Seventy-Sixth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BYS TUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS When, Opinions Are Free 420 MAYNARD ST., ANN ARBOR, MICH. NEws PHONE: 764-0552 r'- 2i~hW911 Prevail Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the inidividual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. FRIDAY, APRIL 8, 1966 NIGHT EDITOR: MERLE JACOB The Dilemla of the Drf: Someone Has a Solution Publick OcurenesRaw Power Beats S ystem Every Time by BuceWasserstein HOW DO YOU beat the system? After listening to Professor Organski's discourse on the reali- ties of power politics at the China Teach-In, I was inspired to think of some tactics which would help advance the student's cause. FOR EXAMPLE, students want a voting voice on tenure com- mittees, and the faculty establish- ment is opposed to the idea. What do you do? First, you pick a department in which a high percentage of stu- dents are liberals such as sociol- ogy. Then you get the students to boycott any class which is taught by a professor hired aftera given date on which students demanded to be included in tenure selection. Then you get people from Voice to picket the class so that wishy- washy students will be dissuaded from attending. Then, you set up a picket line at the professor's house including all of the grubbiest students on campus. Assuming that the teacher AS THE WAR in Viet Nam continues, recognition of .a draft dilemma has been growing in many areas outside the offices of Gen. Hershey and Co. Solutions to the problem abound as every type of group imaginable has its own pet solu- tion. Few of them are adequate; in fact, few will ever be considered, much less accepted. It is dangerous to hail each new reme- dy as THE drug to cure the current draft disease. The present system is, admit- tedly, unfair in many of its policies, yet it appears to be the best means of in- duction available--until time allows its re-evaluation. EN. PHILIP HART (D-Mich) voiced the doubts of many when he stated that he had "serious questions about the fair- ness and equity of the present concept of deferment for those who can afford a col- lege education, as long as a college educa- tion is not economically within the reach of all who might be academically quali- fied." A possible answer to this problem was described in the petition drawn up by a number of professors in the literary col- lege calling for random induction. While this solution may be acceptable to an egalitarian, some argue that the Armed Services, through the draft, take many "off the streets of Skid Row" and give them an education and set of values which may have been otherwise unobtain- able. It has also been said that such a process would entail an unnecessary waste of resources; college-trained inductees could be better used elsewhere. PROF. ROSS WILHELM, of the econom-, ics department in the Schdol of Busi- ness Administration, has described the draft as "a waste" from an economic view- point. He has suggested that the military. should fill some of their manpower needs by calling on the Reserves and the Na- tional Guard. By leaving the Reserves and the National Guard at home, we are in the position of drafting the poorest trained civilians to fight, while the best remain behind. Once again, a system of this sort has the potential to waste resources. The same men who fought in the past wars have not been idling their time waiting for the next one to roll around. Many of them have taken up careers and now have family responsibilities. They have conceivably aged some, and though the Reserves and members of the National Guard are required to attend weekly training meetings, this is not equivalent to the training one encounters in an Army Boot Camp. The fighters of the past may not qualify as the fighters of the future. SENATOR HART, along with Paul Good- man and many others, advocates the adoption of a system which would give the inductee an option to serve his coun- try either militarily or diplomatically; "a new system of broad national service to supplement the service one could give his country through the Armed Forces. None disagree that a Peace Corps worker in a remote village is making a significant contribution to his country at some per- sonal sacrifice. This can well be true in other areas of foreign or domestic service as well." Senator Hart's solution appears to be the most logical step towards the concept of fairness in the induction process. It provides for a system of national defense on the diplomatic and military front, and, at the same time, gives the inductee a choice as to how he will defensively serve his nation. TfHESITUATION in Viet Nam at this time prevents a rational review of the inductive system. The war requires a large number of military personnel, and the past formula for success is seen as the present panacea. One may argue the need for such a war to be waged, but, once war has been declared formally or informally, one cannot argue the need for personnel. The value of the present system, while appearing to be the best solution now, must be questioned in the future. It should be answered with a system com- parable to Hart's option system for for- eign, or domestic service. -PAT O'DONOHUE lives in a nice, quiet, middle class neighborhood he will begin to feel pressure from his neighbors. Of course, the home of the de- partment chairman would also have to be picketed. THUS THE sociology depart- ment would have hired a man who has no pupils