4e Mir4igan Bai Seventy-niine yeairs of editoril freedonri Edited and managed by students of the University of Michigan Checking the ROTC stalemate 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mich. News Phone: 764-0552 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1969 NIGHT EDITOR: JIM NEUBACHER SCU: In famous footsteps THE NEWLY formed student-organized and operated credit union deserves support. Formed in order to provide loans to students at reasonable rates of inter- est and on reasonable terms, the infant union should be a formidable partner to the well-established tenants union. With 660 members and $87,000 in as- sets, the new union is doing phenomenally well and may soon be able to provide large loans to a great number of students. The union has attracted sizeable gifts from several campus groups and has se- cured a charter from the state banking commission. As directed by President Gene Smith, as ordained by the state, the SCU can- not fail. It has the necessary financial support to reward its student investors with as much as a five per cent interest rate, although it cannot guarantee this. BUT THE union needs more student sup- port to be helpful to those students who now are suffering from the anti-in- flationary curbs on loans, who are con- sidered "high risk" and are unable to secure a bank loan. The union needs more assets and investors. The formation of this union is remin- iscent of the emergence two years ago of the Tenants Union. It is the product of the thoughtful work of a few students wishing to provide a needed community service. It is another step in the direction of establishing a successful student co- operative movement on campus. -THE EDITORIAL DIRECTORS By HENRY GRIX Editor THE ROTC ISSUE has reached a stalemate. While President Fleming issues warnings with alarm clock regularity, the anti-ROTC demonstra- tors march on buildings with the predictability of the morning milkman. Meanwhile both sides spend sleepless nights trying to out guess each other's tactics, and it appears that nothing of consequence is going to happen at all. It is clear, however, that this cat and mouse game cannot go on forever. How long before the disintegrating radical coalition attempts one last act of bravado and doesn't make it out the back door in time? How long before President Fleming seizes the initiative and decides to go the injunction route, having protesters disorderly arrested at home? In other words, Monday night's lock-in might have turned out disastrously if the protesters had decided to stay, or if the president had not allowed an escape hatch for the anti-ROTC demonstrators. The issue has secured too many firm commit- ments from faculty, students, and administrators for it to simply drop out of sight, and this stalemate can only go on for a little while before somebody gets hurt. A compromise is needed. IT MUST be accepted as a premise that the ex- istence of ROTC on this campus is a University is- sue that must involve the entire community. It should not degenerate into coy debates between Barry Bluestone and ROTC officers. The relative attention-getting success of t h e anti-ROTC movement - considering its shoddy leadership and tactics - should indicate that the initiative on this one may be taken by anyone who is willing. The recent reluctance of Radical Cau- cus to tag along with SDS's minority tyranny and endorse any offensive tactic against ROTC is com- mendable. Perhaps the caucus may succeed at foc- using s t u d e n t interest on a program of action which would appeal to the entire student body. In- deed it is remarkable that despite days of guerrilla- style protest, no precise ennuciation of student sen- timent on the issue has yet been made. A well-argued and strongly supported student statement on ROTC should be presented to the Regents for their October meeting in three weeks. MEANWHILE, STUDENTS SHOULD pressure faculty to adopt the strong anti-ROTC position set forth in the final draft of the Academic Affairs Committee report. The report, which has been considered by the committee for several months, is, in the opinion of several committee members, ready to go directly to the Senate Assembly. From there, it may pass to the Regents. This will necessitate a speeding up of the faculty's usual tortoise pace of handling issues. But the ROTC question has been debated for over a year and merits some quick action to avoid future disorder. IF THE REGENTS choose to ignore or stall on the ROTC question-as they have indicated they may-the faculty and students should resist. They can use the proposed classroom strike to propa- gandize against ROTC, they can call for and at- tend an open hearing on the ROTC question. If the Regents fail to act, then militant action is justified. But the action must be directed against the intransigent Regents and administrators, not the unsuspecting ROTC cadets in North Hall, the already committed faculty, the informed students. Exemplary action has ceased to create an exam- ple of how the ROTC question can be resolved. It has proved a