pb Mir1higant &ig Seventy-Third Year EmrED AND MANASM gT STUDENTS OF THE UNlvEtstrY OF EN!eIAW UNDER AUTHOR=Y OF BOARDW i CONTROL OF STUDENT PULLcATIONS ma Me F'm STUDENT PUiUCATOhm BLDG., Aww ARaoR, MTCH., PHogE wo 2-3241 1 Prevail printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in al' rep'ints. "Man, That Guy Is Weird" STop TRAPIAIC W(*r~t coorkles ViAS MADE wir COON~g 10 R5 pt ' A W THE FULBRIGHT SPEECH: Call for Pragmatism Wains Cool Reception PRIL 2, 1964 NIGHT EDITOR: MARY LOU BUTCHER Double Standard Demands Legalized Abortion IETY'S OBVIOUS double standard here morals, are concerned sorely ssitates a more lenient approach to concept of legalized abortion. The e society which sees nothing wrong ten-year-old "femmes fatale" decked in "pre-teen bras" and heavy eye ow-and which looks the other way i these young girls grow up in the t of movies and advertisements de- ed to emphasize the sexual aspect of over all else-still will not condone e girls' wish to avoid teen-age moth- of1'when such a fate threatens as the ltable outcome of such preoccupation sex. cording to the most recent estimates, Zillion abortions are performed in this .try every year, or approximately one every four births. And because these of necessity, only estimates, abortion being illegal except when the moth- life' is threatened, even this estimate be low. Add to this the calculation one woman dies somewhere in the from an illegal abortion every hour, becomes obvious that the problem one that can be dispensed with y. (Special attention must be paid to word "illegal"; doctors emphasize there is minimal danger to the moth- 'hen an abortion is performed in a ital and before the sixth week of nancy.) MH THE LAWS the way they are now, however, it is an extremely lucky girl undergoes a necessarily illegal abor- and lives to tell about it. As authori- continue to crack down on what "pro- onal" abortionists remain -- well- ied physicians who have found abor- ; a profitable sideline-the pregnant who does not wish to have a baby is. ;elled to seek out some amateur, who or may not have a smattering of gledge of what he is doing and who, ny rate, is rarely prepared to offer hing remotely approaching sterile ting conditions. One recent article scribed a trip to such an amateur ionist as "like playing Russian Rou- " which is still putting it rather ly. le may argue ad infinitum whether ot abortion of any sort, with or with- legal sanction, should be decried as rder." For my' part, I fail to see how destruction of a human embryo ugh abortion can be called "murder" any more than one might consider him- self as deliberately killing a bird each time he ate an egg. Those who persist in the wrongheaded policy of referring to abortion in such terms, however, would do well to consider it a form of "mercy killing." This is especially true in cases where it is realized the baby would be born deformed (as in the case of the 1962 thalidomide tragedy); but it would also be true whenever the mother would other- wise have neglected the unwanted baby or killed it outright. More than one such mother has simply left her baby in a garbage pail and let starvation take its course. TILL, the entire question of whether murder is involved is irrelevant when one realizes that in our modern-day soci- ety abortion is inevitable anyway. As long. as society continues to emphasize sex in the way it does, there will be girls in need of abortions; and as long as there is a legal barrier between such girls and pro- fessional care, there will be unnecessary carnage. If killing an embryo is "murder," what higher class of crime is the death of a young girl at the hands of the ama- teur abortionist? The American Law Institute has recom- mended legislation which would'allow an abortion to be performed legally and by a competent surgeon when the doctor con- siders childbirth to be dangerous for the mother or when it is possible that the child might be born with severe defects. However, such a law should be broad enough to include such unfortunate cases as the 14-year-old Chicago girl who was impregnated by her own uncle, "a drunk- en bum who ... left the country," accord- ing to the doctor the girl approached in hope of gettingan abortion. This doctor reported that, when he found his hands tied and could do nothing to help her, "she went to some quack who charged her $600 and so mishandled the surgery she bled to death." He added that the girl had been "condemned by laws that are stupid and inhumane," a statement with which I must concur. THE FACT remains that as long as our society continues to condone the dou- ble standard regarding sexual behavior to the great extent that it does today, it will have to accept some responsibility for taking care of the girls led astray by its indifference. For those girls who prefer to go through with having the baby and then putting it up for adoption, this choice should always be preferable; and more power to-those that make such a decision. But those girls who would rather undergo an abortion should be given the privilege to so decide for themselves without having to fear that they will not survive the oper- ation. -STEVEN IALLER ewslettering ported several of the SGRU candidates and actively opposed SURGe, saying at one time, "Do not vote for the SURGe candidates." FILIP, being in charge of the Newsletter, was in an excellent position to have these statements corrected. As a member of SURGe he must have known that they are false. He seems, however, to have been more interested in getting the SURGe point of view across to the readers of the Newsletter than in reporting objectively what happened in the campaign. Another feature in this month's News- letter is a profile of each of the recently elected SGC members. The profiles