a.
7. 0 a.
The data no i being
a alyzed in conjuction itJi
other . lion to determine
dion ybe
warranted, Thomas said, ad­
ding: . type of data will help
identify potential areas o� sys­
temicdisaimination but will not
replace full investigation or
evidence gathered to document
cases of alleged discrimination, "
"From he dquareter , we
no have ccess to more than
100 pieces of information on
each case, • he noted. "Added as
each case dvances through the
investigative process t� f"!al
resolution, such information m­
eludes the name and address of
the charging party and respon­
dent EEOC offices handling
each' chug , the specific allega­
tions made in each charge, ac-
tion taken by EEOC, pertinent
dates and other details. The
DB lso enables EEOC to
identify trends in discrimination
ch ges. _
. will ma e it tougher for
respo dents char�ed �th bias,
especially tho e WIth a hIStory. of
the pr ctice to play the "hurt in­
nocent- or- plead lack of
kno Iedg of the preactice, ob­
servers beli ve.
In ur nee Planners
e prov e promp
Consultants
aI ervice
C II
nt Fundin
Fin ial Plan
Employee Benefits
illI;�777
Suite 2205 Cadill To er Bui .
Detroit. ichi n 8226
\
e e
ic .. an C· izen
MAIL TODAY TO;
PO BOX 03560 -
HIGH 0 PK, I 48203
(] BilL �E
) PAYMENT
ENCLOSED:
[ ) $15 • 0 year
[ ) 9· ix month
[] 25 . two years