P tP t Mtt Dally ,I Behind Michigan's Sixty-Ninth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN necn upinionnAre Free UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBtcLATIONS Trutb Will Prevail STUDENT PUBLICATIONs BLDG., ANN ARBOR, MIcH. * Phone No 2-3241 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. DAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1958 NIGHT EDITOR: ROBERT JUNKR The Choice for Governor Bagwell HIOGHER EDUCATION in the state of Michi- gan has been merely buffeted back and forth between both political camps during the current gubernatorial election with the Demo- cratic party, under the leadership of the forever handshaking Gov. G. Mennen Williams, cen- terizig' their arguments on who is to blame for the state's educational problems. Gov. "Soapy" Williams has lambasted the supposedly de- crepit, "deeply-entrenched" Republican Legisla- ture for hamstringing attempts to improve Michigan's educational facilities. The Democratic Party has the knack of always calling for improvements in education but never achieving them when given the op- portinit'y. The plight of universities and col- leges across the state can be traced to the state's hodgepodge tax structure. No legisla- ture can allocate imaginary funds for educa- tion. This has been the case under the Williams administration which has been "deeply-en- trenched" for the past ten years. FIGHTING AGAINST Gov. Williams' ten years of inaction and negative programs is Paul D. Bagwell. GOP candidate Bagwell has not concentrated on hindsight but foresight. The ex-Michigan State University professor knows all too well the effects of the present state administration on-the higher educational institutions in the state. Bagwell offers a plan of action and progress in solving the state's tax problem which in turn will alleviate the problem of finding adequate funds for higher education. While Bagwell has concentrated on concrete solutions, his opponent has carefully side- stepped the issues and shifted the blight of his administration to the shoulders of the Eisen- hower administration. Gov. Williams' reason for this is two-fold. First to find some "out" for his mishandling and secondly to bolster his hopes for the 1960 presidential elections. BAGWELL HAS PROPOSED several concrete, plans for stemming the steady flow of in- dustry from the state. Industry, the life blood of Michigan, has suffered severely unde1' the yoke of the Williams administration. The steady exodus has sharply cut the state's income from their taxes and in part has shown its effect on allocations to the state's universities and colleges. The Reuther-Williams team basically has only one interest at heart-the support of the labor vote. Gov. Williams has keyed his entire administrative programs during the past ten years to this key bloc of the state's citizens. And this is to the neglect of other important problems facing the state. -BARTON HUTHWAITE Willianis . . FOR YEARS, Gov. G. Mennen Williams has been pictured as a political Pandora, who if reelected will unleash a new flood of woes on the state. Republicans skillfully sketch Gov. Williams as a frivilous dabbler in affairs too deep for him, a man who cannot guide the state through its current problems. This just ain't so. The blame for most of the state's troubles should be placed squarely on the shoulders of the state legislature-composed in the main of ultra-conservative Republicans. Take the two biggest problems in the state as examples, the financial problem and the educational. The state has had its economic troubles for years, yet it will be only during this spring's session that the Legislature will hear-the report of its tax committee. It is problematical whether the Legislature will want to take the tax medicine it ordered, even after hearing the tax committee's recommendation, but in any case alterations in the state's tax structure are the Legislature's responsibility, a responsibility that has been slowly and ineptly met. REPUBLICANS also charge that Gov, Wil- liams and the Democrats are responsible for driving industry out of the state. Un- doubtly some industry is leaving the state. But it would be more accurate to say that the rate of Michigan's industrial growth--for it is growth and not decline-is smaller than that of many other states. More industry could be attracted to the state only at the expense of other, more important items: wages, effective unions, and tax reve- nues, which, as the past years have shown, are inadequate now. This is not to say that the Democrats are not to some extent to blame for 4he "'exodus" of industry, for they are. But-the Republicans have failed to provide constructive, and not merely vitrolic, criticism. BECAUSE OF THE inept handling of the financial problem, the Legislature has been forced to blunder along in education too.