tactical and logical blunder. It must stop. If the aim is to remove ROTC from campus as a first step to ending the University's complic- ity with the defense establishment, a plan of more direct action is called for. HOWEVER, THE VITAL question of disciplining those students who have become involved in the ROTC issues remains. Fortunately, up to this point, exemplary "creative non-disruptive disruption" has not resulted in the intrusion of Sheriff Harvey and his heavies. But President Fleming has vowed to take action and his growl has teeth inside. But he should not bring police on campus. Nor should he involve University and college authorities in prosecuting protesters for breaches of academic rules. Civil courts, not college administrative boards, should prosecute. Although legal offences may be many. (trespass, class disruption, breaking and entering) the act is a single one. The penalties for civil wrong are harsh enough. THE ANTI-ROTC issue did not require militant, illegal action; its use was both reprehensible and deleterious to the formation of a united student front. But the student protesters did raise a valid issue. And when the Regents abolish ROTC, North Hall can be used as a student discount bookstore. College presidents and police: The halcyon days of yore THERE ONCE WAS a time when college presidents at least t o o k precautions in bringing the police on campus. It was almost a standard of measurement of one's shrewdness. The shrewder ones, like Robben Fleming used to be, would tend only to use police as a last resort. But those days are over. College presi- dents have been engulfed in the public's "law and order" madness. As police pres- ence on campus becomes more unpopular with students, administrators a r e suc- cumbing ever more frequently to use the strong arm of the law to crush dissent. The results are usually catastrophic. Last spring, when anti-ROTC students took over University H a 1 1 at Harvard, Making a pont REAL ORATORS are hard to come by these days what with the passing of the golden-toned senator f r o m Illinois and all. But the University is fortunate to have its own rhetorician in the person of Peter Denton, Rent Strike leader. And yesterday Peter delivered his well chosen words once again -- but with one minor flaw: It's Pierpont, Peter, Pierpont -- not PierPOINT. -N. C. HENRY GRIX, Editor STEVE NISSEN RON LANDSMAN City Editor Managing Editor VARCIA ABRAMSON .. Associate Managing Editor 111ILUP BLOCK ..., .Assiociate Mnag ingc Editor CHRIS STEELE...............Associate City Editor STEVE ANZALON .Editorial Page Editor JENNY STILLER Editorial Page Editor LESLIE WAYNE.............Arts Editor JOHN GRAY Literary Editor LAWRENCE ROBBIN. .. .. . .. Photo Editor LANIE LIPPINCOTr A.I stan t to the Managing Editor WALTER SHAPIRO Daily Washini ton Correspondent MARY R XDTKE Contributing Editor president Nathan Pusey panicked and summoned the police to eject the occu- pants. The police answered the call with clubs swinging and succeeded in beating innocent bystanders as they cleared the building. Pusey's indiscretion threw Har- vard into a general strike and earned him the opprobrium of both students and fac- ulty. Perhaps Pusey's naivete can be excused by his obvious lack of familiarity w i t h such situations. But what about t h o s e presidents on campuses that have long been activist? THERE WAS ONCE a time when "suc- cessful" college presidents like Rob- ben Fleming were reluctant to call in po- lice even as a means of restoring "order." But lately, the Robben Flemings are de- ploying police even if they suspect some- thing is about to happen. Figuring thab an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of misery, Fleming locked the doors of the administration building the other day and stationed police at the doors to keep students out. The police were still there late into the night, long after the book- store movement had adjourned for the day. So 1 a s t Wednesday night, a student strolling around campus would have seen the University under guard. The men in blue were garrisoned at both the Ad Building and at North Hall. And while the effect of this police presence is prob- ably only insulting, the increasing eager- ness to procure their services for campus pacification can only lead to trouble. THERE WAS ONCE a time when college presidents worried about things like that. -STEVE ANZALONE Editorial Page Editor - JAMES WECHSLER Haynsworth:* Support from a gen tieman' * MID SIGNS of renewed re- sistance to the Supreme Court nomination of Clement F. Hayns- worth Jr., a mystery story involv- ing a key witness for Haynsworth may further cloud the high-pres- sure confirmation drive. The witness was John Bolt Cul- bertson, president of the Green- ville, S.C., County Bar Assn. and, more importantly in the setting of the Haynsworth hearings, an avowed member of Americans for Democratic Action, an NAACP sympathizer" and sometime legal representative of the Textile Union. Not often is Sen. Eastland dis- posed to listen reverently to the testimony of a man with such a