- *' ". - .9. - - TA' A New Study Shows What Happened- To Social Scientists During the McCarthy Era ACADEMIC PPREHENS By GUY E. SWANSON 'Island Park, a pleasant place for a stroll on a weekday, has had its solitude forever eided by an apartment project on its margin." Worst AlonenesAll Scenes like this are becoming more difficult to find in some areas. Rapidly Soaring Population and Urban Togetherness- Pose a New Threat to Society Americans Refuse to Face By DAVID LOWE IF SOME future historian should be asked: What was the most remarkable phenomenon in 20th century America? he will un- doubtedly answer: The disap- pearance of the countryside. And he will go on to explain that even by the 1950's the urban centers, where a greater and greater pro- portion of the growing population was concentrated, had so extended themselves that the last vestiges of nature had retreated to a dis- tance where most of the populace rarely saw them. Should he be asked further: Why this astonishing develop- ment? he will answer that there was no conscious reasoning behind it, only a combination of an un- imaginative use of land and a booming population. And he will be right. These two facts-the almost complete lack of planning for the new building on the edges ofrour cities and an ever- faster growing population - are perhaps the beginning of the most serious crisis America has ever faced. They should be of national con- cern. But they aren't. Senator Richard Neuberger, one of the Senate members of the National Recreation Resources Review Com- mission, has said with justified. sharpness that such matters, es- sentially matters of conservation, lack "glamor" and therefore get little coverage in the press. HIS WORD - conservation - has been traditionally asso- ciated with National Parks, irriga- tion projects and wild life pre- serves, but that is only one facet of the problem. Since the Second World War the urbanization of our 15opula- tion, combined with a growth in the last half century from 80 to 170 million people, has made us a nation of city dwellers, of crowd- ed city dwellers at that. A single ,metropolitan area may be said to stretch from Washington to Bos- ton, and the complexes of Chicago and Los Angeles, to name only two others, yearly }become more and more vast. Suddenly the problem is not only one of protecting distant preserves, but the neighboring countryside as well, not only a matter of pro- viding vacation sites, but also fields and woods of immediate ac- cessability. John Rader Platt, associate pro- fessor of physics at the University of Chicago, writing in the New Republic on this very subject has come to an interesting conclusion: It is no accident that the uni- versity communities on a river or a lake-Madison, Evanston, Ann Arbor, in the Midwest- appear often on the lists of the most livable places, even for people who are not profes- sors. The scenery and the sym- phony are both within a few minutes' walk, yet the citizens have national horizons. ONE WONDERS how long it has been since those lists were drawn up. If a person in search of livable places should visit Ann Ar- bor today what would he have to say about the present availability of the scenery?, East towards Detroit the gently rolling hills are being set with houses, and along the highway there are new motels, new stores,l new car lots and the inevitable, drive-ins. Here and there, like remnants of an already condemned race, there is a stand of trees; but Orwellian nightmare of the North Campus buildings, surely prize winners in any competition for sterility of design. There they stand in a huge clearing with the trees pushed, back into the dis- tance, as though nature wQuld con- taminate them. And now this year, Island Park, a pleasant place for a stroll on a weekday, has had its possibilities for solitude forever ended by an apartment project on its margin. In the article previously referred to Professor Platt notes: These communities (Madison, Evanston, Ann Arbor) are be- tween 50,000 and 100,000 pop- ulation. Without a university, it takes a larger number, 200,- 000 or 300,000 to support a symphony orchestra or a good art gallery. But this is near the limit. Any further increase begins to cut the people off from their countryside. This is obviously already hap- pening in Ann Arbor. The shopping centers are going up and the de- velopment, and in a very short time a pleasant hour's saunter in the country will be impossible. BUT SO WHAT? Does it really matter? It matters a great deal. Ann Arbor may be seen as a miniature of the larger picture of our nation--a victim of spreading blight and approaching overpopu- lation which will, in time, perhaps lower our standard of liviiig and certainly effect the quality of our lives. Julian Huxley, one of the world's authorities on population prob- lems, has pointed out that ex- cessive population effects not only man's material necessities: Beyond his material require- ments, man needs space and beauty, recreation and enjoy- ment. Excessive population, can erode these things. The rapid population increase has already created cities so big that they are beginning to de- feat their own ends, producing discomfort and nervous strain and cutting off millions of peo- ple from any real contact or sense of unity with nature. It doesn't take a sociologist or psychologist to explain why chil- dren without parks become delin- quent or why, in our mass society, so many people find no satisfaction in their work nor security in their lives. It is usually the most urbane of us who feel the need of potting or folk singing or painting - all attempts to get back to the most primitive, the most natural parts of our personality. As the cities grow, as Chicago nears Milwaukee and Detroit ap- proaches Toledo their inhabitants find that the 20th century Ameri- can ideal of TOGETHERNESS