"These May Be A Little Harder To Execute" Sixty-Ninth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS STUDENT PUBLICATIONS BLDG. * ANN ARBOR, MICH. * Phone NO 2-3241 'he Opinions Are Fre Truth Will Preva" Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. ~tff t~ '.4 I"' '.1 ~ ~ ~ "Ne"~. 4 ~;cY~ 2xY' 4f NIC N I - L. 4-. 7..- DAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1959 NIGHT EDITOR: BARTON HUTHWAITE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: Tacit Support of IHC Inaccurate, Member Says Fletcher Hall Should Remain As Women's Housing Facility 'HE RESIDENCE HALL Board of Governors will decide at their March meeting whether reconvert Fletcher Hall into a men's housing it. The problems, brought out in the Board's eliminary discussion at the February meeting, veal a lack of completeness in the University's sidence hall system. Fletcher Hall is the only residence hall unit iere' the student may pay for room only, thus abling him (or her) to find a meal job to ovide board. As this .setup is unique in the sidence hall system, it is understandable that th men and women have a real need for this Pe of housing. An obvious long range solution is the building more units of this type. But the present issue s in who needs this type of housing the most. 'he most important factor by far is one of obility. -A man is freer to rent a room and yve a meal job, thus deriving the'same finan- Al benefits as if Fletcher Hall were a men's unit. An undergraduate woman, however, must live in University approved housing and Flet- cher Hall is one of the few ways a room without board arrangement can be arranged. Supporters for the reconversion of the hall argue that it was originally a men's housing unit, and the men should be able to have it if they want it. The fact remains, nevertheless, ° that the woman need this kind of housing more/than the men do. Men have a choice of living in residence halls or an apartment; on the whole, the women do not. The women's lack of mobility, due to the fact only senior women are usually given apartment permissions, 'and especially in the light of the Dean of Women office's announcement of fewer apartment permissions next fall, would seem to give them the greater need for this type of housing. --THOMAS KABAKER A Gift to Istruction? SENIOR CLASS GIFT of 1959. What will it be? Tentatively, the Senior Board (32 members composed of the four officers of the eight un- dergraduate colleges in the University) has decided to order a mace'from England for use at graduation ceremonies, and at other times for display in the administration building. Traditionally a mace is carried in the cere- mony. The special mace would have an eight- sided face, with each face depicting one of the colleges. Nice thought, but really of what 'use? Seniors at Northwestern recently voted to use their annual class gift of $4,000 "to provide added rewards for promising young instructors to encourage them to stay at Northwestern." Why not do something similar here? CONTRAST MONEY for faculty salaries to two recent Senior class gifts at our Univer- sity-the lovely fountain between the Adminis- tration Building and the Union, and the "sculp- ture" presented last year to stand magnificently in the lobby of the undergraduate library. Even the $1,500 to $1,800 annually collected from seniors here- though a small sum-would be more than welcome-and might become tradi- tion. Education - and the University have been criticized as has the quality of the individual instructor. A contribution to encourage good instructors is necessary, and it would prove that the students are actually interested in promot- ing higher education. And who -knows even bigger things might come of it. A similar move by the Northwestern senior class to two years ago encouraged three alumni groups, to solicit over $50,000 for faculty salaries. --ELIZABETH ERSKINE Associate Personnel Director WATCHING THE BUDGET FIGHT: Domestic Spending Edges Foreign Student to Student BROTHERHOOD WEEK now ending empha- sizes an opportunity on campus many American, students often overlook. The University is unique in that it attracts many international students each semester .. . and unfortunately very few Americans utilize the facilities for meeting them. Approximately 1,450 international students and. about 450 visiting scholars are at the University this semester representing almost every free nation in Europe, Asia, Africa and South America. The majority have their own national clubs which are coordinated under the International Students Association. Many use the facilities of the International Center for guidance and recreation .., in almost every instance American students are invited and encouraged to pgrticipate in these activities. However, only aIvery small minority do. The advantages to be gained .from these activities are many. Some of the international students at the University are destined to be the future political, scientific and educational leaders of their country. They are in the United States not only to gain an academic education,' but also to meet Americans and learn from them at first hand the structure and thinking of this nation. The more these students can learn from the people of the United States the better pic- ture of America they can take back to their country . . . and consequently promote better future relations between their naton and Amer- ica. BUT THE ADVANTAGES are not only for the international student. The American can gain a firmer impression about far-ajay places from meeting their citizens, something which is not always found in the classroom. - Today's news is filled with incidents arising in many underdeveloped countries. Fuller under- standing of concepts underlying these conflicts. such