background. But last week East- land, his Southern brethren on the Judiciary Committee and Hayns- worth's Justice Dept. sponsors presented Culbertson as a gentle- man and a scholar whose words merited special attention. For he had come to speak in support of the nominee despite his disagree- ment with certain of Haynsworth's views. His recital was clearly visualized as a final blow to the ADA-labor- civil rights coalition aligned against the nominee. In a performance that the Associated Press described as "homespun" and "colorful" and that the TV cameras recorded at length. Culbertson delivered a glowing testimonial to Hayns- worth's character, integrity and legal equipment. While asserting that Hayns- worth would not have been his choice for the post because of the former's conservatism, Culbertson declared he could not remain silent while Haynsworth was "cru- cified." WHAT HE DID not say-and what remains to be revealed be- fore the committee-is that, ac- cording to the sworn affidavits of two respected ADA and AFL-CIO officials, Culbertson "enthusias- tically" encouraged the ADA cam- paign to block the nomination and offered advice to an AFL-CIO emissary assembling data against Haynsworth. On Aug. 17, two days before Haynsworth's widely forecast nom- ination was announced, Leon Shull, national director of ADA, telephoned Culbertson about the prospective choice. In view of Cul- bertson's ADA affiliation (such memberships are few in South Carolina) he seemed an obvious source, In a sworn statement dictated (on the basis of notes) on Sept. 17, when news of Culbertson's im- pending appearances in Hayns- worth's behalf reached ADA, Shull describes Culbertson as having been ardently anti-Haynsworth for his "anti-civil rights ... an- ti-labor" biases and his close ties with the "reactionary Southern establishment." According to Shull. Culbertson vigorously encouraged ADA to press the fight. THE PARALLEL AFFIDAVIT comes from E. T. Keher, a South- ern attorney associated with the AFL-CIO's Civil Rights Dept. Kehrer reports t h a t he visited Culbertson at the latter's law of- fice on Sept. 4 to discuss the rum- ored Haynsworth appointment. Culbertson, according to Kehrer. voiced "great concern" over the reports; he said Haynsworth's se- lection would be "one more step" toward imposing conservative rule on the high court. He mentioned the names of two men who might furnish Kehrer ammunition for the anti-Haynsworth campaign. During t h a t meeting, Kehrer states, Culbertson intimated that he might have to offer pro-forma approval of Haynsworth because the Greenville Bar Assn. had vot- ed to endorse the failure of representativef him. He lamented the NAACP's local to attend the meet- ing at which the vote was taken and depicted himself as highly "embarrassed" o v e r the bar group's stand. Culbertson assert - edly pledged that he would "do as little as possible" to help Hayns- worth. As in his talk with Shull. he appeared to be a warm spiri- tual ally of the anti-Haynsworth forces. Nothing he said. as described in the affidavits, was consistent with the euphoria of the tributes he recked to Haynsworth when he took the stand. L.ATE L.AST WEEK, whe'n the opposition to Haynsworth seemed to be fading, Sen. Birch Bayh tD- Ind.) is understood to have pri- v a t e 1 y confronted Culbertson with the affidavits and encounter- ed broad disclaimers. At that juncture Bayh. dispirited by the lack of Senate suport, chose not to invite a collision under oath between Culbertson and the two men who swear he cheered them into battle. But the new furor stirred by dis- closure of Haynsworth's role in the Brunswick Corp. affair - his purchase of stock before public is- suance of a court ruling in which he participated -- may invite re- examination of Culbertson's testi- tony. The seeming discrepancy in Culbertson's public a n d private demeanor is primarily relevant to the credibility of the massive ef- fort - jointly staged by members of the Justice Dept. and the East- land committee - to blunt all criticism of the nominee. That Culbertson may have been a victim of infatuation with his own rhetoric once he began testi- fying may be the most charitable explanation of his exercise. But it is not wholly satisfying. THE ISSUES ARE infinitely larger than the Culbertson affair. Most basically they concern the apparent double standard with which the vital phrase - "the appearance of impropriety" - is applied by the Senate and t h e Justice Dept. Was there one ethi- cal criterion for Fortas and an- 'other for Haynsworth? That ques- tion shadows many phases of these proceedings, including the unresolved role of barrister Cul- bertson. i rNew York Post Letters: Responding to Nissen's 'attack' on Mayor Harris 77 77-77'" r_ _.... . .. ,s. d. ..... - .. ... .. ..a --, .,,,. , .z. W. .y,.,..... . . , . T r ;,,, f~ .. " . . ,,, 4 ir' ' , , i fai « wil t; W1 " 1 ji; t:;t i f y! I ! iy -'+ - .. _. ..i To the Editor: STEVE NISSEN'S attack on Mayor Harris in The Daily (Sept. 18) is so dishonest as to make one wonder about Nissen's "moral re- sponsibility." It