Seventy-eight years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students of the University of Michigan under authority of Board in Control of Student Publications "I'd rather not answer any of those questions... 0I1't want to upset the elections going on in the United States!" JAMES WECHSLER- Ed Muskie, -d St., Ann Arbor, Mich. News Phone: 764-0552 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily exp ress the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. Y, OCTOBER 1 1, 1968" NIGHT EDITOR: ROB BEATTIE Promise sister anything, but give her Panhel secret..,weapon THE PREVAILING assumption about the state of the nation is that large numbers of Americans are trembling with almost uncontroll- able hysteria and prepared to accept most of the trappings of a police state to achieve the illusion of serenity. Certainly the successes recorded by George C. Wallace and the favorable opinion-ratings accorded Mayor Daley's Chicago exercises lend support to that nightmare. But is that the whole story? If a kind of semni-madness is the dom- inant and irretrievable national mood, what explains that remarkable phenomenon named Edward S. Muskie of Maine? His style and substance are the embodiment of reasonableness, tolerance and a quiet passion for justice. Yet as the final month of the campaign begins, he has obviously emerged as the secret weapon of the embattled Democrats. It is still highly questionable whether a Vice Presidential nominee can become a crucial decisive figure in a national election. But Muskie is giving that proposition a noble trial. AT THE TIME of Muskie's designation by Hubert Humphrey, his name elicited much the same response evoked by Nixon's choice of Spiro T. Agnew. In brief: "Who's he?" The analogy was not quite fair; Muskie has been a widely respect- ed figure in the Senate almost from the moment of his arrival there in January, 1959. He showed a good deal of early spirit by tangling with Democratic Senate leader Lyndon Johnson on moves for drastic liberalization of the cloture rule. (Johnson's stand has come back to haunt him in the Fortas case). But Muskie won few national headlines; his diligent and enlighten- ed labors were far better known to his colleagues and readers of Maine newspapers than to the country at large.v ' PANHEL once again has delayed imple- menting an anti-discrimination clause introduced over ten months ago. And ap- proval of the clause -a imed atfemoving. the most obvious mechanism for discrim- ination, the alumni recommendation - still remains doubtful in the face of fear- fulhesitation by-individual sorority hous- es. The withdrawal of the black sororities' from Panhel, coupled with this hesitation,. makes it clear that the integrated appear-, ance Panhel attempted to maintain was merely a facade to cover its discrimina- tory practices. For the relationship between the black sororities and Panhel was nota reciprocal arrangement. The black houses gave Pan- hel an exterior that fulfilled the sorori- ties' definition of liberalism. Yet they re- ceived no benefits f r o m Paynhel's pro- grams. BASICALLY, the purposes and programs of the two organizations were not the same. The black sororities1 were founded not as social but as service organizations, aimed especially at programs s u c h as ghetto and tutorial projects. Nor did the b 1 a c k sororities benefit from Panhel's major activity - the rush program. White girls politely talked to black girls, black girls were ushered through white houses. But each chose, or were chosen, to remain vith their own As such, few Negro girls decided to par- ticipate in the massive formal rush. In- stead, black sororities pledged most of their members in the spring open rush, thus forcing black houses to participate in two major and exhaustive rush sets per year. Even if the 16 white houses who have yet to sign the statement go through the difficult process of convincing their na- tional alumni to agree to the clause, it will only be an exercise in token liberal- ism. For the effectiveness of the clause will be totally nullified without the pres- ence of the black houses. MOREOVER, it is remarkable that this controversy arose in 1968. It has been four years since blacks have been assured total equality under the law. And Panhel's hesitancy to commit themselves to even this minor attempt to end discrimination indicates they are sadly anachronistic in their view of relations between black and white today. Yet, if the 16 white sororities were to adopt the clause at their meeting next week, their former actions still would not be vindicated. The opportunity for a sin- cere expression of intent passed ten months ago. The ensuing hesitancy has clearly shown their true interests do not lie with the sentiment behind their anti- discrimination clause. Letters to the Editor INDEED, WHEN HE was select- ed as Vice-Presidential nominee, there were those who wryly noted that the choice was entirely con- sistent with the hopes and desires of Mayor Daley, who has a large Polish-American constituency. Da- ley, who studies family trees with tender concern, was well aware that Muskie's father had been a Polish immigrant. Whether or not Daley actually played a hand in Humphrey's de- cisiori, nothing Muskie has said or done that night has suggested any spiritual kinship with Daleyism. In fact his patient, thoughtful and dignified responses to young dissenters on his campaign trail have set an could fruitfully emulate. 