I III.- . , " I ', , -. - 11-1 1 . -, , .. -1 1 . In. . -, -. . - .1 . , ' -, -, -,- - ------- s . .: - .,a Self-Portrait of The enior... ...and The Faculty WHO IS the University senior? What is he like? What has he gained from four years of college experience? What are his hopes and aspirations for the fu- ture? In an attempt to discover this,, The Daily sent 22 reporters out who asked 165 seniors these questions: "What have you gained from four years at Michigan" and "What are your hopes and aspira- tions for the future?" The Daily makes no claims for any de- gree of "scientific" accuracy. Reporters used different techniques in their inter- viewing and the sample was not random, or at least part of it was not. Some reporters when interviewing came prepared with a total set of questions, others let the interviewee free associate, and still others attempted to probe the interviewees to get below mere superficial responses. ABOUT TWO-THIRDS of the sample was drawn somewhat at random. Re- porters were asked to find seniors, es- pecially those who were not their friends, and make appointments for interviews. The remaining third of the sample was determined by selecting every tenth sen- ior in the student directory through the letter 'G'. The data was then analyzed and com- piled by The Daily Senior editors. There is one other factor which should be kept in mind. Since students seldom were asked specific questions, responses are in general uncoached. A student who complains about "spoon-feeding," or "un- satisfactory counseling," is complaining from some degree of strong feeling. He has not been asked, "Is school hard enough?" or "Is counseling adequate?" These responses were volunteered. DESPITE THE LACK of science that went into this study, we suspect that a Graduating Students Reflect On Their College Education, Look Toward Future Years 'Seniors Conipare Favorably With Previous Years' Classes' more careful study, while perhaps leading to more detailed analysis, would not lead to significantly different results. In the first- place, the trends are in many cases far too pointed to be accidental. Appar- ently a good many students felt the need to say specific things, either because they are things one is supposed to say, or because they really felt them. In the second place, although there seem to be certain trends, the answers do cover a great deal of ground and represent a wide variety of opinion. A sample which in- cludes one student who claims the Uni- versity is trying to ram Republicanism down the students' throats to the girl who reported "I don't think very deeply, I got married last year," and many di- verse views might actually be a good sample. FROM THE information compiled, sev- eral generalizations can safely be, made. First, students no matter what their school placed great emphasis on increased social adjustment. The phrases, "learn how to live with people," "how to get along with others," "how to understand others" appeared again and again. Closely related to this were a reported increase in tolerance and something loosely called "broadening." The story of the student from the small town who was exposed to many newv and different viewpoints and backgrounds and learned to understand them was a common one. And no matter where they were from, students were exposed to new possibilities of behavior and new attitudes. While this did not prompt themn to change their own, it did make them more aware of the world. DESPITE THE great concern for social adjustment, the students interviewed appear to be highly self-centered. Men- tion of the desire to do things for others, participation in community, political or church activities was conspicuous by its absence. Even the choice of professions which have a tradition of servie such as medicine, social work, and teaching was made because "I'm interested in making psychological studies," "it is a secure pro- fession," or something most similar. With the exception of a missionary and one social worker there were remarkably few students who wanted to give some- thing. Students did report an increased inter- est in cultural activities, such as fine arts and music. Reports of classroom experiences and stimulation from teachers were also no- ticeable by their absence. It would seem that whatever. the student receives from the University, he receives far more from living in a large active cosmopolitan com- munity, than he does from either the cur- riculum or the efforts of the individual teachers. The following is a specific breakdown of the responses of several undergraduate segments of the campus. Literary College Senior Man CHIEF GAINS of the literary college student from the University seem to be a broader, more intellectual outlook-- with a goodly number of exceptions. Cul- tural appreciation of fields such as mu- sic and art was also stressed- The broader outlook was expressed in a wide variety of ways, often coupled with a statement that the student was more interested in people and better able to get along with them. While some felt the University was too big, the size may have helped others find increased oppor- tunities to meet people. The broader out- look statement was usually not expanded upon, although it was related in some cases to fraternity living and in others to dorm living. Occasionally an apartment dweller commented he would have en- joyed greater contact with other students. Broader outlook manifested itself also in a concern with (and in some cases an understanding of) world problems, poli- tically speaking, and with "the problems of life." Expressions all seeming to show the same tendency, varied widely-a few commented on being able to understand their fellow-manl, others mentioned in- creased knowledge of one's self. Intellec- tual interests also seem to fit in here. Students mentioned they were now "less sure of things," equating (or relating) this to being more intellectual. EXTRA-CURRICULAR activities appar- ently played a small part in develop- ment-a few mentioned them as being good. On the other hand one student said they showed that he should spend his time studying. However, very few even mentioned them at all. Fraternities were most often mentioned as a source of social development. Us- ing that term in a broad sense-students learned to get along with and develop an interest in other people; others spoke in broad terms of "social maturity," per- haps meaning social graces and still oth- ers mentioned picking up drinking and sex. Very few laid great stress on the fra- ternity as the agent of the process; how- "HE UNIVERSITY Senior 1959" may be a many-sided, paradoxical crea- ture, but faculty members generally indi- cated that they are pleased with those who are about to leave their classrooms for th'e last time. Those departing for the 'outside world' compare favorably with their counter- parts of previous years, are serious- minded and conscientious. But the changes since the freshman year have not all been for the best said the comparative handful of teachers who replied to The Daily's letter requesting faculty observa- tions about the senior students who've been exposed to them at least once during the past four years. The senior "stacks up pretty well" against his predecessors, one faculty member said in generally summing up the attitudes expressed by his colleagues who reflected about the past few years. "In fact, when I look back at my own generation and my