were classified as news stories by the News- letter's editor, Bob Bodkin, and therefore should have been written without any editorialization. In this light, it is interesting to note that the profile of Filip, written by Jim MacRitchie, a close personal friend of his, should contain a statement like "Don Filip has many qualifications which make him one of -the most informed members of the Council." While this statement may or may not be true, it is obvious editorial material and has no place in a news story. (EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the first in a four-part series dealing with Sen. J. William Fubright's re- cent foreign policy speech. This ar- ticle deals with Fuibright's theory of foreign policy. Succeeding articles will deal with Fubright's Latin American policy ideas, his views on Communist China and Southeast Asia, and criticism which has been made of his remarks.) By RAYMOND HOLTON PRAGMATISM IS THE KEY to foreign policy. This is the es- sence of what Sen. J. William Fullbright, chairman of the Sen- ate Foreign Relations Committee, told his fellow senators and fellow Americans last week in one of the most significant speeches to come out of the Senate in the ,20th century. But he received a cold and cri- tical reception from 90 per cent of his fellow public servants. What is it Fulbright suggested which aroused some of his peers to call him a heretic? Basically it is a re-evaluation of our current slip-shod ways of con- ducting foreign relations. This is a gross understatement, for what Fulbright dares to suggest is than American policy makers should disregard "excessive moralism" in deciding from which plane of op- erations the United States is to work in dealing with countries of dubious political nature. What Fulbright suggests proves him not to be completely stymied by the many complicated problems which arise in modern-day world events. BY NOW, most people realize Fulbright's motif in his long speech. "There has always-and inevitably-been some divergence between the realities of foreign policy and ourideas about it. This divergence has in certain respects been growing rather than narrow- ing and we are handicapped, ac- cordingly, by policies based on old myths rather than current reali- ties," Fulbright states. Of course, Fulbright goes on to say that such a divergence be- tween myth and reality is dan- gerous. He suggests two possible reasons for this state of affairs: "The first is the radical change in relations between and within the Communist and the free worlds and the second is the ten- dency of too many of us to con- fuse means with ends and, ac- cordingly, to adhere to prevailing practices with a fervor befitting immutable principles." * .* * FULBRIGHT TAKES a strictly objective view of this bipolar world and states: "It seems reasonable, therefore, to suggest that the character of the cold war has, for the present at least, been profoundly altered: by the drawing back of the Soviet Union from extremely aggressive policies; by the implicit repudia- tion by both sides of a policy of 'total victory'; byrthe establish- ment of an American strategic superiority which the Soviet Un- ion appears to have tacitly accept- ed because it has been accompan- ied by assurances that it will be exercised by the United States with responsibility and restraint." FULBRIGHT shatters what he calls our nation's Master Myth- "that the Communist bloc is a monolith composed of govern- ments which are not really gov- ernments at all but organized con- spiracies, divided among -them- selves perhaps in certain matters of tactics, but all equally resolute and implacable in their deter- mination to destroy' the free world." Of course Fulbight believes "that . the Communist world is indeed hostile to the free world," and he takes too much time ex- plaining to his peers that Poland and Yugoslavia are not synono- mous with places like Russia and China. "The myth Is that every Cote munist state is an unmitigated evil and a relentless enemy of the free world; the reality is that some Communist regimes pose a threat to the free world while others pose little or none, and that if we will recognize these distinctions,° we ourselves will be able to influence events in the Communist bloc in a way favorable to the security of the free world." FULBRIGHT further suggests that by recognizing the realities of the Communist world today, the United States could in some un- known manner shape. the "course of events within a divided Com- munist world." He therefore suggests, again pragmatically, that the United States take advantage of all the trade opportunities available with certain nations of the Communist bloc. ". . . The potential value of trade-a moderate volume of trade in nonstrategic items-is an in-, 'strument for reducing world ten- sions and strengthening the foun- dations of peace." Besides,we can make money while we're at it. THESE, THEN, are Fulbright' view of the world today. His theory for coping with this world has been considered to be similar to the foreign policy of French President Charles de Gaulle, designed to aid France to the Uppermost eonom- ically. However, Fulbright isn't so crass. He by no means suggests any sort of Gaullist cure-all for U. for- eign relations.. He is advocating an earnest policy of offering the various nations of the world the respect of the United States. WHETHER OR NOT our high- level foreign policy makers cast off the scales which blind them from reality cannot fully be fore- told. However there is hope. Ful- bright may have supplied the long awaited impetus needed to mae realistic changes in U.S. foreign policy. Political science professors and buffs have all along thought what Fulbright brought out into the open. However, as Fulbright