4 -LESLIE WAYNE iCkNixon and dirty books RICHARD NIXON, reflecting the kind of sophisticated concerns which have dominated this election y e a r, probably hit the highlight of his campaign Mon- day, when he fervently promised that if elected he would ask Congreds to pass a Children's Anti-Obscenity Act, making it a federal criminal offense to mail obscene matter to children under 16. In keeping with the law and order fet- ish that has marked this uplifting Presi- dential race, Nixon asserted ,that his ad- ministration would vigorously enforce such a law, "jailing the corrupters and ending once and for all the use of the United States mails to subvert the moral standards of our children." Unfortunately the issue is more corn- plex than this, and Nixon's proposal leaves some serious questions unanswer- ed. For example, would only adults seek- ing to subvert the morals of children be punished or would children sending Qb- scene matter to other children be incar- cerated as well? And what is Nixon going to do about the growing postal deficit after he elimi- Second class postage paid at Ann Arbor, Mi-higan, 420 Maynard St.; Ann Arbor, Michigan. 48104. Daily except Monday during regular academic school year. nates one of the few kinds of mail that actually pays for itself? BUT THERE IS something seriously alarming about an electorate which applauds a candidate who boasts that he is "somewhat of an expert'' in the field of obscenity. Indeed, many of America's problems become more comprehensible when one takes into account the'fact that the vast majority of the voters are ob- sessed with obscenity. Perhaps the Nixon speech merely rep- resents an attempt to liven up an other- wise stultifying campaign by injecting a' perverse mixture of sadism, sex, and all the other repressed desires of the would- be censors to whom Nixon was speaking. Unfortunately, it does not seem likely that Nixon's speech was made purely for entertainment. 't is far more probable that his deep concern with obscenity ca- ters to the desire for irrelevant repres- sion among the middle-aged electorate in this country. Unable to comprehend the generation gap, many of them seek to blame it on left wing political propaganda which they frequently confuse with obscenity. -ANN MUNSTER 'if they vaItn To the Editor: BELIEVE the withdrawal and mass walkout of Alpha Kappa. Alpha and Delta Sigma Theta so- rorities at Wednesday night's Pan- hellenic Presidents' Council meet- ing constituted a very childish dis- play of irrationality and emotion. Last year when they wanted our help in securing housing in Ox- ford, they supported Panhellenic wholeheartedly. Now that they have their housing, they h a v e turned their backs on us. Sororities that do not have a national organization or a system of recommendations cannot appre- ciate the fact that the rulings of national organizations that haye existed long before Michigan's Panhellenic cannot be changed overnight. IF THE MEBERS of these so- rorities had taken the time to re- view the Panhellenic Membership File, they would have seen that allr the University sororities have been working with their national or- ganizations since the original res-, olution was passed toward the eli- mination of binding recommenda- tions. By withdrawing and setting up their own organization the black sororities are in effect creating a "lily-white" Panhellenic. I there- fore must challenge their belief in the elimination of discrimination:' if this was their goal, they would have stayed to help us achieve it. -Wendy Kress Personnel Director, Panhellenic Association Oct. 11 Write-off ? To the Editor:, I WAS sorry to see that y o u r McCarthy feature on Saturday's editorial page was about as un- fair and prejudiced as the inter- view with the Wallacite, Peggy Collins, even though the Wallac- ites were given an objective treat- ment in the "sympathetic" por- trait in Friday's paper. Rick Perloff tried very hard to bring up and exaggerate the neg- ative aspects of the present Mc- Carthy write-in campaign in Michigan, namely the discourage- ment and disillusionment of some who are for the ti e-beipg tired of fighting, and the decrease in size of this McCarthy movement in comparison to pre-convention ef- forts; both aspects are to be ex- pected. He did a poor job if inter- preting most of what he did re- port. I'd like to mention a few of the significant items he omitted. We have been collecting names since registration and have a, list of 400 volunteers. (This summer's list had 900 names). He overlooks the first organizational meeting where, according to The Daily, 400 at- tended. He chose to emphasize the second iweekly meeting where with attendance optional f o r already active volunteers, at least 50 peo- ple came. It featured Wes Vivian, Democratic candidate for the con- gress from this district. Most importantly the write-in effort is not really concerned with electing a' president - Mr. Perloff is wrong here that hero worship keeps us going - but with keepr'g the issues of the war, poverty, and justice in the forefront of public attention. The glamor of these activities is, probably not so attractive as was that of campaigning in national primaries, and some people a r e tired of politics- In fact, the Young