By RON LANDSMAN The controversy over the literary college's language and distribution requirements appears headed for its climax this week. At a mass meeting tomorrow night at 8 p.m. in the Union Assembly Hall, students will vote whether to take action against the requirements. Proposed action rangers from a disruptive sit-in in theoffice of literary college Dean William Hays to.,waiting for faculty action, which may come as early as next week. On Thursday the college faculty meets to consider changing the language require- ment and whether to open their meetings. ',Tomorrow's mass meeting follows months of petitioning and organizing by Radical F Caucus and Student Government Council. The meeting was first suggested by the caucus on Jan. 14, the day the college fac- ulty abruptly adjourned their meeting after some 25 students, mostly from the caucus, refused to leave. In reaction to the faculty move, caucus members decided to call the mass meeting and urge the disruptive sit-in. The next day, the executive committee of the college called for a special open forum languag the following Tuesday to discuss the lan- guage requirement. Hays and the executive committee said they were not reacting to the threat of the sit-in when they called for the forum, al- though caucus leaders were skeptical. Radical Caucus leaders initially decided not to attend the meeting, charging that it side-stepped the issue of open meetings. They changed their minds the next day, though, but added the proviso that some faculty member must move that the meet- ing be made a regular faculty meeting with decision-making power. The forum vent on as scheduled and the demand was not met. The day after the announcement of the forum, SGC voted to back the caucus ini- tiated mass meeting. However, an SGC resolution prohibiting disruptive sit-ins barred their further support of the caucus. Hays met that Friday with leaders of the caucus and SGC to discuss the coming for- um, but the meeting was rather inconclusive and the students said they were dissatisfied. The forum last Tuesday to discuss the language requirement was quite a surprise. Over 1000 students and faculty turned out controversy for the meeting, forcing it to be moved from Natural Science Aud. to Hill Aud. However, the meeting was inconclusive. Both students and faculty spoke on both sides of the issue. After the meeting Hays announced a spe- cial faculty meeting for this Thursday to discuss only open meetings. Student leaders criticized him for limiting the issue, and Hays later reworded his pro- posal, adding 'the question of language re- quirements to the agenda. Hays' move was not without effect on the students' action. At their meeting that night, caucus members decided to move the begin- ning of the sit-in back one day, to noon Wednesday. Last Wednesday, the day after the forum, Hays invited six students to the faculty meeting. Four students-Michael McLaughlin and Bruce Levine of the caucus, and Michael Koeneke and Bob Neff of SGC-immed- iately said they would not attend a closed meeting. To do so, they said, would tacitly imply the faculty had a right to such closed' meetings. On Thursday Hays suggested a compro- mise. In an open letter to the student body. Hays called for elected, voting student rep- resentatives on the curriculum committee and came out in favor of open meetings. He also reviewed the work done by the curriculum committee on the language re- quirement and asked for patience until their report comes out in March. The move forced the caucus to shift its position. Caucus leaders indicated they would probably move the sit-in from Wed- nesday to Thursday and that it would not be disruptive-pending what the faculty did at their meeting. That same night, SGC defeated an at- tempt to suspend their rules barring disrup- tive sit-ins, which would have left them free to support the caucus' position. The move was not related to Hays' letter. The press of events in the last two weeks tends to obscure what happened the previous year. As long ago as September, 1967, Prof. Roy Pierce of the political science depart- ment, then chairman of the curriculum com- mittee, cited revision of the language re- quirement as one of the major goals for the year. It was later that academic year that the nears committee began negotiating with the In- stitute for Social Research for a survey of student views on the requirement-a survey that was not conducted until this semester. Other important issues kept the commit- tee from delving deeply into the require- ment this year. But late last year the cim- mittee told Hays their report would be ready by the March faculty meeting, and it is a commitment current committee chair- man Prof. James Gindin says he can meet. But by last semester, students were on the move, too. In September the caucus began its petition drive against both the language and distribution requirements which was to net some 3,500 signatures. SGC started its own petition drive a short time later. In late November more than 150 students joined in presenting the petitions to Hays. At the time Hays said little could be done about the language requirement until the