I to1rAtrsgan maag - Seventy-Sixth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHTGAN ^ _UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS Where Opinln Are Free 420 MAYNARD ST., ANN ARBOR, MICH. NEWS PHONE: 764-0552 Truth WHil Prevail * Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. Feb. 8: Pay Your Money, Take Your Choice WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1967 NIGHT EDITOR: LAURENCE MEDOW1 City Council Puts Vietnam Beyond a Vote By LEONARD PRATT Associate Managing Editor LL THE FUSS about The Daily is rather flattering, in its own way. I've never been a member of something important enough to be investigated. Moreover, in these days of the resurgent American Civil Liberties Union, this is prob- ably the last chance a lot of the staff will ever have to be consid- ered part of an organization that isn't in someone's interest. It's an opportunity not to be missed. The chance certainly hasn't been missed in the past. THE BOARD-now consisting of five faculty members, two Daily alumni, three students and two University vice-presidents - has had a history of pressured con- flicts. Members have always been subject to a good deal of pressure from administrators interested in getting the paper off their backs. Daily editors have usually felt the same about this pressure as did one student overheard discuss- ing the matter in the Fishbowl. yesterday: "You've gotta under- stand that around here the truth usually hurts." Yet the board has often proved a valuable assistant for the edi- tors in just this area, serving as a buffer between green journalists and weary administrators. But Monday they decided not to. They decided not to because The Daily's traditional campus ally, the faculty, has changed its posi- tion. FACULTY MEMBERS, increas-' ingly alienated from the adminis- tration, have often had a soft spot in their hearts for the paper in the past. Their influence has usually effectively neutralized the administration's demands on the board.*' But the soft spot dried up dur- ing the last couple months. The Daily's general editorial support for November's "student power" agitation disaffected many otherwise sympathetic professors. A series of stories followed which many faculty members didn't like, culminating in The Daily's pub- lishing of a story reporting that Berkeley Chancellor Roger Heyns was interested in the Uni- versity's presidency-though it's hard to understand why James Reston's report of the same fact two days earlier in the New York Times caused hardly a ripple. So with both the administra- tion and the faculty demanding that Something Be Done, the in- vestigation was almost inevitable. THAT'S THE POLITICS of the board's move, but it's still not clear what will come out of it all. Board members Monday night were fully aware of the bomb they were throwing, but even they seem un- sure of just what they might hit. About the only thing that can .e safely predicted now is that the campus will wind up with exactly the kind of Daily it de- serves. Any newspaper reflects its read- ership to a very great degree. It's written for them and if it's not what they want to read, they pro- test. Normal readers protest a normal newspaper by not buying it. But, campus papers, even The Daily. aren't that independent. They're owned directly by their readers. and there's the rub. SO NO MATTER what the im- mediate politics are-whether the editors declare war on the board, as has happened in the past, or whether the whole controversy curls up and dies quietly-over the long run The Daily will be what- ever its readers and writers, mem- bers of the same community, want it to be. If the community really wants to shut the paper up it can do it, nessy as the process might be and as hard as I will fight it. But these fireworks, if they are to come, will come at some time in the future in a way that can- not yet be foreseen. So there's little purpose in fretting about them. WHAT BOTHERS ME more right now is something that an- other student pointed out yester- day: "Do you realize that The Daily is the last chance left for a student to do anything on this campus?" He meant more than he said. The Daily is the only student organization which has survived the crush of enrollments and the presence of the trimester. The Un- ion and League, the Greek system and even Student Government Council have all paid the price of the multiversity. Only this news- paper remains as a unifying all- campus element in student life. THUS, THE PAPER has become more and more the center of "student activism," in all its forms, eyer since the early years of the decade. From the abolition of the lean of women's office through the