"Do I use it like a billyclub, Mr. President . . .?" hie £Ir4I4I n 4aih Seventy-eight years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students of the University of Michigan 420 Maynard St, Ann Arbor, Mich. News Phone: 764-0552 , 1 \ \ . . 1 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. FRIDAY, MAY 16, 1969 NIGHT EDITOR: NADINE COHODAS Nixon's vacuous peace: Yankee must come home PRESIDENT N I X O N' S long-awaited speech on Vietnam is notable chiefly for its lack of originality and initiative toward a peace settlement. The President's statement on Vietnam is disappointingly and dangerously un- yielding. In his speech, Nixon outlined terms for an "honorable" peace. He called for si- multaneous and mutual withdrawal of North Vietnamese and .American troops from South Vietnam and free elections under international supervision. Although his policy statement con- tainedI a note of elasticity uncommon in pronouncements of our former President, it clashes head-on with North Vietnamese and NLF plans. THE NLF CALLED last week for uni- lateral withdrawal of American troops and bases from South Vietnam. It has proposed elimination of the present Sai- gon regime and the insitution of an in- terim coalition government to supervise free elections in the South. Nixon's policies reveal the old American premise that no difference exists between American and North Vietnamese, both are interested outside parties. Conse- quently he regards mutual withdrawal as reasonable and just. Neither Would Nixon agree to the elimi- nation of the present Saigon regime rea- soning that it has been duly elected and is representative of a significant segment if not the majority of South Vietnam. NIXON HAS refused to re-evaluate these premises. The urgent question is "not whether we should have entered on this course, but what is required of us today." Unfortunately, what is required of us to- day is to repair the course which led us to Vietnam. Unilateral withdrawal is plainly the. only practical out left to the United States. Obviously Yankee can and should go home, but the Vietnamese cannot leave Vietnam. Complete withdrawal of North Vietnamese troops assumes that the Northerners may be distinguished from the VC irregulars; but most VC ir- regulars are South Vietnamese. By IGNORING this fact, by re-empha- sizing old policies Nixon is shamelessly prolonging the inevitable. Nixon reite- rates the absurd necessity of defending "the millions of Vietnamese who have put their trust in us" so as not to "risk general massacre." Nixon accepts and en- dorses the domino theory, predicting a loss of international confidence in the strength of American commitments. However, the loss of international and American confidence in America has been due to the intransigence of political lead- ers, unwilling to realize the limits of American power, and admit the error of intervention. Meanwhile, unilateral with- drawal becomes more embarrassing and diplomatically difficult; neither the rest of the world, nor the Vietnamese, are fooled. ONE CAN ONLY hope the President's speech does not fool the American public. It failed to delude a slough of legislators, intellectuals and journalists. Nixon's own party compatriot, Jacob Javits pronounced there was little dif- ference between Nixon's approach and that of the Johnson administration. Police tags THE PRESENT CONTROVERSY between the Ann Arbor police and the city's black community over the beating of a black HRC staff member brings to light an aspect of law enforcement procedures not normally attributed to Chief Walter Krasny's squadron of parking ticket servers. Police brutality is nothing new, of course. The Human Relations Commission has been complaining about it for years. And our society in general has finally reached the point where it admits the existence of such misconduct. Unfortunately, that same society does not seem prepared to do much about it. But all this may be changing. The police are getting a bit ostenta- tious with their power, and I think this is beginning to rub the public. In fact, the Ann Arbor police have provided me, by their actions, with an anecdote of some small relevance to understanding the magnitude of the problem. EARLY EARLY YESTERDAY morning, my girl friend and I were returning, by car, from an unscheduled tour of the University's many and magnificent research facilities on North Campus. The traffic light on State St. turned red suddenly and I pulled up short- While we waited, a car pulled up behind us. I asked my compan- ion if it was a police car. "Yes," she said. I turned right, drove two blocks and turned left. Then one more block and another left. The police car was still on our tail. I pulled over into a parking space, but left the motor running. The plice car stopped behind us and waited. We waited. Finally he pulled out and streaked down the street. I pulled out