100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

December 14, 1983 - Image 3

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
Michigan Citizen, 1983-12-14

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

y:
from: f Capitol: Woman", a newsletter
of the Michigan Hou Committee on
Constitutional Revision and Women's
RiPtJ
SI G - recent inform tion
rele by the tional Cenference of
State Legislatures CSL has focused
on the . ue of "Poverty: The Effect of
onsupport,"
Leading off ith the thought pro 0-
tatement that "If current trend
continue mother and their "children
compo almost 1 00 percent of the
po erty p pulation by the year 2000:
the arti Ie re ei recent r rch on the
jrnp ct of divorce on omen and child-
ren.
the decade of the 90's approach­
the ine or ble mov to rd m .
po erty n elusively fern nd child
conditi n b mar ed b le t n
50 per ent of children ndin their
entir childh d ith both parents and
5 per ent 0 th chi dren ith
e p r nt livin ith their mothers,
ith th intr ductory ta th
report e plore the vari u myths
urrounding di rce nd po rty.
or e mple th myth of the tradi-
tional en n family of four with
in the uburb nd amother ho
r in the home is e ily put to re t
with data indic tin th t:
o
-Fifty percent of the mother in
America wor outsi de the home.
=Forty-three percent of the married
women who are working ha e children
under the ge of . .
-Twenty percent of all children
under the e of 10 or 18 million child­
ren live in sing parent home .
Obviously, the definition of the 'typ­
ical" American family need to be
rewritten to more accur tely reflect that
the reality f cin women nd children
today.
A SECOND MYTH is that men ho
are divorced do not fare well financially
becau they are "strapped with main­
tenance or pport p yment ."
Data ugge that this myth I far
from reality: one year after divorce a
oman' andard of living decrea
73 percent, bile a man' andard of
li . increased 42 percent.
omen in median income familie
( 20 000 to 29,000) have a post-divorce
income that i le than 50 percent of
their income while married.
t the same time, men ho are po -
di orce in this same income range ha
a living ndard that· 97 percent of
their pre-divorce andard.
Thi pattern of gro disparity in
tandard of living doe not appear to b
ffected by the pa e of time: Yen
year after divorce, a oman' tandard
of living ha remained in a decline, and
e i . ely to be e perien . g declin
of 29 percent in term of income avail­
able to meet ba ·c needs.
At the same time the man who i
po t-di rce h e perienced a 17 p rcent
incre in his economic position.
E CE,O A 0 i
only awarded in 14 percent of the case ,
hi e child upport is only awarded in
59.1 percent of the c here children
are involved.
But, even if child upport i ordered
'it is e imated that 28 percent of all
farnilie do not receive the ordered pay­
ment while another 23 percent only
receive partial p yment.
DECE SER 14 - 20, 1983 THE CITIZE
PAGE 3
Dat from 1978 from the U . D -
partment of Commerce indicate that th
avera e amount of upport J i800
to 2300 per year for two children. Thu ,
there can be no b . for continuing to
pport the myth that mo divorced
omen receive all of their income from
child support or elfare paymen .
According to the Friend of the
Court A . tion, Stati . al Report,
1982, the d ta in i higan are no be ter.
In 1982, in reportin countie the
- a rage child upport order ranged from
payment in dditi I to her p bli
an e grant b au child upport
is used to off t the grant.
A FIFTH
YTH IS THAT
mothers can m
payments.
. . simply not
econ my wh re omen earn on e
avera e 59 cnet for every 1 earned b
up for 10
m .
objecting to gregated
St. Louis. In 1980 Senior .s. i ri t
Judge James eredith ordered limited
busin for de gregation within the ci y.
Hungate, who too over th c
ilj
ASH I GTO D.C.- Congre
man ar Siljander (R - Thr e Ri er
i the 10 e rated member of the
. chigan congressi onal dele ti n
ccording to an article in The ichigan
obilizer, the CP ne etter.
The CP took the ranking of
privately funded non-parti con-
ultin fum Congr ional Edu tion
ccordin to that fum Senator
Donald Riegle and Carl Levin ored
5 percent and 90 percent respecti ely
on ey minority roll call ote.
The verage Senate re 50 per-
10 of 12.82 per in Ot
Crawford and Kalka Counties to a
high of 57 per wee in ayne County,
with mo counti s grouped t pproxi­
mately 20 per week aver ge upport
ordered.
FOURTH MYTH is that Aid to
F amilie with Dependent Children
( FDC is the • remedy for the femini­
zation of po erty."
Data confirm that thi i simply not
true.
The 3 million omen and 7.2 million
children who compri e the families on
AFOC, pend an aver e of 18 m nth
on a istan e.
In 30 percent of the ses the
m ther i wor ing, in addition to re eiv-
ing ist n e.
The average family size of n FDC
c se in j higan i 1.91 members ith an
rage payment per hou eh Id of
367.92 per month in fi cal ye r 1983.
This represents decrea in ver-
monthly income from high of
380.87 per month in fi cal ye r ] 9 2.
If a worn n receives FDC, she is
not eligible to receive child support
In 1980 bite head of
household ere or-
in had medl n nnual income of
11 900.
nd Hispani omen h
ere similarly ituated h d a median
annual in orne of 900.
I f a oman children are youn �
her median in ome is oin to be e en
Ie : white ith children und r
00
income
partrnent of Labor p erty 1 ndard
8, 00 per family of three.
The c nclusi none rn
fr rn the foregoing d ta re in
not on1y are om n and children in th
f ste t gro ing p erty group but their
conditi n i be in e cerabated
courts hich order rel ti el I up­
port p yment i they ordered t
II nd a failure t enforce th up rt
orders on e they are III de.
Appeals court hears S