suspension of the sit-in ban, The Daily's been involved in things simply because it was the only broadly-based student organiza- tion in existence. So if the paper goes, this last remnant of an all-University com- munity goes too. I don't know which of them I'd miss more, but I'd miss them both very much. i MONDAY NIGHT City Council decided that the war in Vietnam was above a vote. Argument against the passage of a pro- posed referendum on the war in Vietnam generally ran that: "If you want to ex- press discontent with the policy, there are other ways to do it." That's not the point. What remains crucial is the fact thatto oppose one of the most important and controversial policies undertaken by our government in recent years is defined by official opinion as a pariah, not a minority, stand., COUNCILMAN Douglas Crary (R-Sec- ond Ward) proposed that those wish- ing to protest the war sign their own pe- titions and/or place ads in local news- papers. Councilwoman Eunice Burns (D- First Ward) advised that those protest- ing the war (as she does) write to the President and to local congressmen. There are basically two effects of deny- ing a referendum. First, it is basically the poor who suffer when non-voting activ- ity is required. Letter-writing and other extra-curricular political activity is bas- ically the realm of the well-to-do; it takes quite a bit of effort to organize the poor for even normal, let alone extra-nor- mal, political activity. But secondly, why must those who would oppose a government policy be denied the right to vote on that policy? By say- ing "you can express your opinion in other ways" one inherently denies the legitimacy of the challenge. If one ac- knowledges the legitimacy of other means of registering sentiment, is it not logical that a real indicator be offered the poli- cy-makers, rather than unofficially sam- pling which is impossible to gauge? THEREARE PROBLEMS with a referen- dum to be sure. A ballot on Vietnam would be cumbersome and complex. But the vast misgivings surrounding this war, and the profound removal of its instru- mentation from the public voice should have been more than enough to convince City Council that foreign policy must not be absolved from official public purview. -RONALD KLEMPNER Letters: The Need for the Southern Courier J. Edgar Strike's Again 't IT IS HARD TO BELIEVE that the Amer- ican-Russian consular treaty could really be in trouble, but it is. Accord- ing to J. William Fulbright, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, there is a good chance that the treaty won't make it through the Senate. Fulbright himself put it best when he said last week in an interview with The Daily that "the treaty itself doesn't mean that much but its symbolic significance is extremely important." Passage of the treaty, which allows for the establish- ment of Russian consuls in major Ameri- can cities with America doing likewise in Russia, will prove that the U.S. is gen- uinely interested in improving relations between the two countries; its defeat can do grave harm to promoting an east- west detente. THE TREATY is in trouble because J. Edgar Hoover, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, doesn't want it. Living in the platitudes of 15 years ago, Hoover personally killed the treaty two years ago and may well do it again. He claims, and has told many people, that this treaty would allow the Russians to carry on subversive activity throughout the country. In Hoover's view the country is always on the verge of being submerged by an omnipresent Communist threat. It seems only his FBI keeps the country free from Soviet control. Hoover is an unelected representative of the Dulles days of massive retaliation and the psychosis of the cold war. One gets the feeling that he shudders every- time someone mentions that Communism may not be an international imperialistic monolith. But then, his job is at stake. FORTUNATELY, J. Edgar Hoover's ideas are no longer in touch with the times; unfortunately, J. Edgar Hoover's power in Congress and in the mind of a surpris- ing number of American citizens lingers on. One can only wonder how much long- er our one-man Red scare will continue to block important advances in interna- tional relations and domestic sanity. -NEIL SIIISTER To the Editor: I AM WRITING to urge support of a splendid, but very hard- up, young journal, The Southern Courier. We often hear newspa- pers spoken of as necessities, not merely luxuries. But by and large the claim is nonsensical. What passes for news in most papers is a pale reflection of reality trim- med to satisfy the American need to avoid being stirred or disturb- ed. Not so in the case of