THE MICHIGAN DAILY Tuesday, August 27, 1968 } seeks money, str SGC members realized these financial problems were not tem- porary and would cripple the or- ganization in the future. In the face of definite negative from the Office of Student Affairs and the Regents to SGC's requests for a bigger budget or permission to make additional charges per stu- dent, SGC looked for new ways to consolidate their year-old Inde- pendence from OSA. One way in which SGC felt it could strengthen both its position as a student lobby and its con- stituent base was through the, legislative restructuring. The impeturs for changing the political structure of SGC was first proposed by Bruce Kahn, '69, last yegr's president of SGC. Claiming that the student govern- ment was unrepresentative Kahn advocated a re-examination of basis for representation on the student government. The Daily had already given up its alotted ex-officio seat on SGC and some elected members were in favor of abolishing the remaining ex-officio seats held by other student organizations. They argued that some students. were being represented twice or more by virtue of their membership in a student organization with an ex-officio seat. Secondly, pressure was being exerted from groups outside of SGC to replace its at-large elec- toral system with one based on geographic or academic wards. Students who took this viewpoint felt that their opinions were not reflected by SGC members be- cause no one member was respon- sible to - a defined electorate, Par- ticularly vocal 'among this group were students in the engineering school- who were opposed to the council's stand on war research and the Institute for Defense An- alysis (IDA). SGC had unani- mounsly opposed the University's participation and membership in research and IDA., Finally, gradute students felt disenfranchised from SGOC and considered the organization deaf to their interests. Graduate stu- dents hardly voted in SGC elec- tions and had formed their own Graduate Assembly to handle their affairs. Hopefully SOC could be changed to accommodate thef interests of both graduate and un- FORCES POLIC Y'CHANGE: eng.th. ngC loses ri dergraduate students within the framework of a single organiza- tion. By DAVID DUBOFF JJC will acquita In response to these pressures In a little over a year Joint pealing a convi a referendum to decide to have a Judiciary Council (JJC) has ele- these rules." constitutional convention was vated itself from a rubber-stamp JJC's new con placed on the ballot last Novem- for the administration to a signi- set forth JJC's ph ber. The referendum passed and ficant force for student power on determination fo the machinery for a constitution- campus. reference to "Uni al convention was set up.-tregulations" was Delegates were elected on an JJC is the University's court of phrase- "properly at-large basis last March and the appeals, hearing cases of students rules and regula first meeting of con-con took .conced of, violation of non-. place' as school was nearing its academic University regulations stituted. close last spring. The convention by judiciaries of dormitories, fra- A major innov discussed plans and suggestions ternities, sororities and the cam- vised constitution for the basis of a new student gov- pus driving court. The ten-mem- institution of an enment ranging from the repre- ber body is composed entirely of system. The new sentation of, the present SOC to students. vides that the defl a radical proposal for a volun- The new mood on JJC began in where penalties o tary student union to replace the the spring of 1967, when a major- expulsion could current SOC. ity of the nine students appoint- the right to reque The second major proposal ed from over 40 applicants pledged fore a panel of fi dealt with financial base of SGC to acquit students charged with ed at random fI -a plan for the incorporation of violating rules that were' not made directory. SGC as a legal entity. According solely by students. -The subtle bu to the incorporation plan, SGC JJC lost no time in implement- threat that JJC's would be organized as a legally ing its philosophy. On Oct. 3, 1967 for the administri autonomous, non-profit corpora- it handed down a landmark deci- Under old structu tion whose purpose would be ,'the sion when it acquitted two stu- was to be punish provision of "an agency for stu- dents charged with violating Uni- a non-academicc dent participation in the formu- versity regulations on the grounds case had to be bi lation, improvement, and promo- that, "It would not enforce any JJC- f tion of the educational goals of rule that had not been passed by. The council's sy the University." an autonomous student ,legislative tal of students c If the legal status of SGC chan- body." lating non-stude ges to a corporation, Council will In its Oct. 3 decision the coun- relating to dorm acquire new privileges and liabili- cil stated that "unless-the answer policies and won ties. SGC would be able to pur- 'yes' is given to both questions, the administration chase, sell and possess property, solicit funds and enter into legal CO ST TU TSS E CE contracts in its own name. CONST llliU ENT S SILENCED~o The corporation would be fin- anced largely through an assess- , ment of its members-the stu- dents. These dues would be con- c e : lk parable to the appropriation the administration currently supplies SGC from its general fund, and By STUART GANNES with the political would be collected by the Univer- Voice Political Party, the Uni- issues at the Uiiv sity. versity's local affiliate of Students like Tom Haydens However, both con-con and in- for a Democratic Society and a provided the, imp corporation face bleak futures.' former bastion of SDS's strength ganization and w Con-con will have to restructure on university campuses, has in the spire widescalep itself before any work can be past few years shrunk. in imipor- among the studen done due to the fact that many tance from a campus-wide 'coor- Voice played a of the elected delegates have dinating group to an esoteric de- in "radicalizing"t since graduated from the Uni- bating 'society. this campus. versity. The incorporation pro- SDS has been in existing since In challenging1 posal has not received Regental 1960 when a group of students tion on a number support. The Regents argue: "The largely from this University form- lated issues, Voice Board does not wish to summarily ed the organization during what on campus and b close the issue, but it must in all later came' to be known as the' 500 students were' fairness advise SGC of a strong- Port Huron conference. the organization° ly adverse reaction to the propo- During the first years of its grees. sal." existence, Voice became involved In 1966, when d ibber stamp image any student ap- ction based on stitution clearly ilosophy of self- r students. Any versity rules and deleted and the student passed tions" was sub- ation in