Sixty-Ninth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN hen Opinions Are Free UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS Truth WSillPrevail" STUDENT PUBLICATIONS BLDG. * ANN ARBOR, MicH. * Phone NO 2-3241 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This mcst be noted in all reprints. Y, FEBRUARY 22, 1959 NIGHT EDITOR: LANE VANDERSLICE Burying Head. in Sand Cannot Prevent Rockets Above USSIA IS AHEAD in space. Will these fate- ful words have to be spelled by Soviet ckets on the moon before America's top lead- s face the realization that the United States Des not still maintain a lead in space? Only lesser officials have come out saying we *e behind. Last Friday, Dr. Hugh L. Dryden, eputy Administrator of the National Aeronau- cs and Space Administration said to Congress at the Russians have the capability of sending manned missile on a round trip into space fore the United States. A statement such as is one might have accomplished something )nstructive had President Dwight D. Eisen- :wer said it publicly, but since he didn't it ill undoubtedly have little impact on the ation. The country has refused to become shocked - bothered by facts of Russian superiority in ie field of missile development. Even the early ccesses of the Russian's Sputniks failed to ir the United States to a point *where there could be demands on a speedup in the missile . u.... .. . .... ,.. .. ,....,y- _ ,...r - S COTCH. ..STRAIG] Invii, BECAUSE of the nature of the state's largest source of income,, those who appropriate money to the University frequently think of it in purely industrial terms. They think of efficiency, plant, the eight-hour day-in short, the method of producing the most (the greatest number of students) for their money. Understandably, this irritates people con- nected with the University, because they see their mission in considerably less crass terms. YET, MAYBE it is about time that the tables were turned, that the University started using those terms itself-that with the current appropriations of the State Legislature the Uni-- versity is actually as inefficient as can be, that it is spending capital rather than income, and one can draw on capital for so long before there is nothing left. An industry can for a short period of time live off its capital. The harmful effects are subtle, and frequently cannot be detected. But the industrialist wakes up one morning to find that he has nothing left:. The same is even more true for a University. The University's' product is much less tangible than that of an automobile firm-and it is more difficult to tell when a University is doing a good job, and when it is not doing quite as well. The University is not producing automobiles, but if it does its job well it is not producing diplomas either.. If should be producing -the mature tough-minded, individual thinker who will mak'e the valuable citizen. THE UNIVERSITY'S greatest single capital resource is the faculty. A good faculty mem- ber represents a major investment of the Uni- versity. As' a machine -produces parts which go :to make up the automobile, the good faculty member helps to develop the proper product of the University. But no industry worth its salt is satisfied with theniachines it has. It is continually doing research to improve them, it is trying to find better replacements as the old ones wear out, and if not better ones, those which are just as good. The industry makes the most it can from the best machines. But the most here means that the industry runs the machine at the speed at which it is most effective. A lathe is not run so fast that it breaks the cutting bit, or fails to give the proper finish. All this holds true for a University as well. Here again, because the product is less tangible, the signs are also less tangible. AUNIVERSITY is as good as its faculty and can never be content with what it has. The faculty members themselves must be given time to do research, to improve themselves and hence to do ,a better job. Further, as the older men retire, bright young ones must be trained to take their place; and when men leave, replace- ments must be found. + '~fly u program. For some reason, possibly founded on a strong sense of nationalism, most Americans seemed to feel that the small Explorers and Vanguards that were finally tossed into space equalled the massive Soviet satellites already in orbit. ORE OF THE BLAME must fall on top officials in the Republican Administration. Consistently they have belittled Soviet missile achievements while building up those of the United States. Even when the Russians man- aged to send up a satellite containing a dog, the Administration branded it a publicity stunt, with little real value to science. For the United