The Southern Courier. One cannot appreciate how nec- essary this fledgling journal is unless one has lived close to the events in Alabama and Mississippi that it reports. It is the only wide- ly distributed paper published in those states that contains more than a hint of the oppressiveness of the Southern system. During my year in Tuskegee, many things happened that I was involved in in a first-hand way- a civil rights murder, demonstra- tions, primary elections, city coun- cil meetings, tense confrontations -the works. To read about these events in the Atlanta Constitu- tion, either of the Montgomery pa- pers, or the local Tuskegee paper was to view them through an art- fully contrived screen that obscur- ed the harshness, bitterness, ven- om, courage and, yes, the humor of what happened. Only in The Southern Courier could one find reports that re- motely resembled reality. WRITTEN BY sensitive and in- telligent individuals who abhor in- justice as deeply as they love their craft, the Courier became, at least for me and my family, a necessity. From no other source could we get any sense of the concrete detail that words like "racial injustice," "hate," "prejudice" and "discrim- ination" cover. Written in simple prose, the Courier somehow manages to avoid oversimplification. Earthy, it yet avoids vulgarity. Quite the oppo- site. Its reporting is an almost pictorial representation of the hu- man spirit in all of its subtlety. And the photographs that fill each issue are themselves works of art. Look at the photos on display in the Fishbowl, and the issues posted outside the Department of Jour- nalism and see what I mean. BUT, as I first said, this excel- lent newspaper is in bad financial difficulties. They need help. And they deserve it. The readers of The Daily can help by taking subscrip- tions, and perhaps by adding a few dollars to the price. Did I say you could help the paper? It would be more accurate to say that you can hardly be the loser if you require the weekly privilege of reading the Southern Courier. -Arnold S. Kaufman Professor of Philosophy Help anted To the Editor: WE ARE acquainted with some of the young people who run The Southern Courier, and we feel pride of the success of their bold experiment. They are men and women of integrity, dedication and the highest sense of responsibility. reporting a new kind of news for the South: the day to day life of the Southern Negro. The Courier's pages are filled with the words of the poor, the ungrammatical truth of the prob- lems of Alabama and Mississippi. Every issue is a document; with sensitive photography and report- ing, many issues are works of art as well. The newspaper has .now been running for two years, and has a circulation of 20,000. (The editor estimates that there is easily a market of twice the size, but he needs more help in circulation.) For obvious reasons advertising is virtually nonexistent, and the newspaper is desperately in need of support. We strongly urge mem- bers of the University of Michi- gan community to take a good look at The Southern Courier. A spe- cial subscription rate of $5 has been arranged. Checks payable to The South- ern Courier. Address: 1012 Frank Leu Building, Montgomary, Ala., 36104. Rarely has such a newspaper been needed so much. -William Christian, Jr. -Susan Christian Sesqui-Skunk To the Editor: I WAS TEMPTED to respond to Assistant Prof. Hornback's re- cent ill-tempered comments in this column on the Sesquicentennial and the Business Hall of Fame- until I recalled Cornelius Vander- bilt's remark about a squabble he once had with Daniel Drew: "It doesn't pay to kick an agitated skunk." -David L. Lewis Associate Professor of Business History SDS Protection To the Editor: THIS LETTER is a comment on the recent picketing of the CIA and the Chase Manhattan Bank while they were interviewing on the University of Michigan cam- pus by the SDS: I am not a little girl. I do not need the organization of the Stu- dents for' a Democratic Society to protect me from all experience outside the womb of the Univer- sity of Michigan. Yet it appears to me, as a senior at the Univer- sity who is busily interviewing as many different potential employ- ers as possible, that the SDS is attempting indeed to 'protect" me making the horrible mistake of talking with the Central Intelli- gence Agency and the Chase Man- hattan Bank. The picketing by the SDS of these two agencies, who were in- terviewing students for possible positions in their organization in the Bureau of Appointments and Occupational Information, was protesting that students of the University "were not consulted as to whether we want these men here, or consulted as to