after him. "Where are you going?" asked my companion, who knew full well that we had already arrived at our destination. "If he can follow us, we can follow him," I said. I HASTENED TO CATCH the police car. Just as we followed him around the corner, he darted inside a parking structure. "He's hiding in the parking structure," she suggested. We glided slowly past the parking structure, and proceeded very slowly down the street. Suddenly he appeared at the entrance to the parking structure and turned to follow us again. I turned left. He turned left. I drove up half a block and pulled over. He stopped behind us. I shut off the car, got out and walked back to where he was idling. "What's the problem, officer," I asked, noting his license plate number. He seemed like a little boy sitting in his Ann Arbor police car, slouching down, dirty blond hair in disarray. I had the distinct impres- sion that he was playing at being policeman. He asked me where I was going, and I'told him that we had been going to The Daily until he started following us. He grunted, or rather, emitted whatever the verbal equivalent of a grunt is. I almost wanted to give him a ticket for harrassment and insulting a citizen, but I didn't have one with me. As I walked back to my car, I carefully rechecked his license num- ber. He only followed us for another block. * * * THERE REMAIN ONLY a few unanswered questions. Will it hap- pen again? I think so. Last summer the police stopped us because they thought my girl friend was a little girl whom I had kidnapped. Will I give the policeman a ticket next time? I'm looking for the pack that came with an old cops and robbers kit niy parents bought me many years ago. If the Ann Arbor police insist on following white couples in brand new 1969 Chevy Novas, what then of black people on the streets, in the bars? And if there is an element of racism and sadism among officers of the Ann Arbor police force, what is to be done about it? This last ques- tion is one which Mayor Robert Harris and the new Democratic city administration must face up to immediately and meaningfully. A i' . . b. 'SmoRe-'_ MURRAY KEMPTON - Talking tough in harm's way 0THE RESOLUTION of Com- mander Lloyd Bucher's case last week was v e r y much of a piece w i t h the resolution of so many American lives, our judg- ments being at a n c e permissive and graceless. Lord Jim, having failed, was put out to d r i f t around the Malay ports; CommanderaBucher is put out to drift in a management school. We are very careful al- ways to avoid reality: we can do nothing with a man who can nev- er be permitted to command again except send him to management school. IT WAS HARD to comment on Bucher's case, from confusions rather more reactionary than Wil- liam F. Buckley's. For one thing, however serious the reason, a man just ought not to permit himself to be photographed crying in pub- lic. For the other, Bucher was so all-out Navy; and when a man talks that way, he has a certain duty in crisis to the tradition he overrated while at ease. But then, in the midst of this fit of orthodoxy if not patriotism, I read that all the enlisted men on the Pueblo thought Bucher a commander of great class and sus- pended all hostility to him; any officer kindly judged by enlisted men is too good to be tried by of- ficers. STILL THE TERRIBLE sadness which lingers about this case goes quite beyond James Reston's com- plaint that only Bucher was put on trial and that the men who sent him there "remain invisible, unidentified and uncharged." That is j u s t the histpry of warfare; many heroes would never get a chance to be heroes if it weren't for the dumbness of their gen- erals. The true sadness is in the in- difference to reality of the men who sentsBucher, not just telling themselves that nothing could happen but not even telling him what he ought to do in case any- thing did happen. PRUDENCE IS A virtue scorned by the false masculinity which has for six years now been the posture of America in the world. The eas- iest applause has gone to the pub- lic man who talked toughness; the harshest derision to t h e public man who talked caution. Hard is good, soft is bad. And yet how soft we really are; nothing proves our essential complacency more than the dispatch of Bucher into harm's way with no thought that acts can have consequences. But that is the national style; Mr. Nixon runs for President de- crying the shame of our passivity over the Pueblo and is as passive himself when the North Koreans down one of our planes. IT IS HARD to complain about this particular gap between lan- guage and r e a 1 life; Mr. Nixon happens to be one President the violation of w h o s e campaign promises is one of the highest ser- vices in his power. Still how much he must long to indulge the national habit of knowing just how tough you ought to be in matters where you have no responsibility. You