Page Two THE MICHIGAN DAILY Wednesdov. Mov 7.1~9 Pae woTE ICIA..AL - t-,,;V%.Ay t IVV y I , I lV / music "ay Festival: The same old song By R. A. PERRY As most students were cram- ming for winter term exams, or, rid of all that, were packing parents' cars to flee this oasis, Eugene Ormandy and his Phila- delphia Orchestra came for the thirty-fourth consecutive year to participate in the Ann Arbor May Festival. Sponrsored by the venerable and historic jniversity Musical Society, the May Festival has been a spring feature of the Ann Arbor scene for 76 years. While such tradition bestows honor upon the May Festival's ad- innistators and stirs nostalgia among certain of the audience, it hardly guarantees either musical merit or, as the rather poor attendance illustrated, any special box-office lure. TO be sure, certain illumina- ting and moving musical .mo- ments passed from the Hill stage to the patient audience during those five concerts (April 24-27Y, but in toto this year's May Fes- tival produced a queasy and soporific deja vu feeling which ; those music lovers in Ann Arbor ,who decided not to attend must indeed have anticipated. Certainly Gail Rector, presi- dent of the University Musical *Society, is a man dedicated to musical excellence and he strives -w to surmount rising costs and maintain the finest selection of guest artists for the Festival. Sopranos Regine Crespin and Maria Stader, mezzo-soprano Joanna Simon, tenor Richard Tucker, pianisti Hans Richter- Haaser, and cellist Zara Nelsova all! promised and, with certain qualifications, produced per- ,' formancs of ,quality. Yaet Mr. Rector is also a con- servative man bound to past choices, and though all indica- tions-attendance, performance, and even mail-point to the problem, he continues to engage Ormandy and the Philadelphia Orchestra. The Philadelphia Orchestra under Ormandy has been a magic name to record buyers, and they have been the best sell- in orchestra in the land-but then the Reader's Digest and T.V. Guide are near the top of the magazine market too. The comparison is not unjust, for while the Philadelphia Or- chestra comprises an excellent body of virtuoso musicians, the head of that body, Eugene Or- mandy, perhaps the only con- ductor alive who can make Bach sound, like the "Grand Canyon Suite," lacks the meticulousness and conceptual depth to elicit from that orchestra perform- ances of complete persuasive- ness. When asked to communi- cate music not as color but as Idea, as in Mahler where music becomes the medium of philo- sophic expression, 0 r ma n d y sounds as profound as a Presi- dential address. Even the usual- ly benign Harold Schonberg ad- its that "there has been a singular reluctance in musical circles to admit him into the ranks of the 'great conductors" JAlthough Ap the fifties Or- mandy produced many satisfy- ing reercins, his Symphonic' Fagtastiue or the orchestral ~ccompaniments .to Serkin's eethov6n' concerti), he has in the past years sounded increas- ingly rhetorical, glassy,; and ,cushy. He seems to have become the Joseph E.'Levine of the con- '' cert world, and Columbia's spew- ing out recordings etitled "Or- mandy's Greatest Hits" is not without significance. (Can you imagine "Furtwangler's Greatest Hits"?) Now an enormous market exists for Ormandy's special genius and flair, which snobbism can only too easily denigrate, but the University Musical So- ciety's May Festival need not be a continual outlet. The seri- ous and sophisticated musical community here does not find Ormandy and the P.O; any spe- cial, enduring attraction, and to many the though of sitting through five P.O. concerts in four days would be like sitting down to a five course dinner of wedding cake. The general Ann Arbor community and environs, whom tge May Festival also serves, do not, as attendance at- tests, turn out in sufficient num- ber. To this problem of properly assessing the audience should be added the limitations of Or- mandy's repertoire, the para- meters pretty much being the post-romantic and early mod- ern composers. For how many people in Ann Arbor are Debus- sy's "La Mer" or "Images," Resphigi's "Pines or Rome," or Prokofiev's "Classical" Sym- phony, still really compelling reasons to attend a concert. A spring festival of music can only be commended and sup- ported, but it would be infinitely more exciting, meaningful, and appropriate if the University Musical Society took the courage and initiative to alter its format when traditions prove stultify- ing. Following the National An- them (were those snare-drum rolls I heard, or jets?, Or- mandy opened the May Festival with a performance of Prokof- iev's "Classical" Symphony that was commendable for a certain raw precision but which showed too erratic a tempo to truly pin- point the satire of the Lar- ghetto. A highly colorful and evoca- tive, if a bit sonically thick ren- dition of "Iberia" followed. Ormandy, of course, will never go as far as Boulez in correct- ing that bleary, Monet-reson- ating Impressionism, label that has attached