creasing strength among Republican vot- ers, he is not open to criticism on the ground that he is playing politics from an embassy abroad. When he asked President Kennedy for a diplomatic post, he must have been as certain as was everyone else that he had retired permanently from active politics. He could not conceivably have had it in mind to run as the Republican candidate against John F. Kennedy, to whom he had lost two elections. Ambassador to South Viet Nam was just about the meanest and most difficult diplomatic post that could have been of- fered to anyone, and when he accepted it he proved beyond all cavil his stoutheart- edness and the sincerity of his public spirit. NO DOUBT, some of the political strength he showed in New Hampshire, and seems now to be showing again in Oregon and California, is based on the fact that he is a patriotic public servant and that the people realize it. But that cannot be the whole source of his sup- port, and we may be certain that some very considerable part of it is due to public weariness with Goldwater, Rocke- feller and Nixon. Undoubtedly, Republicans in search of a candidate are ascribing to him virtues and abilities which they wish the Re- publican nominee to have. The more Lodge does not speak, the more Gold- and did begin to make campaign speech- es, he would have to take a position on the controversial issues which divide the Republican Party as they divide the country. He would have to speak out about the civil rights bill, about the campaign against poverty, about education, about medical care for the aged, about urban renewal-and about Cuba and Viet Nam. With Sen. Goldwater controlling a large block of Republican delegates to the San Francisco convention, it would become more and more difficult for Mr. Lodge to be nominated if Mr. Lodge said what it is reasonable to assume that he believes. But, of course, on the one subject he knows most about, Viet Nam, it is entire- ly impossible for him to make a partisan issue. The Johnson-McNamara policy in South Viet Nam is inseparably the Lodge policy as well. His best course, it seems to me, is to stay at his post in Saigon unless and un- til he is drafted by the Republican con- vention. There is no point of honor which requires him to resign before that. And there is every practical political rea- son for supposing that he is more likely to be drafted if he is not an active can- didate than if he is. PRESIDENT KENNEDY was, we may be sure, quite well aware of the political uses of appointing such a prominent Re- pubiican as Henry Cabot Lodge to soutn Viet Nam. It was in line with his regular practice, to neutralize public issues by looking for a Republican whom he could MAY FESTIVAL CONCERTS: Fine Renderings Enhance Afternoon, Evening Fare THE THIRD MAY FESTIVAL concert proved to be a pleasant after- noon in spite of the flimsy quality of the music. Philippe Entremont set the character of the concert by making a fine piece of music out of the Concerto No. 2 in G minor for Piano and Orchestra by Saint-Saens. Entremont commands a flawless tech- nique. But he prefers to make light of all difficulties and to conceal the effort of his playing in an appearance of complete relaxation. His approach brought out all the sparkle and fire of the music and suppressed bombast and vulgarity which lurks beneath the surface. It is hardly fair for me to review Entremont's performance, since I was sitting in the Choral Union bleachers and couldn't hear him as well as I should have. At least half the fun in a concerto, however, is the accompaniment. Some conductors can accompany, others can't. William Smith, assistant conductor of the Philadelphia Orchestra, is among those who can, as I had a particularly fine opportunity to observe. There was one flaw, a momentary lack of coordination at the end of the first movement, which only called attention more strongly to the perfect ensemble which prevailed everywhere else. * * * * THE REST of the concert proved stimulating in one way or another. The restrained and sensitive performance of the first of the Nocturnes by Debussy, the long, slow, "Nuages," seemed to me very impressive. I enjoyed the irony of the contrast between the opulent orchestration of Satie's "Trois Gymnopedies" and the sparsity of the music itself. (Debussy orchestrated the first and third, William Smith the second.) And speaking of orchestration, I found Tom- masini's settings of Scarlatti sonatas in the ballet suite "The Good- Humored Ladies" oite disannointing. Tommasini's orchestration simnly EUGENE ORMANDY and the Philadelphia Orchestra, in their all- Strauss May Festival concert last night, presented various levels of Strauss' development as a composer, and a high level of their own as musicians. The program started with "Till Eulenspiegel's Merry Pranks." The strings, -and, indeed, the whole orchestra, had fine dynamic range and superb ensemble. With striking clarity of detail, the brasses-so solid and un-"brassy"-the flutes, shrilling out of the rest of the tumult, and the singing violins led up to Till's march to the scaffold. The orchestra throbbed out the awesome cadence, while Till, a delightfully screeching clarinet, snickered his defiance, un- fortunately covered somewhat by the orchestra. "Ein Heldenleben," one of Strauss' most mature works, followed. Slight tempo uncertainties marred the first section, where nothing was covered or missed. The violin soloist, Anshel Brunislow, and his section, with their flawless change from the carping "Critics" to the romantic, singing "Hero's Helpmate," were memorable, though some of the solo passages-fingering and bowing are almost impossible here-were not completely under control. The winds, after the impressive but too offstage fanfare by the offstage trumpets, tended to drown the strings, who fiddled away madly, making one regret being unable to hear this fine section. MASON JONES then played the Horn Concerto No. 1, one of Strauss' earliest works. Mr. Jones' First is rather slow and restrained -almost subdued and, like the horn in "Till," lacking conviction- at times, strange in view of the bubbling cadences in the orchestra. He had very clear and firm tone, which made for a very tranquil and effective second movement. The finale was again restrained in tempo and style, but gained real passion in the end, with the cadenza. "Der Rosenkavalier" Suite ended the program. Though a lesser , , -A PHILIPPE ENTREMONT, First 4