States to regain the scientific lead it once held, it will first be necessary to face up to the reality of the present situation: the Russians are ahead in several aspects of the space race. As long as this admission is not -made, the United States will continue to fall farther behind Russia. -KENNETH MELDOWNEY H[T By Richard Taub ;ing Ruin, In addition, each faculty member must be as efficient as he can. But efficiency here does not mean turning out the most students-it means turning out the most best students. THE LEGISLATURE by a paltry appropria- tion not only forces the University to deplete its capital, but also forces it to be inefficient in other ways. Fewer faculty members means that classes are larger. Five more students in a class may mean that the teacher will decide not to assign a term paper to the class-it may mean that he will be forced to give a less rigorous examina- tion because it is easier to read, or he may neglect the task of correcting papers to a reader who is not nearly as good as he is. Increase the size of the class, or increase the class load,,and the faculty member not only has less time to do research, but less time to spend with each student-less time to talk to him in his office perhaps. And yet, just as tests and term papers did, the time a teacher can spend with an individual student may make a major contribution to that student's develop- ment. Give the student more courses per semester, so that he spends more time utilizing the plant, and he has less time to think, read, and grow, The difficulty about all this is that the "added value" the University gives to the student is hardly measurable at all. But it is there! Just as surely as that grotesque, big finned monster parked out front is there. 'CUTTING CORNRS to cut costs makes no more sense in the academic world than it does in industry. Of course, sometimes a cut which seems detrimental may in fact turn out to increase efficiency. For instance, the reduced budget in the general library led to open stacks for all students, It may have appeared "more efficient" to have tan coated lads scurrying about the stacks, quickly sending the books by conveyor to the waiting student at the desk. But it really may be more efficient, in the University's terms, to allow the student to won- der about the poorly ventilated narrow path- ways, to find some unlooked-for book and sit cross-legged in the dimly lit corridor while the time races by. He may never even get the book he wanted, but this is really more efficient. But it is also more efficient to have millions of books in the library, even if many of them don't get read in five years, or even ten. For as any industry tries to have the widest variety of necessary resources at its command, so must the University. Cutting down on University appropriations, so the University "makes better use of what it has" may be good up to a point, but after that, it can lead to bankruptcy. New Books at the Library Gordimer, Nadine-A World of Strangers; N.Y., Simon and Schuster, 1958. Jackson, Shirley-The Sundial; N.Y., Farrar, Straus & Cudahy, 1958. Lin Yutang-The Secret Name; N.Y., Farrar, Straus & Cudahy, 1958. Morris, James-South African Winter; N.Y., Pantheon Books, 1958. Overstreet, Harry & Bonaro-What We Must Know About Communism; N.Y., W. W. Horton, 1958.A Samuels, Ernest-Henry Adams; Cambridge, Belknap Press of Harvard Univ., 1958. Sansom, William-The Cautious Heart; N.Y., Reynal & Co., 1958. R .rin~nA ifv, R_ Thla Prvd .. sssA -Daily-David Arnold OFF CAMPUS, WINTER STILL RETAINS ITS CHARM-A FARM ON GEDDES ROAD DULLES AND THE COLD WAR: The Changing Balance of Power THE GROWING PRESSURES: individual Last Defense Against Materialistc Tide By MICHAEL KRAFT Daily Editorial Director N A WORLD of practical concerns, where success finds its measure in recreation rooms and new automobiles, the academic community usually prides itself, almost snobbishly, in its position as an island of idealism. Slowly but surely, even these outcroppings are being eroded by the endless rains of expediency. The universities and colleges are losing, if indeed they ever had it, their position of uniqueness in a world where those activities considered most important are the ones with the most tangible results. To be sure, people still explore in doctoral theses such things as "The Organization, Administration and Training of the United States Volunteer Militia, 1792-1861" or "El Tema Sel Pirata en La Novela Historica Hispanoeamericana." And traditionally, those who want to measure their success in gold have been welcome to the scales. The Islands of idealism could provide havens for those who seek to live and work for something they consider more important, as monasteries provided a more secluded