THE MICHIGAN DAILY SATURDAY. OCTOBER 23, 1985 TINE MICHIGAN DAILY SATURDAY. OCTOBER 23. 1965 EMING1'fWAY STORY: Magic Performance by Bogart Create~s' Exciting Film- Classic Power's Relationships to the -IT ' By GAIL'BLUMBERG Magazine Editor It The Cinema Guild; bgart fans take note - "To ve- and Have Not" is a winner. Faulknger screenplay with Hem- way characters' and dialogue w Bogart at his best. 'he indefinable magic that is gart and Bacall earns for this ture a place among the mem- ble. But it doesn't even stop. re. Hoagy Carmichael, playing own music-you've been miss- something if you've never rd him-and Walter Brennan, wing superb skill in his char- ,ex portrayal of an old fisher- n "rummy," are just two more sons to make this movie a must. ogart is the Hemingway man arnate and Harry Morgan is ailor-made role. He is aman ne, living by the Hemingway e-tough, independent and re- ing to embrace any cause, to ke any commitment. 'He is ningway's first hero to come the decision that man needs iety, that "No matter how, at man alone ain't got f-ing chance." no bloodyI Strong Faulkner Screenplay But don't expect too much Hemingway from this picture. If Bogart is Harry Morgan, Harry Morgan and his story have been changed so that they are, even more, Bogart. In writing this screenplay, Faulkner retained the basic Hemingway theme, several. of his vivid characters and a good chunk of Hemingway dialogue. The rest is pure Faulkner. The plot is only vaguely rem- iniscent of the original, but much simpler and highly romanticized. Slim, played by a very young Lauren Bacall 'n her first screen. role, is a Faulkner addition. As the romantic interest in the movie, she becomes the main catalyst in H a r r y Morgan's philisophical transformation. The ending, in Hollywood and Bogart tradition is, if not immediately happy, un- deniably optimistic.- : U n1ik e Hemingway's Harry Morgan, who neede a whole life to learn: about himself and man's position in society, the Faulkner Morgan not only learns, but lives to profit -from his knowledge. Skillful Dialogue and Music Above all, "To Have and Have Not" wins the prize for memor- able dialogue-most of it Faulk- ner's. "Walk around me," Bogart growls. Bacall slinks around, sets her sultry glance on his so-tough face and purrs "I know, there are no strings around you-yet." The music is used very skillful- ly, from Bacall's bass crooning, as incredible as it is intriguirg, and Carmichael's mellow voice swing- ing, even by today's standards, in highly original arrangements. It both comments on the action and expresses parts of the theme. Top Entertainment The only weak spot was the scenery, obviously Hollywood con- tinued, yet strangely not too out of tune with "the picture as a whole. If you don't like Bogart, if you haven't a taste for his special brand of camp-this movie is not for you! Stay away and leave it to the rest-and there'll be plenty -who'll find this film unbeatable entertainment. smith Pltas TNo Investigation )f U' Professors' Activities (Continued from Page 1) magazine. When asked about pos- sible Communist penetration in the teach-in movement, he declar- ed: 'Is it up to us to say who is a Communist and who is not?' "On the eve of the May 15, 1965, meeting, Miss Greenfield asked Dr. Rapoport whether he entertain- ed the possibility of. changing - even ever so/ slightly-any of his opinions on Viet Nam as a result of the pending exchanger He re- plied:' 'I do not feel the govern- ment has any case whatsoever." Coburn Text The complete report text on Coburn's alleged affiliations 'fo- lows: "The pamphlet, 'N a tiona1 Teach-In on the Viet Nam War,' giving the program of the May, 15, 1965, teach-in lists N. Coburn in the mathematics department of the University of Michigan as a sponsor (p. 19). "Coburn was a member of the University of Michigan Council of the Arts, Sciences and Profes- sions, an organization cited as sub- versive by the House Committee on Nn-American Activities. "Coburn appears in the Daily Worker of Jan. 14, 1953, as an academician who signed a peti- tion in behalf of Julius and Eth- el Rosenberg, atomic spies, who were convicted and received the death sentence. HUAC Hearing' "Coburn was summoned to ap- pear before the House Commit- tee on UJn-American Activities Committee May 10, 1954. He did' not appear. His counsel pleaded illness. "According to the May 8, 1948 issue of The Michigan Daily, pub- lished by students of the Univer- sity of Michigan, Coburn sent a telegram, dated May 7, 41948 to congressional leaders protesting against the Mundt (anti-Commu- nist) subversive activities bill. "Coburn was active in a facul- ty meeting held June 15, 1952 at the University of Michigan which' adopted a resolution protesting the policy of the university in bar-, ring Commynist speakers. 