x AnEditorial . "DO NOT FOLD, spindle or mutilate"-or ignore. Students have something to say. The interests of the 40,000 students and 3000 faculty who will compose the University in 1970 must be represented in the selection of President Harlan Hatcher's suc- cessor. The Regents, as representatives of the people of Michigan, hold the explicit constitutional responsibility for the University. < The final choice of the new President must be theirs. Yet, while they have a deep concern for its excellence, many considerations make it clear that such a complex and demanding decision must involve others as well, for the Regents cannot do it alone. In exercising their constitutional responsibility, the Regents will draw fully from their own perspective on the University, de- rived from their work with administrators and from their exper ience as public representatives of the University. But the Regents have an equal responsibility to seek every possible source of information and perspective on the needs of the University and on the men best qualified to guide it. The University is as free as it is-and as good as it is-be- cause the Regents have shown trust in and support for recom- mendations from responsible members of the entire academic community. W ITH THIS IN MIND, they have quite properly indicated to the faculty that they will have a meaningful voice in the selection of.the next President. Students, who will be no less af- fected, must also participate. To ignore any segment of the University community during the selection process, to choose a new President as old country fathers chose husbands for their daughters, would run the risk of badly mismatching needs, interests and abilities, of selecting not necessarily a poor leader, but the wrong leader for this univer.> sity at this time. Although they are often viewed as transient entities with negligible insight into the processes and purposes of the Univer- sity, students are, in fact, its prime reason for existence. Other university presidents have not been responsive to student interests; Edward Strong at Berkeley was one. As the University's 1962 Reed Report on student affairs states, the studentf . . . must be considered a participating member of a c "community of scholars," with responsibilities and opportuni- ties commensurate with his capacities. He should be expected to participate fully in decisions affecting his welfare . . . He should work with faculty and administration for the broad welfare of the University, tempering his self-interest to thef common good: Students can best discuss their own problems. They can bestz give their' perspectives on how presidential candidates would deal with student problems-and with students themselves. And, finally, having participated in his selection, University students< would not feel indifferent or hostile to him, but would have a f strong commitment to his success.I IT IS A MATTER of great concern, therefore, that the Regents t have been presented with one selection plan in which stu- t dents would be represented only on an "evaluation of needs" panel? which would appraise the present and potential state of the Uni- versity and then disband. Three new committees, composed of z faculty, alumni and Regents, would then evaluate and rank presi- #:dential candidates. : Ni The adoption of such a plan would be tragic. As presented s to the Regents, it would effectively preclude any possibility ofr essential student involvement and contribution in the selection process. Moreover, by having several different committees reporting to the Regents rather than a single committee working with them, the plan would make impossible the kind of continuous interac- tion between Regents, students, faculty, and alumni which is of t supreme importance in insuring the wisest possible choice. F OR THESE REASONS we urge the establishment of a joint committee to include representatives from all these groups. This joint committee would oversee the initial tasks of evaluating the University, establishing criteria for candidates, and gathering, sorting and screening names. It would then arrive at a list of 20-25 candidates, whom itz would interview and discuss at length, preparing a final list of 10,r ranked in order of preference for final consideration and selection t by the Regents. The Regents would be likely to call on the Senate Advisory' Committee for University Affairs for nominations to such a com-> munity. We urge that they do so, and that, similarly, they seek student nominations froni Student Government Council and Graduate Student Council. This joint committee would effectively represent the inter- ests and perspectives of all concerned' groups at all vital stages of the selection process. It would provide for effective interac- tion by all groups at every stage of the process except the final se- lection. The qualities of the next President of the University will to a great extent determine the direction in which the University will move in the future-indeed, if it will move at all. We believe it is essential for all parts of the University community to partici- pate and be represented in that decision. STUDENT INTEREST in the selection of the next President is high. SGC has already, approved unanimously' a resolution ' seeking real student participation in that decision and meets to- morrow to vote on a final plan. A joint committee for .the selec- tion of the University's next President deserves the highest priority, and we urge its swift creation. -THE JUNIOR AND SENIOR EDITORS What's New at 764-1817 Hotline Literary college scholarship applications for Spring-Summer Term III and for the next academic year (Fall 1966 and Winter 1967) are now available in Room 1220 Angell Hall. Completed C, 4r Sfr 43a &iiati; Seventy-Five Years of Editorial Freedom I=, VOL. LXXVI, No. 107 ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1966 SIX PAGES To'. 