to teach and is having one hell of a bad time in Ann Arbor. And, sure enough, he will take up that offer to teach at Berkeley. Although it is unfortunate that any individual has to suffer, that is the nature of politics. As Or- ganski would be the first to point out, power is raw. THIS TYPE of technique was used with great effectiveness by Saul Alinsky in the Woodlawn area of Chicago. Instead of picket- ing the slumowner's office, he would take the ghetto Negroes and go picket the landlord's house in the suburbs. And of course, in addition to using these techniques for pur- poses of academic reform, students too can pick on specific slum land- lords. CAN YOU IMAGINE for ex- ample if students picked a given cardboard apartment building and instructed all potential customers to go to the cardboard box down the street which charged the same prices. Obviously all those mort- gages on the boycotted apartment would be in for real trouble. Students could send letters around to all landlords who charged exhorbitant prices for in- adequate dwellings and warn them, "you may be next." Then the question for the landlord is whether it is worth the risk of being boycotted and going bank- rupt to squeeze a few more dollars from students. Another idea in this area would be to have rent strikes a la Jesse Grey. For example, a majority of the students in University Towers could demand that the manage- ment repair the torn elevator doors or they will not pay their rent. What can the management do but repair the doors? Or the University of Michigan Student Economic Union could or- ganize wildcat strikes to protest low wage level. IF THE ONLY WAY students can win a better way of life for themselves is through pure power, the only solution is to organize. The only effective organization can, of course, be accomplished through a popular student front with groups ranging from Young Republicans to Voice Political Party. THANK YOU Mr. Organski. . . . FR SEVERAL weeks members of Voice have been picketing local stores which sell Schenley liquors, because of Schenley's re- fusal to recognize an agriculture union as the bargaining unit for grapepickers. Wednesday, Schenley capitu- lated and recognized the grape pickers union. As William L. Kircher, national director of organization for the A.F.L.-C.I.O. said, "Labor history was written here today." THE SCHENLEY settlement marked the first time in the his- tory of California that a union of field workers had gained official recognition from the grower. There are 500,000 people em- played in California's agricultural industry. According to the New York Times the "average family income of seasonal farm workers is estimated at about $2,500. It is about time that these people had a fair shake in the "Great So- ciety." There is little doubt that the boycotting of Schenley products throughout the country by groups such as Voice was instrumental in bringing about the settlement by discrediting Schenley before a na- tional audience. NOTCH ONE for the activists. 0 9 Secret Sex Becomes the, "Big Deal" 6 SINCE MY OWN youth-I was born in 1911-there has been important progress toward free- dom, naturalness, and honesty in sexual matters. In child care, as taught by Dr. Spock or the De- partment of Labor Manual, there is a widespread relaxation of toilet training and a reasonable toler- ance of masturbation. There has been a remarkable liberation from censorship of so- called pornography, so that it is now possible to write plain Eng- lish about most human problems. Information about contraception and venereal diseases has become publically available and useable. Psychology, whatever its merits or demerits, has squelched a lot of superstition. And, by and large, religion has let up on hellfire. IN MAJOR RESPECTS, how- ever, there has been no improve- ment. Practically, parents leave their young out on a limb with their "freedom"; they are permis- sive and even sentimentally ap- proving of sexuality, but they do not provide space, moral support or practical information. Police law is as barbarous as ever, despite the fact that moral legislation with regard to sexual matters like marriage and divorce, abortion, statuatory rape, or homosexuality (just as with regard to gambling, alcohol or drugs) in- variably does more harm than good. And the school systeis persist, as they did in my childhood, in the fiction that sexuality simply does not exist. AT PRESENT, in my opinion, the attitude of the schools does the worst damage. In the first place, there is a terrible waste of opportunity-as is true, of course, also with the rest of the schooling. At the elementary level, it would be a great thing if the wasted training would include psycho- somatic exercises and eurhythmics to unblock and harmonize the anger, grief and sexuality that are Paul Goodman damned up in the average child; but this is impermissible because of the school board, the mayor, the church, and the yellow press. High school and college would in principle be ideal environ- ments for exploration in the risky field of sex, under the protection of benevolent teachers; but that will be the day! I have even found it impossible for a college to adopt a course of group therapy for seniors, so they can gain some awareness of themselves and one another before they graduate, to marry or not to marry, to choose careers, to vote. BUT THE WORST damage is done by the school's denial of the existence of sex for this creates a schizophrenic unreality. Since sex does not exist