100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

October 17, 1984 - Image 15

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
Michigan Citizen, 1984-10-17

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

1. JOBS, THE ECO 0 Y. For Black Americans, the Reagan
'recession" of 1982-83 was more accurately a "depre ion".
-In December 1982, unemployment for Black reached 20.9%.
(This compared to white unemployment of 9 .6%.) The rate for Blacks
in January 1984 was at a still-high 16.7% (compared to 6.9% for
whites). For Black teenager; , the rate is a steep 49%, and in some
urban centers, this rises to an intolerable 80%.
- The recession proved the most devastating employment
experience for Blacks in the �ore than 35 years since employment
figure have been kept by race. The unemployment gap between Black
and white has increased substantially in the Reagan Administration,
from an 6.6% difference in 1981 to 11 % difference by the end of
1983 ..
-Despite the e high unemployment rates, Reagan has cut job
training and employment programs by 60% since taking office. Gener­
ally half the participants in these programs are non-white.
From a combination of sources, including the House Bu get Com­
mittee's analysis of the FY '85 Reagan Budget, the National Urban
League's "The State of Black America: 1984", and the Children's
Defense Fund's "American Children in Poverty", comes an ominous
. .
message: the Reagan Administration has crafted a scheme to bank-
rupt the future of Black America. Current White House policy has
set back progress of recent decades for those least able to bear the
brunt of unyielding unemployment levels, a diminished standard of
living and devastating cuts to health and social service programs. The
repressive conditions brought on by this administration are ignored
or unseen by a Ronald Reagan who claims that the State of the Union
is flourishing and America is standing tall. ot only are those at h
bottom of the economic ladder mired in the tangle of an ineffective
safety net, this administration has created a leg y of regression and a
tradition of neglect.
R ag n'
TU-
lTV. The Reagan Administration throu It
civil rights laws, has undone many of th p 1 ti
of past discrimination.
- Reagan originally opposed ext n . n the 1965 Voting Tights
Act - and signed it only due to overwh Imin bip rti n Congre ional
support.
- He lifted a ban on tax-exempt tatus for r ci t priv te schools and
colleges - a decision subsequently overruled by the Supreme Court.
- He has presided over a 15% cut in actual spending power for civil
rights enforcement budgets and staffs in five key federal agencies.
- The Department of Justice in the last 30 months has filed only six
new lawsuits to win compliance with the Fair Housing Act; before
1981, 20-30 ca es were brought annually.
- The number of equal employment opportunity suits brought by
the Reagan Administration has declined more than 70% compared with
the Carter Administration record.
- Reagan's Department of Justice has resisted pursuing suits to de­
segregate our nation's schools.
- Reagan has stripped the U. S. Commission on Civil Rights of its
historic and essential independence.
- Reagan is less than enthusiastic in his support of the Econ mic
Equity Act now before Congre , which would help w men chi v
economic equality. Currently, women earn 59cent to the m 1
blac women earn 47 cents to that male dollar. .
2. DECL ING ST A DARn OF LIV G. Poverty in America has
increased under Ronald Reagan - currently 15% of all Americans live
below the poverty line. In the rece ion year of 1982 the number of
Blacks below the poverty line ro e to 35.6% - three time more than the
poverty level for whites.
- 48% of all Black 18 years and under live in poverty (compared to
17% of whites under 18).
- The figure for Black children under 3 years is even higher - at
51.5%.
- For female-headed non-white families, ith several children, the
poverty ratio reaches 70%.
- In 1982, the median Black family income was 13�98, while the ,
median income for white families was 24�93. Thus Black family in­
come was 55% of white family income; the income gap is now larger
than at any time in the 1970s or early 1980 .
3. SOCIAL SERVICE CUTS. In the midst of thi rising poverty and
continued high unemployment, Ro nd Reagan nonetheless proceeded
to slash federal cia} service budgets. The . cuts have especially hurt
minorities who are disproportionately served by federal programs.
- AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children) has been cut by
13% ince Reagan c3J!1e to office. 98% of those erved by this program
re women and children. 45% of them are Black.
- Food tamp have been cut by 13% - and yet Ronald Re gan on­
tinue to be puzzled by reports of hunger in America.
- School lunches and other child nutrition programs have be n cut
by 2 %. Thi ha meant that 3 million children - mainly minorities -
have been dropped from these programs.
- Less than half of Black prescho lers are immunized against OPT-
. ,
Reagan's past record speaks for itself. Unfortun tely
America.ihis future priorities remain very much the sam . Hi r c ntl
proposed budget for FY85 again calls for cuts in cial pendin no tax
increases, a massive military build-up,
The Democratic Party concurs with the ational Urb n League's
recommendations for steps to enhance the state of Blac Ameri a.
Tho e step include: a full employment economy a social ervice safety
net that lets no one slip through, a tax system that doe n't take from
the poor and give to the rich aggressice affirmative action programs,
vigorous enforcement of civil rights laws, including fair hou ing odes,
and- major federal investment in quality education for all our citizens.

Back to Top

© 2025 Regents of the University of Michigan