himself points out, he is following the Burkian model of a peoples rep- resentative. That is, Fulbright re- fuses to be a messenger boy for his constituency. Instead he desires to offer some ideas of his own, which he, as a well-placed ob- server, is qualified to do. ANATOMY OF A STRUGGLE: Civil Rights in Maryland Hello? IE UNIVERSITY'S telephone switch- board is truly unique. This may well be only major institution in the country ich you can call and find nobody home. -K. WINTER SGC and N( UDENT GOVERNMENT Council mem- ber Carl Cohen recently took a swipe he SGC Newsletter, saying that it can . be called a successful way to pro- constituent interest in SGC. ucii an attack on the Newsletter is ipletely warranted. The current issue quite biased and in some instances tually incorrect. he lead story was written by of all ple, Don Filip, who is the chairman of SGC Newsletter and the SGC member ponsible for its content. The story is ed in favor of SURGe political party biased against SGRU political party. STORY SAYS that SGRU was "orig- nally an anarchist coalition," but does mention the fact that, although the :inal structure of SGRU might have bled in some ways his description, it drastically before the recent SGC campaign was underway. ry goes on to say that during the n "SGRU pushed for abolition of ate veto" of SGC action, a state- at is completely false and without tual basis. rticle also states that "Voice cham- the cause of moderation between and SGRU." This is also false. By RICHARD OSTLING Daily Correspondent LMINGTON, Del. -As the civil rights "debate" droned. on in the nation's capital last month, a similar struggle ended in a state capital just 30 miles to the east. In the same Annapolis building which was America's first peace- time capitol, Maryland legislators passed a public accommodations bill to cover the whole state. A similar bill last year exempted 12 of 23 counties under the state's deep-set tradition of local option on legislation. Most of those exemptions went to the Eastern Shore, the part of the state east of the Chesapeake Bay, where racial equality goes hard against the grain of history. * * * WITH RESISTANCE far strong- er than you'll find anywhere else in the Northeast, and with the news media headquarters in near- by Washington and New York, the Shore has become a showcase of the Negro civil rights movement. In this well-watched arena, the strategy of nonviolence is on trial. Most of the Shore towns except Cambridge have forged local pub- lic accommodations pacts and taken halting steps toward in- tegration. But while Cambridge has been a continuing scene of strife, the climax prior to the statewide bill came in the sleepy college town# of Princess Anne, wheregthe state's last lynching oc- curred in 1933. Princess Anne had its biriacial committee and everything was in- tegrated except Muir's Restaurant and another eatery which closed down during the turmoil. Students at Maryland State College thought one all-white restaurant was one too many. Maryland State was built on the site of slave pens on the outskirts of town and was an all-Negro col- lege until recently. It is now slight- ly integrated, and is officially a branch of the University of Mary- land. With a student body of 600, the college means Negroes out- number whites nearly 2 to 1 in the area. WHEN negotiations to "crack" Muir's failed, Negro students of both sexes took to the streets several times. Then, rather sud- denly, a midweek' demonstration became one of the ugliest events in the civil rights movement in the Northeast. The white townspeople weren't involved; it was a pitched battle between students and state police- men, says Ralp Moyed, who runs the state desk of the Wilmington (Del.) Morning News and covers racial troubles for the News and its sister paper, the Evening Journal. When the officers got tired of the shouting, crowds and traffic obstructions, they called out two German shepherd dogs. This act, Moyed said, turned an orderly protest into a violent saga. After it was all over, several students had been bitten and two were in two firehoses. But the students used weapons that maim and kill. It was a major blemish on the record of nonviolence in civil rights efforts. What went wrong? One force which could have con- tributed to either sanity or violence was the unanimity of the student movement, which is called SAFE (Student Appeal for Equality About two-thirds of the student body was in the riot and reporters' on-campus interviews indicated support for the protests was near 100 per cent. Moyed says the bond between students and faculty at Maryland State is unusual. The teachers' support was clear when they rais- ed the bail money and arranged to get the 27 students who were arrested in the riot out of jail. The position of college President John T. Williams was most dif- ficult, for the college depends on Annapolis for virtually all its money. Yet he would not condemn the demonstrations, even the last one. He merely called for preser- 'CHICKADEE': Fields Of Corn At the Cinema Guild C. FIELDS and Mae West- Mother Nature herself could not have selected a more natural pair. Those who have an aversion to humor heavily laden with-in- deed, consisting entirely of-corn are advised to avoid the Cinema Guild tonight and tomorrow. But those who like it are invited to have themselves a veritable feast, for in "My Little Chickadee" the corn grows wild. Fields and West are not really acting roles in this movie, for they authored the script and, there- fore, are simply playing them- selves. But, what more could one ask? NITPICKERS will debate as to who steals the show-the pom- pons, blustering, cynical Fields, or the insolent, sultry Mae West- but I hold them equally culpable. I must confess that this was my