atmosphere' in the past. BUT MODERN transport~tion and communication work' wondeis. What the sneers of the muttonheads and the practical people have been unable to do ever since ThomasHuxley derided "mere intellectual edu- cation" back in 1880, the practical business of "self defense"' is about to achieve. Tremendous pressures, much of it in the nearly unresistable form of "patriotism" are crunching the ideals of a liberal education and the pursuit of what is interesting but not practical. * , , * ACTUALLY, the deterioration has long been evident and the ideal that universities are idealistic may have never been attained. If members of the academic world are really so unconcerned about money, there would be little resulting concern about faculty salaries and raiding between staffs. And the academic world always "enjoys"' its own form of materialistic standards. Students are measured in grade points of average and faculty members in pages of publication. But more recently, the pressure is wearing away even the ideal of "knowledge for its own sake." The recent proposal by a state legislator that students help finance a bond plan for buildings by post-graduation payments because they'll be making more money, and after all, educa- tion is an investment, only reflects a prevalent attitude toward a college degree. * * * * ONE STATE SCHOOL, which perhaps has never really prided itself on a liberal approach, has already succumbed. D. B. Varner, chancellor of the Michigan State University Oakland, a branch opening this fall near Pontiac, announced last week that the 600 members of the initial freshman class will not be required to take Freshman English. The following is reprinted from the Thursday issue of the Pontiac Press: "'I know this would be a radical departure from traditional college curricula and perhaps is a controversial step. But if the students don't. know their native tongue after using it for 18 years, it's too late for us in college to teach it to them. "'the cost angle has been figured in too, Varner said. "Educational dollars are scarce nowadays. We don't want to spend them teaching students what they should have learned before they came to us. ". . .students, he said, will frankly be encouraged to study Russian as a foreign language. "Speaking realistically. the study of Russian must be emphasized if we are to make a real attempt to equip our college youth for the years ahead." * $ * * IGNORED OF COURSE in the desire to save educational dollars is that, at least for some, Freshman English is the first time the student's thinking and writing undergoes close examination. "Speaking realisti- cally," most high school students have had little exposure to thinking. MSU's choice of equipment for the years ahead is positively frightening, But as with Rep. Bowerman's proposal for study now, pay later, this is only a reflection of a commonly shared approach ... namely that education is a process one hurries through, taking the most "realistic" courses. Unfortunately, the mounting pressures of practicality are increasing the pace. EVEN THE MOST determined resistance cannot completely ignore the barest needs, that of making enough money to afford the luxury of intellectual inquiry. But without a continual image of something worth enjoying for its own sake, there is little fun in being practical . . . there's nothing left to work for. However, only people, not governments or administrations are really concerned about the "full" life. Thus, the last bulwark of educa- tion for its own sake lies within the individual student who is determined to explore as much as possible as deeply as possible whenever possible. Unfortunately, the world's increasing specialization and pressures is decreasing the realm of possibility, As education expands 'as a national or practical necessity, it shrinks as an individual pleasure. And when the idealism crumbles, so does part of man himself. !. By JOHN M. HIGHTOWER Associated Press News Analyst W ASHINGTON - The great problem which John Foster Dulles - or his successor at the State Department - must face in the next two years is the changing balance of power btween Russia and the United States. In indus- trial and space-age military pro- duction, the Soviet Union is mov- ing up very fast. Since the beginning of the cold war, United States political and military policy has been used on a power balance in favor of the Western allies. The basic assump- tion has been that Russia would use its military power to promote political expansion if it dared, but it didn't dare. In January 1954 Dulles gave this concept a name: "massive retaliation." About 1 months ago concern over the reliability of this doctrine as a mainstay of world peace spread through the western