itself to Debussy. It is the precision and specificity in Debussy, rather than the blend of color, that offers spe- cial fascination. Notice for in- stance the way the tambourine (the emblem for street sounds) serves as the bridge into "Per- fumes of the Night," the second movement; it soon disappears and then is the first harbinger of the coming morning, the bridge into the third movement. The featured artist of the first concert was Richard Tucker, a leading Metropolitan Opera ten- or since his debut in 1945. Tuck- er never possessed that special and of virile innocence which made tenors such as joerling,t Wunderlich, Schiotz, or Krebs moving and loved, but in his, prime Tucker had the perfect blend of Heroism and Ardor for Italian roles, without the exces- ses that often 'make Corelli or Del Monaco displeasing. Well, Tucker can nolonger be said to be in his prime, but his voice still warrants admira- tion and that perhaps under- handed complimet of being "tserviceable." In his opening two Ormandy, as always arias, one by Mozart (K. 431) and one by Handel ("Sound an Alarm" from Judas Maccabae- us) -his voice sounded unopen, unfresh, and showed little re- serve; it furthermore constrict- ed rather than lifted in the up- per register and he could pro- duce no real legato plastic phrasing. However, he seemed more re- laxed and flexible in Meyer- beer's "0 Paradiso," and in "No! Pazzo Son! Guardate" from Manon Lescaut he really turned on the verismo and the volume to give a splendidly hammed-up performance that was more amusing and exciting for its be- ing out of context. Featured on the second even- ing's concert was Hans Richter- Haaser playing the Chopin E- minor Piano Concerto. Richter- Haaser specializes in Beethoven and Brahms, and in the former he especially excells. At a recital I heard him give in Boston four years ago I was especially im- pressed by the sensitivity he could contain within an enorm- ously strong and dramatic ap- proach. It w a s therefore sur- prising to witness the light, sachet1approach he brought to Chopin's poetry. Richter-Haas- er gave us Chopin all sweet and graceful and he recalled Heine's comment that "Chopin's fame is aristocratic, it is perfumed with the approval of good so- ciety." It was, all in all, a disquiet- ing performance. In the opening allegro maestoso, Richter-Haas- er revealed an extraordinary light touch and clean fingering, but in the precious flow of po- etic doilies an essential urgency and potency was lacking. Of the second movement, less, said the better; the pianist made several errors that seemed to rattle him and he did not. regain his poise until the.third movement, when he and Thor Johnson, guest con- ducting the orchestra, had a dif- ference of opinion on tempi that was never firmly resolved. In fact, the entire performance showed the lack of rehearsals that such Festivals make diffi- cult to avoid. Also on the program were two works by Ginastera, his Psalm 150 Op. 5, and Pantasilea's aria from Bomarzo. The former, writ- ten in a style that may be con- sidered a mixture of Stravinsky and DmitrJ Tiomkin, showed the composer's early interest in and m3 astery of percussive effects. Bomarzo which was premiered last year, I have not heard, but I found the sprechstimme "aria" from the opera, even in Joanna Simon's credible performance, tedious, boring, dated, and pre- tentious - four unfdir adjec- tives for a first hearing. Concluding the program, the University Choral Union per- formed John Corigliano's "Fern Hill." Closely reminiscent of Barber/Agee's "Knoxville Sum- mer 1915" in b o t h style and tone, Corigliano's music tends to swallow Dylan Thomas's mag- nificent poetry -, and the last thing Thomas's poetry needs is further obfuscation - but nev- ertheless evoked t h e idyllic mood well. Greater choral defi- nition would no doubt have ben- efited the music a n d revealed the composer's preferences in a more enlightening fashion. On Saturday night Hill Aud. was as full as it would be for the festival; Ormandy conduct- ed the P.O. in two symphonies, Ives' Third and Mahler's First. In his third symphony, writ- ten between 1901 and 1911, Ives depended as usual upon hymn tunes but he did not set out to meld them into any rambunc- tious polytonal collage; rather he brooded over their melan- cholic place in the' American tradition of village revival meet- ings, and in the three move- ments entitled "Old Folks Gath- ering," "Children's Day," and "Communion," I v e s effected serene music, quite limited in coloristic detail, of subtly shift- ing moods. Relying on the s m o o t h Philadelphia strings, Ormandy molded a lovely per- formance. The major work on that eve- nings program was Mahler's "Titan" Symphony, completed when the composer was twenty- seven. Basically mordant in its outlook, the symphony contains all of the motifs of Mahler's later work: the amenities of na- ture, the brooding cynicism, the lamentations, and the conclud- ing, projected !affirmation in which Mahler longed to believe. Uniting the disparate