first brush with. Mae West-and what a delightfully ticklish brush it was. My prose is not adequate to convey the vast new worlds of meaning she lends to the words "Is it?" when replying to "Nice day, isn't it?' That tone of voice and that look defy description and/or imitation. Youngsters like myself - age twenty-one - who have not yet experienced the de- lights of Miss West (cinematic de- lights, that is) are advised to form a line in the Architecture Building at once. S* ., W. C. FIELDS, of course, is sim- ply an animated pickle. Never has a more sour individual walked upon this earth. I wonder if he ever met Will Rogers? Surely this is the one man capable of making vation of the "academic climate" during the strife and urged stu- dents not to cut classes. THIS UNITY could have foster- ed nonviolence but, Moyed said, "The students were naive and un- skilled. They just suddenly march- ed into- town. The idea was spread. by the campus grapevine. There was no plan, no order . . . A lot can happen to 400 people in a half -mile." Besidesthis, he said, "the stu- dents didn't understand the non- violent techniques and weren't committed to them. Yet- nonvio- lence is necessary under those circumstances. At this point in their struggle, if the Negroes care about white sentiment they must stick to nonviolence." Then comedian Dick Gregory arrived in Princess Anne. Moyed said, "Gregory put the demon- strations on the right track. If they had gone on at the same plane there would have been more violence. Somebody had to say, Stop!'"$ In this case, the "right track" was a temporary halt to protests, plus a trip to Annapolis to see Gov. J. Millard Tawes, who hails from the county where the college is located. The governor agreed to push to get that county included in the state civil rights bill at a special session of the legislature and, before it was over, the whole state was in, even Cambridge. THE BILL is only the first chapter. Eastern Shore Negroes will have to go through a long progression toward equality in areas which can't be legislated quite so neatly. The tactics 'for the upcoming struggle are being discussed right now. John Wilson, leader of SAFE, has bolted that group because he thinks it's playing it too safe. He and Mrs. Gloria H. Richardson, the Cambridge Negro leader, met recently in Chester, Pa., with Mal- colm X (pardon-Brother Mal- colm) and other Negro leaders. Mrs. Richardson says she supports many of the brother's ideas. Her stand, and his inclusion at the summit meeting can only add prestige to his black nationalism and preoccupation with blood- letting. A good measure of whether Negro militancy will be kept under control will be this spring. The warm weather, the same youthful response which foments panty raids, plus the frustrations of the Negro on the Eastern Shore, may lead to possible sit-ins and other demonstrations when an enforce- ment of statewide law-not to mention a possible federal law- is just around the corner. * *.* THE CRUCIAL QUESTION is how long Negroes will remain con- vinced that nonviolent methods are working. The word in the civil rights movement is that only Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is com- mitted to nonviolence as a philos- ophy. For the rest, it's merely a tactic which will be cast off if necessary. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: 1loomington Students Still Face Threat To the Editor: ALTHOUGH the April 1 article dealing with three Blooming- ton students correctly stated that the indictments against them for conspiracy to overthrow the gov- ernment were quashed, it failed to mention that County Prosecutor Hoadley is appealing this deci- sionand that he state attorney general has announced that he will permit the appeal. The case will have to be argued before a higher court, probably the Indiana State Supreme Court. If Hoadley wins his appeal-and this possibility is by far not out of the question-the three de- fendants may once again face charges of sedition. The appeal, in re-opening the "sedition" case against the three Indiana Uni- versity students, constitutes a cruel but "legal" constinuation' of the witch-hunt directed against civil liberties. The Ad-Hoc Com- mittee to Defend the Indiana Uni- versity.,Students will continue to publicize the case and collect money to meet legal and court ex- penses of the three defendants, who have now been forced to live with the threat of imprisonment for a year because they are so- cialists. -Howard Salita, '64 An Idea for SGC To the Editor: N VIEW of the attacks made on Student Government Council in +ha r--n Plins n mid lime judge for itself whether the ma- chinery of SGC needs improving or not. To make this proposal effective, the "box score" would have to become a regular feature of The Daily. From its recent stand in the SGC election, The Daily has in- dicated a desire to improve co- munications between SOC and students themselves; the box score approach is one way to bring student government closer to its constituents. -Ronald Gottschalk, "65 Delegate to the USNSA Congress End Justifies Means To the Editor: THE Interquadrangle Council representatives from East Quad Council and I are having some- what analogous problems with our respective student organizations; the IQC and the Inter-Coopera- tive Council. In each case we have decided to work around our organizations instead of using so- called "proper" channels. Appar- ently the EQC representatives have tried to work within IQC but have been wrongly rebuffed. In my case I have found hypocriti- cal, officers-most agree that the IQC has problems but seem un- willing to initiate any solution. I feel that maneuvers outside an organization serve to intensify problems so that they may be corrected. While th ecriticism is