camp. There were three reasons. In Au- gust 1957 Russia announced suc- cessful testing of an intercon- tinental ballistic missile. On the following Oct. 4 it launched its historic Sputnik, the first man- made moon. * * * THE UNITED STATES military response to these Soviet achieve- ments has been to begin putting nuclear missiles into NATO terri- tory in Europe, where Allied gov- ernments agreed to receive them, and to speed up missile and de- velopment production programs and ICBM bases in this country. Within a few years the great pow- ers will have ample weapons on both sides to destroy each other overnight, with an initial advan- tage accruing to the attacker. The direct answer to this condi- tion of peril seems to be some form of disarmament backed up by in- ternational inspection against sur- prise attack. Dulles and President Dwight D. Eisenhower along with Allied leaders have tried to nego- tiate disarmament pacts with Rus- sia. But all efforts have failed to date because Soviet leaders charge that any inspection system which would be effective in Western eyes is merely a device for spying in their country. In October 1957, after the first Sputnik spun into orbit, Dulles alerted his associates in the State Department to watch out for Soviet probings of Allied unity and security around the world. They did not have long to wait. Premier Nikita Khrushchev's first move was to try to force a summit meet- ing. The belief here was that he aimed at maneuvering the West- ern powers into recognizing Soviet domination of Eastern Europe, in- cluding East Germany. IN MEETING this crisis Dulles followed a philosophy he expound- ed early in his term as Secretary of State. It has come to be known as "brinkmanship" after he talked in a magazine interview about the necessity of going "to the brink" of war in order to make another nation back down when it threat- ened aggression. This has been a consistent theme in all his talk about the basic policy of the United States in the cold war. "Free people," he said in May 1954, "will never remain free un- less they are willing to fight for their vital interests." "It is our policy," he said in a speech last December, "to check said in February 1955, "I believe it will come - when Russians of stature will patriotically put first their national security and the welfare of their people. They will be unable to have that security and that welfare subordinated to the worldwide ambitions of interna- tional Communism. "If their point of view should pyevail, then indeed there could be a basis for worthwhile negotia- tion and practical agreement be- tween the United States and the new Russia." AT A RECENT news conference, however, Dulles dealt with the other side of the coin. He said the move by the Soviets beginning last November to oust the Western powers from Berlin demonstrated that they cannot be trusted to keep agreements. But agreements with the Soviets are acceptable if they can be made self-enforcing, he added, and the Western powers must explore every opportunity for making such agreements as that. One of the most persistent criti- cisms of Dulles is that he has not been willing to negotiate enough. He usually has sought evidence of serious intent on Russia's part be- fore going to the conference table. And he has worried about the risk of being pushed by peace-hungry public opinion over the world into unsound agreements. "One ever-present danger," he said in November 1954, "is the danger of being fooled into drop- ping our guard before the peril is really past." Last month, discussing Soviet demands for negotiations on Ger- many, he put the same idea this way: "I have seen nothing so far which leads me to feel that there is a genuine desire to end the cold war. There is a eery strong desire to delude us into thinking the cold war is ended." Dulles has given United States foreign policy the deep imprint of these ingredients of his own think-" ing-long-range hope about win- ning out in the end, eternal vigi- lance against being lured into an unworkable agreement, and the will together with the arms to fight if Russia's challenge ever goes that far. These fundamentals will carry over into the coming years whether his hand or another charts the course. REACH CYPRUS AGREEMENT: NATO .breach Healed By PETER DAWSON Daily Staff Writer OVERCOMING Archbishop Makarios' last-minute objections, last week's London round table on Cyprus completed the general ar- rangements for an independent republic of Cyprus. The terms of the agreement are a fairly even compromise among the demands of Greece, Turkey and Britain. Greece and the; Greek Cypriots gave up in September their demand that Cyprus unite with Greece. They are also allowing Britain to retain sovereignty over the