-The, divergent attitude of the Republican legisla- ture, on the one hand, and Gov. Williams on the other is nowhere better illustrated than the example of the "young turk" Republicans, who, in siding with the Democrats in trying to ob- tain more money for education, have been alienated from the main body of the Republican party. But when the alternative to Gov. Williams is some more of the thinking that has dominated and inhibited the Legislature for many years, there is no choice but to vote Democratic in the race for governor. --LANE VANDERSLICE Rural-Urban Tax Trends Face Voters By MICHAEL KRAFT Daily Editorial Director F WER FARMERS are in the dell and the king has very little money in the counting house, Despite the fairy tales and cam- paign promises aimed at Michigan voters as they head to the polls this Tuesday, certain solid realities and trends underly the illusions of the speaker's platform. And al- though some new names are on the ballot, the problems and issues are both old and shared by some other states, Yet, the conflict between the trends and the problems create certain paodoxical combinations of interest in this state which are being largely ignored or overlooked admist the usual campaign ora- tory. IN MICHIGAN, as throughout the nation, the trend is towards increasing urbanization. The fim- ily farm, although far from being extinct, is losing out to increasing mechanization which requires large investments for tools and equipment, and the greater Job opportunities in the city. In 1957 the United States Bureau of the Census estimated the state's population was 7.7 million, an in- crease of 1.3 million or 20 per cent over 1950. A good deal. of the increased population is from other states especially the south and without taking any credit away from them this probably has aided Gov, G. Mennen Williams and state chair- man Neil Staebler to shift Michi- gan from a normally Republica state to a more heavily Demo- cratic one. * s w HOWEVER, this trend provides an interesting background for what Republicans charge is an- other trend. The claim of course is that business is leaving the state because of an unfavorable business climate created by Gov. Williams and his alliance with union leader Walter Reuther. Numerous figures are being thrown around by Gov. Wiliams and his opponent, Paul Bagwell, but they merely suggest that figures don't lie, but rather per- haps liers can figure. For they are based on different sets of data, were gathered in different ways,cand sreally show nothing very conclusive. However, it is 'interesting that those hollering the most about business conditions are members of the Republican controlled legis- lature, and scarcely anything but Democrats are sent to Lansing from the state's industrial cen- ters. MOST OF THE noise comes al- most as a reflex action . ,, each time the Governor suggests a new tax, Legislators scream he is driv- ing business out of the state. Meanwhile, demands for state services are increasing even faster than the population while tax receipts have been decreasing partly because of the recession. The state faces both an estimated $80 million deficit and the grow- ing needs of education. In December, The Citizen Ad- visory Commission on Taxation is expected to recommend changes in the tax structure based on an extensive study. This may even- tually put some money into the counting house and provide some relief for one of the state's major headaches and campaign issues. I GOP VICTORY LIKELY: Legislative Incumbents Hold Firm i By SUSAN HOLTZER 'aily Staff Writer WASHTENAW County, bucking a state-wide trend, seems al- most sure to send its three Repub- lican incumbents back to the State Legislature. The Democratic surge continues. In the 1957 spring elections, they swept the entire Administrative Board. Now. for the first time since the Depression years, state Demo- crats see a possibility of capturing the House of Representatives, as skin-tight races in various parts of the state herald the Republican downturn. Locally, the trend is present; the Democratic party is beginning to pick up strength, notably in Ann Arbor itself. But it is not yet in a position to challenge the firmly- entrenched GOP legislators, Sen. Lewis Christman, Rep. George W. Sallade and Rep. James F. Warner all appear to have re- INTERPRETING THE NEWS: The Pasternak Case I MORE CUTS LOOM: State Financial Crisis Affects Budget Request By THOMAS HAYDEN Daily Staff Writer WHILE THE FINAL outcome will not be known until the spring, past history suggests that the State Legislature will slash the University's proposed $37.3 million budget at least five million dollars. The chief reason, perhaps, can be traced to the state's current financial crisis. Fiscal experts now estimate that the state's general fund, basis for most regular expenditures, may total $80 million in the red when the current fiscal year ends June 30. Just a few months ago, the accumulated deficit was expected to soar no higher than $65 million. Add to this the fact that Wayne State University will this year be seeking full state support for the first time, while at the same time, smaller schools ire also expanding. It becomes increasingly clear that since the state has few funds and the deficit must be made up some- where, the budgets of the University and other state supported schools may