Shef~i41gan Bally Seventy-Sixth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNTVEuSITY OF MICHmtTAN UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD TN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS 420 MAYNARD ST., ANN ARDOR, MIcH. NEws PHONE: 764-0552 Editorials pinted in The Michigan Daily ex press the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. VEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 1967 NIGHT EDITOR: JENNIFER RHEA The Next Phase NOW APPEARS that, despite the ad- vice of numerous military experts, and spite our professed desire for peace Vietnam, we are headed toward a ma- war with China on the Asian main-, ad. Events of the past several weeks have ade it clear that the conflict has taken aew and ugly turn. The list of targets North Vietnam has been expanded y by day-a railyard and power instal- ion near Hanoi, an oil depot and ce- nt plant on the outskirts of Haiphong; d MIG air bases. This most ominous escalation of the attacks has increased the probability at 'North Vietnamese planes will seek actuary across the Chinese border. But is doesn't seem tc faze the adminis- ition. Apparently, Secretary of Defense Namara had a change of heart since declaration three weeks before that nbing the airfields would result in re American deaths than the MIG's emselves were causing in action. The w rationale behind the bombing was e benefit of an increased "reaction ne" of enemy aircraft stationed farther ay from the targets in the North. HE INTERVENTION of Chinese volun- teers-a move that might follow sim- r lines as the Korean invasion-is not >it of wistful imagination. The Chinese ve every reason to look at the United ates increased presence in a bordering intry as a deep threat to her security. This wart has reached .a point where t even our own people-much less the inese-believe that the Joint Chiefs of iff have everything under control, and a determine the size of the war. As n. Eugene J. McCarthy (D-Minn) aptly ted; "It's almost impossible to find yone in government who was there en the original decision was made who s he anticipated that it would develop o as extensive a war as it did." Vho ifs to say that the military is not ly intent on some type of confronta- n with Peking, and would not welcome y opportunity that presents itself? Who i tell whether our military plans to 'ade North Vietnam at some future te, regardless of any subsequent ac- n by Peking? THE INFLUX of supplies from China and the Soviet Union has been step- ped up, and equally significant, the fric- tion between the !two giants has lessened in recent months. In the middle of Feb- ruary, according to U.S. News and World Report, they reached a settlement where- by Peking agreed to end its interference with ground transportation shipping Rus- sian materiel to Hanoi. North Vietnam will thus be able to hold out for a longer period, and the admin- istration's frustration will grow over the seeming impossibility of ever winning the war in its present dimensions. Our officials have told us that China, embroiled in a civil war, would never get involved in war with the U.S. But with increased military action in her neigh- bor, North Vietnam, the Chinese people may eventually rally to the defense of their imperiled nation. WITH THESE WELL-FOUNDED fears gripping a growing body of Ameri-, cans at home-with the vocal minority becoming ever more vocal-the adminis- tration last week decided to throw un- patriotic paint on, the movement. There was, of course, Secretary of State Rusk brandishing a carefully researched re- port purporting to show the link be- tween the Communist subverters and the patriotic dupes who took part in the massive demonstrations in New York City and San Francisco on April 15. There was President Johnson himself, enlarging upon his previous "Nervous Nellie" speech. And for the first time in American his- tory, a field commander was called home to report to the nation on the conduct of the war. Predictably Gen. William C. Westmoreland labelled the protest move- ment as unpatriotic and demoralizing to the fighting men in Vietnam. Tagged to his visit will be the even- tual hike in U.S. manpower of about 30,- 000, which will raise the level of our forces to 470,000. But the deterioration of the military situation in the northern provinces and the North Vietnamese buildup around the demilitarized zone have convinced the generals that even this level is inadequate. The buildup of men and escalation of tactics will, no doubt, continue. -STEPHEN FIRSHEIN ~~- y' ' {y &.* 1 -1 dAs -,- J Lttesoth dio t ' c tL1}t- r- 4 , + " t ' i ,1;3., . ..- + p" The Narcissistic 'Michigan Alumnus' A few hours after he returne.i from the funeral of former West German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, President Johnson took time to address the 700 dinner guests of the American Physical Society at the Sheraton Park Hotel in Washington D.C. "I want to negotiate' he said "I want a political solution. I want more than any human being in all the world to see the killing stopped, but I just can't negotiate with myself." And he pleaded the audience to help him. "I need your help and your support in the trials and tribulationsthe country is undergoing " President Johnson's statements were lost in the surcharged at- mosphere of patriotism and escalation in the midst of the return of General William C. Westmoreland, field commander of the U.S. forces in Vietnam. And very few noticed that the National Liberation Front, a daylater, on April 27, announced that its "forces would observe a 48 