is the worst aloneness of all. And cul- turally, only New York and per- haps San Francisco among our cities can pretend to give any ad- vantages commensurate with the physical disadvantages of living in. them. And what's going to happen when, as now predicted, by 1975 there will be 277 million of us? THIE PROBLEM illustrated in such a small but vivid way in Ann Arbor is, of course, not only a national one, but a world-wide one. A few facts will help to put what is happening here in proper per- spective. In 1949 the United Na- tions began preparation for an official international survey of the subject of human population. A conference on the matter was finally held in Rome in 1954. In the five years between the two dates the world population had in- creased by more than 130 million. The planet is being populated at the rate of 4,000 people per hour, 90,000 per day and 34 million per year. Malthus pointed out in 1798 that population grows geomet- rically, not arithmetically. The effect of this may be ob- served in the fact that the popu- lation of the world in the latter part of the 17th century was 500 million; in the 1920's it reached two billion, today it is two and one half billion. That is to say that it doubled twice over between 1650 and 1920. Until the present century the compound rate of increase was one per cent perdyear; it is now one and one-third per ye'ar. With universally falling death rates the' compound rate will continue to increase, and it is now believed that the danger point of popula- tion growth in the world will be reached in the next 30 or 40 years. Any projects such as irrigation of the deserts, cultivation of the seas will not be solutions of the problem, but merely postpone- ments of the inevitable. In recog- nition of this the governments of both India and Japan are now ac- tively at work in the area of popu- lation control. OF COURSE the United States does not have the problem that India or Japan does - neither Ann Arbor nor New York is likely to be faced with the reality of starvation as is, from time to time, Calcutta or Bombay. Yet our standard of living is the result of so much space, so many resources to spend and waste; that a large reduction in, (Concluded on Page 15) ALL SOCIETIES view specialistst and -experts with mixed feel- ings. We need the specialist's skills, but it makes us uneasy to realize, that he may not use his expert knowledge for socially de-l sired ends. Some primitives try to limit the influence of their ex- perts. The blacksmiths, though well paid, may be forced to live in a separate enclosure and magical. precautions taken against the spread of their powers. The medi- cine man is honored when all goes well; killed if crops fail or patients die. Contemporary industrial socie- ties are thoroughly dependent up- on the efforts of their more skilledI members; have a correspondinglyI greater need for developing a] workable relation between the ex- perts and their publics, The biting folk tales about pro- miscuous priests, sadistic doctors,' or the venal attorneys-"Why does the hearse horse whinny whenever a lawyer dies?"-are not adequate to control the relations of lay- men and specialists. So notable a case as that of Robert Oppen-+ heimer's dismissal from govern- ment reminds us that we lack. smoothly operating rules for de- ciding these matters. AS A PARTICULAR kind of ex- pert, the teacher in -a liberal arts college has something of the prestige of other professionals,l and is often the target of public+ suspicion. One fairly recent opinion poll shows that college professors are exceeded in public prestige only, by justices of the United States, Supreme Court, doctors, governors of states, members of the Presi- dent's cabinet, diplomats, and mayors of large cities. Their peers in public esteem are scientists, members of the Con- gress, and bankers. Below them are such important functionaries as ministers, lawyers, directors of large corporations, civil engineers, and union officials. Professors command more prestige than such "glamorous" professionals as air- line pilots, newspaper reporters, and Army officers. But all is not honor and pre- ferment. There are popular images of the professor as an impractical egghead, a scandalous bohemian, arid a dangerous radical. From 1950 to 1954, Senator Joseph McCarthy, and others with like views,- went further. Pro- fessors at leading universities were, along with Army generals, the Democratic Party, and an oc- casional Soviet agent, accused of treason or of sympathy for traitors. The Senate's censure of McCarthy In 1954, and, more especially, the lofting of the Russian sputniks in 1957, were required to change loose entists. 'His recent book (with Wagner Thielens Jr.), "The Aca- demic Mind, Social Scientists in a Time of Crisis" (Glencoe, Illi- nois: The Free Press, 1958) re- ports his findings. We should remember that the crisis among' the professors was not imaginary. Lazarsfeld tabu- lated 9904ncidents in which teach- er's careers were threatened for reasons other than academic in- competence. Of these, 54 per cent involved the teacher's political position and ideology. Another seven per cent were probably of this nature. In 18 per cent of the incidents, the teacher was dis- missed. In another four per cent, he resigned under pressure. Seven per cent were limited in their teaching or research activities. These are, if anything, conserva- tive estimates since the outcome was not clearly described for 35 per cent of the cases. The average college studied had six incidents which threatened the careers of members of its staff. About 60 per cent of these inci- dents concerned the political posi- tions of members of the faculty. At least thirty-four per cent of the incidents ended in the teach- er's suffering substantial depriva- tions. REDUCING a history of fear and agony to numbers should not lead us to conclude that these crises had limited results. As any policeman knows, a few exemplary arrests can cow large populations. Further, if the persons threat- ened are socially visible, the effects of their cases are more spectacu- lar. It happens that, whether by inadvertence or design, the likeli- hood of a teacher's being attacked (and, we may suspect, of his being threatened for his political views) was greater in the better known colleges than in teachers' colleges or religious-affiliated institutions. More than this, when size and type of college are held constant, in- cidents are found to be more likely in the institutions with the more distinguished faculties and the more abundant resources.