483-4680 O~rx CARPENTER ROAD FREE CAR HEATERS NOW SHOWING Rapoport, who is listed in Who's Who in America, is currently in Europe attending professional con- ferences until November. His wife pointed out yesterday some mis- leading statements in the subcom- mittee's reports. Mrs. Rapoport added that her husband was in Europe on June 25-the date on which the sub- committee report claimed that Rapoport signed a, receipt for a special delivery letter. She commented that if anyone is genuinely interested in her hus- band's opinions on the subject of Communism they should read his books. Letter Not Received Prof. Richard Mann of the psy- chology department and secretary of the Inter-University Commit- tee for Debate on Foreign Policy said last night that his committee had received the letter addressed to Rapoport from the subcom- mittee this summer. However, he said a response to their request was made even though the sub- committee report claims that no such response was made. Coburn was not available for comment. When Dodd's subcommittee re- port came out last Friday it was played down by the national press. The New York Times did not run the story and the Washington papers ran it on the inside pages. One Washington' reporter ex- plained that the news editors of his paper did not want to run the story prominently because they did not want to "add fuel to a sensitive issue.", Others Listed Aside from Rapoport and Co- burn, the other people on the list were: -Prof. Thomas Arthur Bisson of the intercultural studies de- partment of- Western College for; Women, -Prof. Derk Bodde, an associate professor at the University of Pennsylvania, -Prof. Oliver Edmund Clubb, member of the political science department of Columbia Univer- sity, -Prof. D. F. Fleming, former (Continued from Page 1) or indirectly interested in any contract, purchase or sale made for, on account or in behalf of any such ,institution and all such contract purchases or sales shall be held null and void.., and it is hereby the duty of the governor' upon proof satisfactory of a vio- lation of the provisions of this section to immediately remove the officer... offending; and the of- fender shall be guilty of a felony." Power says, however, that to the best of his knowledge he has never been informed by the University of any possible violation of this law. Written Permission Asked about getting actual writ- ten permission to sell copyrighted manuscripts Power said, "Well I didn't get permission, but I know that Vice-PresidentPierpont is very sensitive to these matters and this (arrangement) was all cleared through him when I was elected a Regent." "This arrangement was suggest- ed to me, I didn't suggest it," says Power.' The second new development between the microfilming com- pany and the library is the un- dergraduate shelflist, which was basically the work of the Assistant Director and Bibliographer of the Library R.C. Stewart. The ex- haustive task of selecting books for the Undergraduate Library be- gan in 1955. Stewart and several assistants went through approxi- mately 400,000 prospective titles to aid in the selection of 40,000 books for the original Undergrad- uate Library collection. Upon completion the Univer- sity's Undergraduate L i b r a r y shelflist of books was recognized as one of the finest in the nation. In 1958 University Microfilms copied the shelflist. In the company plant all the catalogue cards which together comprise the undergraduate shelf- list were filmed. Each April since then, the shelflist is updated by filming all additions to the under- graduate shelflist. The shelflist can be purchased in card catalogue form for $1,900, in a book form for $875 and on microfilm for $100. Save Expenses ? New libraries desiring to save the research and expense involved in developing their own shelflist can save money by buying the University of Michigan shelflist for their own use. By way of comparison, the G.K. Hall Company in Boston also cop- ies library shelflists in specific fields. The, shelf list is sold to clients in book form. A royalty on books sold is paid by the Hall Company to the li- brary involved.. University Micro- films pays no royalties. According to a spokesman for the Library of Congress, micro- filming companies may copy cata- logue cards from the Library of Congress. However all the work is cone by the Library of Congress at a fee of one and one-half cents per card. When Harvard University com- pleted its Lamont shelflist, the project was reprinted by the Har- vard Press. With respect to the royalty question, Power. contends that, "If we (University Microfilms) paid a royalty we would have to enter into a contractural agreement with the University." He indicat- ed that he felt this could be in violation of the state law prohib- iting Regents from entering into contracts with the University. Advertisement A University Microfilms adver- tisement that has appeared in many magazines and brochures advertises the product as the "University of Michigan Shelflist." According to University Attor- ney E. A. Cummiskey the name of the University cannot be used without the prior consent of the University. In the academic area this would necessitate the consent of the vice-president for academic affairs." "Any breach of this ruling would first have to be determined by the Regents. They are the final authority. No legal action can be brought in the name of the University without the prior authorization of the Regents," Cummiskey said. University Permission As of now the company has not even requested University permis- sion to advertise