hour ceasefire on May 22-23 to commemorate the birthday of Buddha" SINCE EARLY this year., ,the United Buddhist Church of Viet- nam has called for a ceasefire on the twenty-third. At first the call was received with cold indifference by the Saigon government. Only on April 8, after extensive consultation with the United States did General Ky agree to a 24 hour truce on May 23. Secretary-General U Thant on April 18 urged that "the ceasefire proposed for May 23 be extended indefinitely." The Buddhistspropose that following the truce, an interim civilian government composed of lay representatives of all religions in South Vietnam-Buddhist. Catholic, Cao Dai Hoa Hao,,Protestant-be 'formed. This interim government which would be entrusted with the task of organizing elections'for a parliament and a civilian-elected government, would negotiate directly with the NLF for an end to the hostilities, with the U.S. for the withdrawal of the American troops, and with Hanoi for the withdrawal of the North Vietnamese troops. In essence the Buddhist proposal aims at negotiations first among the Vietnamese themselves, to bring about a true neutralization of South Vietnam. Economic and cultural relations with North Vietnam would soon be established, creating conditions for an' eventual reunification of the country. A NEW CHANCE for peace thus arises. If President Johnson wants to "stop the killing," he does not need to find some one to negotiate with at the beginning. What he needs and what the Vietnamese hope for and need is his decision to let the Vietnamese negotiate among themselves. President Johnson ca. then order a cease to the bombing of both North and South Vietnam What would be more dignified and politically wiser for the leader of the most powerful nation on earth to stop the killing at the demand of the majority Buddhist religion (backed by other faiths) of the country which the U.S. wants to help. The answer to the Buddhist peace proposal will come soon. From May 1 until May 23, there will be stirrings in the civilian population in South Vietnam. General Ky will probably suppress by force all these demonstrations, as he did with the support of the U.S. logistics in May last year, if he knows that the U.S. has no intention of prolonging the already agreed 24-hour truce The war then will continue with both sides escalating in ferocity and intensity. IN AN OPEN LETTER to the American people on February 18, two leading Vietnames Buddhist monks, Thich Tri Quang and Thich Quang Do wrote: "It is because of the religious co9science in us that we cannot accept the war which is going on in our country, that we cannot accept the presence of foreign troops and of troops whose actions are in- fluenced by foreign governments for this massacre of our people and of each other. The more the war goes, the stronger communism be- comes, the more Americans become colonialist and our people are destroyed." This is to me not only an appeal but also a warning of the shape of things to come in South Vietnam if the coming chance for peace is not seriously considered. Birth Control in India --TRAN VAN DINH-- m New Chance for Peacd Mr. Tran Van Dinh, a former officer during the Vietnamese independence war against the French and a former diplomat (his last post was Acting Ambasador of South Vietnam to the United States) is now a journalist and a lecturer. He has contributed articles to The New Republic, the Christian Science Monitor, and- War/Peace Report. An alumni magazine may srve- many purposes: it may be a link between alumni and the univer- sity, communicating the activities of each to the other. It may be a resume of progress, keeping the alumni informed of university ac- tivities. It may be used as a ve- hicle to raise funds from the alumni. Its simplest function may be one of providing a status sym- bol; in this case, attesting to the fact that its subscriber is a gradu- ate of one of the nation's finest universities, specifically, the Uni- veirsity of Michigan. On all of these counts, the "Michigan Alumnus" makes the grade. But after two years of reading this magazine, I feel that it has failed in what I conceive to be the most important purpose of all: a means of communicating between the generations of college students on the crucial issues of our time. The two most important crises which the students are involved in are the Vietnam war and civil rights, with its background of prejudice, inequality, poverty, di- sease, ignorance, and despair. The University of Michigan was the birthplace of the teach-in, the first organized expression of con- cern over international problems in many years. Its meaning was as significant to the protest move- ment as the 1961 Alabama bus boycott was to the civil rights movement. If the most intelligent and ar- ticulate and concerned students are characterized by outrage or even just polite disagreement with our policies in Vietnam, the ma- jority of Americans can be char- acterized by bewilderment and confusion, evidenced by the mu- tually exclusive calls for more bombing and greater attempts at negotiations. YET FOR ALL this action and feeling on the major university and college campuses throughout the nation, what does the "Michi- gan Alumnus" give its readers? The name of the 3rd vice presi- dent of the First National Bank of Second City. Calif., or who has three children, and who said what about nothing. Its pages are filled with details of alumni clubs, the records of athletic teams, espe- cially football, and lists of donors to something or other. There is nothing wrong with