Democrats and the Young Repub- licans, each of which usually hs a memb~ership of 500 have only 150, apiece this y e a r, of wbich about one third are active. However, not everyone has giv- en up on electoral politics, as The Daily evidently would like to see. What the present McCarthy or- ganization wants and is accoin- plishing is to maintain an inter- e s t e d continuing organization. which would be better experienced and more effective than one that would start over again for the 1972 presidential election. -Patricia Larsen Staff Chairman Oct. 8 Enlightenment To the Editor: I FOUND Steve Daniel's letter, printed in The Daily of October 9, highly enlightening. I envy his confidence in the validity of his views and position, but at the same time I am deeply troubled by the fact that he appears to be so un- shakeably sure that he is rijht in all that he contends. Surely as scholars, if we learn anything, we learn to be wary of inferences a n d generalizations drawn from our own limited ex- perience. Perhaps broader inquiry on Mr. Daniels' part would reveal to him that there exists in the faculty a strong willingness to re- examine goals, procedures, assum- ptions, rather than blindly obstin- ate opposition to change predicted on the belief that we have all the answers we need and that which exists is of necessity "best" for all concerned. In particular I detect no evi- dence of an unwillingness on the part of faculty or administrative officers at this institution to com- municate intelligently with stu2 dents and to participate in ration- al debate aimed at improving the functioning of the University as a majorinstrument foreeducation, whatever that may mean. -Harvey E. Brazer Chairman, Economics Department Oct. 9 1 to end bias, they shodd help aus' MUSKIE HAS DULY undertaken the role of emissary to the Polish bloc, so many of whose members are widely described as activists in the "white backlash." But he has fastidiously avoided any pandering to frustration and prejudice. In Cleveland the other day the scene for his major appearance was a convention of 700 Polish-Americans. Recalling that his father was a Polish tailor who fled oppression to breathe the free air of America, he said: "You and I should be the first to'reject those, who parade under the banner of suppression disguised as law and order." Then he added in firm tones: "Suppression breeds discontent and discontent breeds rebellion . . . You and I know that no one can be free unless we are all free. You and I who have gained so much in this great land - and we have - should be in the forefront of those who want to help Americans who have suffered from discrimination." IN A SPEECH delivered in Daleyland the other day Arthur Schle- singer Jr. recalled what Abraham Lincoln said in 1855 about Know- Nothingism: "Our progress in degeneration appears to me to be .pretty rapid. As a nation we began by declaring that all men are created equal. We now practically read it all men are created equal, except Negroes, When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read all men are created equal except i4egroes and foreigners and Catholics, When it comes to this, I shall, prefer emigrating to some country wher they make no pretense of loving liberty - to Russia, for instance, here despotism can be taken pure, and without the alloy of hypocrisy." In his own fashion Muskie has imparted a Lincolnesque note to the squalid, strident sound of contemporary debate. Pis performance has achieved a certain special distinction because of the blumiders of Mr. Agnew; but that is hardly its sole merit. Almost alone, he has sounded as if he had deliberately chosen to address himself to the better in- stincts and intelligence of the nation., The recognition he has won in so brief an interval must be some reassurance to those - at home and abroad - who believe America is sick beyond salvation. It is also conceivable that his solid presence encouraged Humph- rey's independent declaration on Vietnam last week. (Copyright 1968 N. Y. Post) e M .A example that Humphrey EDITOR'S NOTE: The following are excerpts from a paper by Prof. Max Mark of Wayne State University read at the annual convention of the American Political Science Association early last month. Mark is looselysallied with~ younger political scientists who are dissatisfied with the current direc- tion their discipline is taking. By MAX MARK 'HERE IS A STARTLING in-r congruity between the revo- lutionary character of our age and the conservatism of our dis- cipline. While such an age would: require aWpolitical science of rele vaney, of concern with direction and goals. of crystallization of is- sues for moral commitment, we have a discipline preoccupied with techniques, with a focus upon means and anisistence upon the possibility and desirability, of a value-free political science. What 'has greatly contributed to the traditional conservatism of the academic social sciences-- and at the same time has hidden this character-has been a redefi- nition of social science. Ideally derived from various sources of cognition, pursued and organized on the basis of hierar- chically ordered needs to know, social science has become any kind rzcism: with power, provided that this knowledge is easily testable. TIAT THE social sciences could have been subjected to such a cavalier treatment has been the result of