. .
.JIf':� •••.
II-
HI uncquivoc I deter-
min lion to n ht or the
protection for the ri bt of
ite minoritie • in lead of
t of t depri ed and di -
enfranchi ed m . jority, i cry -
t I clear. Hi de ire to
re-Introduce and maiDtaiD
apartheid and bite domi -
tioe in ne er gui e , Ii e his
pi nned -bi-cameral parli.-·
meat" ilb veto po er to
bloc Blact political dvance­
meat, cannot be gaiD aid.
bo can till call tbe jiD oi -
tic de Kler -a m D of irtue"
. or -a reformer"? .
Indeed, de Kler i C's
and andela' main burdle to
progre to ards Soutb
African democratization. De
Kler ' chiavellian politi­
c I cunning i a formidable
arrier 0 the advent of OD­
racial de mocracy i D South
Africa. Hi in ignificant con­
ce ion are neither fi h,
He h, nor red hcrring ....
T UtA C. didn't play
d k and d ra e i th t ei r
b rgaining chip. They kn
bat I he y ere doing by
pendin th ir arm trug­
gle. Di creuon is the better
P rt of valor.
African World Festival 1990