15-20 'U' Receives $1 million From Upjohn Gift Will Establish Center of Clinical I Pharmacology Study By NEIL SHISTER Prote stor s Days, 7'7 Sentenced IFines C Defendants To Request The Upjohn Pharmaceutical Co. donated $1 million to the Univer- sity for the establishment of the first research and training center devoted to clinical pharmacology. The center, which will be ad- ministeredby the medical school, will - study the effectiveness and safety of drugs on man. In announcing the donation to the University, E. Clifford Upjohn, chairman of the company, empha- sized the need which exists for such a center. Federal Funds The final size of the center de- .-'":' :: '::: pends upon the University's suc- cess in obtaining a matching grant from the federal government. Dean William Hubbard of the University students are shown here Medical School said he was opti- niques in the handling of pre-schoo mistic about the chances of ob- they wish. On the left a child is bei taining such a grant. He estimated that the final cost of the center0 could be a little less than $2 mil- lion if the University received the maximum possible grant. The Upjohn donation was in0 conjunction with the University's $55 million fund raising campaign, mencement day, 1967. There was no request for a -Daily-Thomas R. Copi working in "Children's Community," an experimental private school which uses original tech- ol youngsters. Children operate in an unstructured classroom atmosphere, free to do whatever ng instructed on how to read; on the right children are working with crafts. e Kindergarten Class New Teaching Methods pharmacology center in the orig- inal list of priority needs for which the $55 million will be used. Completed by 1969 The University is hopeful that the center can be completed by late 1969, and is beginning plan-' ning immediately. The center will be located close to the General Clinical Research Unit in Univer- sity Hospital and the clinical lab- oratories of the Kresge Medical Research Building.+ Dr. Maurice H. Seeveers, chair- man of the pharmacology depart- ment, said that the, center "is probably the first building of its+ kind in the world, and certainly the first in the United States. + "It offers us our big chance to apply more precisely in man the] same careful controls that we have been using in animals." By DAVID KNOKE out of the experimental educa- Chaotic? Only to the observer acters, to expose the pupils to tional theories of Montessori, Syl- who hasn't grasped what the semi- other backgrounds and forestall The Children's Community, a via Ashton-Warner and A. S. disciplined curriculum is accom- any race misunderstandings. The' unique experimental private school Neill's Summerhill. According to plishing. First of all, children's children make no distinctions on established last fall, has entered the school's prospectus, the pro- curiosity is not frustrated; his color pr class lines; Sarah and her' into its second semester with un- grain of the Children's Communi- questions are answered willingly friend Patty, a Negro pupil, show- structured daily "classes" on aty aims at treating each child as and he is allowed to try any- ed great affection for each oth- kindergarten level, an individual whose educational thing himself, as long as his er, hugging and whispering se- Actually the program is so un- requirements demand different health and safety is' not endan- crets. precedented that, any terms nor- approaches. Experience in doing gered. The children work with raw mally used to describe education- things plays a big part. The vocabularies of books are materials, constructing all sorts of al situations no longer apply in Art Lerner, '69, one of several not simplified; children are read objects from paint, paper, clay, discussing the Children's Commu- students who act as part time as- to by teachers and the Univer- straws, nails and wood. With a nity. j sistants to Suzanne Whitney, the sity students. Mrs. Hendon point- child's unrestricted imagination, A visitor to the sessions, held school's teacher, explained the im- ed to the "word books' 'the chil- a four-foot length of garden hose weekday mornings in St. An- portance of not restricting the dren keep. When one of them becomes successively a jumping drew's Episcopal Church, is im- pre-schoolers to desk-work and comes up with a new word he rope, a tug-of-war rope and a mediately swept up into the magic uniform rote-learning en masse. wants to learn, he draws a pic- telephone. of young children growing, learn- "It's bad to keep kids cooped up ture and practices copying the The freedom the children have ing and actually enjoying the inside all the time," he said. "If letters on a cardboard page. has not led. to irresponsibility, process, according to Mrs. Toby someone wants to go outside, run Sarahl, a dark-haired girl, be- teachers said, rather the more the Hendon, director of the school. around or climb trees, we yield to gan chattering away about "Pe- child comes to realize that he The idea of the school grew his wishes and go with him." ter's trip to the forest," appar- makes the decision, the more re-, The immediate striking thing ently reading marvelously for a sponsibility he assumes for cor- ;about the class is the complete girl of four, Actually, she had recting his own misbehavior. lack of inhibitions which the memorized the book, and learned When Ray, a quiet, shy child, of different racial and cultural No Prejudice sawdust, he went to the broom backgrounds. The books are illustrated large- closet and swept up the litter of Of the 17 children, one is Chin- ly with Negro and Oriental char- his own accord. ese and five are Negroes; seven New Appeal 'Organized Violaters Free on $500 Bond, Must Appear Again By CHARLOTTE A. WOLTER Circuit Court Judge James R. Breakey yesterday sentenced 28 Viet Nam protestors to jail sen- tences and fines for their partici- pation in the Oct. 15 sit-in at the Ann Arbor draft