is Nissen's state- ment, not Harris', which is "packed with lies and incredible distortions of the facts." --Nissen quotes Harris as having referred to street people as an 'unwashed non-student minority." I have carefully examined the, newspaper reports of last summer's street incident and cannot find this statement. -Ni stentputs "long-haired weirdos" in quotation marks in a sentence discussing a Harris state- ment, thus implying that these are Harris' words, which again is not the case. -NISSEN ATTACKS Harris' statement of praise for police re- straint during the street incidents, ignoring the fact that Harris' com- ments were explicitly descriptive of the actions of the Ann Arbor Police Department, and not of the Washtenaw County Sheriff's De- partment, over which Harris has no control. Most observers, includ- ing the Ann Arbor Argus, are agreed that it was the Sheriff's TPnrmlwihvnc +Via - - i- Harris of duplicity. It might also be pointed out that Harris' work with the New Detroit Committee played a part in the enactment of the legislation which made the rent strike possible. -NISSEN REFERS to "pressure . . for action against so-called obscenity,' " ignoring the fact that the Mayor has resisted this pres- sure, leading the other Democrats on council in a unanimous vote against an anti-obscenity ordi- nance sponsored by council Re- publicans. Indeed, it is Harris' and the other Democrats' position on this issue which is one of the two principal grievances of those who are attempting to remove them from office. (The other grievance is the Democrats' willingness to permit rock concerts in Ann Ar- bor. which the predecessor Repub- lican council prohibited) NISSEN'S COLUMN also ignores some of the positive accomplish- ments of the mayor in the areas about which Nissen seems con- cerned. Last summer's street con- frontations and beating of street people ended in part because be- cause Harris was able to persuade the police to get off the street-- something for which he was vio- thing, he has been criticized for being too straight-forward and forthright. Radical political analysis does not consist of manufacturing facts to fit one's ideological framework. There may be a legitimate argu- ment to be made against efforts to limit polarization and conflict, but Nissen hasn't made it. -Prof. Eugene Feingold Sept. 18 Sit-i nstatement To the Editor: FOR THE PAST year and a half the University has maintained a difficult but real peace. The Uni- versity community has maintained that peace by honestly facing, dis- cussing, and resolving issues through a process which has ap- proximated majority rule. From women's hours to driving regula- tions and the establishment of SGC's University Discount Store, the evident sentiment of the stu- dent body has been mirrored in the decisions of the University. The bookstore represented the first major break in that practice. The bookstore had the overwhelm- ing support of the student body _ A , . .,. , . t n ignored our proposals, and pro- ceeded with a secrecy that made a rational commentary impossible. Today a student rally requested that President Fleming try to call a special Regents meeting to dis- cuss the bookstore. Fleming re- jected it saying, "No, the issue is dead." THE ADMINISTRATION broke the peace. Nowv the community is faced with the consequences. We do not like the use of force. We do not like inconveniencing other people, We prefer negotiation to bloodshed. But we cannot con- demn our fellow students-exas- perated, insulted, and humiliated by the Regents, the president, and the rest of the executive officers. We can only hope that at this time the administration, faculty, and student body have each learn- ed a lesson: the administration, that when they do not act reason- ably and with a decent concern for the student body, they will provoke us to acts which they as well as we will regret; the faculty, that they simply cannot stand aside on an issue which is impor- tant to two-thirds of the Univer- sity community: and the student body, that unless we can make Galer T'Io the Editor: BERNARD GALLER should read The Language of Computers more carefully when he does politics, especially the remarks on the na- ture of parameters and standard- ization of imputs. I too was at North Hall Monday evening, from beginning to end, and having seen more demonstrat- tions than Mr. Galler, I think I would tend to agree with The Daily's crowd judgment, both in size and response. As far as the nature and inten- sity of student support, I am cer- tain Mr. Galler is more than aware of the problems involved in mak- ing samples, or for that matter. interpreting them. I would not go so far as to say students of Com- munication Science are less than politically active or morally con- cerned, but the sociology of their situation suggests their response to the anti-ROTC action is scarcely more than representative. FINALLY. THE FACT that they were Mr. Galler's class, that we are not told the diction of the questioning, or the possibility of response, makes his generaliza- i I A 7 f - 4-+ v--