100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

May 30, 1984 - Image 1

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
Michigan Citizen, 1984-05-30

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

t andards of code enforcement
the city operating by?
That question concerns Re. athaniel
Gathright, pre . dent Concerned Tenan
Organization.
lett from one of the landlords in
Action Rentals to tenant t 474 Pipe-

one led to qu tion.
The tenant - Charlene eridy and
Barbara artin - nt a certified letter
wee, y 24, to Bapti . Their
letter amed the landlord that if did
not fIX certain items "thin en d y
they ould begin withholding th ir
rent.
pt"
an eviction notice for
, e have t up
the tenant with Le
ev. G thright in an intern
"It i definitely gain the
dlord to retalit te again
effort of tenant for decent housing."
G thright id the tenants ould be
counte uing B p " g for dam es
to hich they are en tled under the I .
"But my chief concern . with the
city right no ,'said Rev. athright.' e
o e can protect ou Ie" t
the I dlord i the courts. But ho can
e protect ourselv "t the city?"
G thright 0 ed The Citizen a letter
from Bapti t to t tenant hich read ,
" ccording to the City of Benton Harbor
offici ,I and v rat oth r landlords
ere told in person that th only-part of
the " pection port t they ould
be enforcing t the pre nt time ere the
item t t ere a health and ety
Lilly, Community Services
t'I- ....... Dir or, department ponsi-
bl for code enforcement told this paper
that the meetin Sap referred to
on held with the Landlords . ati n.
ccording to lilly, the city said it
proposin a revised landlord/tenant
ordinance. Under the revised ordinance,
th city ould e landlords a certifi­
. cate alJowing th m to rent apartments if
they meet "minimal h and safety
cod .tt
"Our initial concern is to eliminate
d safety threat and then addr
incipient cod Yilatio ," Lilly id.
Rev. G thright . hi group in-
city commiJaion that it '.'to­
y rejects" the propolCd ordinance
UDlmGlm,ent d anta the existing ordin-
ance enforced immediately.· .
t can't d
• �1eDd
DotJIdlI&· ill dO ,tbo,uah no
he t, bad wiring, faulty fumance, no
heat - just horrible conditions."
Lilly Id h did not know when the
Urban
pro po d ordinance changes ould be
offered to th city commission.
Continued on Page 16
eague opposes yout
Editor: The following is Q stlltement
by 10M E. Jscob, President, NatiofUll
Urban LetlgUe, Inc. on the propoSlll for
a .,bminimwn wage,
Congre will shortly consider bill
proposing to alo em loyers to pay
young people under the age of 22 a
2.50 hourly g during the rnmer
, months - 25% below the current mini­
mum a . The reasoning i that such Cl
move ould cut unemployment among
young people, pecially minority youth
ho un mployment rates are ro-
nomical.
The national Urban Le gue long
opponed a youth subminimum w ,
baaed on careful study of the . ue.
Our position reflect the evidence t t
employers do not cun tly make . of
1 to 'the minimum
..... �.\O( �
ers, and the refusal of employers to hire
disadvantaged youth, amon others.
en considering thi bill, Congr
should why ubminimum wage
would ere te jobs for disadvantaged
youth when an arr y of tax credit and
other generou incentive to employers
ha not? A subminimum age ould
weaken the ge base of all orkers
without creating many ne job for
disavanataged youth" It would simply
stigmatize them cond-rate orker
earning second-ra ewe .
If Congress i determined to go ahead
with some form of bminimum e
legi tion, it hould be limited to a
carefully target d pilot project, involving
no more than a handful of citie for a
sharp y limited time period, and ,it uld
have its purpo research into tb
direct and indirect effect of b-
25e

I
Story on 3 ...
subminimum
age
,
The experiment ould be re tricted
to teenager only - it i unr son able
to expect 22-year-old, many ith
family re ponsibilitie, to b denied
even a nurumum that produces
belo -poverty-level income for year­
round workers. ark protection must
also be built into ch n e periment
- Health and fety laws mu t be com­
plied with by employers, nd the youn
orker in the experiment ould be
exempted from taxes, including th
social curity t ,to restore m of the
income 10 t by the differential ag
rate .
The bminimum e n ver a a
good idea. It ill· 't. It ould be
tr gic for Congre
I gi tion of thi rt ithout first
in it in carefully d . gn d pilot
c pro oft mporary dur ion .

Back to Top