as nationalism, can best be achieved by talking to those who are most involved in the international issues. Discussion with interna- tional students can give the American student a better yardstick for measuring the effective- ness of his own country's actions. Adherence to the message of Brotherhood Week should bring both individual and national benefits of a year-round nature. -JOAN KAATZ By KENNETH McELDOWNEY Daily Staff Writer EARLIER this week, President Dwight D. Eisenhower joined other Republicans in charging that the Democrats are starting a wild spending spree that may throw the budget billions of dol- lars into the red. This charge has just been the latest in a long line of charges and countercharges that have followed the highest peacetime budget ever offered to Congress. Practically as soon as the details of budget were made public the cries of "politics," and fears of lack of money for national defense, were voiced in Democratic quarters throughout the country. THE BASIC FEAR of the Dem- ocrats and also of some Republi- cans, is that the Administration, in the interests of a balanced bud- get, is willing to make cuts in such fields as conventional wea- pons, manpower and even guided missiles. Leading defense experts, when called before Congressional committees, claimed that even with the increasing power of the Communist nations, the United States would still hold a safe lead in total destructive power. Statements such as these did not impress the Democratic Con- gress as much as recent Soviet ad- vances in unmanned missiles. Many Congressional leaders have declared that they will increase the military defense budget to help meet the growing Communist threat. Attempting to swing public opinion in support of his budget, President Eisenhower has repeat- edly hinted thatif the Congres- sional expenditures 'do not exceed his requests he would support a tax reduction in 1960. Other Republi- cans have gone even further and promised a tax cut if the budget is balanced. THE 'DEMOCRATS, realizing the political implications of this since 1960 is an election year, plan to offset their increases in certain parts of the budget with cuts in programs that are close to the President's heart. One such area is foreign aid. Some experts in Washington predict the President will be lucky if his foreign aid program is not cut by more than a billion dollars. But even if the Democrats would keep the national budget at the 77 billion dollar level as proposed by President Eisenhower there is serious doubt that the budget would be balanced.To offset ex- penditures, the Administration has estimated that the govern- ment would get 77.1 billion dol- lars in taxes and other income. Several factors make this figure unrealistic. The estimate is based partly on the hopes that the na- tional economy would improve enough to pour 10 billion more tax dollars into the Treasury. Even if this happens, the chances that the budget would be bal- anced are dimmed by the Demo- crats' statements that they will not the public works projects such as airport and housing construction as well as increases in welfare projects. On the other hand many Republicans feel that the main thing at the present time is to help the rest of the world and thus United States national se- curity with more foreign aid. But with his repeated requests for economy and bone slashing, President Eisenhower only con- tinues to undermine the already precarious position of his favored sections. vry statement he is- sues about "big spending" only serves to give the Democrats an- other reason to cut down on his request for foreign aid which is about 800,000 dollars higher than Congress has allowed in previous years. * * * THE LARGE Democratic ma- jority in Congress, combined with the decreasing influence of a "lame duck" President makes a combination that President Eisen- hower is going to find almost im- possible to overcome in trying to push his budget requests through the Senate and the House. Recent Democratic speeches saying that they wish to have a balanced bud- get, indicate that foreign aid and other of the Administration's re- quests are going to be cut in favor, of the Democratic preference for more support to be given to a re- covering, but still weak economy at home. To the Editor: IN REGARD to your front page article in yesterday's 4 issue of The Michigan Daily I would like to clear up a few points which are misleading to the reader. This article concerns the "tacit support given the report submitted by. IHC President Robert Ashton to- the members of the Residence Halls Board of Governors." It states in part that none of the members of the praesidium ex- pressed approval or disapproval with either the report or the man- ner in which it was presented. This, I feel, is an erroneous statement. Immediately after the reading of the report to IHC last night I my- self questioned seriously the nature of the report. ,and expressed my dissatisfaction with the manner in which it was presented, not only to the board but to the council it- self. I feel that the letter was overly sarcastic and contained an overdose of cynicism, and its atti- tude was one which I felt caused more antagonism than was neces- sary or desired by the majority of the men in the Residence Halls System. While it has been observed that the report contained many "per- sonal feelings and observations" peculiar to thewriter, I feel that it is inmportant to remember that Mr. Ashton is stillrthe president of an organization designed to serve the best interests of more than three thousand men, and his action can do much to influence decisions made by the University Administration, and the attitude toward the student held by this body. I seriously doubt that the wording or the manner