well suffer. SUCH HAS BEEN the pattern during the reign of the present legis- lature, which has generally taken-philosophy of "hold the line" towards higher education appropriations. The University last fall requested $37 millon and after a long struggle, received $30 million for operations during the present fiscal election almost guaranteed as campagns begin the last lap of their march to the polls. At least, none of, the three seems particu- larly concerned about the Nov. 4 outcome. S* * ,* SOLIDEST of the solid is Rep. Warner, running against Democrat Maurice Hoffman in the county's Second District, which comprises the area around Ypsilanti. All ex- pectations point to a repeat of his stunning victory in the Aug. 5 pri- mary. As the only one of the three whose territory is almost entirely outside the University district, Rep. Warner has escaped the simmer- ing resentment over last year's legislative budget cuts. Rep. Sallade, on the other hand, has reaped substantial gains from the bitterly-fought Battle of the Budget. As a candidate from the Uni- versity-dominated Ann Arbor dis- trict, Sallade holds what is usually the decisive trump card-the gen- eral approval of the University. His Mast-ditch battle to amend an increase into the appropriations bill earned him a considerable amount of support, and he is gen- erally felt to give top priority to University interests. Mrs. Annette Hodesh, Sallade's Democratic opponent, has appar- netly made little headway against this popularity. Ann Arbor appears to be satisfied with Sallade's rec- ord; there is little sentiment advo- cating a change. Confirmed Demo- crats, of course, are supporting Mrs. Hodesh, but even they are not too chagrined at the thought of Sallade's reelection. ONLY IN the race for State Senator, where the county's two districts combine, is there any- thing like. a real race. And even here, Sen. Christman cannot be considered in any danger. Christman has had his troubles, primarily within his own party. A concerted move by a group of in- surgent Republicans led to an open schism in the primary election that for a time caused an acute GOP headache. Christman's resounding victory, however, seems to have snuffed out any full-scale rebellion. Although a number of Republicans may still move Into the Democratic column, an actual walk-out is highly unlikely. * * * S OPPOSITION to Christman, both Democratic and Republican, stems mainly from the Ann Arbor area, particularly among tho e connectedvwith thedUniversity. Anger over the budget hovers most over his head, for many feel Sallade tried his best, and Warner is outside their area of voting in- fluence. But there is not enough to counterbalance his solid backing in outlying districts. In addition, 0. Thomas Law, his Democratic opponent, has failed to ignite any real fighting spark in the campaign. Law is operating under a double handicap. First, he lacks political experience; second, he is a University employee, which generates immediate animosity in nearly every area outside Ann Arbor. In all three contests, there is a marked tendency to stick with the incumbent. At this moment, Wash- tenaw County at least will not contribute to the Democrats' dream of House control. 4 By WILLIAM RYAN Associated Press Foregn News Analyst R OME-THE KREMLIN has executed a neat maneuver to get itself off the horns of a frightful dilemma, It has found a way to expel novelist Boris Pasternak from the Soviet Union if it decides that course is the wise one. Having his meek confession of sin in its hands, the Kremlin now magnanimously an- nounces he is free to travel out of Russia to receive the Nobel Prize for his devastating novel, "Doctor Zhivago." But there is a catch-a big one. If Pasternak goes out of the Soviet Union, he stays out. In effect, then, he would be expelled. What will be the next act in this grim farce? Ordinarily, one might expect Pasternak's humble refusal of the offer to leave, accom- panied by the proper denunciations of himself and the Nobel committee, to be the end. / BUT COMMUNIST BOSS Nikita Khrushchev holds a club over Pasternak's head. Khrush- chev can, if he chooses, simply send Pasternak out of the country to collect his prize, and then declare that the "traitor Pasternak" had left the country of his own free will. The kicker is in the Tass statement yester- day an the Pasternak case. If the novelist wishes to go agroad for hisp prize, says Tass, the Soviet Union puts no obstacles in his way. But-and this is a big but --"if Pasternak wishes to leave the Soviet Union altogether and the social order and people which he slanders 'in his anti-Soviet composi- tion," he will not be ,stopped either, "He will," says Tass, "be given the chance of departing beyond the frontiers of the Soviet Union and of experiencing personally all, the delights of the capitalist paradise.'" The fine Russian hand of Khrushchev is much in evidence here. The Soviet Union illustrated the basic savagery of the Soviet Communist system in the Pasternak case, and Khrushchev is in the doghouse of the free world's intellectuals. This is 'a situation