could al- most f e e 1 in his speech to the Chamber of Commerce his itch to cry out against the shame of the president of Cornell allowing him- self to be kicked around by a fourth-class military power like the Black StudentsaAssociation. (C) New York Post M Ed ilorial St ft MARCIA ABRAMSON.....................Co-Editor JIM HECK .......... ...............,.,.. Co-Editor MARTIN HIRSCHMAN .. Summer Supplement Editor JIM FORRESTER.......Summer Sports Editor PHIL HERTZ.......Associate Summer Sports Editor ERIC PERGEAUX, JAY CASSIDY.......Photo Editor NIGHT EDITORS: Joel Block, Nadine Cohodas, Harold Rosenthal, Judy Sarasohn. ASSISTANT NIGHT EDITORS: Lorna Cherot, Erika' Hoff, Scott Mixer, Sharon Weiner. Indeed, it is all too obvious from Nixon's policy statement that he has nothing really new to say. What the President is asking for is another year in which to stall, to threaten, to cajole an "honor- able" settlement in Vietnam. HOWEVER, ON the basis of Wednesday night's settlement, the President de- serves no reprieve. Americans must de- mand unilateral withdrawal as the only way to free the United States from Vietnam. -TOBE LEV LETTERS TO THE EDITOR ROTC seen as the scapegoat "......HOWARD KOHNr ,,i The sad state of (a mind's) pollution I DON'T KNOW now if he ever really existed. He was young and had promise, which none of us have anymore since we're so committed to crying out in anger even when we want to be quiet. They say they will clamp a fishbowl over us if we don't stop the ringing in their ears. They don't know how tempting it is to ac- commodate them, how weary we are of our own indignities to each other, how glutted we are with our self-righteousness. * * He wrote yesterday from Micronesia where he's at in the Peace Corps. "I shoulda gotten braces," he said. "I hate the people here. They're petty and they're closeminded. They're just like some teachers I used to know." The U.S. Navy would like to station a military base in Micronesia, now that the Peace Corps has called attention to its strategic position midway to Southeast Asia. - Actually we've come a long way on the will of our intolerance but not very far out of the well of our impotency. * * * WHAT'S MADDENING IS that it's so easy just to be intolerant without sensing their human impulses still alive inside. In New York 84 can- didates, three of them judges, elected last fall are still in open violation of federal election laws. Attorney General John Mitchell, who is hintingi he may prosecute them, is defying Su- preme Court rulings on wiretapping. And the Abe Fortas case is not sensational because it is that unique. Still we have shouted so loud we can hear ourselves, which forfeits any chance we had of finding peace in ourselves. Nothing we've heard has the capacity for something that remote and precious. ** * gonna knock'm flat," he'd say. He wasn't kidding either. -Some monkeys would go around knocking apples out of trees with rocks. But not him. "No violence for this cat," he'd say. Instead he'd go shimmying up' the tree, always careful not to scrape the bark. And then, inevitably, ploomp, down he'd tumble on his head. Education has its failings, he found out, but ignorance isn't one of them. I've been listening to these Livonia (Mich.) matrons in their Kinney girdles and Maidenform strap shoes carry out their vigilante crusade to rid grade schools Hof sex courses. "They're teach- ing our children that the penis goes into the vagina and that's how babies are conceived," said one to an audience of 100. "You know god- damn well that isn't true." Hedwould have laughed at her. I almost vomited. * * * I didn't go to the testimonal for Judge George Crockett, although I'd like to make him mayor of Detroit. I was going to go but there's some- thing self-consuming about those $10 plates of boiled beef and soybean-base gravy. Not to men- tion all that redthreated money from those red-blooded liberals. I think money may have polluted our sense of touch so badly we can't even feel the rocks when we throw them. I'm not against throwing rocks..But I hate to see them become a victim of our insensitivity. SOMEHOW WE'VE got to use that money to put some of the rocks back on the bottom of the Huron Rover, which is now cluttered with beer cans and dirty oil filters. Scare the tech- nocrats. Threaten them with violence. But don't kill them. Because in 15 years the Huron River To the Editor: AN EDITORIAL published on 29 college and university cam- puses has recently demanded that we "End University Subservience by Abolishing ROTC." So be it. And while we are at it why not abolish all military services, melt down all the ,warships, tanks and planes and make peace beads, necklace ornaments, roach clips and a few spikes to place off- shore so that "invading armadas" wont't float in like the oil and foul our beaches and kill our birds. And then we can pay our taxes