mal
?
•
placed in fo te r ere, long
before e "bonded" ith the
hite couple.
App rently thcr are diC­
erent 5t ndard for A rican
American rei uve '-even
tho e ho re gainfully
mployed-preventing them
from gettin cu tody of their
children.
Ho the St. CI ir County
judge could . nJ p rmanent
custody to th hile couple.
allo ing them '0 dopt the
o • i beyond cornprchcn-
. Ion. p rticularly hen he
m de no 110 ance for a con­
unucd rei lion hip ith 'he
boy' brother and iter.
Thi i . il the mor
hcinou hen you unde t nd
that the oci I or r. in­
formed th court that the
hite couple h d rep atedly
refused to allo the aunt and
.ibting to vi ith the boy
be u c th y ere t'raid he
might "bond" ith them.
Try thai on lor 'I/C. all uu
people ho ere carlyon ap­
plauding the ad puon 01" a
ncc d y African American
child y a bene olcnt hue
couple.
Th
Continued on
e 1
hi te m le con-
G rr II