- Of the 743 incidents for which the instigating source is known, about half began with charges from off-campus groups (state or national investigative committees, community groups, mass media, and individuals) and the remain- der with charges from alumni, colleagues, students, relatives of students, and the college adminis- tration. About a fifth of the charges from a known source were instigated by governmental com- mittees. WERE THE SOCIAL scientists alarmed? More than this, did the incidents affect their work, and, if so, how? Unfortunately it is here that Laz'arsfeld's data are least satis- factory. We cannot, for example, separate the impact of incidents related to McCarthyism from others involving. politics or from those 'of a non-political character. What we can do is examine some consequences of all types of in- cident. Lazarsfeld has rated worry and cpution among his respondents. Teachers are said to be worried if they endorse more than one of the following statements: think it is possible that some student will re- port a warped version of their political views, worry about the possibility that future employers might ask someone at their present institutions about their political views; wonder if some remark of theirs related to politics might be a subject of community gossip; fear that a political opinion might affect their Job security; think that alumni might be offended by Legislator and judge of -what knowled accusation into a evaluation of these the nation's security. more sober experts and ASSESS-the impact of Mc- Carthyism on America's liberal arts colleges, and thereby to con- tribute to the formation of more judicious public 'policy, the Fund for the Republic asked the help of Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Professor of Sociology in Columbia University. Lazarsfeld concentrated his atten- tion on McCarthyism's impact on the academicians '.whose' work might be most affected-the social scientists. Field work 'was done In the Spring of 1955. From a sample of 165 accredited colleges, he inter- viewed a representative group of ,451 historians, economists, so- ciologists, and general social sci- Guy E. Swanson is an as. sociate professor in the so- ciology department. some political remark of theirs; wonder whether the college ad-j ministration has a political file on1 every faculty member. Professors are classified as cau- tious if they subscribed to two orI more of the following practices:1 sometimes go out of the way to make it clear that they have no7 extreme political. leanings; some- times refrain from expressing opinions or participating in activ- ities that might embarrass the col- lege administration; exercise more care than before in bringing up political topics with colleagues;, take greater care that students are not referred to controversial read- ing; tone down things they have written because they might cause; controversy. USING Lazarsfeld's criteria, we can explore the anatomy of academic apprehension. It is not a picture reassuring for' scholarly freedom. Forty-seven per. cent of the respondents were wor-' ried. Twenty-two per cent were cautious. At the extremes, 48 per cent were neither worried nor cautious while 17 per cent were both worried and cautious. Only five per cent showed caution with- out worry. Worry and -caution, like the frequency of incidents, are not dis- tributed at random among social scientists. They -are positively re- lated to the teachers' tolerance of divergent views, to their produc- tivity, to the number of liberal as- sociations they have had, and to, their professional eminence. Worry and caution are negatively related to- age and tenure. We learn something of special interest from examining the dis- tribution of worry and caution by quality of college. Lazarsfeld has formed four groups of colleges by the distinc- tion of fheir social science faculties and the institutions' resources: low, medium low, medium high, and high. (Teachers colleges, those affiliated with a religious body, and small public liberal arts col- leges are likely to be rated low or medium low.) The social scientists in colleges of high and medium high quality are more likely than others to be worried, although the percentage worried does not drop below 40 in any quality grouping. It is, how- ever, those in colleges of medium high quality who are' most likely to be worried (49 per cent). AGAINST the distribution of worried teachers, we may con- sider the following percentages of cautious teachers: low quality col- leges - 23 per cent, medium low quality-22 per cent, medium highi quality-27 per cent, high quality -19 per cent. As Lazarsfeld's other data show the colleges of high quality are likely to be -the larger and' wealth- ier private institutions. Their trustees and admi iistrations take a protective view toward the fac- ulty. Their social scientists were likely to be alarmed about the im- pact of criticism on the profession but not as likely as - others to be cautious. By contrast, the colleges of medium high quality are likely tc be the larger, but somewhat les. SUNDAY, APRIL 19, 1959