Louis desegregation case
Tim ry
from The 'ational Leader
ST. LOUIS - An unu at gathering
of all 10 judges of the 8th UiS. Circuit
Court of ppe ha heard argument
in leg 1 sho down over th landmar
St. Louis school desegr tion ca •
The judges eduled an extraordi-
nary 0 hour of arguments.
F voting the plan i the St. Loui
Bo rd of Education, the AACP nd
001 eli ric in suburban St. Loui
County.
The mo outspoken opponent h
been ttomey General J obn A croft
ho obj t to a pro . . n that the tate
p y mo of the plan' co Ashcroft
attended the hearing but did not argu
th t te' ca .
Under the plan, which went into
effect thi fall inner<ity Blac s are
110 ed voluntarily to tr nsfer to pre
dominantly whit hools in burban
t. Loui county.
By 1988 s many
expected
Education experts nationwide have
id theagreement, approved July 5 by
U.S. District Judge William Hungate,
i tbe largest voluntary school desegrega­
tion effort in the U.S.
Hungate ordered the plan to go into
effect this fall, when nearly 3 000 u­
dent volunt rily transferring to n
schools. Enrollment in the 56 000 stu­
dent city publi hool system is more
than 75 percent Bia .
But the appeal court this fall ban-
ned further tran en until the ate'
objection ere heard. The court is ex­
pected to decide the in January.
The city of St. Loui oppo s a sec­
tion of the plan giving the courts po er
to order tax increa s to help pay for the
plan.
That provi . on a believed to have
been factor in the defeat this month
of a hool bond . e. Hungate had
ordered the election in n effort to rai
money to fIX deterior ted school build-
be au of eredith ill hIt r
ruled that the limited plan h d f il d to
de gregate th hoo. H� rdered
a tudy of plan for metropoli n h 1
de grega ti n.
cent. ·chigan' Hou member a er­
a ed 58 percent 0 erall.
ichigan Republican ored
a e of 43 percen compar to
36 percent for all of the Hou mem-
ber the CP report .
. dugan Democr t re
gr ter n ·tivity to min rity . ue
orin an e e of percent.
Howard olpe and Dal . d
scored perfect r tin
The t 0 Blac Congre en, John
Conye and Geo e Croc ett red
75 per ent and 90 per ctl -
ly.

Back to Top

© 2025 Regents of the University of Michigan