whether we want relative information about prospective employers made available along with the interviews, "And We Thought We Police Knew Something About Power" look at the First Amendment of our Constitution: freedom of speech is not limited to their "dem- ocratic" organization. I hope that the Bureau of Ap- pointments will continue to draw as many different varieties of bus- inesses and organizations to the University without the censorship of anyone! -Linda Pritchard, '67 Criticizes Daily To the Editor: DAY BY DAY The Daily lives up to its tradition of "Seventy- Six Years of Editorial Freedom." If the tradition were "Seventy- ...f., 'y' T w+.rrn. r~r 'us- ' \ - - .. _.. .e= . Good for =U' and Daddy, Too." You really should have had your laugh in the back room and gone to print without it. Together the picture and the tone of the ar- ticle leave the impression that had the booklet in question offered a free haircut at the Union bar- bershop, rather than "explain in layman's terms the existing tax law, The Daily's editorial staff would have raved and taken ad- vantage of the incentive to con- tribute to the fund drive. Rarely is philanthropy complete- ly altruistic or disinterested, a fact of life which The Daily does not seem to recognize, but which Regent Paul Goebel fortunately does. It strikes me as extremely unfortunate that the naivete of the editors can seem so destrue- tive, cynical and negative in its unadulterated freedom. BUT NOT ONLY are you irre- sponsible, you are inconsistent. Your headline on page one reads "'U' Budget Request Takes Dras- tic Slashes." Your editorial on page four dumps onr the fund drive. Do you really think that the pages of The Daily can substitute as legal tender? -Alfred Mudge, '69L Trial To the Editor: WHEN I WAS innocuously rous- ed from my sleep the other morning at 5 a.m. by a bulldozer plowing the snow off the side- walk 20 feet from my bedroom window in the Northwood Apart- ments, I felt very much like Jo- seph K. I must have sinned; I admitted my guilt before I really had known what I had specifically done. And the bulldozer was my trial. IN SHORT, I felt absurd. And playing out my Kafka nightmare I stopped to read The Michigan Daily-the gatekeeper of the law. It was there that I stood before Mr. Lutz. the high priest of the law, speaking through Mr. Blue- stone, his sage. The law had been kept from me. And now, as I was expiring my last breath, Mr. Bluestone bent over me, and the meaning of the law was revealed: "The bulldozer was there because there was six inches of snow on the ground and it was authorized by the Plant Denartment." It had all been so obvious and clear. Damn this complicated world. Why had I not seen It be- fore? The law is there to be under stood by all those simplistic enough to revert to reason instead of acid or to sense in place of psychedelics. -William Horwath Teaching Fellow Department of English 4 I Death of the Astronauts 4 THE TRAGEDY of three dead astronauts is now a thing of the past, and yet it will not be soon forgotten. It will live on, not out of horror for the accident itself, but because of a mass elegy which has arisen out of it. Since the accident, there has been a flood of newspaper articles and television reports discussing the causes and effects of the event, and the funeral arrange- ments for each astronaut. Moreover, sym- pathy statements have abounded from individuals and groups, including state legislatures, who wish to publicize their relationship to a dead hero, and perhaps borrow some of the aroused public sym- pathy. BUT IN THIS national pageant of mourning, the personal tragedy of three human beings has been forgotten. In- stead, we see the valiant reaffirmation of The Daily is a member of the Associated Press.and Collegiate Press Service. subscription rate: $4.50 semester by carrier ($5 by mail; $8 yearly by carrier ($9 by mail). Published at 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mich., 48104. Owner-Board in Control of Student Publications, Bond or Stockholders,;-None. Average press run--8ICO. Second class postage paid at Ann Arbor. Michigan. 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104. JUNIOR MANAGERS-Gene Farber Erica Keeps, Bill Krauss, Sam Offen, Carol Neimera, Diane Smaller, Micnael Stecklis, Jeanne Rnsinski, Steve Wechsler. Business Staff3 SUSAN PERLSTADT, Business Manager JEFFREY LEEDS ........ Associate Business Manager HARRY BLOCH . .............. Advertising Manager STEVEN LOB WENTHAL........Circulation Manager ELIZABETH RHE IN............. Personnel Director support for the United States space pro- gram, and consequently, the indefatigable "American way of life." It is shameful when the death of three astronauts-men who lived and died with great personal valor-is used merely as an excuse for unthinking patriotism. There are those who would convert this event into a cry for renewed vigor in or- der to reach the moon before our adver- saries. And it is shameful when an isolated accident must be exploited by people to show that they can be touched by hu- man suffering, thereby absolving them- selves of a criminal indifference to atroci- ties committed in their name halfway around the world. Are those dying there any less human? If not, why the discrep- ancy in newsplay? F THIS IS the "American way of life" of which the astronauts' death is meant to remind us, perhaps it would be just as well if we left the moon to itself. -DAVID DUBOFF The Courier AN ARTICLE by Geile Roberts in yes- terday's New York Times reports: "The civil rights movement has collapsed in broad areas of the South, and is fighting what seems to be a last-ditch battle for survival in its few remaining spheres of influence." One of those remaining spheres is the Southern Courier; two letters on this page deal with its function and quality. What might be added is that the Courier serves the North in providing frequent or consulted about any other as- pect of the job placement pro- gram." WELL, BULLY for the SDS, but my rights as an adult individual capable of deciding with whom I care to speak and be employed will be infringed upon if any per- son or any group sits in judgment over who comes to the University, the informationpublished concern- ing the organization or any other "aspect of the job placement pro- gram." Perhaps the SDS better take a Six Years of Responsible Editorial Freedom," we might have a rag we could respect.' Perhaps good taste and editor- ial responsibility are too much to expect from a student newspaper, but one must hope that FREEDOM (which seems to be Daily's rally- ing point) would stimulate respon- sibility and not be the blanket license for whatever tasteless, or perhaps "experimental," babblings the editors choose to print. I refer specifically to the nega- tive cynicism of David Saltman's editorial yesterday, '55-M Fund: :" "r,1:+ rrrr." r:::: l:.Y:.: Y r : ! ......... ........ rr...... :r. rV:.;V::. 4Yrlr. "I:JM1:Y:l."Vl" "r :r .J ..r yy p. NNftf ffl: flt W: .KlJ:ffr t:. .:.V: J: J.V::: r: r::.1V.": ,4Y:: f::r.M1:M1:I:."! NJ.Vr::::::.:1V::.": """"""," ...V ... . .. ...!! .1N:V: MX. : 5""JRY It. 5 ! ... .N f"N.:Y: N:r NY.1VlrrJ:: .NY"" .1. 1GYNV NG... . :: Y". V.1". l:.;Y: rJ.:V: 1:.51V!!: f"N1:.1"fNY.:".'.V!l: tlf' ".Jl................ ":...... ....... . n4. . ::.".':::: VI: Jr:I:.V :Y "" ....n.........., .. .. ................................................................. ... .. .. .. ..,......... .......... .J.{' . ...... . rr ................ . .NM':N{'S r AJ l r".{y,,. , .t ............. . " """" " .f .'Y:.ll.V :l l:. rr,1V J:f::.1:,.. ... ........ ......... r i. ..r .. .N.....1' ....... , n .1n.. , .. .... ...................... ...... ......... ....... .. .r . . .... ....... .. r. ... r ............ . r"r.l. r ...VeF. .r.. ":'3 "NJ 1967: The Generation of Leary By BOB EWEGEN Collegiate Press Service THE LIFE of a college genera- tion is of short and indeterm- inate length. Two or three years sees a ma- jority turnover. By its very tem- porary nature, the tone of a col-. lege generation is subject to swift and radical change. Such a change may be occurring today. The college students from the twilight ofthesEisenhower years through the New Frontier on up to about 1965 were very much the children of Kennedy. Regardless of their particular philosophical . orientation, they sought improve- ment in man's condition through governmental change and public action. Naturally, the bulk of students never became massively involved. But what Clark Kerr termed the small creative minority of leader- lives or contribute meaningfully to human welfare. Perhaps these factors are the so- cial backdrop which is producing the children of Leary. If it seems impossible to find a' better life through outward, asocially directed action, perhaps students feel the only alternative is to withdraw and find Valhalla within their own in- ner self with the help of a sugar cube. This, of course, is the other factor, the spread of LSD. Sim- ple to manufacture, impossible to detect within the human system, LSD offers the way to an internal paradise for the children of Leary. THE WEB of laws slowly be- ginning to surround LSD may simply be another "noble experi- ment" with even less chance of success. The motto of the children of xxrarrilxy nr9PntPri not mitxxrnrrily hnrmnnv %nrl h mnn nrnrrracc nrmclt "f lin allne hocrin +n cnaalz