the re- includes is the ,n optional jury constitution pro- fendant in a case of suspension or be applied has est a hearing be- ve jurors select- rom the student ut revolutionary new policy posed ration was clear. ores, if a student Led for breaking conduct rule his rought up before ystematic acquit- onvicted of vio- nt-passed rules nitory visitation men's hours left in with no means, of enforcing these rules other sion are implemented and new than requesting that the student's rules adopted. school or college take disciplinary The preceding week the law action. A stand pressuring the Re- school faculty voted to impose gents to change their regulation sanctions on law students whose on these issues: behavior interfered with "the As of this writing, the future of functioning of the University" un- JJC seems less certain than at til October 1. any time since it instituted its new The administrative board and policies. An ad hoc group of fac- j executive committee of the lit- ulty and students attempting to erary college have been working implement the Hatcher Comrnis- since last Octdber on interim reg- sion report is working on a fRe- ulations that would bring cases gental bylaw on the judicial sys- of disruptive conduct .before the tem that should be presented to board. the Regents this fall. While it is University President Robben W. expected that their proposal will' Fleming has told the ad hoc group be similar to the existing judi- working on the bylaw proposal ciary system, recent actions by' that he will have an "interim pro- the administration and the fac- posal" ready for the Regents at ulty would seem to indicate that their July meeting if the group the conflict over the legitimacy does nothave its judiciary'pro- of JJC's position is far from re- posal prepared. solved. These moves a'e predicated on Acting in the absence of regu- the assumption that the state of lations on disruptive conduct ap- limbo which has existed since SOC proved by all segments of the abolished non-student rules gov- University community, the facul- erning student conduct last Sep- ty's Senate Advisory Committee on tember means that no rules exist. University Affairs asked the Re- But SGC and JIC are united fin gents to ban activity which inter- their claim that SGC-passed'rules feres "with the free movement of are valid insofar as they concern persons or things on the campus" purely student-related conduct, or "deprives others of needed and that JJC, as it is presently quiet, light, heat, or other physi- constituted, provides an adequate cal conditions of work," until, the mechanism for adjudicating stu- proposals of the Hatcher Commis- dent infractions of those rules. " i. - 1 d o and intellectual versity. Founders and Alan Haber etus for the or-, rere able to in-' popular support ats. n essential role the students on the admiiistra- r of student-re- became popular by 1966 at least associated with in tarying de- discontent at the ut of revolution UP TO '/ OFF JLRICUI'S ANN ARBOR'S FRIENDLY BOOKSTORE! phasis switched from campus polvics and educational philo- Isophy to reforming University regulations, the dominance of Voice gradually shifted to the stu- dent government. The major student issues of last year were not initiated by Voice. Voice chose the path of being the radical wing of SOC. However, Voice did accomplish one or two coups last year. At a ,welcoming tea for the new Pres- ident of the University, Robben Fleming, Voice staged a satirical skit in Fleming's house. Last spring, when newly appointed' Secretary of Health Education and Welfare Wilbur Cohen (a former professor at the Univer- sity) came here to speak,' Voice unrolled an enormous poster in front of the podium declaring HEW was a "Welfare Figleaf on a Warfare State." Finally, Voice was the consistent producer of the best buttons on campus satirizing student issues. One button which decried the University's secret Thailand de- fense project said "Go Michigan, Beat Thailand." While Voice and other groups strongly opposed the University"s participation in the Institute for Defense Analysis and the conduct of classified research, the pop- ular 'support which had been' so readily available for previous is- sues failed to. materialize. Cam- pus wide referenda recommending that the University withdraw from IDA and cease all classified re- search were defeated in the stu- dent election. Meanwhile, another left-wing group known as the Resistance. oriented to national politics, es- pecialy problems' with the 'draft, has gained the support of students who would have formerly worked for Voice. While SDS chapters at :other universities (notably Columbia) have been in the forefront of the students confrontation with ad- ministrations, Voite has mellowed. Its leadership, which contains a large amount of .grduate stu- dents, has not shown, this year, the 'tendancy.toward radical ac- tion of Columbia's Mark Rudd. And whereas other 'SDS chap- ters have seized control of a situ- ation as minorities, Voice still hopes to capture the support of a majority of the students as it did in the fall of 1966. ,- University reached its height and' both students and faculty were on the verge of confronting the Ad- ministration on the issues of Viet- nam and the students desire to create a student cooperative book- store, Voice reached the peak of its influence on campus. Other student groups, notably the Student Government Council, adopted Voice's policy on campus IF ,/ How doyoutell a Freshman 'there's a difference between banks? with a Naton+'an statement Banking at National Bank is a pleasure for students. We go out of our way to assist our stu- dent customers with their special banking needs. Some banks think of students as,just the numbers of their checking accounts,, but at National Bank, we don't forget we work with people. Check which services you need: * budget checking accounts-10/ a check, paid for ahead of time in books of 25, so you don't have little dimes to keep track of (like at bther banks), and there are no other service charges WILuAM * free checking when you maintain a $200 minimum balance or $500 - average monthly balance with our regular checking accounts * Campus Office designed and staffed with you in mind-corner of U william and Thompson, just two blocks from Angell Hall 01 AK L E * all other banking conveniences-money orders, travelers checks, I savings accounts, and so on. When you start getting your National Bank statements this year, you'll understand what a difference this "National Bank State- ment" makes, issues. As students v became in- creasingly aware of University politics, Voice rode a wave of pop- ular sentiment and support.. Last year, as the radical em- A Ii "' / You Meet the NICEST ,I 1 1t PEOPLE at. the S.B.S. 4 We have a tremendous stock of used books for all your courses at the low SBS prices. You need NOT reserve them. per till 9:00 P.M. for your convenience I