elements of Mahler's sensibility is the musical progression of ideas and not merely the transformations of the musical structure. The instrumental lyricism, even in the "morning melodies" of the first movement, ne v e r exist merely as coloristic effects. B. H. Haggin, speaking of Mahler's use of the orchestra, says quite rightly: "If an instrument plays or an inner voice moves, the activity is never a routine in- strumental doubling or filling in of texture, but always something done with attention, thought, and purpose." It is exactly in this needed philosophic searching out of in- ner necessity that Ormandy fails. In the "Langsam" move- ment, all- of the instrumental effects were there, but no sense of the motivating Idea; there was action without strategy. Furthermore, because there was no real intuitional contact with the underlying personal sensibility, certain effects were often exaggerated (especially in the "Sturmisch bewegt' move- ment), somewhat like' a stripper who, no longer believing in the basic allure of her beauty, grinds grotesquely. The final D- major affirmative hymn of praise lacked convincing sincer- ity, and thus where lift was re- quired, Ormandy provided only loudness. This esseptial commiseration with the motivating Idea of the music / is probably something that a conductor cannot simply acquire, and thus no matter how well the orchestra plays, Mahler will always require, for the most meaningful communication of his sensibility and art men like Walter or Bernstein. It is worthwhile to note that Ormandy, following the lead of the Odyssey/New Haven Sym- phony recording, reinserted the "Blumine" movement that Mah- ler decided to 'delete. Mahler knew best, for this pastoral an- dante neither fits the structure nor the mood of the symphony; it may be seen as an attempt to soften the pungent anxiety of the music and as such is a dis- honest palliative which Mahler must have realized weakened the thrust of his symphony. It is only our modern penchant for completeness and accuracy, not p u r e musical considerations, that will no doubt persuade conductors to hereafter include the movement as a matter of course. That moment all concert- goers wait for-when the artist is lit, inspired, one with the music, when everything falls in- to place-occurred in the fourth concert. Zara Nelsova, an im- posing woman with Greta Gar- bo gestures, embraced her cello and performed miracles with the Elgar Concerto Op. 85. In the first movement espe- cially, Nelsova could do no wrong and her fingers effort- lessly and ever so lightly found their targets; moreover, Miss Nelsova seemed in perfect rap- port with the slightest expres- sive demands of the often re- petitive music. Thor Johnson was alert to the special wonder occurring and elicited fine ac- companiement from the Phila- delphia men, who themselves awarded Miss Nelsova with bravos. The Elgar concerto is not terribly much of a work- that is, it handles its limited lyricism with limited invention -but Miss Nelsova drew from it as much as one could ask. Also on the fourth program was Schubert's A-flat major Mass. Thor Johnson led the Uni- versity Choral Union in a sur- See MAY, Page 5 F# A~ Zara Nelsova: Yes ,1r U LIVE A LITTLE LONGER STOP OR. REDUCE SMOKING FREE EXPERIMENTAL SMOKING CLINIC 6-8 Weekly-One and a Half Hour Sessions CALL, NOW-662.4401 U - U Its been single-edged double-edged, banded, injectored, plastic- coated, and now electro-coated. But it's still straight. ' ! ! _Cue-Newsday women's WearDaily WARNO 0 E RS SEENARS-PE-NT CH:.EK..' 'TEAG . >: > TARR.NG HARRY:AND:EW"{.}:E+H":M;ELL{?TT :E LEEN HERL E;-iALFRED LYNCH Starts .}{}R: "%:,:;X""::r ~r:'}r;}r>SS:4WEMO}R.: N Thursday ROADRD -KTLE WIDS+RALiNIPAND ADPTTINBYM :R00DBR .E 9;w3.C0IED : .:........ j 7 :0 .f.., ,. V ,C ~ htO ih in ,t i o £1 Uv.vri.. r O Ca Ha e he l.s. au h " WARNpER" BROSb{ -SEVu.E AR PRE PROUCTON ESIN B TNY ALTNPODUDANDDBRO,-EVTEDBYSDNESUETS JAMS ASN VAESA EDRAE -NIMOORNE SIGNOEST D GNEAID ARNER' BeoeYo'e CHEpKHH . Bu, I Yo CO-STARING ARRY ADREWS"yEYou CanLLHOveTh"eILast HELuI"AFDLYC RONAL RAD -KAHLEE WIDOES TRANLATOmpNDADeTeO BYeaUR 8:15) E 101 I0 9o li * The blade. Whatever else they've done to it, one thing hasn't changed. It's still straight. And your face still isn't. its round. The new Norelco Triple- header gets around this problem. We put our unique rotary blades into three floating heads that follow your face by going in where rn two out of three snaves in an inde- pendent lab test. And you get a comfortable mTve because the Norelco floating eads curve with your chin, bend with your neck, and even straighten out for your cheeks. Automatically. And with- out a nick, pull or scrape. . The new Norelco has a hidden trimmer that pops out for sideburns, and a push button for easy flip-top cleaning. It also comes in a recharge- able model that gives almost twice as many shaves per charge as any other rechargeable. We can't see you changing the shape of your face. Rut we can see you changing w r 1, r 1 1J \i **r 1 l ... _ _ r 1; r, r . I