of the re- port was designed with these in- terests and attitudes in mind, and suggested at the meeting that it mightshaveabeen possible for the report, if deemed necessary, to have been written in a more com- patible and diplomatic manner. I did not, however, question the material included in the report as I felt that more information was necessary before one could ade- quately appraise the validity of the case as it was presented. I know that the men of our house, as well as the men in the rest of the Residence Halls system are anxious to further pleasant relations between themselves and the administration, and that any action on the part of one of these men which destroys or hinders this amicable state would not be ac- cepted with "tacit support." -Sam Corl President; Taylor House Irritation . To the Editor: A AM at last driven to comment on some of the recent nonsense on the editorial page. At first I was shocked that a man as addicted to the habit of stock-phrases-and worse, stock- thinking-as Assistant Dean Cross, could be on the University payroll. But on reflection, I realize that this is not an unusual phenome- non; there are at least a half- dozen people,at /all levels of the University hierarchy, who are equally unperceptive and who en- gage in the Foot-Swallowing Act equally as often. Likewise, I am compelled to re- taliate when someone writes to The Daily indignant that anyone dares to attack his neat little sys- tem of values-so indignant that he denounces one of our most per- ceptive and most articulate faculty members (David Bordua, sociology department) with the proclama- tion that Bordua's arguments are "uneducated generalizations far too irrational to be taken seri- ously." Ignorant, defensive out- bursts such as this raise doubt as to the success of a college educa- tion, after all; in developing a sense of responsibility for what one says. But then, so many of the "parents" of our little academic family furnish the model for such behavior, that one cannot really blame the students for imitation. But perhaps the most irritating recent Letter to the Editor was about draia criticism. I was es- pecially pleased with reviewer Miss Willoughby's criticism of Williams' play "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof" and especially disturbed with mechani- cal engineer M. Ramaswamy's ex- cited attack on review and review- er, which appeared in these col- umns shortly after. I am afraid that the public is coming to think that any book or play which is made into a movie must be "good." Or perhaps that if. Arthur Miller endorses a play, it is tantamount to insulting Marilyn Monroe if we do not take his word for it. If Mr. Ramaswamy wishes to dis- agree with a reviewer, it is cer-, tainly his privilege to do sd, but to brand the very competent Miss Willoughby an insensitive adoles- cent is not only mistaken, it is in poor taste. In short, Mr. Rama- swamy seems to be surprised thy4' a drama critic should, in fact, criticize. I think we are a little past the stage of "If you can't say something nice, don't say any- thing at all." -Lawrence J. Gusman, '59 AT THE MICHIGAN: 'Separate' -Hopeful "THE LONELY, th resigned, the desperate" are the people who sit at the separate tables of a sea- side hotel in winter. These people may know the facts of life, "but they don't like them" or them- selves. For this screen version of his stageplay, Terrance Rattigan created characters who cannotr know others because they do not know themselves. They are afraid of life, which Ratigan manages to equate most frequently with sex, or they are contemptuous of it, or they misuse it. "There is no refuge from your- self" may be an old message, but it remains one that people fail to comprehend. Another ancient theme is that people, normal ones, seem to need love for a complete life. This film soft-sells the notion of togetherness, but at its end no one is in doubt as to what product he is supposed to buy. 1 Yet the conclusion is not the beaming "happy clinch," but the hopeful glow of mutual need con- trolling, if not erasing, fears and self-pity. Suggested is the possi- bility that the warmth of human understanding may conquer the snobbery of the self-righteous and the impotence of the self-doubting. RITA HAYWORTH as the beau- tiful woman afraid to grow old alone and incapable of using her beauty except as a weapon man- ages to act her role and her age. Burt Lancaster is only slightly less convincing as a roughly-handsome hulk whose problems are larger than his appetite for Irish Whisky. A fraud and degenerate, but the most honest with himself is David Niven as the "Major." Sybil (De- borah Kerr) looks much of the time as though she interpreted the direction "look repressed" to mean "look compressed." She is con- sistent in her performance, 'how. ever, and does not blossom in the. last reel into a full-blown siren as sometimes happens in films of this type. Wendy Hiller has the most curi- ous role of all as the manager of the hotel. With a few conveniently timhed words, she manages the "nasty old man" (Niveri) and the repressed girl into the beginnings of a normal, relationship. In ma- neuvering Hayworth and Lancaster back into marriage, she manages herself out of a future husband. Either she is a symbol of the kind of live someone can give when they care more for another's need than their own or she is the most unbelievably charitable woman alive. No one, including Miss Hill- er, seems to shed any light on which' interpretAtion is correct. Heavily as the advertising for this film concentrates on its sexual themes, this' is not a bedroom story, but a dining room drama. The separate tables are symbols of the loneliness of people and one senses the enormous effort that is needed to cross the room and join another as lonely as himself. --Jo Hardee ]DAffY OFFICIAL BULLETIN (Continued from Page 3) supervisory engrg. personnel. Male, M.A. preferred in Bus. Ad.. Psychology, Per- sonnel, or Education. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co., De- troit, Mich., has 3 positions open in office and credit, also salesmenneeded. IPrefer some bus. exp. Male, no degree required. Bingham-Herbrand, Fremont, O., has openings for 2 Engineers. This firm e 1 .4 4 THE LIGHTER SIDE: Mloney, Money, oe , INTERPRETING THE NEWS: ICIBM Implications; By J. M. ROBERTS Associated Press News Analyst APPROACH of the .time when the United States will be able to strike targets any= where in the world with home-based ballistic missiles has raised speculation involving grave political as well as defense situations. People had no real concept of the implica- tions when Britain began to use coal to make and run machines for commercial production. Eli Whitney's cotton gin helped to start a civil war which changed the face of a nation. Trying to win World War II, the United States produced a power which promises to revolutionize transport and industry, and which L74r 3ir~ipgwu &3ilg Editorial Staff RICHARD TAUB, Editor MICHAEL KRAFT PJOHN WEIHER Editorial Director City Editor DAVID TARR Associate Editor DALE CANTOR................Personnel Director JEAN WILLOUGHBY......Associate Editorial Director ALAN JONES .........sports Editor BEATA JORGENSON.......... Associate City Editor ELIZABETH ERSKLNE....Associate Personnel Director $I COLEMAN .............Associate Sports Editor DAVID ARNOLD,............Chief Photographer JL has created political problems almost beyond comprehension. Existence of the ICBM has many implications not directly connected with the actual deter- rence or making of war. Two speculations immediately aroused are: Will the ICBM eventually eliminate the need for American military bases abroad? Will it encourage isolationism in this country? Britain enforced the Pax Brittanica, or British Peace, between the Napoleonic and First World Wars, with bases around the world. They also were designed to promote colonial- ism, and contributed to the widespread anti- Western feeling in Asia and Africa which is causing so much trouble today. In spite of its entirely different motives, some of this smut is now rubbing off on America. Russia protests fear of the bases and blarpes them for'forcing her into a warlike attitude. Their elimination, she claims, would permit her to approach world cooperation in greater safety. It's hard to see, however, how she would be less fearful of the same danger merely because it is based farther away, even if she is sincere in her protestations, which is doubtful. ELIMINATION of the bases would contribute to greater trust of the United States by some of the non-committed countries such as India. But it would also end one of the great war deterrents-the knowledge on the part of the intwrnatnnvio nmi itsthat an aftxltack o By ARTHUR EDSON Associated Press Newsfeatures Writer WASHINGTON - Almost any married couple would feel right at home in the Senate these days- For the Senators are arguing over that desirable, elusive, often controversial commodity: money. Or, more precisely, the money in the federal budget. One fact seeis obvious: What with one thing and another, in- cluding wars both cold and hot, we have lived beyond our income. As we husbands know, that's only the beginning. What-- and who - got us into this mess? Was it the new dress for that stupid formal party? Was it the set of golf clubs? Was it the piano, which brought on, alas, the added burden of piano lessons? In no time at all, you can pro- duce charges, counter charges and -why can't women be more rea- sonable about money matters?- Tears. Except for the tears, that's been the story in the Senate. There have been speeches, speeches at- tacking speeches, statistics, statis- tics disproving statistics. One thing is clear. No one wants to be identified as a free wheeler at the public trough, especially with an election coming up m 1960. THE TWO PARTY leaders in the Senate have stressed this point. Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (D- Tex.): "I want to save every little penny I can." Sen. Everett Dirksen (R-Ill.): "I have learned from long, frugal experience that one must do with what he has." With such penny pinchers around, the , question naturally arises: Who pinches hardest? The Re- publican administration? Or the Democratic controlled Congress? While these questions were being endlessly debated, the argufiers, being politicians, were occasionally reminded of a little story, fortu- nately. The fiscal situation of the gov- mound of earth. We will just dig the hole deeper!" (laughter). Johnson said the arguments re- minded him of a poor school teacher who tried to land a job in the hill country during depres- sion days. He had made a good impression, and was getting along fine when he was asked: "There is some difference of opinion in our community about geography, and we want to know which side you are on. Do you teach that the world is round, or do you teach that the world is flat?" The applicant was undaunted. "I can teach it either way," he said. (laughter). Sen. John Williams (R-Del.) said: "I do not wish to get into the argument as to who killed cock robin. I am sure a great many people feel that neither political party has strained any muscles in cutting government expenditures." And Sen. Jennings Randolph (D- W.Va.) chimed in with: "Mark Twain once said, in a New Year's resolution, 'I am going to live within my income this year, even if I have to borrow money to do it'."' In the meantime, pay your taxes, early. Every penny will be needed, for pinching purposes. ;,x- ; ti } t,