committee acted. When pressed about open meetings, he said it was the faculty's decision. Hays later turned the petitions over to Gindin, who i72 turn informed the faculty crisis officially of the petitions at the Dec. 2 meeting. The student demand at the time was for a decision by the end of January, although no specific action was threatened if the demand wasn't met. The issue of open meetmngs was not ig- nored either. In November, Prof. E. Lowell Kelly of the psychology department moved that meetings be open. A similar motion in the 1967-68 academic year had been defeated in an informal vote. Kelly said he thinks the chances of pass- age now are overwhelming. "The mood of the faculty has changed a lot in the last year," he said. He cited the opening of Senate Assembly and Regents meetings as indicators of possible success. His motion has some provisions that might upset students, though, besides the right to go into executive session. Visitors would be confined to specific areas of the room to facilitate ,vote tabulations and would not have the "privilege of the floor," The issues now before the faculty are very clear, but what they and the students will do is not. Thursday should be the decisive day. i An Editorial, . . P Sir itau AT FIRST changed GLANCE the University significantly since the ~Iaiti appears massive to have demon- strations of the Student Power Movement of late 1966. Yet the ,aura of change is illusory. For while many of the onerous restrictions on student behavior have been removed, these regulations had only tangential relevance to education. This week,/the thrust of student activism, which forced the elimination of these restrictions, turns for the first time to academic problems. Literary college students will meet tomorrow night in the Union Assembly Hall to consider possible action in light of the faculty's failure to abolish language and distribution requirements. While widespread student support has been galvan- ized around these twin issues, the eventual goals of the movement remain ill-defined. MAKE this controversy as productive as possible we recommend that tomorrow's mass meeting ac- cept the following demands: Immediate abolition of the current language re- quirement; * Immediate student voting equality on the literary college curriculum committee; * Immediate stepsntoward promptly givingstu- dents voting equality in all college-wide curriculum decisions. Intensive scrutiny has made clear both wide- spread student dissatisfaction with the language re- 4uirement and its general inability to significantly pro- mote the learning of a foreign language. The problem is largely tht coercion cannot imbue students with the dedication necessary to tolerate the drudgery of learning a new vocabulary and gramma- tical system by rote. As long as many students do not see the personal relevance of language study, this coercion can only be counter-productive and may alienate them from the rest of the learning process as well. BUT EVEN if the language requirement is abolished, little long-term good can result unless the outmoded and patronizing decision-making structure of the col- lege is altered as well. While a change in the curriculum committee is necessary, it is not nearly sufficient. For the power of a committee is only to' recommend, rather than make final decisions. In the future, students must have full equality with faculty in making all college-wide curri- culum decisions. It is obvious that students are as affected by and concerned with the curriculum as faculty members themselves. It has also become clear that students can only suffer academically when given merely a passive role in academic decision-making. Academic decision-making has traditionally been calculated in decades rather than months or years. Joint student-faculty control over curriculum matters would serve as an effective catalyst for the University to thoroughly re-examine its educational philosophy and methods.' Admittedly, it will be difficult to arrive at the ap- propriate and representative method for transferring final authority in all curriculum matters to a joint student-faculty group. But the difficulty of making this structural change cannot be used as an excuse to deny its necessity or delay its implementation. And the first task of this new student-faculty group must be the immediate abolition or restructuring of the now unworkable distribution requirements. T'1 PROVIDE for the broadest amount of faculty sup- port and to prevent undue student divisiveness, we believe the students should allow the faculty one more chance to take appropriate action. Under the literary college bylaws, a motion to end the current language requirements and change decision- making policies can be brought up at Thursday's fa- culty meeting and a vote on the matter can be taken at the regular faculty meeting the following Monday. Any disruptive action before Thursday's meeting could seriously block the easiest road the students have for winning their demands-immediate faculty action. And if the faculty fails to respond favorably on Thursday, further action can be considered at another Vol. LXXIX, No. 98 Ann