4 * * * °; - A if / -4- n r uw "S - t i t i Waa f f X r 4 f 1 { f 1 y r Arts & Letters Mr. Clemens and Mark Twain: A Biography, by Justin Kaplan. Simon and Schuster. $7.95. A new biography of Mark Twain has every right to be one of the decade's truly substantial publishing events. The revival of interest in Twain has never been higher; there is a crying need for a really top-flight biography; enough of the laborious ground work has already been covered in schol- arly articles and monographs; and a rash of books treating in great detail limited areas of Twain's life have come out and been thoroughly evaluated. Access to great quantities of material in the Mark Twain Papers has been much sim- plified of late, and will be even easier as the University of California Press continues publishing them. The time is ripe for the great literary biographer to step in, sift, evaluate and synthesise all this into a magnificently read- able and accurate definitive Life. Justin Kaplan must have felt pretty sly six years ago when he "set aside an editorial career" (as the dust-jacket blurb tells us), to work on his "long-planned" biography of Twain. He would sweep the field. And by commercial standards it would be hard to say he hasn't done just that. The book had a fine publisher, a large advertising budget, an enormous sale; and last month Mr. Kaplan walked off with the crowning glory-a check from the National Book Award Committee for writing the year's best book in Arts and Letters. Imagine! The biography of Twain has arrived! Except it hasn't. Mr, Kaplan deserves congratulations for writing a book which sells a lot of copies, no small achievement, especially since it is his first. But for all that, he has not written a very good biography of Mark Twain. As one might guess from the title, Mr. Clemens and Mark Twain is a biography based on the assumption that its subject was in some sense a split personality. There is Mark Twain, the literary fig- z ure made famous in Roughing It, Innocents Abroad, and on the lecture platforms of the lyceum circuit throughout the 1870's. His character is a famil- iar part of the 19th century American scene, and has per- haps contributed more than we realize to our national self- image. We all recognize him- the small town boy grown up, boisterous, colorful, viciously self-reliant, bawdy-mouthed, probably homeless and smelly, given to nostalgia, and much less worldly than he thinks. Imagine the great grandfather of the hippies and you have ¢ $ Y t him. 't%. k Samuel L. Clemens was such a man in his youth, a fact which would now have only . passing interest except that 1; t Clemens also fixed the spirit \ \} of such men in literature. Peo- ple loved it, and Clemens was caught, stuck to his persona, T and forced to write and lecture in the character of M a r k Twain which was enormously profitable but sometimes quite (Continued on page twelve) Fiction The Fixer, by Bernard Malamud. Farrar Straus & Giroux. $5.75. Science, Philosophy, &n Religion You are invited to imagine what the weekly reviewers' response would have been if Dostoyevsky had published La Vida: A Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Po, The Brothers Karamazov in the United States in 1966. We --San Juan and New York, by Oscar Lewis. Random might like to think that this incomparable novel would re- $10. ceive the reception it deserved, but probably the journalis- "In the course of my anthropological studies of tic criticism would have fallen into a familiar and predict- and family life in Mexico," says Oscar Lewis in his i able pattern. The novel is too heavy, some would say. What tion to La Vida, "a number of my ... friends have so point, others would demand, has all the interminable philo- delicately suggested that I turn to a study of povert. sophizing, the endless desputes on the nature of God and own country, the United States. My study of Puerto Man in this tale of parricide? Finally, still others would is a first step in that direction." Lewis's new book i. dismiss it as a transparent- roman a clef, a fictionalized treatment of the Ilyinsky mur- der case, and as such unworthy, of serious critical attention. Surely this is preposterous - naturally nothing like this would be perpetrated on a n o v e li s t of Dostoyevsky's stature. Or would it? For the reception of The Fixer was of !jrr. -.j l just such a patronizing and # ' p ' prejudicial nature. A fine and moving book, infinitely above ~- ; anything the author had pre- ~', viously produced, one which strikes chords which remind us !' ./ of Kafka and (yes!) Dostoy- K-7 evsky - and, for all that, a \ novel which seemed upon pub- lication to be fated for the on w- ur oblivion to which so-so fourth - x/'/ novels are inevitably consigned 6ries The National Book Award- for Fiction may, hopefully, save The Fixer, for this is a sense scarcely even that, since it is overwhelmingly novel which should not lie buried upon remainder tables. to the slum culture of San Juan. Although Puerto One of the chief obstacles to its recognition was probably have been U.S. citizens since 1917 and Puerto Ric its historical nature. The book is based upon the Mendel "unincorporated territory," the life portrayed in ti Beilis case, a particularly loathesome anti-Semitic trial which will seem in many ways as foreign, barbaric and st took place in Russia on the eve of World War I. The Fixer roughly parallels the Beilis trial, in which a Jew outside us as an Australian tribe's. Yet somehow I suspect the Pale was accused - and convicted - of murdering a the study were wholly devoted to indigenous North Gentile boy to obtain Christian blood to mix with flour can poverty, it would appear no less strange. That, ii for Passover matzos. That the charge was absurd was appar- is the main point of "the poverty of culture" and tl ent to all but the most fanatical anti-Semities, but the value of this book as a social document. prosecution was successful because it was politically advan- tageous for those concerned that Beilis be convicted. For Lewis, who originated the phrase, "the culture Admittedly, if The Fixer