100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

June 26, 1988 - Image 17

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
Michigan Citizen, 1988-06-26

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

Red scorpion
protests continue
about the film and.the hi der
implications.
SWAPO, the South We t'
Africa People's Organization bf
. t . . amibia, is fighting to rid that
illegality of South Africa. country of South African
The targets of the prot are· military occupation, .
• . tors of That Los Angeles groep and
It feature others across the country
fd glamorizing character, launched protests when ne of
odeled after South African- ! the film was exposed early this
backed rebel leader Jo year, forcin2 Warner Brothers
Savimbi o i fighting . CIA motion picture studio to an-
upport to � the An- do plans to distr ute the ftlm.
golan gave U.S. financing has' been
·The film traced to the the FIrSt Ban of
a neigh�rin� co MinneaPolis, e of �e largest
South Africa occup financial institutions in the Mid-
The Sou �ican �tary. and the tar of pr' in
�rtedly . ID produc- the past by labo organizatio
109 the f." and recent and groups objecting to' the
doauDen t the b k's Ie of the South African
film as .hea�ily financed by gold Krugerand .
South �� � IDter. ts. Anna Bagadasarian, vice
H lisi Pnce, chairman o� the president with the the ban s'
S'Y APO �upport Committee Los Angele entertainment
id that hIS Angeles-based division, refused to comment on
group planS pr clio that the financing of the film.
also aim to educate public
-A rology
Most of the people with
Dr. r: whom I come into contact foil
t • P 0 tr _. the daily ne paper hor�JX?'
radically all of y �though they would de ly that 11
..... , .... Ii it, to has any significant impact on
• G., d. " their lives. .
Astrology bas been mves­
tigated and reinvestigated for
centuries but the conclusions
are always the same:' Astrology
is another form of superstitk n.
To determine the trot . or
validity of astrology most pie
(who already believe in it).
search for information that will
support what they accept fact.
They reject or ignore any infor­
mation th t might tend to refute
their assumpti M. For instance,
if a person believed that a per­
sonal relationship with an in­
dividual who born der a
certain sign ould result in tur­
moil, they would how you
everal cases in which tbat
precise negative re ult oc-
---------- curred They Id disregard
any such relationships that suc­
ceeded. (WOh, they were not true
__________ cance They had not fulfilled
Mal_II, the� a trological po e tial.W)
in de- Anyexaase' ed to refu e
challenge , legitimate or other­
. .to the validity of astroJocy.
Why do people figbtso�­
Mendy to make astrology,an c­
ceptable guide for living?
Astr ogy i their way to cope
with the un own;" their way
to bri certai y' t uncer­
tainty or their 1Ms; it is a yof
.aJ'�bom 1917 re' the . ttadled to
SOJ ...... �Tr .. · ualeft ir . a bad dec:ISIC ...
Y d bepn !career cbo� fDon't bla me; bla
. la\a'yactivist, 1843. the, tar ;) aD�, f�n.lly, it
J 1y2 - U.s. prOYl br
I
Dear Mr. G,:
10 . might disillusi n you but
trology ran ri t up there
ith black magic, superstition
and hocus pocus. There' is no
solid evidence to support it a
guide to behavior or prognos­
tica . D. In fact, two years ago,
the country's'majo trologers
discovered that they had made a
major mistake in interpreting
- . the alignm nt of the planets. All
of tbeir data (volumes of it)
eeded to be drastically revised
Can you imagin the grossly
negative imp ct tttat revision of
all trologi data uld have?
That's why it aever revised
1950.
-

Back to Top