Arbor, Michigan-Sunday, January 26, 1969 Ten Cents Ten Pages Fleming but rejec defends ts 'U 'Dionysus 69' incht nary' idea Detroit per formance * * * Hays sees 7, I-N language SO utiOn plays uninterrupted I By RON LANDSMAN A new proposal for abolition of the language requirement, with' credit given for proficiency, has won the approval of Dean William" Hays of the literary college. The latest proposal, made by Prof. Peter A. S. Smith of the chemistry department, would abol- ish the requirement. However, the: 120-hour requirement for the bachelor of arts degree would be reduced to 110 hours for students who enter the college with pro- ficiency in a foreign language.1 i In addition, a student who took University courses to attain pro- ficiency could receive either the' others now being seriously con-; sidered by the committee. These include: -complete abolition of the re- quirement; -pass-fail for all elementary lan- guage courses; --institution of a two track sys- tem, speaking and reading; -substituting a history or culture oriented course for language: -increasing the humanities re- quirement: and -a "contact" requirement, com- prising two years of high school or one year of a college level lan- guage course to insure the student, has contact with other cultures. versity. especially French and By STEVE NISSEN Supporters see merit in all of Spanish. which carry the brunt of University President Robben W. Fleming. last night these proposals. They find dif- required language courses, would defended the performance of "Dionysus in 69" but warned ferent advantages in each for the rather not teach first-year lan- college and the student. guage. It is a task they think be- that "the University is not a sanctuary, therefore the law The advantages of Smith's pro- longs in the high schools or even applies on campus as well as in the community." posal include positive encourage- junior high and elementary Last night, the play was performed uninterrupted in ment for language proficiency., schools. Detroit, with police in attendance. Unlike the current requirement, If the University granted credit "It conformed to the laws of morality," a police spokes- which is negative in structure, for language proficiency, high this one imposes no penalty on schools would be more encouraged man said. The actors kept their clothes on." He would not those students who omit language, to have their students learn lan- elaborate on the extent to which the actors "kept their but gives a positive advantage to guages. clothes on." those who do. A similar consideration-making The play, a part of the Creative Arts Festival, is scheduled One effect of the proposal would language proficiency an entrance to perform tonight and tomorrow at 8:30 p.m. in the Union be felt in the high schools. The requirement-has been generally Ballroom. language departments at the Uni- See MAYS, Page 10 "The human body is hardly obscene," Fleming explained in a prepared statement. "Thus nudity-in and of itself--is Odifficult to describe as ob--- "~~*~ scene." ib ksrentstrie "The question is one of the pon- an ac e athin which nudity occurs, ten hour credit or credit for as }.J N A NTH lT Vf}T many language courses as he took, whichever was larger. Hays said he found the pro- posal "novel and rather accept- able." "I think it is likely that it would get strong support from the fac- ulty," he said. "It is the type of proposal that would attract the faculty." However, Hays qualified his comments, explaining that he did not speak for the faculty or the curriculum committee and could not predict what. they would fi- nally decide. Smith's proposal, which Hays' 1.1 1t' , ±L VI..mJ A3kJ /V A. En min Coit By MICHAEL THORYN of a tenants union and a rent Engineering Council is support- strike." ing the rent strike proposed by There are 4,400 students in the the Ann Arbor Tenants Union. engineering college and DeFouw said he'is confident that "people Council president Eugene De- will begin to swing our way." Fouw has set up a committee "to "Many engineers were holding make engineers aware of the goals back, waiting to see if the council of the union," would support the rent strike DeFouw's action followed a idea," he added. unanimous vote of the council The decision to organize a rent received Friday, is by no means Thursday night to the first. His suggestion joins six actively participate "support and strike was reached last December in formation after students met several times FEDERAL PROGRAM Aid cut to hit class of '73 By NADINE COHODAS A year ago an in-state stu- dent from a low income family would have had a good chance to attend the University, even if his parents could not pay the entire cost of his education. Through the three-year-old program of Educational Oppor- tunity Grants (EOG), the Uni- versity was able to use federal funds to assist some 400 first- year students last year. However, Congressional cut- backs in appropriations may force the University to limit aid to help only one-fourth as many incoming students with federal money in 1969-70. The EOG program is designed to assist students from low-in- come families. Any recipient is automatically entitled