he would like to correct, if pos- sible. He would like to give the Soviet Com- munists something akin to respectability among the intellectual classes abroad, because for the Communists they are most important people.' If Pasternak remains sufficiently meek and humble, he may be able to stay. If he is not sufficiently penitent, he will be shoved out to Scandinavia to collect his prize and then be declared a fugitive traitor. The Soviet regime certainly could not afford to expel Pasternak on the basis of his book alone, even though Soviet law might provide for expulsions. The propaganda damage from such a move would be entirely too great for the Communists to contemplate. There had to be another excuse, should ex- pulsion be deemed necesary. The excuse now is there. Whichever way the Kremlin decides, however, it can hardly hope to repair the damage to Communism already done by its behavior throughout the story of Boris Pasternak. New Books at the Library Baker, Carlos H. - A Friend in Power; -NY, Scribners, 1958. Braden, Charles S. - Christian Science To- day: Power, Policy and Practice; Dallas, South- ern Methodist Univ. Press, 1958. Brown, Maurice J. E. - Schubert: A Critical Biography; NY, St. Martin's Press, 1958. Childs, Marquis - Eisenhower: Captive Ntua_ A rritis-a ctiid of thrprjavl - n, t year. Two years ago, the original request was $34 million, the legis- lature finally appropriated $31 million, a record figure. These figures illustrate the rapid growth of the University when contrasted with the 1951 appropri- ation of a relatively thin $13 mil- lion. Adapting to last year's budget, the University effected several ma- jor curtailments. Included were decision to cut staff and faculty, anchor swelling enrollments, defer opening the Dearborn Center for a year, and to eliminate programs of research in human resources. The University also temporarily abandoned such projects as the Institute of Science and Technol- ogy, and expansion of Great Lakes resear-ch on problems of water pollution. Opposing the legislature's ac- tion, University President Harlan Hatcher warned that the slash came at a time "when we should be moving most strongly ahead." He listed the lack of any general improvement in faculty salaries and the elimination of the human resources program as the most serious effects of the budget re- duction. President Hatcher, along with Marvin Niehuss, vice-president and dean of faculties, declared that the cuts would "reduce the institution to the level of a second- BUILDING FUNDS AND ACADEMICS: U' Seeks Capital To Maintain Standards By JOAN KAATZ Daily Staff Writer. AMONG THE PROBLEMS State legislators must meet this year is expansion of higher education facilities in Michigan to prepare for the 'war babies' that will be applying to colleges in 1960. A glance at the University's capital outlay request indicates that the University is trying to prepare for this influx. However, in the case of a school with the stature of this Uni- versity, the need is not merely for more classroom space to provide for more mass education. But rather to maintain the educational standards of the school as enrollment mounts. SEVERAL KEY REQUESTS indicate the University's desire to uphold its reputation while improving facilities. The music school has been waiting three years for construction to begin on new facilities, to say nothing of previous years spent await- ing planning funds. Now cramped facilities and lack of space keep music school enrollment down to a minimum. This stagnant enrollment is apparently an effort to keep up the standards while more and more applications are being received. If the school can't provide the proper practice space for its students, however, its instructors cannot expect the students to cover as much material as is necessary for a good music education. As the facilities become less and less in relation to the needs each year, the curriculum will probably be curtailed and thus, the standards of the school will be lowered, despite the efforts of the dean and faculty. * * * THE EDUCATION SCHOOL'S needs are another example of the -nrobmhh A rahin., oif ,mwj,. rf m.. -- fab h. +o data complete more projects, like the Salk vaccine, which may be beneficial to the nation as a whole. Somehow it seems irrational to deny the Uni- versity these facilities which aid the general public and not just the student. The request of $15,668,000 for educational facilities and $3,681,370 for hospital needs may sound like too much money, but actually it is Just a start toward accommodating the influx of students and toward giving them the education they expect. Editorial Staff RICHARD TAUB. Editor VCHAE &K RAT JC Editorial Director DHN WEICHER City Editor DAVID TARR Associate Editor LE CANTOR.. ........ ...ronnel , P Director LN WILLOUGHBY...... Associate Editorial Director ATA JORGENSON .......,. Associate City Editor ZABETH ERSKLNE,...Associate Personnel Director A JONS. . .. ... Sports Editor RL RIS~hAN.......,...Associate Sports Editor COLEMAN ..SportEditor VID ARNOLD................ .. Chief Photographer Business Sta ~-- m~m