the product as "The University of M i c h i g a n Shelf list." Moreover the same advertise- ment fails to give proper credit for financing the shelflist pro- ject. An advertisement which has appeared in many magazines and phamplets says the shelf list was developed "with funds provided by a foundation grant." "The advertisement is in error," Wagman. explained. Actually the shelflist was financed with Uni- versity funds. "I meant to mention this to Power," Wagman added, "but for- got to. It is a minor mistake." Asked about the advertisement Power explained that he did not know of the ruling, "I never heard of the rule." He said he plans to verify if such a ruling exists. No Consent While Power did not obtain consent for the use of the Uni- versity's name in the advertise- ments, he did obtain permission, to place University Microfilm cameras in the Undergraduate Library. Before Power became a Regent he had several cameras in the basement of the Graduate Library which were used to microfilm University books. University Mic- rofilms also let the library use the cameras at no charge to mic- r6iohd i library materials.. When Power became a Regentl he did not mention these camerasI in his letter to the Attorney Gen- eral but on his own volition he removed the cameras from the library. In the place the cameras once occupied, the University es- tablished its own library photo- duplication service. Cameras Removed Why did Regent Power remove his cameras? "Because," Wagman explained, "in 1956 when Power was elected a Regent we decided our relation- ship with Power would become much more formal. "At the same time Regent Pow- er, because of the attorney gen- eral's opinion could no longer film University of Michigan disserta- tions for a fee. We (the library) decided to build our own labora- tory (to film dissertations and other materials). It kept things nice and clean and above board." Then why did Wagman invite Power to return his cameras to a place in the library in 1964. "My thinking varied," Wagman explained. Service to Othersy "The reason the camera was put in was because I suggested to Regent Power that since our shelf- list (the University of Michigan shelflist sold by University Micro- films) was used as an acquisition tool and since a lot of libraries would want copies of books in our library that were listed in the shelf list it would be a service to him and other libraries if he could produce wanted copies of out-of-print books." "At the same time it would be worthwhile for him to do this from a business point of view. In order to do this (copying of shelflist bools) he had to use the UGLI and it would be a lot simpler to stick cameras in the UGLI," Wag- man said. "It's a normal;relationship and we watch very carefully to see that no one is hurt," Wagman added. "Actually having the cameras in there is an advantage for us," Wagman said. He explained that it saves the wear and tear in- volved in shipping books back and forth between the library and the plant and shortens . the period when they are out of the library. Not Otherwise Available Having cameras in the library, allows University Microfilms to microfilm books that might not: otherwise be available to them. The University library does ex- tensive loaning of books for micro- filming, to o t h e r companies' throughout the country. However, certain reference and research books, books in fragile condition and certain periodicals cannot leave the library. By hav- ing a camera in the library Uni- versity Microfilms can film these books. Wagman said that he would be happy to let any other microfilm- ing company enjoy the privilege, enjoyed by University Microfilms. If they wanted to put cameras in the library for the same purpose he would let them. Experience and Equipment Regent Power said the micro- film company had two cameras in the library before 1956 because, "We were doing filming for the University for which they paid us. University Microfilms had the ex- perience and the equipment to do the job. "Now as I recall we took the cameras out when I became a Re- gent. because the library couldn't pay for work done by University Microfilms. This would have been a violation of the state law on conflict of interest." Several employes of University' Microfilms are actually involved in withdrawing books from the University library. U Normally at UGM Normally undergraduate library books, Wand reference: books are microfilmed in the UGLI 'facility. Most of the books withdrawn by University Microfilms from other divisions are taken by truck to the company's plant in Ann Arbor. "You should see the lineup at the end of the day when they are checking out. We have to give them a special oversized cart," a library employee commented. Noting that "University Micro- films has drawn heavily upon the resources of the University Li- brary," Stewart said that, "Uni- versity Microfilms has naturally benefitted from us." Some Problems As might be expected with such a big operation there are occasion- al problems. For .example one book was withdrawn from the graduate reserve room last Feb.