to renew his grant at the end of his fresh- man, sophomore and junior crnrc rh1c. the, n An.cP onin Consequently, even with the carryover, the total amount available for the grants next year will be $3 million less than last year's expenditure. "At a time when we have the greatest demand we have less money," says University Finan- cial Aids Director Ronald Brown. Because much of the federal money will be used to renew scholarships of sopho- mores and juniors, Browns says freshmen will get the "short end of the stick." "If Congress tails to restore the cuts," he says, "the Univer- sity will find itself making ini- tial awards to something be- tween 86-115 students where last year 412 received initial aid. Last year the University was allotted $389,425 from the pro- gram, which was divided among 001 cfirlnnt-c' Almnszf half cof "It is unfortunate that we should have to'cut back at the very time we should be trying to push forward," Brown ad- mits. "Institutions finally are realizing the promise in pro- grams geared to recruiting stu- dents from low-income fam- ilies." Not only will- there be less money allotted next year, but 1969-70 is the first year colleges and universities in the program can use three per cent of their allotment for administrative costs. "It is a rare university indeed that could not use the money," Brown says. This p ro b a b I y means another reduction in the amount available for scholar- ships. On the national level, the ef- fect of the cutback is devesta- ting. Where grants were given to 144.600l freshmn las1t near with Student Housing Association (SHA) officials to discuss rental! problems. The union's strike steering' com- mittee lists reasons for the strike, as "unusually high rents, sub- standard h o u s i n g, inequitable leases, excessive damage deposits,! and indifferent responses to com-1 plaints and other serious prob- tlems." The union hopes to negotiate a significant reduction in rent, and leases whose duration would be determined by the lessee. Peter Denton, Grad, a member of the union's strike steering com- mittee, said the strike will seek success through the force of num f bers and within the legal system.A The strike is scheduled to start when 2,000 students sign pledges to withhold rent and rafrain from signing new leases with struck members of the Ann Arbor Prop- erty Managers Association. The steering committe hopes to begin the strike in February. Nancy Holmstrom, Grad, a member of the steering committee, said the Engineering Council ac- tion "sho.ws the rent strike is a broadly supported movement with} persons of all interests and po- litical concerns." She said between 500 and 7501 persons have a1r e a d y, signed pledges. James Meininger, Grad, was se-I lected by DeFouw to head the committee in the engineering col- lege.Current plans all for a coin- mittee member to distribute in- formation to interested students in the Engineering Council office. Tentative plans have been made to distribute strike information in classrooms. "We'd like to saturate 6uui c L of a weeK -ong conroversy , which began Monday when Ann Arbor Detective Lt. Eugene Stau- The complete text of President Fleming's statement appears on Page 10. denmaier told University Activi- ties Center President Dan Mc- Creath that police action may re- sult from the showing of the play. Several members of the Union Board of Directors, have said their endorsement of the play is con- ditional upon the full clothing of See FLEMING, Page 6 JL Although he defended the con- troversial play, Fleming said, "It is unfair of us to criticize the local prosecutor and police because of a law enforcement problem they did! d i ie t not seek." i "I may or may not agree with their ultimate judgment, but I do not propose to criticize them for MADRID W) - The police of fulfilling their obligation under Spain began a nationwide hunt the law," he said. for political and university dissi- "Dionysus in 69" has been the dents yesterday under special bj chpt f n upk..ns rninpa powers of a state of emergency. Arrests began -within hours af- ter Gen. Francisco Franco signed a decree signaling the start of a campaign to root out alleged sub- version in the universities, the labor movement, politics end among Basque separatists. Police sources said more than 100 persons had been detained by late afternoon and that first de- tentions came from among radical leaders whose names had been put on a most wanted list weeks ago. For those prisoners, the Franco regime promised "the full weight of the law." This could mean many years in prison. Police powers during the three- month emergency will be broad. The decree permits police to search without a warrant, hold prisoners indefinitely without charges, exile Spaniards from their home provinces and ban free speech and free association. The campuses of Spain's two largest universities 'were deserted. The University of Madrid, with 40,000 students,and the University of Barcelona, with 28,000 students were closed by authorities until further,, notice. In one last hurrah before bur- rowing deeper underground, Com- munists littered the University of 11f.,,aiAid ,'nt, rbsiin th4niioht *m*