for the children, the schools become in so far un- real environments: there is no doubt that this is a chief cause of inattention and dropout. More important, since the school is overwhelmingly the unique public and official environ- ment of the young, children and adolescents begin to take their sexuality itself as not quite real, for the chief-property of reality is to be publicly expressible and to affect and be affected by other realities. THE CONSEQUENCES are evi- dent in the reality of American life and the sexuality that is part and parcel of it. For the young, sex exists only in their peer-group; it is therefore ignorant and insulted. It must not interfere with home- work, nor can it energize writing, art, sport, career, or any other cultural pursuit. But as a part of the youth "sub-culture," divorced from community or grown-up meaning, it necessarily becomes stereotyped. False privacy results in timidity and conformity, and prevents true solitude and individuality. Instead of each youngster developing ac- cording to his own disposition, situations, and luck, and even- tually learning to cope with the demands of society, all are forced into conformity to an uncultured and jejune perr group. Conversely, insulated from the rest of life and yet obviously tre- mendously important, sexuality becomes a glamorous big deal. AS FREUD pointed out, sexual- ity is co-equal among half a dozen other major human functions, like knowing, making a living, art, citizenship, God, being a parent, to all of which it contributes a color and value. But if it is either inhibited or isolated, it becomes destructive and trivial; it is over rated or it vanishes. 10 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: Romney Clarifies Speaker Ban Policy Williams vs. Cavanagh: Mudslinging Can Be Fun, But... Editor's note: In late February Mr. Leonard M. Schwartz, '67. sent Governor George Romney a copy of a column written by James W. Schutze on the Senate speaker ban resolution. His reply was a clarification of his posi- tion on the controversial speaker policy issue. The following is a copy of Gov. Romney's letter: Dear Mr. Schwartz: THANK YOU for sending me your comments on the recent appearance of a communist speak- er at three of our state universi- ties. I welcome the opportunity to amplify my personal views on this controversial subject. First: I "support the principle of university autonomy as spelled out in our state constitution. The governing board of each institution has final authority over all mat- ters of internal policy, including the policy on outside speakers. I therefore oppose efforts to inter- fere with the independence of uni- versities in this area. Second: I am in basic agree- ment with the existing uniform policy on outside speakers which was adopted by the Michigan Co- ordinating Council for Public Higher Education in 1962. The Coordinating Council's "Report on Speaker Policy" spells out the in- tention of the institutions "to foster a spirit of free inquiry and to encourage the wide discussion of a wide variety of issues, pro- vided that the views expressed are stated openly and therefore are subject to critical exaluation." THE REPORT also includes this important provision: "The speaker must not urge the audience to take action which is prohibited by the rules of the college or university, or which is illegal under federal or Michigan law. Advocating or urging the modification of the government of the United States or of the State of Michigan by violence or sabotage is specifically prohibited. It is the responsibility of the student organization to in- form speakers of these prohibi- tions." I BELIEVE that this policy achieves a proper balance between the right of student organizations to invite speakers representing a wide range of viewpoints, and the responsibility to exercise this right THE APPARENTLY unbeatable George Romney is driving potential Democrat- ic gubernatorial contenders away from the electoral lists in droves. An obscure Republican congressman, Robert Griffin, is certain to lose to the Democratic sen- atorial nominee. So the contest between Detroit's Mayor Jerome P. Cavanagh and former Gov. G. Mennen Williams for the Senate nomination has been the only thing that's happening so far in state politics. BUT WHAT HAS BEEN happening? The most notable event thus far in the whole campaign occurred Wednesday. "It is a matter of record that people hold- ing nonpartisan city (of Detroit) jobs have been used on political junkets to out-state Michigan" for Cavanagh, Wil- liams stormed, noting Cavanagh announc- ed his candidacy for the Senate "only 76 days after he was inaugurated" as De- troit's nonpartisan mayor. Pointing out he had removed his own face from the Democratic ballot vignette, Williams called on Cavanagh to "make this a truly fair election by removing his face from City Hall and taking his cam- paign workers off the city's payroll." In short, he said, Cavanagh ought to resign as mayor. Cavanagh counterattacked at once. "I am delighted that my opponent has ex- hibited a concern for nonpartisan gov- Acting Editorial Staff MARK R. KILLINGSWORTH, Editor BRUCE WASSERSTEIN; Executive Editor ernment," he said, because "he never ex- hibited such an interest in the 12 years he was governor." Claiming that Williams had been cam- paigning for the Senate post ever since he got the job of assistant secretary of state for African affairs in 1960, Cavanagh said he'd "be most happyto resign if I had family millions (as does Williams), but I have eight children to support." The employes? Oh, yes, some had indeed been working for him-=but on their vacation time. OF COURSE, there are other issues that might be discussed during the race, such as the war in Viet Nam, the spectre of inflation, the war on poverty and oth- er matters. But such knotty questions pall before the present-and virtually the only--issue. It even appears urgent, since Cavanagh may have to resign anyway, if he is elected to the Senate in Novem- ber. Here, however, is a dramatic oppor- tunity for a constructive dialogue which might even revitalize the whole demo- cratic process. Cavanagh started out his candidacy by asking that he and Wil- liams "debate the great issues of this campaign face to face in communities across the state." If Cavanagh can un- tangle himself from his eight children and Williams can withstand debating with a nonpartisan mayor, they should indeed debate. IN FACT, they should do more than that. For example, they might offer a public accounting of their respective fi- nances and the number of their children and other dependents. Since Cavanagh hinted darkly that Williams was too busy campaigning to bother "when several governments in Africa were under at- tack and were in fact in revolt," per- haps the Senate Foreign Relations Com- I 4I t t r , r S4 x a4 ° b+ A4 a z~ .1 A ( ?h, i according to the reasonable re- straints spelled out in the policy. -George Romney Good Intentions To the Editor: H tAVE RECENTLY been reim- pressed with a strange though familiar phenomena. A man or mbn so consumed by a desire that they misinterpret the reality in' which their desire must be actual- ized, thereby frustrating its actu- alization. Some time ago, in William Wy- ler's movie The Collector, I saw a young man wanting so desperately to be loved by a girl that he was unable to understand that by im- prisoning her, he removed any possibility of his desire being re- alized. Motivated by the most no- ble and understandable of emo- tions, he insanely destroys what he strives to possess. I ALSO WATCHED the play Herakles by Archibald Macliech and again saw a man distort re- ality through the intensity of his good intentions. Herakles at- tempts to serve God and man by perfecting the world, cleansing it of all human misery. But in the process of destroying the evils of the world, he mistakes his seven sons for monsters and slays them. . In his enthusiastic direction of power towards a beneficial objec- tive, he somehow looses his ability to discriminate between men and monsters. The attempt to perfect the world results in senseless des- truction. In the case of both Her- akles and The Collector, our awareness of the ruthless irony causes us to sympathize with the men, but we cannot condone their actions. I HAVE ALSO watched our pre- sent political and social situation. I have seen men who for the most part are motivated by the most moral of motives. I have seen men desiring America to be loved and respected, but in their enthusiasm failing to comprehend that love and respect are not engendered by power and intimidation. I have seen men intensely de- siring to rid the world of evil and suffering, but in their enthusiastic use of power, they have destroy- ed monsters which in fact are their brothers. Our awareness of the irony may cause us to sympathize, but it cannot allow us to con- done thsains. if you try hard enough" results in many atrocities. We must learn to dream in terms of existing condi- tions, and these conditions must be perceived and evaluated cor- rectly. We must learn to avoid strangling the child in our loving embrace. We should have long since learned that blood letting is an ineffective method of purging disease. -Douglas C. Sprigg, Grad. At Last To the Editor: FIND THIS a difficult letter to . write since I am so Iempted to simply accept the Zioiist's view- point as true and d.scount the Arab's stand as false :propaganda. This attitude of mina or of other Zionists or the reverge one of the Arabs has been held ever since Jews were officially ad!n tted te Palestine in accord with the !!r- four Declaration and has been in- tensified since the formation of the state of Israel. I feel it is time for a change in these attitudes and the charges and countercharges which have been seen in the Daily recently have convinced me how necessary this change is. BOTH SIDES should realize that they are probably equally quilty of breaking all legal as well as humanitarian laws. The military attacks made by both sides on each other, the unwillingness to try and solve the Palestine refugee problem, the Jordan River de- velopment dispute, as well as the continual arms race, are just some of the stumbling blocks to peace. However, no real effort has been made in order to bring about a solution to some of these problems. THEREFORE, the energy being wasted on trying to justify the position of either one side or the other (and it is wasted since noth- ing constructive occurs), should be channelled into a means of bringing the two sides together. Peace will be an impossibility in the Middle East until the Arab and the Israeli 'or Zionist come down from their position of self- acclaimed innocence, look closely at their own records, admit their faults, and then finally come to grips with the existing problems. MI jp 9 CLARENCEdPANTO Managing Editor HARVEY WASSERMAN Editorial Director JOHN MEREDITH ......Associate Managing Editor LEONARD PRATT.........Associate Managing Editor A