contained only this sort of sub- erty" has a very specific meaning, as he explains ir human hatred, bigotry and injustice, it would have been cellent introduction. Lewis believes there is a tenac neither better nor worse than similar expositions like Meyer of values and social conventions which arises in tra] Levin's Compulsion or Donald Mankiewicz's Trial. But the interests aroused by Malamud's novel are both higher and deeper than this, so obviously so that one wonders how even the hurried weekly reviewers could have managed to ignore them. Before touching on the intellectual problems in The Fixer, one must do justice to its crudely historical and physical na- ture. Though we must ultimately read this book as a spirituala odyssey of the victim, handyman Yakov Bok, The Fixer's7 vision takes in the entire Russian scene from a worm's eye view. The harsh and livid light of Bok's consciousness illuminates, at its widest focus, a political scene where the . forces of liberalism and reaction are at war - the prize being the control of Russia through the weak Tsar Nicholas IL The societies where the poor are a separate group, with lo persecutions and pogroms which are daily facts of existence organization, who feel alienated from the dominan to Bok and his fellow-Jews are "sound" political tactics of the In such a society, the group in power "explains pove conservative party; they are not inexplicable existential result of personal inadequacy;" with the partial res (Continued on page twelve) (Continued on page ton) Poetry Nights and Days, by James Merrill. Atheneum. $1.95. Ranked glinitings from within Hint that a small articulate crowd has been Gathered for days now, waiting. These lines from Nights and Days are perhaps intention. ally descriptive of the anticipation answered by Merrill's fourth book of poetry. The volume contains eighteen poems, all of which sustain the subtle confrontation characteristic of the poet's approach to the individual in general and himself in particular-an encounter guided by the morality of a promise-keeper and poetry-maker. In one poem Merrill explains his constructions: The rough pentameter Qu~atrains give way, you will ob- serve, to... Interpolations, prose as well as verse. A constant affirmation is inherent in his impeccable form, although previous critics have found it obscured by vivid vocabulary and pretentious underlying meanings. He re- sponds to this accusation in "From the Cupola": I find that I can break the cipher come to light along certain hum- ming branches make out not only apple blossom and sun but perfectly the dance of darker undertones on pavement or the white wall. It is this dance I know that cracks the pavement The pavement of his poems-often cracked by grandiose distraction, chiselling caesura, humiliating recourse to the dictionary, or the heavy tread of genius quoted verbatim- remains enticing. An author so willing to admit and, in fact, able to parlay his "weaknesses" into a National Book Award Prize Winner, must clearly be met on his own ground. That his poetry "smells of the lamp" is actually vital to the world of Nights and Days that Merrill would show us: The lamp I smell in every line. Do you smell mine? From its rubbed brass a moth Hurtles in motes and tatters of it- self -Be careful, tiny sister, drabbest sylph!- Against the hot glare, the consum- ing myth, Drops, and is still. My hands move. An intense Slow-paced, erratic dance goes on below. I have received from whom I do not know These letters. Show me, light, if they make sense. Merrill has a painter's eye for colors, and shows a par- ticular fascination with golden light. The gilt wash of the Hagia Sophia, in his poem tThe Thousand and Second History & The Enlightenment: An Interpretat A. Knopf. $8.95. In an attempt to synthesize div enment, Peter Gay offers a two- terpretation of its cultural climate he describes himself as leaning I expresses dissatisfaction with tho: praise the period, as well as witl Enlightenment as the source of e his first volume the author exam of the Enlightenment and the d vailing structure of society and lightenment philosophers. He deal struggle he had delineated in the suit of Modernity." In defining the Enlightenment there was no strict organization o7 be applied to everyrphiloso- c pher of the Eighteenth Cen- tury. The association of think- r, ers might best be described as a family - pursuing a com- mon cause, exchanging ideas, debating, presenting a certain unity without 1 o s i n g the identity of individuals. The source of unity for the En- N lightenment was an attitude of criticism pursued in the loneliness of freedom. In de- scribing the Enlightenment as the development of "modern paganism" the author indi- cated two basic elements of the age: its affinity for class- ical thought and its opposition to Christianity, which was identified with an uncritical, myth-oriented mentality. Enlightenment philosophers discussed four principal pe- riods of history: the great river civilizations, the a g e of Greece, the Christian millen-~" ium, and the Enlightenment. 9 The philosophes considered their age parallel to the civili- zation of the Greeks. While earlier civilizations had made scientific and cultural advan- ces, they were still bound to a mythical view of the world, content to explain their ex- perience in terms of magic and mysterious powers direc- ting man's life. The primary Greek achievement was the development of an inquiring, ' objective attitude toward re- ality. To the Enlightenment philos a development of the Greek thrus ity. The philosophes regarded the sion to mythic thinking. They flourishing in a decadent age, feed empire, finding support among tl preoccupation with God and salva authors to be preserved, but only tian mold and divorced from t (Continued on p E w social Night," seems at times only what it physically is-ochre t group, plaster hiding the. real facade of red, green and blue. Simi- rty as a larly, Merrill, using his verbal prism, breaks the light that cult that hits our eyes into its subtler components. Mirrors and win- (Continued on page nine) -W