with a clean conscience because we'll know that not a cent of it will go into killing other human beings. WHAT A MARVELOUS world it would be and Oh, God, how I wish it could be so my four children could grow up without constant threat of death. But do any of you really, really think it will be that way? Do you think we can just unlock our doors, leave our keys in the car and trust everyone to be good and true and fine? It used to be called isolationism and it didn't work then and indi- cations are that it still won't work. If you still have to lock your bike then maybe the world isn't ready for absolute love, truth, honesty, integrity and human un- derstanding. I wish it were, BUT IT ISN'T, And until it is we are going to need our military services for some time to come. It is the kind and quality of that military service that is the real issue. Make no mistake about it, we are going to have military services so we might as well de- cide to improve them rather than destroy them. Projecting all of you into the future for a moment, consider the fact that you are going to be the future government of this Na- tion. Yes, that's right. You. And we of the "establishment" are looking to you for some im- provements which we hope will come about unless, as we fear, you fink out on us and hang up your reasonable to deal with than wljat Allen Ginsberg calls "Prussian butch-crewcut f r e a k y military types"? Think about it. It may not be good now but how much worse it would be without the balance that such an education can provide. Ask any responsible military of- ficer what he thinks of ROTC trained officers and he will tell you that without them the mili- tary would really be all the things you accuse it of being now. If you don't like the ROTC the way it is, for God's sake change it! Change it as you are forcing change in the entire educational establishment. BUT IF YOU want to be iden- tified with the bomb-throwers, the power-hungry "new barbarians" among you then destroy it with a cowardly stroke 'of your sword. That's easy. It's harder to change something for the better. You have to get down in the dirt and' grapple with it. It takes understanding and courage. It's no job for the cow- ardly - they do it with shabby little bombs. Oh, it does need changing, no doubt of that. The military knows it and right now you can work together on change. Insist that its courses deal realistically and objectively with the military's past, present and future. Make sure that students are given the opportunity to understand its role in society along with other insti- tutions such as business and gov- ernment. YOU CAN'T SWEEP the mili- tary under the rug and then why should you? Why should you, a minority of anti-ROTC people re- move the opportunity for others to contribute to their knowledge and experience? You -want your rights protected, shouldn't they have theirs protected too? And for those of you who would nibble at the hooked statement that "It's hard to develop any spontaneity-much less dialogue- within the classroom when the professor is not just a teacher, but a superior officer as well." I just ask you to name the number of and science of destruction. Physics, Chemistry, Biology and Engineer- ing are aulong thent. Okay. Throw out ROTC. But to be fair you will have to throw out all government-supported research which could have any possible benefit for the military. Then throw out all those science classes because they produce scientists who are going to go into industry and fiddle with munitions and germ warfare. FINE, THROW IT all out and what will you have left? Flowers? Peace? Brotherhood? A fine crop of beautiful young people who have copped out on their respon- sibility to wrestle in the dirty, rot- ten stinking gutter of our human condition and drag out of it some- thing fine and clean. I submit that you are using ROTC as a scapegoat on which to heap your frustrations at every- thing from Vietnam to the "pigs," who, while they're not spraying you with mace, are protecting you from the bicycle stealers of the world. What are you going to do when the war is over? What excuse will you use to avoid grasping and Wresting and molding what is into what you and all the rest of us want it to be? -Dr. Gary N. Hess University - of California, Santa Barbara May 13 On raids To the Editor: O NE OF THE front page head- lines in the Tuesday edition of The Daily was "SDS center raid- ed." Six sentences were devoted to telling of the "raid," at SDS head- quarters in Chicago. I question the propriety of your paper's use of the word "raided" in this instance, on any page other than the editorial page, which, I believe, is the proper place f o r your interpretation of events in the news. Police and firemen responding to a report of a shooting and a fire, respectively; does not, and has not in the nast :nncntitted a .4 A A samannesammenessmann