own senior year, I feel tlhat many of my contemporaries would have found the scholastic competi- tion much stiffer if they had to compete with today's seniors," mused a member of the history department. TWO ENGINEERING school professors, however, pointed to the World War II "veteran bulge" of the late 1940's as a high point in the caliber of the university senior. "Perhaps we had the greatest number of students doing considerably more than the requirements, anxious to learn all they can, right after World War II when the average age was somewhat higher and a greater number had some definite ob- jective, than is the case today," wrote a member of the engineering faculty. Amplifying the comparison, an an- thropology professor said, "in general, the present seniors are quite serious, per- haps more so than twenty years ago. Stu- dents today are better prepared for col- lege than they were before World War II. "The influx of veterans and older men after the war changed the complexion of the University community greatly, and the result has been a greater degree of seriousness and scholarship. The former campus 'hurrah' and what is referred to as 'spirit' has been lessened, and generally there is much less social emphasis than before the war. I would say that the stu- dent today is in no way more intelligent, but that the better preparation and the higher entrance standards of the Uni- versity make for a more intellectual insti- tution than maybe 20 years ago." ANOTHER faculty member in discussing the current lbvel of seriousness wrote "In the classroom, -the present senior is every bit as serious as his predecessors. Intellectual Curiosity ever, most said that they had benefited socially in the house, but felt theywould have picked up about the same things outside. A few students attacked fraterni- ties as lacking academic environment, and no one mentioned a fraternity as academically helpful; one said fraterni- ties were wholly separate society from the rest of the University. Intellectual attainments occasionally were spoken of in terms purely of the knowledge gained here in itself-a few mentioned the vocational training, chiefly in science, while a few history majors mentioned their knowledge of that field as especially beneficial. One or two stu- dents mentioned fields outside their ma- jor-completely unrelated-as their chief academic gains. MORE GENERALLY, students spoke of being merely "more intellectual," learning to think critically, to examine all sides of a question. This was men- tioned in a negative light-two students mentioned the University as a "breeding- ground of confusion." The traditional idea that a university fosters idealism was brought up. More students mentioned the University was - too impractical and gave a distorted pic- ture of life than those who said the Uni- versity fosters idealism. One student said he had lost his idealism, another that it had become, a more knowing idealism. Very few mentioned specific changes in values. Most of those cited religion for example, and said they had retained their faith after careful examination, one in- dicated he had suspended all religious problems while in college, one said he had lost'his religion, altogether. A NUMBER of students indicated that self-knowledge and a sense of respon- sibility had come from attending the Uni- versity. This may also be involved in maturation, but a sizeable portion men- tioned it specifically, without elaboration .::-perhaps merely as a catchall to cover expressions they didn't think they could phrase. One or two students said they had gained only a degree at University; oth- ers, in a different sense entirely, said the degree was the most important since it helped them into law school, or a job. The academic atmosphere was termed weak by two students and one criticized the University for trying to force Repub- licanism down everyone's throat. (Continued on Page 10) Concerned with the problems of life He is aware that the intellectual world is changing rapidly and appears to be impatient if University courses are- al- lowed to remain stagnant." However, a professor of English com- mented: "A great many seniors appear to gravitate towards courses which 'they can handle' rather than courses which challenge them. In other words, at the risk of making too gross a generalization, the really good seniors appear regularly in the really tough courses in their own departments, while the run-of-the-mill fellows mark time filling requirements in those courses which offer less of a workout or are taught by teachers who are less exacting than others." And still another member of the English department faculty described seniors as "sincere and interested students, often somewhat sleepless and behind in as- signments, but believing in the value of literature and having enough maturity and education to enjoy it pretty fully." LITERARY COLLEGE faculty members however questioned students' choice of courses along other lines. "People may be job-centered, trying to pick up a saleable competence," specu- lated one language teacher. A member of the mathematics depart- ment noted that "the past few years have indicated an apathy to idealistic causes and much concern with materialistic per- sonal goals. During this past year there seems to be a return to idealism, at least, in a small way." One of the formerly quoted English professors said, "If the public has the conception that a college is an institution serving it in a practical way, then most of its progeny carry on the idea. When they reach the school's hallowed halls they think that the end result of their studies ought to be practical, in the sense that it should 'fit one for particular jobs and professions.' There is- not enough evidence here of the adventurous senior, the man who is open to the attractions of knowledge in whatever area it may be. Too many would like to take that 'exotic' or 'esoteric' course, but not enough really do." ANOTHER faculty member wrote: "the men are personable but I don't think their backgrounds are well - rounded enough. There is so much to be crammed in the space of four years, that they don't bear the marks of liberally educated individuals - a broad liberal arts and science background." Other engineering faculty members generally indicated satisfaction, one say- ing that seniors are "seriously trying to learn for the sake of knowing and using and a second adding "they are genuinely interested in obtaining a good educational background for their chosen professions." But a third noted "he is apparently confused about' the value of things he learns. and does not have the apprecia- tion (as the senior of 10 or 15 years ago) did of the beauty and good quality of things in life." Discussing the problem in more general terms, a member of the medical school faculty said "the basic desire for academic excellence must begin long before college entrance, and our society, with its rather anti-intellectual values, is possibly the real source of this problem." BUT alt studer enviro of the that o gradu: Fact "Th with t help I as cox approv If the mater senior 'so wl facult: But partm and w what educa resear THE pe be ca dousl3 more iors a smart vast more intelle are sa Hov acade man from "I'n men and i less a In c meini and c count ing to struct Thi senio: fashic K a rec sprin After four years , . a broader outlook Getting along with others THE MICHIGAN DAILY MAGAZINE SUNDAY, MAY 24, 1959