this in and of itself, although in a university of Michigan's size, one is unlikely to read about more than a very few people you went to school with, but this should not repre- sent the heart of a publication such as this. In the last year the "Alumnus" has mentioned Vietnam in two condescending editorials - apolo- gies for the political opinions of a minority of students. The first coment evoked a protest of dis- agreement against the editorial and appeared to be the only piece of writing that elicited an im- passioned response. Civil rights, likewise, has been assigned to a grab bag resume of student activi- ties. IF ONE WERE to look for a prime example of what I mean by bridging the gap between gen- erations, I would recommend the October, 1965 issue of the John Hopkins alumnus magazine en- titled, "We Shall Overcome." This issue presents the most thought- ful, lucid and moving discussion of civil rights that I have seen anywhere. Are the Michigan alumni in- capable of organizing such discus- sions? Are they not interested in the most important protests in this country? Are they so com- placent they can afford not to understand, or are they afraid to hear dissenting opinions and un- pleasant truths? If such a maga- zine is to more than a gossip sheet and prestige poll, if it is to re- flect the most vital concerns of generations of educated Amer- icans. it wil require some very novel thinking. The magazine, ten times a year, congratulates itself on being part of a great educa- tional institution, but the contents of its pages reflect not greatness but mediocrity and trivia. Is this really the best it can do? -Judy Gregory Perlos, '56 So Speaketh z A RECENT INTERVIEW appearing in the Detroit Free Press entitled "What's ing on in Colleges?", President Harlan ,tcher expresses a profound lack of un- rstanding as to just why things are "go- i on" within the nation's institutions of gher learning. While. admitting certain basic defects the' university system, Hatcher attrib- es the cause of student activism to "a ;hly permissive environment in their mes where they have had a minimum family training and family discipline." .tcher accuses the activists of never ving learned "the art of conversation, e exchange of information, of proper 'e and take and they haven't ,learned aper respect and consideration for .oth- Hatcher . 6 -Atx4t MYi ttILJ ers. They are smart alecky group that many parents know about." Hatcher goes on to say that child labor laws have produced what he terms "child idleness." "Youth has been denied the discipline that comes from work because kids don't work now," Hatcher states. "So they get to be 18, and they're restless, de- tached, uninvolved and now beginning to feel themselves becoming adults." HATCHER'S ANALYSIS of the causes behind student unrest on the nation's college campuses is shallow and patron- izing. Hatcher's generalities about the family backgrounds of student activists is insulting. The indulgence of one's par- ents hardly can be pointed to as the cause for student discontent with university administrations which are unresponsive to student needs and aspirations. Legitimate grievances with a system that is cold and refuses to communicate effectively with students are the sources of responsible student activism. Hatcher speaks of activists as being de- ficient in the "art of conversation," but Hatcher and his crew of vice-presidents have been criticized by faculty teaching fellows -and students alike for the same offense. Only when a confrontation is forced, does Hatcher find it necessary to finally discuss and reasonably work out decisions which affect the lives of stu- dents and faculty. The lack of the "art of conversation" on the part of University administrators probably cannot be traced to their indulging fathers and mothers. One wonders what Hatcher would offer as an alternative to youth-softening. Stu- dent activists do not "behave themselves," but Hatcher doesn't comprehend the un- derlying causes. It surely is not the fact that children no longer work long hours in sweat shops. A N ADULT WORLD of fear and deceit The Daily is a member of the Associated Press and ollegiate Press Service Sn-scription rate: $4.50 semester by carrier ($5 by nail; $8 for two semesters by carrier ($9 by mail). Published at 420 Maynard St.. Ann Arbor, Mich.. 8144. Daily except Monday during regular academic school ear. Daily except Sunday and Monday during regular ummer session.' Second class postage paid at Ann Arbor. Michigan. z Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Michigan. 48104. Sumnier Editorial Staff AURENCE MEDOW................ Co-Editor IEPHEN FIRSHEIN......................Co-Editor NIGHT EDITORS David Duboff Aviva Kempner Patricia O'Donohue Jennifer Rhea Walter Shapiro ARK LEVIN ......... Summer Supplement Editor ASSISTANT NIGHT EDITORS arcie Abramson, Rob Beattie, Jill Crabtree, Shirley Nickovich, Jenny Stiller. CONTRIBUTORS The President's bringing Gen. William Westmoreland home in order to explain the ware reminds me of an instructive afternoon spent during World War II. The country and the , Congress were divided on the question of wheth- er to strike first against Hitler or first against Japan. Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt had agreed on the policy of "Hitler first." But there were large and powerful groups in the country, many of them former isolationists in the sense that they were anti-European, who wanted to concentrate American forces on winning the war against Japan. Even the American Chiefs of Staff were divided on this question of high strategy. Churchill had come to Washing- ton, accompanied by the British Chiefs of Staff, to work out with President, Roosevelt and the ad- ministration the general plan of the global war. ONE MORNING I had a tele- phone call from Sen. Austin, who was a strong believer in the Churchill-Roosevelt line. He said in efect, "I know you are seeing the prime minister this afternoon, and I wish you would ask him to tell his Chiefs of Staff to come to ignorant of the British way of doing things that I could dare to suggest that a British general should address a parliamentary body. As I remember it, what he said was, "I am the minister of defense and I, not the generals. will state the policy of His Ma- jesty's government." No one who ever aroused the wrath of Churchill is likely to for- get it. I certainly have not for- gotten it. I learned an indelible lesson about one of the elementary principles of democraitic govern- ment. And, therefore, I take a very sour view of a field com- mander being brought home by the President to educate the Con- gress and the American people. THERE IS, of course, no argu- ment about Gen. Westmoreland's tribute to the valor of his troops. The argument, which he does not seem to understand very well, is about whether the President is committing those brave and com- petent men to a mission which serves the honor and the interests of the United States and of the world-wide community of nations of which the United States is such a powerful member. This is the most unpopular war in -American history. Even those who have confirmed and support Today and Toimiorrow... By Walter Lippmann The Return~~ ofteGeea burning and the heckling, the, speeches of the senators and the articles of the editorial writers and the columnists. That deeper expression of the real feeling of the country is in the fact that in this war for the the first time in the memory of man it is taken to be quite normal -it is almost fashionable-for the leading families in government and business not to send their sons to war. This abstention, this at- titude of sitting it out, is much more eloquent than anything that is said openly against the conduct of the war. There is no denying that our adversaries take comfort-from the evidence that the country is not united behind President Johnson. They will no doubt find in Gen. Westmoreland's mission in the United States confirmation of the fact that the President knows he is not leading a united country. And no doubt this will help Hanoi and the Viet Cong to endure the terrible punishment which they are undergoing. But Gen. Westmoreland is quite mistaken if he thinks he could win the war if only Sen. George Mc- Govern and Sen. J. W. Fulbright and Sen. Robert Kennedy decided to remake themselves in the image India has been attempting to reach the people in her cities and villages through an exten- sive birth control program. The population explosion and the lack of food are pressing down hard on this nation, and the next several years will be cru- cial ones. Mr. Robert J. Malikin is a Peace Corps volunteer serv- ing with an agricultural exten- sion agency in the state of And- hra Pradesh in southern India. He is assigned to the tiny vil- lage of Yellapuvani Palem, and will be contributing a series of articles on his impressions of the country. By ROBERT J. MALIKIN Special To The Daily YELLAPUVANI PALEM, INDIA -"Loop before you leap. A plan- ned family is a happy family," brightly colored posters shout out to the people in the huge cities of India. With her 500 million people, India has learned well the impor- tance of family planning. And with the posisbility of another bad monsoon season, causing wide- spread famine, the thought of 30,000 new babies being born each day is deeply troubling. "Our dependence on foreign aid and even for the food we eat leaves us little alternative but to concentrate on reducing the growth of population. But the government alone cannot succeed in this. It has to be a people's program, involving voluntary and social organizations, local bodies, village institutions," Dr. S. Rad- hakishnan, president of India, has said. bodies and voluntary organiza- tions through State Family Plan- ning officers, -the state govern- ments, or the government of India. The principal forms of contra- ceptives given out at these health centers are interuterine devices (IUD), such as the "loop," and the "spiral." But while it may appear to be only a simple matter of "hard- sell," health workers are finding it increasingly difficult to con- vince the people of the benefits of family planning. "OFTEN WE are confronted with the idea that the gods con- trol the giving and taking of children," said one village health worker. "So the people think it is completely out of their hands. There is often the fear many people have, of not having any children at all and this is quite a big worry for them." Another problem is posed by random failures of the birth con- trol devices, which may cause the people in the immediate region to lose confidence in their medical advisors. Oftentimes, because of improper care and a lack of in- formation, an already pregnant woman will be provided with a loop. And, when her child is born, many will point to her as an ex- ample of how such measures as the IUD are of no value. Or, the device may fall out unbeknown to its owner, with pregnancy oc- curring at a later date. All of these things can destroy months of work by health workers in a local area. The statistics issued each month on the number of women employ- 4 4# .I