100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

April 24, 1979 - Image 5

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
Michigan Citizen, 1979-04-24

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

Spring time fashions re at
their best for the stepping out
occasions during the rm ea­
tber season,
For the monied 0
is I ing for that un dultera­
ted elegance ith slim afflu­
ent 100 ing clothes, the Paris
desi rs have a' ctacular
of f shionables iust
oozing ith good. taste for
iog nd Summ r '79.
Th terry cloth h em rged
from the Nth 0 adorn th
lady in everything from the
sun 'dress to the tennis courts.
'f A big loose knit stra hat
ill help keep the sun a �y
nd add � taste of flair to this
dimension in feminin
fashion. Add a p ir of big hoop
MTin nd you're re dy for
the sunshin .
There re fashions for th
Disco, too, F rom beautifu sil s
and lusciou satin, to peak-a­
boo lace and sheer se -Vlrough
p tterns. In eve thing fro
p nt ui to nee-len th dres s.
On the e ning scene th
Ion dress is still the predomi­
nant f�shion attire for the I dy
t th th ter, at th prom or
iu t out painting th to n ith
her sophisticated fello .
Str p or trapl , th
uropean designer h enh need
the go n to t e
ision of 10
n
til
nd

your n
lit
Beverly - Slmshi
'dress for eveni
ouson top, dra
nee line e icized
tie belt. Flo J , 1005e
mel easy to the floor.
April 24, 1979
THE OTIZE
P S
Go rnor illi en signed �.A. 153 on �y 22, 1978,
ndin th Elliott-LMsen Civil ights Act. The folio eng
questions and ans rs offered to exptain ichi I� as
it affects prqn�cy, � related benefits nd sex
discrimin�tion.
� �ffecf prepunt
en?
endmcnt does not re�lIy ch nge ichipn I�, ich
has consistentJy provided th�t en orkers could not
treated differentJy because of sex. R ther
cI¥ifi ichipn I� , follo'n a US. Supre
decision which decided that Titl VII, the federal la ,did not
require that pregnant or ers be gi n the same benefits s
other rkers.
aid the Act become effecti ?
The amendment was given immediate effect on M�y 22, 1978;
but since omen ere covered previously under existin pro­
visions, the Dep rtment of Civil Rights has accepted nd
processed complaints of different # treatment bee usc of
pregnancy for several years.
t kinds of benefits are likely to be �ffected?
The I w protect against discrimination in all benefit system .
There are at least three ind of benefit plans hich seem to
hav treated pregnant orkers differently: (1) hospitalization
or health insurance plans, hich 0 ten limited benefits to
pregn nt orkers hile providing unlimited benefit to other
orkers, or which excluded certain benefits, like pre-natel or
post-natal care: (2) ick lea for �ny illness or disability, and
(3) income for a orker who i temporarily di bled. which
sam times excluded temporarily disabled pregnant or er ,
while providing such benefits to �II other temporaril di bled
or ers.
Does the � require employers to Ii these benefits no ?
The I w does not require employers to provide benefits to
pregnant r ers that are not available to other or ers. The
ta does require that pregnant orkers be given th m
benefits as other rkers, ithout discrimin tion. For
c ample, mo t employer provide hospitalization insur nce,
C ill rs
Jose
Beverly - Todav's hshion. A
disco p ntsuit. H s gatherin on
th shoulden, modified dolnun
sleeves and ties at t .. is
Sunn - terry §U111dre�
tti straps and �
ruffled bodice. For
fun, the stn' t s . t
h' front split.
ith

nt c . In keep' up ith ne fashion trend for the
82r�n�c via one of t tri-county Ma'S finest �ppMel shop
'.
f
'.
I-�ttired fi nu ,
proudly JW
t
Ithough the ta docs not f1 quire them to do so.
employer does not ma e ny hospiul in r nce p' n vail b ,
this la docs not require one. But, if hospitalization pi n
provided no , the I requires t it co r pr n nd
prcgn cv-rclatcd problems on th b i
medical conditions.
III a Doctor's su nt
If the employer norm lIy rcquir
ould a mother covered for option of a chi d?
The I protects ain t discrimin tion b sed
pregn ncy and rei ted- medical conditi n of the or er; it
docs not est blish child-care time off. ny employ rs ill
grant lea of bsencc, usually unp id, for child-are
and if there is uch provision, it ould be nted for
doption swell s for care of th 'employee's o. n child,
me employers I 0 permit time off for fath r to participat
in or are chi d-care duties. If a f ther i needed, nd th
e';'ployer p�o ide uch Ie vc, it should grant d ithout
di crimination.
re cov red.
norm I or
condition.

Back to Top

© 2025 Regents of the University of Michigan