THURSDAY, JANUARY 6, 1966 THE MICHIGAN .DAILY PAGE Ft" r TIJVRSDAY, JANUARY 6,1966 TIlE MICHIGAN DAILY PAGE FIVE - .,, ,. Campuses Act for reedoms FANTASTIC REDUCTIONS IN OUR YEAR-END By WILLIAM E. JACKSON, JR.f EDITOR'S NOTE: Mr. Jack-t son is a doctoral candidate int the Department of Public Law and Government at Columbiax University. Academic freedom l1as once again become a national issue. The controversy surrounding thet question has now reached thet point of vaulting once obscure professors to fame, and drawingI in first hand involvement of suchl off-campus personages as gov- ernors, senators and ex-presiden- tial candidates. Freedom of speech on college and university campuses has be- come inescapably intertwined withl the broader question of freedom to dissent in, and ,against, our society. For many the movement is linked chiefly to specific prob-. lems or grievances: Viet Nam, civil rights, speaker rules. For1 others the movement becomes a wide-sweeping vendetta against4 the general character of society- the way it is run, the things it values, those smaller members whom it crushes.' The most recent past has been filled with the struggle to gain legitimacy and sanction for the right to express that dissatisfac- tion and to hear "heresy" on the? college campus. In North Carolina, a "speaker- ban" law was hurriedly pushed through the state legislature in the closing hours of the 1963 session. This unique lawprohibts "any known member' of the Com- munist Party, or anyone who has invoked the fifth amendment's protection against self incrimina- tion in loyalty investigations, from speaking on state-supported col- lege and university campuses. The proponents of the law were motivated by diverse concerns, ranging from anger over civil rights demonstrations in the state capital -participated in by some U.N C. faculty and students, to general popular unrest over the "rrai" teaching at the state . . . y, One of the chief back- bahe law, State Senator '7hite, has candidly com- d: "I don't believe there's