- ruary for University Microfilms. In June the book still had not been returned. Stewart pointed out that the library gets a free copy of the book, or any number of copies it desires when it is microfilmed by University Microfilms. This is ap- parently standard practice among microfilm companies. Some rank and file library em- ployees feel animosity toward Uni- versity Microfilms. "We feel we're being exploited,". one employee claimed. "The most.amazing thing is their name. "Pegple see ;the name and ad- dress and assume the company is part of the University. I am sure a vast segment of the public The confusion created by the microfilming company's name has diminished somewhat in recent years since University Microfilms became University Microfilms In- corporated. A company official said the name describes the nature of the material supplied and its custom- ers. Subsidiary In 1962 University Microfilms became a fully owned subsidiary of Xerox Corporation. In purchas- ing the company Xerox exchang- ed stock with the owners of Uni- versity microfilms. How does library director Wag- man regard the University's rela- tionship with University Micro- films? Speaking frankly, he said, "We get much more from University Microfilms than we give them." He estimated that University Microfilms has donated about $150,000 worth of microfilming services over the past 10 years. "Regent Powerhas never said no to any of our requests." "His is an enlightened business and in the process libraries in- variably cooperate with these pro- jects." "The whole idea is to make books widely available." He ex- plained that University 'Micro- films many projects, such as pre- serving decaying books and mak- ing out of print books readily available, have been a valuable service. Praise for Company Wagman is full of praise for University Microfilms calling the company, "exceedingly progres- sive," and adding that "they have made great contributions to scho- larly research." Wagman's viewpoint is shared by an executive at University Microfilms who describes his firm as "A commercial enterprise active in the field of education." "The University of Michigan has a very progressive. library, and has shared much with us." According to Power, "There isn't a month that goes by that a number of people say 'I wish you weren't a Regent,' because we need what you've got but we are not able to pay for it and we are unwilling to ask you to donate It.' " ."We recognize that the Univer- sity must have the benefit of the services we offer and we must make them available. We make them available often at very sub- stantial sacrifices in order that the University not be penalized because I am a Regent," Power concluded. thinks they are dealing University not a private tion," he added. research professor of internation- al relations at Vanderbilt Univer- sity, -Waldo Frank, author, --Prof. Robert J. Havighurst, of the education department of Uni- versity of Chicago, -Dr. Halstead Reid Holman, chairman of the department of medicine at Stanford University, -Matthew Josephson, author, -Prof. Thomas I. Emerson of the Yale Law School. -Sidney Lens, union official and author, -Prof. Oliver S. Loud of An- tioch College, -Prof. Helen Lynd of the phi- losophy department of Sarah Lawrence College, -Prof. Robert S. Lynd of the, sociology department of Colum- bia University, -Prof. Staughton Lynd of the history department at Yale+ Uni- versity, -Prof. Harry Magdorff of the economics department of the New School, --Prof. John Somerville of the philosophy department of Hunter College, -Prof. Philip Morrison' of the physics department of .Cornell University, -Melba Phillips of the Physics department of the University. of Chicago, -Anton Refregier, artist, -Prof. Theodor Rosebury of the bacteriology department at Wash- ington University in St. Louis, and -Prof. Harry Slochower of the chology department of the New School. with the corpora- I - _i DIAL 5-6290 f*'2.Ri. -________________S_____'..«!'___ "'THE IPCRUES S FILE' IS A T HIKNGM N'S GOLOFINGER' t", -AFEWS WEEK TINGLING FILMI" TECNNICOLOR* SHOWS AT 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 P.M. U U I DIAL 8-6416 HELD OVER! 3RD HIT WEEK! "YOU CAN'T AFFORD TO MISS IT!" -New r r- i i i i r i i i i i i i i f I I I I I I i I : tf A'" tiMxx}}: r J ,"'r,:i rM .,. r y ti ti'! i ff' :Vy 1 :Kx ':fin r::"::.: w". "vS.1".'. ::v."."."... ~.....: , :"'Y..S n... .1...11 . ." : ..Y1.411V r V.'4"''"" Y ..*-...JJ . '..w''...".'. : . . "' ..........;'V''....''VV.y.'' *.y..w .' ......S...SW S 4 W VV '::''::*::''.4 1v-.a,4%. 4..V..VVVm %44. V.v4v:..' . .... "'4d°'"". . ".x.J.: .... . .S .n . 1t ::'{ k: ..:rJ..4t+'.S r:° :_.. .. '4 44' r'* ~4'. "0c . , 4 . r'.. {:t, ,Y MOM The University of Michigan The New York University Men's Gee Club and Men's Glee Club '1 ,4 r. 35 SOt4 HISTS SiLRCI Fl ZSI* r riTV w i f EA TI4AN COfLOR x3ar Pius The An ics Of , ARNOLD STAVAO AR PIW KUNfl HALL '~f LEO GORCCEY t""i~ ADDED LAUGH HIT ..PANAVISIOW' cLU "FIDDLE" AT 8:50 ONLY I ! ! * I TONIGHT at 7 and 9 I« Howard Hawkes' ! I I Have and Have Not r ! ! ! Starring, .. HUMPHREY BOGART LAUREN BACALL HOAGY CARMICHAEL FALL JOINT CONCERTS SATURDAY, OCTOBER 30 7:00 and 9:30 P.M. HILL AUDITORIUM R S TH PAWN KR * i3 Dial j Note: Feature at 1 :00-3:00-.5:05' - I 'l * N T.1. + Dr.,-rye