board office. A 29th protestor, Willie Vaughn, failed to appear. Undergraduate students a n d those who were 'not students re- ceived 15-day sentences with $50 fines and $20 court costs. Some graduate students received 18-day sentences and one University assistant professor in sociology re- ceived a 20-day sentence with the same fine and court costs. The protestors were appealing an Oct. 22, 1965, conviction by Municipal Court Judge Francis L. O'Brien, who had sentenced them at that time to ten days in jail and $65 fine and court costs. The conviction was upheld last Friday by a jury decision in the Circuit Court. Sentence Protestors Breakey began sentencing the protestors individually at noon and concluded at 1 p.m. After the sentencing, defense attorney Ernest Goodman filed a claim of appeal, with the inten- tion of carrying the case to a. higher court. Goodman asked that the appeal bond on this decision remain at the same level as the appeal from municipal court, be- cause the demonstrators had shown that they could be trusted to appear in court at theyproper times. Prosecuting attorney, Wil- liam Delhey objected, asking that the appeal bond be raised. Breakey answered that the pro- testors had shown by their gen- eral attitude and their actions at .the draft board that they had no respect for the law and its enforce- ment. Not Denial Rights He added that, "they had not been denied one single right.. . as in many civil rights sit-in cases. Breakey then set the appeal bond at $500, over the objections of Goodman. He stated that he Shad done so because he felt that he was dealing with an organized move to violate the law and be- cause "there must be a showing by this court that the law of this community will be enforced." Goodman began the process of filing for appeal at 1:30 p.m. and was able to obtain the release of all the demonstrators by 7 p.m. The bond was reportedly raised through pledges obtained prior to the sentencing. Background Information During the sentencing, Breakey asked many of he defendants for details of their background such as age, place of residence and edu- cational status. With respect to the graduate students and the assistant professor, he frequently asked if they were employed by the University as teachers or re- search assistants, and what their salary was. Eric Chester, '66, said he felt the sentencing was done this way because the judge. thought some of the defendants who were older should have known better and that those who were working on public money were subject to harsher measures. He added that such considerations in sentencing were at the judge's discretion. Those receiving 15-day sentences were: Alan S. Brothman, '66; Gary S. Rothberger, '67; Tommie L. Suber; David L. Bloom, '68; Wil- liam C. Ayers, '68; Douglas S Chapman, '68; David N. Smokler, '66, and Robert M. Meier, '68. Also sentenced were: Thomas F. Zimmerman; Alan H. Jones, '67; Laurie L. Lipson; Joseph P. Gaughn, '68; Frances M. Lipton; John Raynor, Grad; Eric T. Ches- are on scholarships.1i Tf,rpCT RE Expansion Planned I * The Children's Community or- ganizers are hoping to expand the ! program byadding one grade lev- 1eston el each year until it is a full K e 111~L l elementary school. A bucket drive will be started soon to seek bad-: ly needed financing for the school, according to Mrs. Hendon. Several of the children left to visit a printing company, accom- By NEAL BRUSS panied by one of the University 1 student volunteers. College "activists" offer the "It is up to the kids to de- greatest h o p e for furthering cide what they want to see," Lau- A m e r i c a n individualism, Prof. ra Shapiro, '68, commented. "Mu- Kenneth Keniston of the psychol- seum trips are a favorite, but ogy department of Yale University they've also been to restaurants, commented last night at the first farms, potteries and the Farm- UAC symposium on the future ,of er's Market." . American individualism. The school's prospectus states After University President Har- that two-thirds of the child's time lan Hatcher began the symposium is spent on such expeditions. An with a brief discussion of indi- individual pupil takes the initia- vidualisni in a computerized so- tive in deciding if he wants to see ciety, Keniston sketched character something he has read first hand, trends in the American student and any others are free to come population, relating student be- or remain at St. Andrew's. havior to involvement in society. Learn Through Experience , Keniston sketched "the profes- "It is only through this exper- sionalists" as the largest category ience," said Mrs. Hendon, "that of students in America, replacing a child can get a dynamic sense the "big men. on campus" of the of what his cultural environment early century, the "apprentices" of is like; it also increases his abil- the 19th century, and the "gentle- ity to observe and widen his in- men-in-waiting" of the revolution- terests and relate them to other ary era . things he has learned." He said the professionalists were Praises* e etivists the feeling of detachment they needed to work for good grades. Such an approach, Keniston said, would tend also to change the character of extra-curricular activities and inter-personal rela- tionships in college. Such activi- ties became intensely serious pur- suits for the professionalists, rather than sources of enjoyment. Keniston presented the "acti- vists" and "disaffiliates" as dev- iants from the professional trend. These groups, he said, represent a small minority within the stu- dent population but are frequently noticed because of their activities. The activist is a student moved to demonstrate for simple moral and ethical values, an individual acting to improve the world. He acquires his 'values from his par- ents, is satisfied with his academic situation, and has few hidden mo- tives underlying his behavior. The disaffiliate, in contrast, s...: ...4 .... ... El I