ter- ritory of her military bases instead of having to merely lease them. 1 '! N T X As for Turkey and the Turkish Cypriots, they have abandoned their insistence that the island be partitioned if the British leave. They had insisted on this out of fear that the Greek Cypriot ma- jority might dominate them: Britain is giving up a Crown Colony. Yet she is keeping her military bases, the only ones she completely controls in the east-. ern Mediterranean. * * * ARRANGEMENTS for the legis- lature, a unicameral one, give the Greek Cypriots a clear majority- 70 per cent of the seats. Yet the Turkish Cypriots will have fuller representation than the Greeks, for they make up only 18 per cent of the island's population. Cyprus will have a Greek- Cypriot president and a Turkish- Cypriot vice-president. The latter will be able to veto policies af- fecting Turkish security and the Turkish Cypriots. How well these officers will work together re- mains to be seen. If the republic is successful, it will mean the permanent end of almost four years' terrorism on the island. More important, it will heal the breach between Turkey and Greece, which has substan- tially weakened the eastern arm of NATO. THE REPUBLIC will have no easy time of it. Dissension with- in the government may handicap it. Opposition to its policies may give it trouble too. Greek Cypriots will be disappointed not to get union with Greece. Turkish Cyp- CAPITAL COMMENTARY: Gen. Marsha By WILLI WASHINGTON -General of the Japanese were then be Army George C. Marshall pis in the Pacific as the Ge sick with a great sickness and with beating at us, with a his life a gallant and a lost era is evil, in Europe.) coming to its close. This was the They said later-the era of the second World War, in ticians of the Repub which Marshall, without ever hav- wing said it-that M ing a field command at all, served gone to promote come so nobly and so well. to push into an abyss t He was the Secretary of State and the last power ofc who gave his name to the Marshall in the far Pacific, Plan for the postwar recovery of China. Europe. He served also as Secre- They called him, Mar tary of Defense. But before this terrible things; I rem he had been Chief of Staff of the the then Senator Will United States Army. And, though of Indiana called N this post in Washington's hier- front man for traitors archy was far below the others he lie." had held, it was this post which This was perhaps most of all he honored in his brutal thing ever said private thoughts. 'history of passionateX This was the man-this rather thin and grey and coldly kind mili.- tary man - who more than any other on this side of the oceanx brought to an end to Hitler and to Tojo and to all the evil power that they had represented. IT WAS THIS man also, with Will Clayton of Texas, and others 3 now lost from public sight - who made the plan for which a Europe, then spent and broken, has nowk come upon a new life of strength- and hope. 11 in Last Fight gAM S. WHITE eating at us ermans were an immense bitter poli- lican right arshall had munism and he last hope our last ally Nationalist rshall, many aember that iam Jenner Marshall "a .. . a living the most in our long partisanship about a man who was as great a patriot and as great a gentleman as we have ever known. Marshall had given up, to a man named Dwight D. Eisenhower, the glory of the top command in Europe when we were all fighting Hitler. Marshall, with a quiet and heartbreaking loyalty to the great common cause, had stayed in Washington to be only Chief of Staff of the United States Army.t Through these years he had stuck here at his post, a soldier quietly doing the best he could while other and lesser men put their names and their marksrupon history. He stayed here and he stayed with his duty. And the men who were full of rancor had their way with him in Congress. They taunt- ed him, they screamed at him, they did everything of hate that could be done against any man any- where anytime. Marshall, the soldier, stayed quiet - and, as always - did the very best he could. * * ** NOT IN ALL our history has one man done, in a military way, so much for all of us. And surely never in all our history has one man been so ill rewarded for all that he had done. Now, in the . Army hospital at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Gen- Editorial Staff RICHARD TAUB, Editor EL KRAFT al Director JOHN WEICHER City Editor DAVID TARR Associate Editor E CANTOR.................Personnel Director K WILLOUGHBY .... Associate Editorial Director N1 JONES ...............Sports Editor TA JORGENSON.........Associate City Editor ABETH ERSKINE ... Associate Personnel Director OLEMAN..... ..Associate Sports Editor ID ARNOLD .,...............Chief Photographer