what I would call the naive abandon with which our empiricists have pursued their re- searches. One would be entitled to expect that the adoption of a particular methodology would be the result. of searching ontological and epis- temological probings. At least, one could expect that researchers would be aware of the implicit on- tological and epistemological as- sumptions of their work ... LET ME START with that ul- timate reality, man himself, as he is implied in empiricism. There is now such a thing as "empirical man," that is man as he emerges from his dissection into discrete pieces of observed' behavior. What strikes ohe in "empirical man"is that He does not convey any central concerns - and he could not, because he lacks an in- ner core. There is no connection between the statistical aggregates into which he has been dissolved. The methodology of conservatism piricism has of social reality. So- cial reality is seen a sa conglom- erate of social phenomena, each a separate entity, and each on a co- ordinate level with the rest. There is housing, schooling, the job mar- ket, marriage and divorce, etc. All of these parts in summation make up the whole of society. Hence, in order to understand society one has to have an inte- grated picture of the whole. So- cial science must start out with the whole, must organize itself for an understanding of the de-, tails from the standpoint of the whole. Given the fact that empirical studies inhregard to problems which are insoluble within the as- sumptions of our society lead no- where. there is a tendency toward proliferation of such studies where the same ground is gone over time and again. But not only this. There has arisen in many cases that unholy alliance between the researcher eager for more research and those in power who are unwilling or un- able to act. Under the guise that more research is needed, action is being postponed indefinitely, out as "givens." Under the im- pirical dispensation it is not the researcher who defines the prob- lem--except in a merely technical sense. The problem is defined for him. He is not in a position to ex- plore purposes other than those that govern society at a particu- lar time. Alternative purposes which would transcend the frame- work of existing society are pre- cluded. The focus is upon the limited choices of the present. There are two alternatives be- fore the scholar. He may on the basis of his social consciousness decide to apply to the phenom- enon of dilapidated houses, the concept of slum or of some equi- valent of it - with all the pre- scriptive implication which such concept will carry - or he may wait until society decides to pay attention to the social meaning of dilapidated houses, and t h e n start with his investigations. WHEN WE NEXT COME to the, problem of understanding process and development empiricism shows a particular weakness. The em- piricist does not analyze social phenomenalin terms of 'becoming.', This leads to a concentration upon the superficial, including superfi- cial similarities. The absence of the dynamic element in empiricism makes for a failure to appreciate the new in the developmental process. Devel- ..................... ..,. .... ......:.... ........ . ............'.......a.,,::. .: :."::,....:. .: 4': 4 { { J. :J ::: ...J..J':t .......h ..: J:.. ... ......,J "We are trying to say that social consciousness-or social values-gives rise to the concepts which are the heart of the social sciences. The question then be- comes, 'Whose values?' . . . concepts themselves are value-laden, of course. What content we give to these concepts amounts to a loading of the dice, and the outcome of our investigation is to a great extent determined by the way we have loaded them." ... ........*.. ..::: :::::.: ...... ..*....::: ,...........:::::.v , ...,,::: ...:.: . "..: .:.. ,..:::::4.::.: .,......:,.4* .4. ...... ... result of a diolectical process bet- ween traditional nationalism and 'the forces of transnationalism al- ready has a strong component of internationalism is only too easily overlooked. SINCE FOR THE EMPIRICIST the purposes of society are "giv ens" his attention is drawn to how the system works. His concern is not and cannot be why and how the system has arisen. His field of vision is means and not ends, his field of vision is power. The conservative implications of a political science based upon power is derived from the inclina- tion to subordinate the signifi cance of ideas to the significance of "power." Ideas become mere rationalizations in the struggle for power. According to the power theory, the facts of life are that there are always the strong, the elites, and the rest, and this willalways. be so. The more things change the more they are the same. Why get excited about change, particularly radical change - af- ter much turmoil we have ex- changed one set of rulers for ano- RELATED TO THE QUESTION of definitions of problems is the question of conceptualization, In the social sciences we do not de with obiects of sensorv nov- We are trying to say that social consciousness - or social values - gives rise to the concepts which are the heart of the social scienc- es The questionthen bcms opments do proceed along dialecti- cal lines. There is always the mix- ture between the old and the new, But since our empiricists in their caution rnutth, i flhii,.~rdi ,nf i I